[Bug 1307265] Re: installation hangs if postgres is not listening on default port
The Postgresql 9.3 update to Ubuntu 14.04 improperly changed the default port from 5432 to 5433. Historically, port 5432 has been the default Postgresql port. Some update in 14.04 of Postgresql to 9.3.4-1 apparently decided to use 5433 as the default port. This change breaks things because header files like postgresql.conf have the default,5432, wired into them as both strings and numbers, so while psql will work on the new default port, existing compiled programs using ecpg preprocessing fail and recompiling/reinking does not fix the problem either (because of the header files with the old default). (Assuming everything was using the default, when no PGPORT environment variable has been explicitly set). If you are going to change the port default, you have to do a complete job of altering all the header files, and at least warn users that the new Postgresql upgrade may require a recompile/relink of existing programs. A workaround to the ecpg programs (and anything else relying on the headers) is to explicitly set the environment variable PGPORT to 5433, just as if a non-default port is being used. The whole point of a default is that's what you get when you don't specify anything. A better workaround is to edit the 5433 back to 5432 in the postgresql.conf file, and restart. The suggested fix is to NOT change the default port from 5432 in the first place. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307265 Title: installation hangs if postgres is not listening on default port To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1307265/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1307265] Re: installation hangs if postgres is not listening on default port
** Also affects: postgresql (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307265 Title: installation hangs if postgres is not listening on default port To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1307265/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 46520] Re: Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer.
This problem is present in Intrepid and easy to duplicate with a laptop and a USB disk. Installating Ubuntu to a USB disk is likely to be a common scenario. Set the laptop boot order to be: USB/CDROM/harddisk. Boot the standared live Ubuntu CD-ROM, plug in the USB disk, and install to the first USB partition. Select the default (not advanced) option and the result of the successful install will boot neither Linux nor Windows, with or without the USB disk attached. The Cause: The Grub files are put on the USB /boot/grub, but the Grub bootloader is put on the laptop harddisk master boot block. The menu.lst disk identifications are the USB UUID for the Linux roots and (hd0... for Windows! Without the USB drive attached, the Grub bootloader cannot find its files, so it fails. With the USB drive attached, the windows disk is wrong in the menu.lst (It is not hd0, as menu.lst identifies it). Not sure why the Ubuntu boots fail, unless since there is no bootloader on the USB disk, the disk is not even seen, and the UUID is not found. Workarounds: 1) Windows boot works (only with USB attached) when you change the boot order to hard-disk first, then the Grub hd0 is accurate for the Windows sections. I thought I tried editing menu.lst, changing the hd0 to hd1 for the windows sections, and even trying to map (hd0) (hd1) ... all failed (before fixing the USB boot, then just changing the hd0 to hd1 worked). 2) Linux boot may be fixed by booting the CD-ROM, and doing the Grub install again to the USB disk (needed the --recheck and the explicit root-directory flag to get beyond the disk not supported by bios complaint). Then replace the menu.lst file, which disappeared! (I had a backup called menu.lst~). 3) To use the laptop without the USB disk, either: a) Restore the MBR with the Windows Recovery Console's FIXMBR (good luck, finding the Recovery Console is the hard part!). b) Find a (Windows) fdisk on a bootable media, and fdisk /mbr c) Do a complete Grub install to a FAT partition (like the recovery partition found on many laptops these days). I finally did this, since I have messed up a system before looking for the Recovery Console on the vendor supplied recovery disks. Other (hopefully) irrelevant details: * AMD cpu laptop, NTFS primary partition, FAT recovery partition * MAXTOR 200G USB disk, 9 partitions, first partition 50G for the Ubuntu install, preformatted ext2. No swap. No boot. * Before repair, Grub console found the /ntldr on (hd1,1), but nothing was found on hd0 (?). * Visible devices were fd1-fd7, hd0 and hd1. I thought the 7 floppy disks were probably the misidentified usb disk partitions. * kernel is whatever the 8.10 live cd installs -- Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 46520] Re: Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer.
The laptop is an HP Presario v3100 with an 80G Seagate ST98823as drive. Always thought it was IDE. From the interrupts, it looks like the harddisk is on the secondary slot, with the dvd/cdrom on the primary (or nothing since the number of primary interrupts is 0). No tools to actually open things and look, sorry. I'm all set up and running the way I wanted, now, thanks. -- Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in standard installer. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414996] Re: [karmic] grub re-writes boot sector on wrong drive on fresh install
After many successful 32 bit Karmic installs from a live usb stick to usb sticks and usb hard disks, I installed a 64bit Karmic from a CDROM (to a usb stick) and clicking on the Advanced button, noticed the difference in the use of (hd0) for the boot location instead of an actual device (e.g. /dev/sdb). I retyped the correct device (/dev/sdb) and avoided wiping out the Windows mbr (which was on /dev/sda, and which the device.map was mapping to hd0). Regardless of the install media (usb stick or CDROM), grub-install gets all the devices wrong in device.map (in this situation). As a result of the device.map file mapping the Windows sda to hd0, every device mentioned in the grub.cfg (or menu.lst) is wrong too, even when the mbr goes to the right location. The boots only work because of the use of UUIDs. To fix the grub.cfg file, correct the device.map, and rerun update-grub. e.g. Make hd0 the actual boot device (/dev/sdb), and put the windows /dev/sda on hd1, if you want to allow the usb stick to boot windows when used on another computer, edit the grub.cfg to remove the UUID lines for the windows menu items. See bugs 45989, 46520, and 384633 for some history of using the wrong device for the mbr. -- [karmic] grub re-writes boot sector on wrong drive on fresh install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495131] Re: update-manager cannot find space on /tmp ramdisk
The root of this problem is the inability of python's os.statvfs to handle ramfs file systems. A workaround is to use tmpfs instead, then everything works. ...DistUpgradeCache.py has the checkFreeSpace function which utilizes the os.statvfs. The purpose of using a ram disk here is to minimize writes to flash, which has a limited number of write cycles. From the docs, it looked like ramfs would be better for this than tmpfs (I have no swap either), but since I can successfully run update-manager with the tmpfs, this fix should be low priority. -- update-manager cannot find space on /tmp ramdisk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495131] [NEW] update-manager cannot find space on /tmp ramdisk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager In 32 Bit Karmic Koala (9.10), running off a 4G usb stick, when mounting a 256M ramdisk for /tmp from fstab, update-manager claims not enough space is available on /tmp. The /tmp ramdisk works fine, able to hold a 70M zip and unpack it, and there is lots of space left on /. Note that a 64 bit Karmic on a 4G stick with an identical ramdisk, update-manager works fine. However, even on the 64 bit version, df shows 0 avail for /tmp. Update-manager can download the package information, but fails to download any actual packages. The first time update-manager was run, 11 packages of 5.2M found, soon after, 12 packages of 5.3 meg were found. Not sure if the 5.234k changed when 12 packages found. No later changes of the 5.234 were seen, regardless of the size of the download (larger or smaller). Example: Update Manager finds 12 packages needing 5.3m, but selecting the Install button leads to a popup error window: Not Enough Free Disk Space The upgrade needs a total of 5,243k free space on disk '/tmp'. Please free at least an additional 5,243k of disk space on '/tmp'. Empty your trash and remove temporary packages of former installations using 'sudo apt-get clean'. Removal of the /tmp line in /etc/fstab, reboot, and update-manager works fine. Restore the /tmp line in fstab, (wait a bit) and next time two packages sized 1.2M are avail, the original error window complaining of needing 5.234k reappears. Even later, when the packages to download total 39.9M, the message remains the same -- 5,234k needed. This bug may be related to 285096. Firefox has no trouble downloading files. Cannot find any other program having problems, even the Synaptic Package Manager works fine. df -a output is all zeros for /tmp, even on the 64 bit system which seems to have no problems with update-manager. The below system info is from the time when update-manager finds 12 packages. System info: Presario V3000 AMD Turion 64, 2G mem, an ext2 filesystem on a 4G usb stick for root, no swap, no proprietary drivers in use. Karmic 9.10, both 32 and 64 bit versions, patched to date 12/8/2009. The line in /etc/fstab creating the /tmp ramdisk: $ fgrep ramfs /etc/fstab ramfs /tmpramfs size=256M,mode=1777 0 0 mount shows the /tmp ramdisk. $ mount /dev/sdb1 on / type ext2 (rw,noatime,errors=remount-ro) proc on /proc type proc (rw) none on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) none on /sys/fs/fuse/connections type fusectl (rw) none on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw) none on /sys/kernel/security type securityfs (rw) udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw,mode=0755) none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=0620) none on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) ramfs on /tmp type ramfs (rw,size=256M,mode=1777) none on /var/run type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,mode=0755) none on /var/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) none on /lib/init/rw type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,mode=0755) binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) gvfs-fuse-daemon on /home/ubfan/.gvfs type fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon (rw,nosuid,nodev,user=ubfan) df may indicate a /tmp space issue, but the working 64 bit output is the same. $ df -a Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 3850176 2897432757160 80% / proc 0 0 0 - /proc none 0 0 0 - /sys none 0 0 0 - /sys/fs/fuse/connections none 0 0 0 - /sys/kernel/debug none 0 0 0 - /sys/kernel/security udev998080 260997820 1% /dev none 0 0 0 - /dev/pts none998080 388997692 1% /dev/shm ramfs0 0 0 - /tmp none998080 196997884 1% /var/run none998080 4998076 1% /var/lock none998080 0998080 0% /lib/init/rw binfmt_misc 0 0 0 - /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc gvfs-fuse-daemon 0 0 0 - /home/ubfan/.gvfs $ free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 1996160 4734001522760 0 57740 240276 -/+ buffers/cache: 1753841820776 Swap:0 0 0 cd /proc/self $ cat mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 none /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 none /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0 udev /dev tmpfs rw,relatime,mode=755 0 0 /dev/disk/by-uuid/0c9a28f4-ff16-433f-95c2-dca95354146b / ext2 rw,noatime,errors=remount-ro 0 0 none /sys/kernel/security securityfs rw,relatime 0 0 none /sys/fs/fuse/connections fusectl rw,relatime 0 0 none /sys
[Bug 495131] Re: update-manager cannot find space on /tmp ramdisk
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36664091/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36664092/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36664093/ProcStatus.txt -- update-manager cannot find space on /tmp ramdisk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384633] Re: Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB
As of Karmic (9.10), grub's use of UUIDs fixed the problem of being unable to boot the other operating systems. The devices are still wrong, but will make no difference unless the install is to a portable device like a usb stick which should be able to boot windows on any PC. In that case, fix the device.map file to make hd0 the actual root device, and rerun update-grub. -- Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495131] Re: update-manager cannot find space on /tmp ramdisk
Further testing with a 64 bit Karmic system now shows this problem. With ramdisks mounted on /tmp and /var/cache/apt/archives (with a directory partial created), the no space message appeared for a 40M download for both the ...archives directory (possibly valid, but I thought the default was 64M), and the /tmp directory, with the same 5.234M additional space needed. Removing the ...archives ramdisk removed the associated error message, but the /tmp message presisted, just like on the 32 bit Karmic system. Removing the /tmp ramdisk allowed the update to proceed normally. All updates were attempted via the System/Administration/Update Manager menu entry. -- update-manager cannot find space on /tmp ramdisk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367766] Re: live USB disk not bootable
The System/Startup USB disk creator command in 32 bit Intrepid will successfully create an Intrepid live usb stick, but will fail when given the jaunty 32bit iso. The created usb stick will only have a syslinux 2 line text header and a boot: prompt. No splash, no menu choices, and nothing entered for a kernel will be found to boot. From Jaunty (32 or 64), the usb creator will succeed in creating a live Jaunty (32 or 64) usb stick. All usb creations which succeeded were using the default (no explicit iso given). It would be nice to fix the Intrepid creator command to successfully use a Jaunty iso. Currently, I still have to burn a live CD-ROM of a new system to create the live usb startup disk. -- live USB disk not bootable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367766 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384633] [NEW] Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub-installer System: laptop hd has WinXP, usb disk has several Linux distros. Boot order is usb thumbdrive, usb hard disk, and laptop hard disk. Using a Jaunty live usb thumbdrive, install to an USB partition. Remove the usb thumbdrive and reboot. The grub menu.lst for the current Jaunty install is UUID based and boots successfully. All other boot paragraphs (Windows and Linux) fail to boot because they refer to wrong devices. All the other Linux installations on the usb disk incorrectly refer to hd1 instead of the correct hd0. The windows paragraph refers to hd0 (and lacks map commands), instead of the correct map (hd0) (hd1), map (hd1) (hd0), rootnoverify (hd1,0). The device.map claims hd0 is /dev/sda, which is also wrong, but makes no difference after the menu.lst is corrected. ** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 729045] Re: [needs-packaging] fltk-1.3.0
Ubuntu 11.10 does have some fltk13 packages now. The ...-dev package was fine, but the fltk13 package itself seems useless since it does not have the (four I needed) libfltk... libraries. The workaround is to add links to /usr/lib pointing to the necessary libraries in the tarball download. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729045 Title: [needs-packaging] fltk-1.3.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/729045/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 816062] Re: When opening up FireFox 5 screen goes white
I sometimes see a white screen in firefox when running 11.04, but only with the Unity interface, not the classical. The whiteness is size dependent, it comes and goes as the screen is resized (showing the normal web page when not present). The resizing may be done with the corner resizer or by moving the window to the left to get a half screen. This occurred at the fresh install of Natty, and basically made it unusable for me. Since the installation is on a 4G usb stick which moves between machines, driver confusion may be an issue. The old laptop has Nvidia chips, but the Natty is not set to use them and Unity does not run. The netbook does not have Nvidia. At some point, the 2D Unity was installed, and now I cannot seem to select a Unity interface on the Netbook (which used to run Unity by default). I do not recall seeing the problem with the 2D Unity interface -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816062 Title: When opening up FireFox 5 screen goes white To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/816062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 876734] Re: gnome-terminal scroll position indicator invisible when left scroll is selected
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876734 Title: gnome-terminal scroll position indicator invisible when left scroll is selected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/876734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 876734] [NEW] gnome-terminal scroll position indicator invisible when left scroll is selected
Public bug reported: Under Unity and Unity-2D, selecting left scroll for a gnome-terminal scroll bar position results in the little red bar, indicating where the scroll elevator will appear , being invisible, making it difficult to find, since random clicks must be applied along the left window border to make the scroll elevator appear. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gnome-terminal 3.0.1-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Oct 17 11:22:25 2011 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-terminal UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 oneiric running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876734 Title: gnome-terminal scroll position indicator invisible when left scroll is selected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/876734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 762203] Re: Computer is not turned off at shutdown
After upgrading to kernel 2.6.38-11-generic, shutdown now completes properly on my MSI 135 laptop running 11.04 off a 4G usb stick. An 8G stick with 10.10 will shutdown with a dirty filesystem 25% of the time. Never had problems with 10.10 on 4G sticks, so maybe the speed of the root media is an issue. The 8G usb light blinks right up to the fraction of a second that power is cut, so maybe a buffer is not getting fully written out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762203 Title: Computer is not turned off at shutdown To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/762203/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 706795] Re: [All releases] Suspend/Resume with rootfs on USB, causes filesystem corruptions and kernel panic on mount attempt, leaving system unbootable with data lost.
I started seeing disk checks at boot time 25% of the time on a new 8G USB Maverick installation, currently running kernel 2.6.35.30. I noticed that at shutdown, the usb light blinks right up to the fraction of a second that power is cut to the laptop, so I assumed that some fileysystem buffer had not been fully flushed. On an older 4G USB Maverick, there is a noticeable time between when the usb light stops blinking and when the power to the laptop is turned off. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706795 Title: [All releases] Suspend/Resume with rootfs on USB, causes filesystem corruptions and kernel panic on mount attempt, leaving system unbootable with data lost. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/706795/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 876734] Re: gnome-terminal scroll position indicator invisible when left scroll is selected
This bug also affects Ubuntu 12.04 beta 2. With all the other window controls on the left by default, the left-scrollbar should not be that unusual a choice. Since finding the left scrollbar is so difficult (scroll length is set to 2048, so the invisible red indicator is pretty small), a workaround is to simply suppress the new scroll bar, and fall back to the old one. which is always visible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876734 Title: gnome-terminal scroll position indicator invisible when left scroll is selected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/876734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495131] Re: update-manager cannot find space on /tmp ramdisk
I just confirmed that this is still a problem in 10.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495131 Title: update-manager cannot find space on /tmp ramdisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/495131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495131] Re: update-manager cannot find space on /tmp ramdisk
This is still an issue with 10.04 and 11.04. Probably 10.10 too, but I'll have to wait until some more updates are available to test. Suggested fix: Use the size= option in the fstab line, which the mount command will report. Use the amount of free space in ram. Use the needed download size. Figure out some amount of ram not to use to keep the system running, and if the device free space comes back zero (which is what the system function reports for ramfs devices), calculate using the above to see if there is really enough space. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495131 Title: update-manager cannot find space on /tmp ramdisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/495131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 495131] Re: update-manager cannot find space on /tmp ramdisk
Edit your /etc/fstab to add a line putting /tmp into a ramfs device. See the below excerpt of fstab: # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # Use 'blkid -o value -s UUID' to print the universally unique identifier # for a device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name # devices that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5). # # file system mount point type options dump pass proc/proc procnodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0 # update-manager cannot see any space in /tmp when ramfs used ramfs /tmpramfs size=256M,mode=1777 0 0 ---snip-- Reboot, and /tmp will be in a mounted ramdisk. The size=256M is unused, but will be reported by mount. Most things will run fine if you really do have free ram, but update-manager will die with insufficient space errors for any size (greater than zero) update. Change the two ramfss in the line to tmpfs, and things work with update-manager. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495131 Title: update-manager cannot find space on /tmp ramdisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/495131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 879120] [NEW] 11.10 shutdown delay of 1 min when using the open source Broadcom firmware
Public bug reported: The Broadcom 4311/12 wireless chips require firmware when using the b43 driver. This firmware is available from Broadcom (which is put into /lib/firmware/b43) or as open source (which is put into /lib/firmware/b43-open). Either firmware works, but when the proprietary Broadcom firmware is not present in .../b43, shutdown takes an extra minute, after the log file line could not find .../b43/ucode5.fw. After a minute, shutdown completes normally. Adding in the Broadcom firmware lets shutdown proceed without the minute delay. This behavior is new with the 11.10 release. Note the below udev items from /var/log/udev are probably the cause of this problem. ... KERNEL[18.445953] remove /devices/pci:00/:00:02.0/:01:00.0/ssb0:0$ UDEV_LOG=3 ACTION=remove DEVPATH=/devices/pci:00/:00:02.0/:01:00.0/ssb0:0/firmware/ssb0:0 SUBSYSTEM=firmware FIRMWARE=b43/ucode5.fw TIMEOUT=60 ASYNC=0 SEQNUM=1822 . and many other FIRMWARE=b43/...fw paragraphs ** Affects: b43-fwcutter (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Package changed: ubuntu = b43-fwcutter (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879120 Title: 11.10 shutdown delay of 1 min when using the open source Broadcom firmware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/b43-fwcutter/+bug/879120/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 879120] Re: 11.10 shutdown delay of 1 min when using the open source Broadcom firmware
The open source firmware is available in packages firmware-b43-installer and firmware-b43-lpphy-installer. It is not certain that the system with the problem had used those packages, however. The firmware may have been compiled directly, or copied from another system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879120 Title: 11.10 shutdown delay of 1 min when using the open source Broadcom firmware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/b43-fwcutter/+bug/879120/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 762203] Re: Computer is not turned off at shutdown
Further testing with a fresh Maverick install to an 8G stick and updated, displayed the improper shutdown problem -- it's as if the usb gets turned off before the filesystem is dismounted, leaving it dirty and in need of checking next boot. Looks like Lucid is the last release that worked properly on the MSI 135 netbook. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762203 Title: Computer is not turned off at shutdown -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 762203] Re: Computer is not turned off at shutdown
Running off a 4G usb stick, I get a hang at shutdown (Checking for unattended upgrades) on an MSI 135 (Micro Star International) netbook, but not on an Compaq Presario V3000 laptop. First time I have seen such a problem, going back to Jaunty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762203 Title: Computer is not turned off at shutdown -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384633] Re: Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB
This problem goes back to grub1, and grub 2 did not fix it entirely. UUIDs helped, but they are not used for every disk reference. I use the normal desktop gui install, from a 2G live usb, to a 4G usb target on a standard Windows laptop, The created grub.cfg still has wrong device references for things like root=(hd2 instead of hd1 even though the UUID is used on the kernel line -- so it does not boot. At the first target reboot after installation, I edit the boot command to reduce the hd2 to hd1, and after successful boot, run update-grub to get the whole grub.cfg fixed. UUIDs are NOT used 100% of the time, Within the last 24 hrs, a Maverick install from a Maverick created live usb to a 4G pqi smart stick created fstab with /dev/sdc as /. (how can this even boot?) The grub.cfg file had the hd2 to hd1 edit to boot, and the kernel line did have the UUID. My first Maverick install was from a Lucid created live usb to a 4G hp (older) stick, and had to do the F6 ... text install. This created an fstab with a UUID, but the grub.cfg had /sdc on the kernel line, as well as the usual wrong hd2 references. Maybe this install was an odd ball given the manual intervention necessary to get the install to work. The cause is obvious, grub2 writes its first install configuration with all the devices, including the install media, which is not going to be present at the first reboot. hd0 is windows on the hard disk, hd1 is the usb install media, and hd2 is the target. Remove the install media, and hd0 is still windows, but hd2 does not exist, since the target is now hd1. I haven't been saving bad grob.cfg files for awhile, but I could do another install and grab one. As I recall, there were comments about the devices that were also referring to the sdc device for the linux boot paragraphs. -- Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 608508] Re: usb stick will not stay unmounted with safely remove
Maverick remounts the Safely removed usb device before it can be pulled out ( 1/2 sec) at the first remove. The second remove attempt works properly on the usb device. Fully patched 32 bit Maverick to 20-Oct-2010, Running Linux Maverick 2.6.35-22-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Sat Oct 16 20:36:48 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux HP Presario V3000 laptop, running root off another USB device (not the one removed). [ 119.929129] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Write Protect is off [ 119.929139] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00 [ 119.929147] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 119.932144] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 119.932172] sdd: sdd1 [ 120.732564] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 120.732582] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdd] Attached SCSI removable disk [ 490.756726] WARNING! power/level is deprecated; use power/control instead [ 490.908311] usb 1-5: USB disconnect, address 5 [ 491.368076] usb 2-5: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 3 [ 491.568933] usb 2-5: not running at top speed; connect to a high speed hub [ 491.590373] scsi7 : usb-storage 2-5:1.0 [ 492.594000] scsi 7:0:0:0: Direct-Access JetFlash Transcend 2GB8.07 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 [ 492.595467] sd 7:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg3 type 0 [ 492.608970] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdd] 398 512-byte logical blocks: (2.01 GB/1.88 GiB) [ 492.612957] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdd] Write Protect is off [ 492.612966] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdd] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00 [ 492.612974] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdd] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 492.630955] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdd] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 492.630981] sdd: sdd1 [ 493.622995] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdd] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 493.623013] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdd] Attached SCSI removable disk [ 506.676069] usb 2-5: USB disconnect, address 3 I waited 5 seconds and pulled out the stick. I haven't waited longer to see if it eventually remounts. -- usb stick will not stay unmounted with safely remove https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 655111] Re: BCM4312 not supported by Additional drivers. B43 is proposed, fails w/o useful message, Not supported low-power chip
Has anyone tried the b43-open firmware with this LP chip? http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/b43 claims it's partially supported: 14e4:4315partially supported 2.6.33 and later (PIO mode)BCM4312 b/gLP b43/wl I just copy in a b43-open directory to /lib/firmware with the 3 files in it and my 14e4:4312 wireless works with the b43 driver. I don't enable any additional hardware drivers for Broadcom. -- BCM4312 not supported by Additional drivers. B43 is proposed, fails w/o useful message, Not supported low-power chip https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655111 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384633] Re: Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB
Maverick usb install media, whether created from Lucid or Maverick will still create a non-booting target usb device (thumbdrive or usb hdd) because the wrong device (sdc instead of sdb) is used. To recap, at install time, the Windows internal hard disk gets sda, the boot media gets sdb, and the target usb gets sdc. The grub paragraphs all are written to the target with these device assignments, even though it is certain that the boot media will not be present when you boot the target. Using a CDROM install media avoids this problem since the drive is not given an interferring sdx device. The usual fix is necessary: At target boot, edit the grub paragraph to reduce the device references by one (hd2 - hd1, and sdc - sdb), for the first boot, then after a successful boot, immediately sudo update-grub. Without the boot media, the devices will be correct for the next reboot. fstab uses UUID, so is ok. -- Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 70317] Re: constant kernel errors about unknown multimedia keys
Running Maverick Linux Maverick 2.6.35-22-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Sat Oct 16 20:36:48 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux on an Compaq Presario v3000 lsptop, I saw this message in my dmesg output: [ 12.793811] ppdev: user-space parallel port driver [ 34.742043] atkbd serio0: Unknown key pressed (translated set 2, code 0xd9 on isa0060/serio0). [ 34.742049] atkbd serio0: Use 'setkeycodes e059 keycode' to make it known. [ 34.742716] atkbd serio0: Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0xd9 on isa0060/serio0). [ 34.742719] atkbd serio0: Use 'setkeycodes e059 keycode' to make it known. [ 63.928333] wlan0: authenticate with 00:0c:41:81:ce:9f (try 1) [ 63.943628] wlan0: authenticated .. The message appeared once, and I have been running Maverick a couple of days without noticing any problems. -- constant kernel errors about unknown multimedia keys https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/70317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384633] Re: Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB
Certainly not the case with me. The root=/dev/sdc1 on the linux line overrides whatever the search UUID did. I just did a fresh install from a 2G usb stick created on a Maverick system with the normal desktop iso, to a 4G new pqi stick. I captured the grub.cfg (bad), fstab (OK), and the /var/log files in case you needed them. The first boot attempt fell into BusyBox after about a minute with the following error: Gave up waiting for root device. Common problems: -Boot args (cat /proc/cmdline) -check rootdelay= (did the system wait long enough?) -check root= (did the system wait for the right device?) NO IT DIDN'T -Missing modules (cat /proc/modules; ls /dev ALERT! /dev/sdc1 does not exist - Dropping to a shell BusyBox v1.15.3 (ubuntu 1:1.15.3-1ubuntu5) built-in shell (ash) Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands (initramfs)_ cat /proc/cmdline gives: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic root=/dev/sdc1 ro quiet splash The modules were: usb_storage firewire_ohci, firesire_core, pata_amd, forcedeth, sdhci_pci, ac_itu_t, sdhci, sata_nv, led_class, ssb The /dev directory contained sg0, sda, sda1, sda2, sda3 (the Windows disk), sg1, sdb, sdb1 (the 4G stick failing to boot) and no sdc. I select manual partition selection, select the sdc1, format an ext2 fs, no swap, the grub boot goes to the 4G stick on sdc (default after I select the sdc disk). The only disks shown are sda( the windows disk), and sdc(the target). sdb is the 2G install usb, and correctly is not a choice. The original grub.cfg file created on the target, before any boot attempt is: # # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE # # It is automatically generated by grub-mkconfig using templates # from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub # ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/00_header ### if [ -s $prefix/grubenv ]; then set have_grubenv=true load_env fi set default=0 if [ ${prev_saved_entry} ]; then set saved_entry=${prev_saved_entry} save_env saved_entry set prev_saved_entry= save_env prev_saved_entry set boot_once=true fi function savedefault { if [ -z ${boot_once} ]; then saved_entry=${chosen} save_env saved_entry fi } function recordfail { set recordfail=1 if [ -n ${have_grubenv} ]; then if [ -z ${boot_once} ]; then save_env recordfail; fi; fi } function load_video { insmod vbe insmod vga } insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 0ddfb60a-4791-45c9-85ec-c13c42c459af if loadfont /usr/share/grub/unicode.pf2 ; then set gfxmode=640x480 load_video insmod gfxterm fi terminal_output gfxterm insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 0ddfb60a-4791-45c9-85ec-c13c42c459af set locale_dir=($root)/boot/grub/locale set lang=en insmod gettext if [ ${recordfail} = 1 ]; then set timeout=-1 else set timeout=10 fi ### END /etc/grub.d/00_header ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme ### set menu_color_normal=white/black set menu_color_highlight=black/light-gray ### END /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/10_linux ### menuentry 'Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.35-22-generic' --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os { recordfail insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 0ddfb60a-4791-45c9-85ec-c13c42c459af linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic root=/dev/sdc1 ro quiet splash initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.35-22-generic } menuentry 'Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.35-22-generic (recovery mode)' --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os { recordfail insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 0ddfb60a-4791-45c9-85ec-c13c42c459af echo'Loading Linux 2.6.35-22-generic ...' linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic root=/dev/sdc1 ro single echo'Loading initial ramdisk ...' initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.35-22-generic } ### END /etc/grub.d/10_linux ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/20_linux_xen ### ### END /etc/grub.d/20_linux_xen ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+ ### menuentry Memory test (memtest86+) { insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 0ddfb60a-4791-45c9-85ec-c13c42c459af linux16 /boot/memtest86+.bin } menuentry Memory test (memtest86+, serial console 115200) { insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 0ddfb60a-4791-45c9-85ec-c13c42c459af linux16 /boot/memtest86+.bin console=ttyS0,115200n8 } ### END /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+ ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober ### menuentry Microsoft Windows XP Professional (on /dev/sda1) { insmod part_msdos insmod ntfs# # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE # # It is automatically generated by grub-mkconfig using templates # from /etc/grub.d
[Bug 384633] Re: Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB
I do agree that if the UUID is used on the linux line, the set root= line to the wrong hd2 will not stop the boot. I have just done 4 quick Maverick USB installs, and I think I recall that not all have had the sdc1 on the linux line. The install to a USB hard disk seemed to only have the set root=(hd2 problem, which I automatically corrected at first boot. I don't plan on doing another USB/hdd install any time soon, but if you need me to, I will reinstall it to see exactly what happens. -- Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384633] Re: Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB
No, I have never edited any default files to produce the sdc on the linux line. The problem is created by a pretty standard install, just doing a manual partition because I am afraid if I answer yes to use the whole disk the windows internal disk would be wiped out. -- Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384633] Re: Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB
I found the original grub.cfg file from a USB hard disk install. It does use UUIDs on the linux line, just the hdx references are wrong. This probably would have booted Maverick successfully, but maybe not Windows, which does the search with UUID, but used the bad hd1 for the drvemap. The fstab file also used UUID for the root and swap, just having the leftover comments about the devices being on /dev/sdcx at install (comments which no longer appear in the grub.cfg file). grub.cfg from a maverick created 2G USB installer to a USB hard disk target -- only hx? references are wrong but may still boot linux.but probably not Windows: # # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE # # It is automatically generated by grub-mkconfig using templates # from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub # ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/00_header ### if [ -s $prefix/grubenv ]; then set have_grubenv=true load_env fi set default=0 if [ ${prev_saved_entry} ]; then set saved_entry=${prev_saved_entry} save_env saved_entry set prev_saved_entry= save_env prev_saved_entry set boot_once=true fi function savedefault { if [ -z ${boot_once} ]; then saved_entry=${chosen} save_env saved_entry fi } function recordfail { set recordfail=1 if [ -n ${have_grubenv} ]; then if [ -z ${boot_once} ]; then save_env recordfail; fi; fi } function load_video { insmod vbe insmod vga } insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 158ce293-1d71-4883-b2e9-8a0d5dfc0170 if loadfont /usr/share/grub/unicode.pf2 ; then set gfxmode=640x480 load_video insmod gfxterm fi terminal_output gfxterm insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 158ce293-1d71-4883-b2e9-8a0d5dfc0170 set locale_dir=($root)/boot/grub/locale set lang=en insmod gettext if [ ${recordfail} = 1 ]; then set timeout=-1 else set timeout=10 fi ### END /etc/grub.d/00_header ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme ### set menu_color_normal=white/black set menu_color_highlight=black/light-gray ### END /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/10_linux ### menuentry 'Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.35-22-generic' --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os { recordfail insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 158ce293-1d71-4883-b2e9-8a0d5dfc0170 linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic root=UUID=158ce293-1d71-4883-b2e9-8a0d5dfc0170 ro quiet splash initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.35-22-generic } menuentry 'Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.35-22-generic (recovery mode)' --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os { recordfail insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 158ce293-1d71-4883-b2e9-8a0d5dfc0170 echo'Loading Linux 2.6.35-22-generic ...' linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic root=UUID=158ce293-1d71-4883-b2e9-8a0d5dfc0170 ro single echo'Loading initial ramdisk ...' initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.35-22-generic } ### END /etc/grub.d/10_linux ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/20_linux_xen ### ### END /etc/grub.d/20_linux_xen ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+ ### menuentry Memory test (memtest86+) { insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 158ce293-1d71-4883-b2e9-8a0d5dfc0170 linux16 /boot/memtest86+.bin } menuentry Memory test (memtest86+, serial console 115200) { insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 158ce293-1d71-4883-b2e9-8a0d5dfc0170 linux16 /boot/memtest86+.bin console=ttyS0,115200n8 } ### END /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+ ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober ### menuentry Microsoft Windows XP Professional (on /dev/sdb1) { insmod part_msdos insmod ntfs set root='(hd1,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 637d775958635993 drivemap -s (hd0) ${root} chainloader +1 } menuentry Windows NT/2000/XP (on /dev/sdb2) { insmod part_msdos insmod fat set root='(hd1,msdos2)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 3ec6-2e70 drivemap -s (hd0) ${root} chainloader +1 } menuentry Microsoft Windows XP Embedded (on /dev/sdb3) { insmod part_msdos insmod ntfs set root='(hd1,msdos3)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 60d45d0ed45ce834 drivemap -s (hd0) ${root} chainloader +1 } menuentry Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.32-25-generic (on /dev/sdc2) { insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos2)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set d3a61730-532b-4d7d-a87a-df9ce2b1f325 linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-25-generic root=UUID=d3a61730-532b-4d7d-a87a-df9ce2b1f325 ro quiet splash initrd
[Bug 384633] Re: Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB
We both agree the second grub file will boot linux. I doubt it will boot windows, but don't care. Look at the LINUX line from first grub.cfg file from a 4G stick install, four lines cut out below: set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 0ddfb60a-4791-45c9-85ec-c13c42c459af echo 'Loading Linux 2.6.35-22-generic ...' linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic root=/dev/sdc1 ro single It's the root=/dev/sdc1 part which makes boot fail, EVERY TIME. Surely you will admit that this overrides the search UUID business? I do nothing to cause the device to be used instead of the UUID. Installs to 4G sticks seem to get the device and will not boot without editing the grub commands. Installs to a USB hard disk seem to get the UUID and will work for the first linux boot. After so many bad installs to non-booting sticks, I tend to edit the grub commands at first boot and fix the obvious wrong items, and not to even try to see if the boot works. In addressing this bug, it is of interest that the problem is not consistently a problem with USB installs, since the USB hard disks will actually boot. -- Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384633] Re: Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB
Yes, I can recreate it. I'll run a couple of Maverick installs tonight to some 4G sticks. I'll use a Maverick created installer, and capture the grub.cfg, and fstab. If I can, I'll grab the log files off the install media too. -- Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384633] Re: Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB
Recreated the problem of the sdc appearing on the linux lines in grub.cfg on an install to a 4G Patriot xmini usb stick. fstab was OK with the UUID used for /, sdc1 only appearing in a comment. I did copy the /var/log files off the install media in case they might be of interest. Install sequence of events: Booted the Maverick install media, at the Try/Install screen, i inserted the target 4G usb. I was Not connected to the internet, and did not check off third party sw. Selected Specify partitions manually instead of use whole disk. (I had previously taken the new 4G stick, and made one partition, starting at sector 8192, with h=4 and s/t=16.) Selected sdc1, then the change button. use as ext2, format, / selected Boot loader automatically switched to the 4G stick on sdc from the windows sda disk. selected install now selected continue on the no swap warning Set time zone to LA selected USA keyboard Filled out the name, user, etc, require pw to boot. When install finished, I switched to a virtual terminal, and tared up the /var/log files. unmounted the target. Rebooted to my normal linux environment (on a 4G stick), and copied off the grub.cfg and fstab from the just created target usb. This result is the same as the previous install to a 4G PQI usb stick, which did not boot because of the sdc1 on the linux line. The bad grub.cfg file with the sdc on the linux lines: # # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE # # It is automatically generated by grub-mkconfig using templates # from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub # ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/00_header ### if [ -s $prefix/grubenv ]; then set have_grubenv=true load_env fi set default=0 if [ ${prev_saved_entry} ]; then set saved_entry=${prev_saved_entry} save_env saved_entry set prev_saved_entry= save_env prev_saved_entry set boot_once=true fi function savedefault { if [ -z ${boot_once} ]; then saved_entry=${chosen} save_env saved_entry fi } function recordfail { set recordfail=1 if [ -n ${have_grubenv} ]; then if [ -z ${boot_once} ]; then save_env recordfail; fi; fi } function load_video { insmod vbe insmod vga } insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 27731a50-39e4-41ad-92e8-52048248792a if loadfont /usr/share/grub/unicode.pf2 ; then set gfxmode=640x480 load_video insmod gfxterm fi terminal_output gfxterm insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 27731a50-39e4-41ad-92e8-52048248792a set locale_dir=($root)/boot/grub/locale set lang=en insmod gettext if [ ${recordfail} = 1 ]; then set timeout=-1 else set timeout=10 fi ### END /etc/grub.d/00_header ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme ### set menu_color_normal=white/black set menu_color_highlight=black/light-gray ### END /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/10_linux ### menuentry 'Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.35-22-generic' --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os { recordfail insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 27731a50-39e4-41ad-92e8-52048248792a linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic root=/dev/sdc1 ro quiet splash initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.35-22-generic } menuentry 'Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.35-22-generic (recovery mode)' --class ubuntu --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os { recordfail insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 27731a50-39e4-41ad-92e8-52048248792a echo'Loading Linux 2.6.35-22-generic ...' linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic root=/dev/sdc1 ro single echo'Loading initial ramdisk ...' initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.35-22-generic } ### END /etc/grub.d/10_linux ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/20_linux_xen ### ### END /etc/grub.d/20_linux_xen ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+ ### menuentry Memory test (memtest86+) { insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 27731a50-39e4-41ad-92e8-52048248792a linux16 /boot/memtest86+.bin } menuentry Memory test (memtest86+, serial console 115200) { insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd2,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 27731a50-39e4-41ad-92e8-52048248792a linux16 /boot/memtest86+.bin console=ttyS0,115200n8 } ### END /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+ ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober ### menuentry Microsoft Windows XP Professional (on /dev/sda1) { insmod part_msdos insmod ntfs set root='(hd0,msdos1)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 637d775958635993 drivemap -s (hd0) ${root} chainloader +1 } menuentry Windows NT/2000/XP (on /dev/sda2) { insmod part_msdos insmod fat set root='(hd0,msdos2)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid
[Bug 631494] Re: [Maverick béta ] Invisib le mouse
Sometimes after the screensaver, the mouse pointer becomes invisible on a current to 11/6 Maverick 10.10 system. I am running the Nvidia graphics 6150, without the proprietary drivers. I don't recall seeing this problem in any earlier release. The hardware did not have problems with the 10.04 black screen of death. Going to a virtual terminal and returning did not restore the pointer. I usually just reboot. -- [Maverick béta ] Invisible mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 615938] Re: mousepointer invisible, but seems to be there
Sometimes after the screensaver, the mouse pointer becomes invisible on a current to 11/6 Maverick 10.10 system. I am running the Nvidia graphics 6150, without the proprietary drivers. I don't recall seeing this problem in any earlier release. The hardware did not have problems with the 10.04 black screen of death. Going to a virtual terminal and returning did not restore the pointer. I usually just reboot. -- mousepointer invisible, but seems to be there https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615938 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384633] Re: Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB
Correct. It just occurred to me that a significant difference between the two installs is that the usb flash sticks only have one partition. I have always had at least two partitions on a hard disk (one for swap, plus the install partition, plus any others). -- Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384633] Re: Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB
grub edited just the sdc to sdb to boot, no other changes made. Copied fstab and grub.cfg to desktop sudo update-grub The fstab was unchanged (OK), and the grub.cfg had the UUIDs used instead of the sdc devices, and the hd2 s were changed to hd1 s., correcting all the problems. diff below from the above grub.cfg file: $ ls fstab fstab-orig grub.cfg grub-orig.cfg $ diff grub* 41c41 set root='(hd1,msdos1)' --- set root='(hd2,msdos1)' 51c51 set root='(hd1,msdos1)' --- set root='(hd2,msdos1)' 73c73 set root='(hd1,msdos1)' --- set root='(hd2,msdos1)' 75c75 linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic root=UUID=27731a50-39e4-41ad-92e8-52048248792a ro quiet splash --- linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic root=/dev/sdc1 ro quiet splash 82c82 set root='(hd1,msdos1)' --- set root='(hd2,msdos1)' 85c85 linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic root=UUID=27731a50-39e4-41ad-92e8-52048248792a ro single --- linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic root=/dev/sdc1 ro single 98c98 set root='(hd1,msdos1)' --- set root='(hd2,msdos1)' 105c105 set root='(hd1,msdos1)' --- set root='(hd2,msdos1)' -- Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 608508] Re: usb stick will not stay unmounted with safely remove
The remount does not occur until after the first time update-manager is run on a new Maverick install. -- usb stick will not stay unmounted with safely remove https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 615938] Re: mousepointer invisible, but seems to be there
Problem solved by using the Nvidia drivers. I would prefer to use the open drivers however, since I boot off a USB thumbdrive, and now I cannot successfully boot on a machine without Nvidia chips. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615938 Title: mousepointer invisible, but seems to be there -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 156477] Re: Installer fails if windows on another partition is hibernated
The Maverick installer was a 2G SD card, created on a fully patched Lucid system on Nov 15, 2010. The workaround to the error was to type F6 early on, which seemed to skip some checking and got me to the language selection screen, from which I installed Maverick to a 4G stick. The error was consistent. If I let the install run without keyboard entry, it would always hang at the error. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156477 Title: Installer fails if windows on another partition is hibernated -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 156477] Re: Installer fails if windows on another partition is hibernated
The Maverick (10.10) live usb media (32 bit desktop) displayed this problem, refusing to get past a hibernated embedded windows which did not affect previous installations back to Intrepid. I believe the hibernated Windows partition was for a quick start of media player for DVDs or CDs but has never been used to my knowledge. The installer stalled on the Ubuntu screen with the colored dots. Typing ESC got to the underlying error screen. The (manually copied) error was: Windows is hibernated, refused to mount. Failed to mount /dev/sda3: Operation not permitted. The NTFS partition is hibernated. Please resume and shutdown Windows properly, or mount the volume read-only with the 'ro' mount options, or mount the volume read-write with the 'remove_hiberfile' mount option. For example type on the command line: mount -t ntfs-3g -o remove_hiberfile /dev/sda3 /cdrom -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156477 Title: Installer fails if windows on another partition is hibernated -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 712292] [NEW] update-manager progress bar windows for download and applying changes sometimes do not appear.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Ubuntu 10.10 update-manager can get into a state which will not show theUbuntu 10.10 update-manager can get into a state which will not show the progress windows for downloading, or for applying changes. The update completes and is normal otherwise. This state will presist across reboots. Running update-manager from a termninal with sudo will always make the progress windows appear, and then the next gui invocation of update-manager will have the progress windows, but the next login/reboot, the windows may be absent from the gui again. The check button from the sudo invocation is enough to fix the problem for the next gui invocation. I believe, but am not sure the initial problem was caused by invoking update-manager from a non-sudo user (even just to check, since the installation could not work). I had two identical thumbdrives, with nothing but updates applied to the default applications, one had the problem, and the other did not. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: update-manager 1:0.142.22 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-25.44-generic 2.6.35.10 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-25-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Feb 2 22:30:58 2011 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: update-manager ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712292 Title: update-manager progress bar windows for download and applying changes sometimes do not appear. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 712292] Re: update-manager progress bar windows for download and applying changes sometimes do not appear.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712292 Title: update-manager progress bar windows for download and applying changes sometimes do not appear. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 510318] Re: Ubuntu - Linux for Human Beings! (About Ubuntu) page contains encoding error
Navigation box appears to have a sporadic problem. There is another page with this problem which causes a pink error box at the top of the page: How Can I Upgrade to the latest version of Ubuntu? The error is not consistent -- it's either: 1)Not present (rare). 2)line 467 col 46 Encoding error 2)line 46 col 62 invalid character 4)line 46 col 63 invalid character The page appears to be complete, but the navigation box at the bottom (previous..., next...) is missing. There is no nav box on the first page either, Ubuntu -- Linux for Human Beings either. -- Ubuntu - Linux for Human Beings! (About Ubuntu) page contains encoding error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520194] [NEW] apt-get crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk()
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apt Manual purge of an old set of kernel files did not totally clean out the /lib/modules/2.6.32-10-generic directory, leaving file modules.builtin.bin. Noticed that a previous kernel ...9 removal left the same file and directory. sudo apt-get purge `apt-cache pkgnames |fgrep 32-10` Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libnunit2.4-cil libappindicator0-cil libmono-system-runtime2.0-cil Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following packages will be REMOVED: linux-headers-2.6.32-10* linux-headers-2.6.32-10-generic* linux-image-2.6.32-10-generic* 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 3 to remove and 0 not upgraded. After this operation, 207MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y (Reading database ... 155387 files and directories currently installed.) Removing linux-headers-2.6.32-10-generic ... Removing linux-headers-2.6.32-10 ... Removing linux-image-2.6.32-10-generic ... Running postrm hook script /usr/sbin/update-grub. snip... Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-11-generic Found memtest86+ image: /boot/memtest86+.bin done dpkg: warning: while removing linux-image-2.6.32-10-generic, directory '/lib/modules/2.6.32-10-generic' not empty so not removed. Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ ls /lib/modules/*10* modules.builtin.bin ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Feb 10 16:01:30 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/apt-get Package: apt 0.7.25ubuntu4 ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined (enforce) ProcCmdline: apt-get purge linux-headers-2.6.32-10-generic linux-headers-2.6.32-10 linux-image-2.6.32-10-generic ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=C SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-12.17-generic SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x7f77542cc56f __fprintf_chk+95: cmpw $0x0,(%rdi) PC (0x7f77542cc56f) ok source $0x0 ok destination (%rdi) (0x) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)! SegvReason: writing NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: apt StacktraceTop: __fprintf_chk () from /lib/libc.so.6 pkgDPkgPM::CloseLog() () pkgDPkgPM::Go(int) () pkgPackageManager::DoInstallPostFork(int) () ?? () Title: apt-get crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk() Uname: Linux 2.6.32-12-generic x86_64 UserGroups: ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-crash lucid -- apt-get crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520194 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520194] Re: apt-get crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk()
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39037117/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39037118/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39037119/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39037120/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39037121/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39037122/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39037123/ThreadStacktrace.txt -- apt-get crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520194 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520207] [NEW] Kernel update to ...32-12 fails because /lib/udev/firmware.sh does not exist
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.32-12-generic Update-manager run Feb 10 had a problem with updating the kernel to 32-12. A window claimed that dpkg --configure -a would be run, but that failed too. Manual run below. Wrong file name for firmware.sh appears to be the problem. Prevents the dpkg --configure -a from running too. $ sudo dpkg --configure -a Setting up initramfs-tools (0.92bubuntu64) ... update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated) Setting up linux-image-2.6.32-12-generic (2.6.32-12.17) ... Running depmod. update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-12-generic cpio: ./lib/udev/firmware.sh: Cannot stat: No such file or directory ^ The file /lib/udev/firmware does exist, maybe that is the one to be used? update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-12-generic Failed to create initrd image. dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.32-12-generic (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-12-generic cpio: ./lib/udev/firmware.sh: Cannot stat: No such file or directory update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-12-generic dpkg: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 created a link in the /lib/udev directory from firmware.sh to firmware and the dpkg --configure -a succeeded. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Kernel update to ...32-12 fails because /lib/udev/firmware.sh does not exist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520207 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367766] Re: live USB disk not bootable
As I recall, the stick did not work on a second laptop either. The problem was fixed in Jaunty, since a create startup usb command succeeded with a Karmic iso. I still have an Intrepid installation which I can use to see if it can successfully create a Karmic usb if that is of interest. I'm bandwidth limited, and don't have a Jaunty iso anymore. -- live USB disk not bootable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367766 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463920] Re: evolution crashes when composing a message pressing space
Karmic/AMD64 after adding the spell, ispell, American dict packages, evolution exhibits the crash in composing when a word break is first typed. Removing the spelling packages is a workaround for the problem. Maybe turning off spell checking as you type will also workaround the problem. This has been reported upstream as a Debian bug (568129) on libenchant1c2a. Lets hope it's fixed for Lucid. -- evolution crashes when composing a message pressing space https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384633] Re: Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB
Lucid (10.04) has fixed the bad device.map (got rid of it), fixed the comments mentioning devices on the other oses, and generally has rationalized the hd0 is sda, hd1 is sdb. Unfortunately, the /etc/fstab file now puts / on /dev/sdcx instead of /dev/sdbx (or UUID as in Karmic). Since there is no sdc after the install media has been removed, this is certainly wrong. mtab is OK, using the correct sdbx mounts. Same procedure -- download iso, (on Jaunty) system/administrator/create USB startup disk, reboot from usb startup disk, install to USB hard drive. Avoid messing up the Windows MBR with the advanced button to fix where grub is installed. After the first package update, which got a new kernel, I think the grub.cfg file is now OK with all the correct devices. Only wrong device I can find is in the fstab for / (root). -- Grub Installer gets devices wrong when running from live USB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361461] Re: (Jaunty) Wicd No Longer Allows Me To Connect
Another possibility is that your access point has run out of ip address leases. I upped the number from 3 to 10 and things started working again. -- (Jaunty) Wicd No Longer Allows Me To Connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577508] Re: gui crashes after screensaver changed (lucid)
Burned a live Lucid CD and booted up the HP Pavilion a210n. It experienced the GL crash/hang too with the antSpotlight, so I guess the upgrade was not an issue. I did find a warning at the top of one text screen which might be of interest: (Process:256): GLibWARNING **: getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0 (cut off) -- gui crashes after screensaver changed (lucid) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463920] Re: evolution crashes when composing a message pressing space
32 bit Lucid is OK for me. The spell packages no longer kill composition. -- evolution crashes when composing a message pressing space https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463920 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120829] Re: /dev/sda3 is mounted despite the 'noauto' option in fstab
I've been dancing around this problem for the last few releases too. My workaround is to use /mnt instead of /media in fstab and then Gnome will obey the noauto. Ideally, I would still get these noauto partitions listed in Places/Other Removable Media menu so I could choose to mount them with a click, but that feature seemed to go away. gconf-editor apps/nautilus/preferences has a medianoautomount option which may help your situation. -- /dev/sda3 is mounted despite the 'noauto' option in fstab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120829 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520194] Re: apt-get crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk()
The crash apparently happened on the 32-9 manual remove too. The 32-9 and 32-10 removals were the only ones I have seen with the error. I do not even see the modules.buildin.bin in my 9.10 system. At some point, I lost the graphics on the Lucid alpha, so I deleted it. The Lucid installation was on a 4G usb stick, so maybe a slow file system exposed a race condition, but I have not seen this type of error on the many other usb sticks with Intrepid, Jaunty, and Karmic. -- apt-get crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520194 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520738] Re: nm-applet freezes xorg/system
I use only released kernels, and see sporadic mouse freezeups when the network-manager is doing something. Yesterday, my Jaunty system froze when accessing the nm menu. I have wireless turned off with a manual switch, but use network-manger for my usb mobile/modem connection. I had no other windows open, so could not change focus, and found even ctrl-alt-del did nothing. Tried unsuccessfully to change to a virtual terminal. Everything appeared dead, so just powered off. I do not ever see these freezups doing anything else. If a freezup happens again, is there anything I can check to provide more information? -- nm-applet freezes xorg/system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520738] Re: nm-applet freezes xorg/system
I have seen my AMD/64 i386 9.10 system mouse (touchpad) freeze when I move it when a network-manager popup message is displaying. If I have another window open, I can still shift focus with Alt Tab, then the mouse works again. -- nm-applet freezes xorg/system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520194] Re: apt-get crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 519855 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519855 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 519855 update-initramfs fails: ./lib/udev/firmware.sh does not exist -- apt-get crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520194 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520194] Re: apt-get crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk()
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 519855 update-initramfs fails: ./lib/udev/firmware.sh does not exist -- apt-get crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520194 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367766] Re: live USB disk not bootable
I just patched my Intrepid system to date Feb 20, 2010, and successfully created a Karmic startup usb stick. The problem appears to have been fixed. -- live USB disk not bootable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367766 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367766] Re: live USB disk not bootable
I just patched my Intrepid system to date Feb 20, 2010, and successfully created a Karmic startup usb stick. The problem appears to have been fixed. -- live USB disk not bootable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367766 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 510318] Re: Ubuntu - Linux for Human Beings! (About Ubuntu) page contains encoding error
The error appears on my Lucid system, AMD64 alternates between the below two errors(in a pink box at top of page). This page contains the following errors: error on line 448 at column 737: AttValue: or ' expected Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error. or This page contains the following errors: error on line 448 at column 725: Encoding error Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error. xmllint --noout --xinclude --noent --postvalid /usr/share/gnome/help/about-ubuntu/C/about-ubuntu.xml no output -- Ubuntu - Linux for Human Beings! (About Ubuntu) page contains encoding error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 510318] Re: Ubuntu - Linux for Human Beings! (About Ubuntu) page contains encoding error
My locale is C, by the way, fully patched on Feb 1. $ locale LANG=C LC_CTYPE=C LC_NUMERIC=C LC_TIME=C LC_COLLATE=C LC_MONETARY=C LC_MESSAGES=C LC_PAPER=C LC_NAME=C LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C LC_MEASUREMENT=C LC_IDENTIFICATION=C LC_ALL= -- Ubuntu - Linux for Human Beings! (About Ubuntu) page contains encoding error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520194] Re: apt-get crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk()
Here's another incomplete purge of kernel files, which did not cause a crash (different file this time, modules.seriomap). This installation was on a hard disk, in a usb 2.0 enclosure. Intrepid patched to date March 10, 2010 showed the manual kernel cleanup problem. Same file, modules.seriomap was left. No proprietary drivers in use. $ uname -a Linux laptop 2.6.27-17-generic #1 SMP Wed Jan 27 23:14:44 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux sudo apt-get purge `apt-cache pkgnames |fgrep 27-15` [sudo] password for xxx: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package linux-headers-lbm-2.6.27-15-server is not installed, so not removed Package linux-backports-modules-2.6.27-15-generic is not installed, so not removed Package linux-backports-modules-2.6.27-15-server is not installed, so not removed Package linux-image-2.6.27-15-virtual is not installed, so not removed Package linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27-15-server is not installed, so not removed Package linux-headers-lbm-2.6.27-15-generic is not installed, so not removed Package linux-headers-2.6.27-15-server is not installed, so not removed Package linux-image-2.6.27-15-server is not installed, so not removed The following packages will be REMOVED: linux-headers-2.6.27-15* linux-headers-2.6.27-15-generic* linux-image-2.6.27-15-generic* linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27-15-generic* 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 4 to remove and 0 not upgraded. After this operation, 150MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y (Reading database ... 156348 files and directories currently installed.) Removing linux-headers-2.6.27-15-generic ... Removing linux-headers-2.6.27-15 ... Removing linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27-15-generic ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.27-15-generic Purging configuration files for linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27-15-generic ... Removing linux-image-2.6.27-15-generic ... Examining /etc/kernel/prerm.d. run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/prerm.d/dkms run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/prerm.d/last-good-boot Running postrm hook script /sbin/update-grub. Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub Searching for default file ... found: /boot/grub/default Testing for an existing GRUB menu.lst file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst Searching for splash image ... found but preserving previous setting: splashimage=/boot/grub/digging.xpm.gz Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.27-17-generic Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.27-16-generic Found kernel: /boot/memtest86+.bin Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done Purging configuration files for linux-image-2.6.27-15-generic ... Running postrm hook script /sbin/update-grub. Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub Searching for default file ... found: /boot/grub/default Testing for an existing GRUB menu.lst file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst Searching for splash image ... found but preserving previous setting: splashimage=/boot/grub/digging.xpm.gz Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.27-17-generic Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.27-16-generic Found kernel: /boot/memtest86+.bin Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done rmdir: failed to remove `/lib/modules/2.6.27-15-generic': Directory not empty dpkg - warning: while removing linux-image-2.6.27-15-generic, directory `/lib/modules/2.6.27-15-generic' not empty so not removed. $ ls /lib/modules 2.6.27-15-generic 2.6.27-16-generic 2.6.27-17-generic $ ls /lib/modules/*15* modules.seriomap $ locate modules.seriomap /lib/modules/2.6.27-15-generic/modules.seriomap /lib/modules/2.6.27-16-generic/modules.seriomap /lib/modules/2.6.27-17-generic/modules.seriomap $ cat /lib/modules/*15*/m* # serio module type extra id proto touchwin 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x33 touchright 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x32 penmount 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x31 mtouch 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x30 inexio 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x37 gunze0x02 0xff 0xff 0x1c touchit213 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x37 elo 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x29 fujitsu_ts 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x35 serio_raw0x01 0xff 0xff 0xff vsxxxaa 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x08 sermouse 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x01 sermouse 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x02 sermouse 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x03 sermouse 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x04 sermouse 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x05 sermouse 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x06 sermouse 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x07 psmouse 0x01 0xff 0xff 0xff psmouse 0x05 0xff 0xff 0xff xtkbd0x00 0xff 0xff 0xff sunkbd 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x10 sunkbd 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x00 stowaway 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x20 newtonkbd0x02 0xff 0xff 0x1f lkkbd0x02 0xff 0xff 0x28 zhenhua 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x36 warrior 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x18 twidjoy 0x02 0xff 0xff 0x24 stinger 0x02
[Bug 577508] Re: gui crashes after screensaver changed (lucid)
Upgraded from 8.04 to 10.04, and had the screensaver crash when using GL screensavers. A quick click before the preview screensaver runs to select a non GL screensaver stopped the crashes. The crash may be related to the bonobo-activation server crash because of a missing bonono socket in /tmp, an error message I also saw on my system after a crash. -- gui crashes after screensaver changed (lucid) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361461] Re: (Jaunty) Wicd No Longer Allows Me To Connect
I just saw the disassociation by local choice (reason 3) on Karmic Jaunty USB based systems which previously worked fine. I'm using the b43 Broadcom open driver and the opensource Broadcom firmware. I think this is a hardware problem, since iwlist scan will show the two available aps with strengths around -75db and quality of both in 30s where one shoud be qual = 78/100, strength= -59db and other is 2/100, -89 Db. The laptop having problems has been failing, and this looks like the latest failure symptom. Your probems may be as simple as a bad antenna connection. Good Luck -- (Jaunty) Wicd No Longer Allows Me To Connect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577508] Re: gui crashes after screensaver changed (lucid)
Just got the crash again after a day of no problems. It was a /tmp/dbusxxx socket that the bonobo-activation-server couldn't access. After fixing the screensaver to use a non GL, no crashes until just after installing an Skype 2.1 (Claimed to be for Intrepid) Maybe a pulseaudio problem? messages file: May 12 20:07:46 dtop pulseaudio[2302]: pid.c: Stale PID file, overwriting. May 12 20:07:48 dtop pulseaudio[2302]: main.c: Unable to contact D-Bus: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoServer: Failed to c onnect to socket /tmp/dbus-cU04aUTdF2: Connection refused May 12 20:07:50 dtop bonobo-activation-server (ubfan-2327): could not associate with desktop session: Failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus-cU04aUTdF2: Connection refused May 12 20:08:23 dtop kernel: Kernel logging (proc) stopped. May 12 20:08:23 dtop rsyslogd: [origin software=rsyslogd swVersion=4.2.0 x-pid=617 x-info=http://www.rsyslog.com; ] exiting on signal 15. May 12 20:16:04 dtop kernel: imklog 4.2.0, log source = /proc/kmsg started. Here's the lspci -vvnn for video and audio: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset Integrated Graphics Device [8086:2562] (rev 03) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8093] Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16 Region 0: Memory at e800 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M] Region 1: Memory at e780 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K] Capabilities: access denied Kernel modules: i915 00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) AC'97 Audio Controller [8086:24c5] (rev 02) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8098] Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 17 Region 0: I/O ports at e000 [size=256] Region 1: I/O ports at e100 [size=64] Region 2: Memory at 3000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512] Region 3: Memory at 3200 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256] Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: Intel ICH Kernel modules: snd-intel8x0 -- gui crashes after screensaver changed (lucid) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 506342] Re: apt-get crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk()
I mount my /var/log on a ramfs (since I run off a 4G thumbdrive), and worked around the problem by creating any necessary directories in rc.local. I've also created in rc.local a link from /var/cache/apt to a /tmp/debs (with /tmp mounted as tmpfs) and create the /archives/partial directory (path). Postgres also needs a directory. This setup puts some of the most active write locations into ram, instead of (slow) flash, which has a limited lifespan. -- apt-get crashed with SIGSEGV in __fprintf_chk() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463920] Re: evolution crashes when composing a message pressing space
** Changed in: enchant (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463920 Title: evolution crashes when composing a message pressing space To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/enchant/+bug/463920/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 970040] Re: When set to autohide, launcher often won't show
@om26er -- I'm not running Unit 3D. Nvidia 304.60 fixed the problem for me, but it takes 2 sec for the launch bar to appear -- too slow for me, so I leave it visible now. Driver 304.63 worked too, after some initial problem which had the GUI login stuck in a loop -- looked like some old .X* files in my home directory caused some issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970040 Title: When set to autohide, launcher often won't show To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/970040/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1170150] Re: vmlinuz/initrd.img symlinks do not point to signed versions on kernel updates of secure boot UEFI machines
Downloaded the Sept 20 desktop 64 bit ISO, and on a Secure Boot UEFI laptop running 13.04, created USB install media, and installed to another USB set up with gpt and an EFI partition. Booting the target USB worked in secure mode, with the signed kernel being used, but the symlink for the kernel is still to the unsigned kernel.As an aside here, to be entered into another bug, note that the above straightforward procedure left the laptop unbootable, with the grub.cfg file on the hard disk's EFI reset to the uuid of the USB stick, (and an additional unnecessary NVRAM boot entry added). ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Saucy) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1170150 Title: vmlinuz/initrd.img symlinks do not point to signed versions on kernel updates of secure boot UEFI machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1170150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1229488] [NEW] 13.10 USB to USB Install on UEFI Secure Boot Machine Left Host Unbootable
Public bug reported: Downloaded Sept. 20 daily build of 13.10, 64 bit, desktop ISO, md5sum checked it, used create startup disk on 13.04 secure boot host to make USB live media, rebooted from it, and successfully installed 13.10 to another USB. Target USB had gpt partitioning, had an EFI partition set up on it, and bootloader target was the UEB's EFI partition. The USB installation boots successfully, but the laptop no longer boots from its hard disk, leaving you at the grub prompt. The cause was the installation improperly changed the hard disk's grub.cfg Expected change to hard disk's /EFI/ubuntu/grub.cfg -- None. Actual change to hard disk's /EFI/ubuntu.grub.cfg -- The uuid in the set root just before the configfile command was reset from the hard disk to the (no longer present) target USB. Additionally, no NVRAM changes were expected from installing to a USB stick, but a new boot entry was created. This boot entry was a correct (for secure boot) -- /EFI/ubuntu/shimx64.efi. NVRAM is a finite resource, which when used up leaves your machine bricked, or relying on an untested vendor supplied reset, so any unnecessary additions are highly undesirable. Editing the hard disk's improper grub.cfg file by putting in the correct UUID allowed the laptop to boot successfully. The EFI menu now has an additional ubuntu entry, which also boots successfully. To summarize, creating or updating a USB installation should not change anything in NVRAM nor on the hard disk's EFI partition. This 13.10 installation did both. (The update reference was to a 12.10 USB update, which changed the NVRAM shim boot entry's disk code and removed it from the boot order (no bug filed), so these issues are not new to 13.10.) Hardware: Toshiba Satellite S855-5378, Insydh20 firmware version 6.60, 8G memory, 750G hard disk, Intel HD4000 video, running dual boot W8 and fully patched 64 bit 13.04 Ubuntu desktop with secure boot enabled. The only secure boot issue with this machine is the inability to boot Windows from grub (bug 1091464), so Windows is the default, and the EFI menu is used to select Ubuntu to run shim/grub. The original Ubuntu selection's path is actually grubx64.efi, which is incorrect for secure boot, but in /EFI/Boot is a copy of shim.efi named bootx64.efi and grubx64.efi, which must be a fallback, because the boot succeeds anyway. The original shim Ubuntu selection was improperly changed/removed from boot order and the EFI menu by a USB 12.10 update (and never added back since a working EFI choice existed). ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229488 Title: 13.10 USB to USB Install on UEFI Secure Boot Machine Left Host Unbootable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1229488/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1229488] Re: 13.10 USB to USB Install on UEFI Secure Boot Machine Left Host Unbootable
Oops, just checked the USB target again after fixing the host machine and found that it had nothing in its EFI partition, so It would not boot either. I thought that specifying the explicit paritition /dev/sdc1 (vs the device /dev/sdc) would work for removable media bootlaoder locations on an EFI partitions, but that did not work in this case. The EFI updates went to the hard disk's EFI partition as well, as evidenced by their different size from the 13.04 versions of the signed grubx64 and shim. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229488 Title: 13.10 USB to USB Install on UEFI Secure Boot Machine Left Host Unbootable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1229488/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1091464] Re: Unable to chainload Windows 8 with Secure Boot enabled
On a just updated 13.10 (Nov 15) getting shim-signed 1.5 and a new signed grubx64.efi 2.00..-19 I see no change in the error. The UnknownMessage (hex 12) or decimal 18 is indeed an invalid subtype for the messaging type (last valid subtype is decimal 15), so looks like leftover garbage in the path buffer? Why is grub even in the messaging type anyway for a hard disk boot? The beginning of the reported path looks just like a network boot looks from efibootmgr -v output. Should the valid path start at the /HD...? If someone without the problem could look at what the actual path chainloader is using could confirm that the /ACPI is present and working on their system we could eliminate leftover garbage in the grub path buffer as the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091464 Title: Unable to chainload Windows 8 with Secure Boot enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1091464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 840146] Re: colord crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
Happens regularly on 12.04, colord0.1.16-2ubuntu0.1, i386, nonfree=nvidia, /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/colord/colord, kernel 3.2.0-39.62-generic-pae 3.2.39, signal =6. fully updated system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840146 Title: colord crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/840146/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1086289] Re: Wrong grub-efi resolution during OS boot menu selection
I have seen the reduced grub resolution, but only after an EFI boot failure and its subsequent fallback to the /Boot/bootx64.efi. My machine is a Toshiba Satellite S855, and it boots off USB with a correctly set up ESP at full resolution, but when I select the hard disk's ubuntu choice, I got the reduced resolution. Examining the actual hard disk ubuntu boot path, it was ...ubuntu/grubx674.efi, which is wrong for a secure boot (which I use). It should be ...ubuntu/shim.efi. The ...Boot/bootx64.efi contained a copy of the shim.efi, and when the bootx64 file was removed, the boot failed. I conclude that the first boot attempt to grubx64 directly silently failed, then EFI tried the Boot/bootx64 and succeeded in starting shim, which started grub -- at the wrong resolution. I'd suggest checking your boot path with sudo efibootmgr -v and confirm that it is what you think it is. So much renaming of these files can occur that looking at the sizes is necessary to confirm their identity. There are signed and unsigned versions of grubx64, and only the correct one will work. As an example of this sequence of errors on a non-secure boot machine, suppose the bootx64 contains copy of the non-signed grubx64 (which will work), but the boot path is to ubuntu/grubx64 which is the signed version. I have not bothered to correct the boot path, since I don't notice any delays, and the resolution doesn't bother me, so I may be totally wrong that correcting the initial boot path will fix things. Also I feel I need to learn more about NVRAM and how to determine how much free space is available before adding things to it like new boot choices -- the Samsung situation of too little NVRAM makes me cautious, afraid I'll brick my machine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086289 Title: Wrong grub-efi resolution during OS boot menu selection To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1086289/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1170150] [NEW] vmlinuz/initrd.img symlinks do not point to signed versions on kernel updates of secure boot UEFI machines
Public bug reported: Kernel updates on a UEFI pc with secure boot enabled have the vmlinuz and initrd.img symlinks updated, but they point to the unsigned versions of the kernel instead of the signed ones. The pc was set up with secure boot on, has never been booted with secure boot off, and no runtime problems have been noted from the wrong symlinks. Having the links to the signed versions is highly desirable, in order to set up a USB stick with its own EFI directory to boot Ubuntu, and not have to worry about changing the USB stick's grub.cfg files. ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1170150 Title: vmlinuz/initrd.img symlinks do not point to signed versions on kernel updates of secure boot UEFI machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1170150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1170150] Re: vmlinuz/initrd.img symlinks do not point to signed versions on kernel updates of secure boot UEFI machines
Ubuntu 12.10, updated several times, getting kernels ...17, ...26, and ...27. The symlinks in / were examined with ls -l and the output indicated that the link was to the /boot/vmlinuz-generic file, NOT the /boot/vmlinuz...-generic.efi.signed file. Applying the sbattach command to the /vmlinuz (and to the actual /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-27-generic file) produced a zero length output with the warnings: warning: file-aligned section of .text extends beyond end of the file warning: checksum areas are greater than image size. invalid section table? Applying the sbattach command to the /boot/vmlinuz...-generic.efi.signed file produced no errors, and output of length 1911. I conclude that the kernels in /boot ending in .efi.signed are the signed versions, and the ones ending in .generic are not -- with the symlinks in / pointing to the unsigned versions. The file /etc/kernel-img.conf contains symlinks=yes, and bootloader=no -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1170150 Title: vmlinuz/initrd.img symlinks do not point to signed versions on kernel updates of secure boot UEFI machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1170150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1170150] Re: vmlinuz/initrd.img symlinks do not point to signed versions on kernel updates of secure boot UEFI machines
Bug 1091464 affects me (grub unable to chainload Windows), so as a workaround, I have a separate ESP on a USB stick. The stick boots Ubuntu 12.10 off the hard disk, and the stick is not mounted in the filesystem. I had been updating the stick's EFI/ubuntu/grub.cfg as each kernel update occurred, but thought I would instead just use the root symlinks, and avoid future grub updates to the stick. That is when I noticed that the symlinks' targets were the unsigned versions of the kernel, and reported the bug. Now grub WILL boot the unsigned kernels off the existing symlinks, and I can see no differences when signed vs. unsigned kernel is used, but I don't know how the symlinks are used by other programs, so something may break if the symlinks don't target the running kernel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1170150 Title: vmlinuz/initrd.img symlinks do not point to signed versions on kernel updates of secure boot UEFI machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1170150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090829] Re: grub-efi fails to install with Input/output error
@yannubuntu re: #34: Yes, I too see the efi firmware path ubuntu/grubx64.efi when it should be ...shim.efi . Looks like grub- install defaulted to that when the path test for shim failed. I haven't done much except get rid of the usb boot for Ubuntu -- I was surprised the F12/select HDD/select ubuntu worked for booting Ubuntu, since secure boot rejects grubx64.efi, but it turned out the grubx64 silently failed, then the fallback was to try EFI/Boot/bootx64.efi, which was a copy of shim (and grubx64 was present in Boot also), so it worked. If you think a copy of my efivars would help, I could post them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090829 Title: grub-efi fails to install with Input/output error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dosfstools/+bug/1090829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1173457] [NEW] Ubuntu 13.04 Desktop 64 bit install uses wrong ESP for secure boot laptop
Public bug reported: On a secure boot pc (secure boot enabled, Ubuntu Desktop 12.10 64bit installed with Win 8), installing from live media Ubuntu 13.04 64 bit desktop to a target thumbdrive (pre partitioned with gpt, and a bootable FAT32 partition 1 of 250M labeled EFI) properly identifies the target's first partition as an EFI bootable partition (when do something else is selected), but the install will then mount the ESP off the laptop's hard drive (at /target/boot/efi). The install creates a grub.cfg file under /target/boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu pointing to the target's(uuid) /boot/grub/grub.cfg. This wrong grub.cfg will prevent the laptop from booting Ubuntu without the thumbdrive, throwing the boot into a grub prompt (since the configfile points to the usb and is no longer present). The install should use the identified EFI boot partition on the target, so the target may boot when first in boot priority, and not touch the hard disk's EFI files. If for any reason a permanent installation is to be made to a USB device, simply select the hard disk's ESP instead of one on the target. ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173457 Title: Ubuntu 13.04 Desktop 64 bit install uses wrong ESP for secure boot laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1173457/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159016] Re: 12.10 64bit live-USB successfully boots, but without persistence on UEFI pc
Thanks Fred. Yes the fix is simple enough, add the word persistent to the /boot/grub/grub.cfg vmlinuz kernel lines. This bug still affects 13.04 also. I find persistence useful for setting up my install media with additional wireless/ethernet packages which may be needed on some machines. A Toshiba Satellite under 12.10 had neither working wireless nor ethernet (until the first kernel upgrade), so I set up the wireless rt8723 module build and the boot-repair deb on another machine, to make the Toshiba installation easier -- Ha. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159016 Title: 12.10 64bit live-USB successfully boots, but without persistence on UEFI pc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/1159016/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1091464] Re: Unable to chainload Windows 8 with Secure Boot enabled
I have the same error on a Toshiba Satellite S855 S5378 with Windows 8 preinstalled. My workaround is to use a (full install) thumbdrive to boot Ubuntu 12.10 on the hard disk, and to pull the thumbdrive to boot windows -- all in secure mode. Windows boots attempted from the thumbdrive, give the error message. The grub command ls will find the files, but chainloader will not succeed in running them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091464 Title: Unable to chainload Windows 8 with Secure Boot enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1091464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1091464] Re: Unable to chainload Windows 8 with Secure Boot enabled
A second workaround, more convienent than the USB boot is to invoke the EFI device select menu, select HDD, then select ubuntu or Windows (both of which work). The ubuntu selection starts grub, but from grub, the Windows boot still fails with the above chainloader error. With the number of different brands mentioned in this bug, I begin to doubt the problem is vendor related. Maybe something we did caused this, so here's what I did: My first install was to a USB stick without ann EFI partition( used HD EFI, booted Ubuntu OK, did not boot Windows, and killed the Windows boot off the hard disk when not present). Installed to (prepared HD) in this condition, worked, but got a grub install error (Windows boot worked again). Installed to USB again after putting on a EFI partition, the install still mounted the HD EFI, which I manually unmounted and replaced with the USB EFI (this worked). At this point, the HD /EFI/ubuntu directory was corrupted, so had to manually delete it and replace the signed binaries. The USB would boot Ubuntu, but not Windows, and the HD would boot Windows (default). Using efibootmgr -v, I could see that the ubuntu boot was set up wrong, trying to boot grub instead of shim -- but much to my surprise, it still booted, so I surmise a silent failure, then a fallback to the /EFI/Boot/bootx64.efi (which was a copy of shim) which succeeded. I manually added (grub-install --uefi-secure-boot /dev/sda) a correct shim boot path, which worked too. I normally now enter F12 to select ubuntu or Windows. Not a totally clean history, but on the other hand, the machine has never been out of secure boot, I have never run boot-repair, and the only EFI variable manipulation I have done is through grub-install. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091464 Title: Unable to chainload Windows 8 with Secure Boot enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1091464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1098959] Re: 12.10 Bluetooth Battery Indicator Interferes with Bluetooth Mouse Moves
Running system is a 4G USB, booted with bluetooth off, no battery indicator displayed, killed the upowerd process, then turned bluetooth on, then turned on the mouse, which immediately worked, resulting in the following dmesg messages: [ 1542.188059] usb 2-4: new full-speed USB device number 4 using ohci_hcd [ 1542.418559] usb 2-4: New USB device found, idVendor=03f0, idProduct=171d [ 1542.418574] usb 2-4: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 [ 1542.418582] usb 2-4: Product: HP Integrated Module [ 1542.418589] usb 2-4: Manufacturer: Broadcom Corp [ 1542.515610] Bluetooth: HIDP (Human Interface Emulation) ver 1.2 [ 1544.470504] hid-generic 0005:0A5C:0001.0003: unknown main item tag 0x0 [ 1544.480876] input: Bluetooth Mouse as /devices/pci:00/:00:0b.0/usb2/2-4/2-4:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:11/input11 [ 1544.481419] hid-generic 0005:0A5C:0001.0003: input,hidraw2: BLUETOOTH HID v0.1e Keyboard [Bluetooth Mouse] on 00:16:41:D4:B1:1F -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098959 Title: 12.10 Bluetooth Battery Indicator Interferes with Bluetooth Mouse Moves To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-power/+bug/1098959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1098959] Re: 12.10 Bluetooth Battery Indicator Interferes with Bluetooth Mouse Moves
Cycling mouse and/or bluetooth never crashes the upowerd for me. I do get some null pointer stack dump from the bluetoothd at some point. Closest complaint was : quanta4g kernel: [ 211.852064] power_supply hid-00:60:D1:00:C3:15-battery: driver failed to report `capacity' property: 4294967291 Here's the null pointer log: Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560251] [ cut here ] Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560261] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/lib/kobject.c:196 kobject_add_internal+0x1ea/0x200() Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560264] Hardware name: Presario V3000 (RD462PA#AB0) Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560269] kobject_add_internal failed for hci0:11 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory. Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560272] Modules linked in: hidp bnep rfcomm parport_pc ppdev vesafb lp parport snd_hda_codec_conexant arc4 nvidia(PO) hp_wmi sparse_keymap kvm_amd kvm snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device psmouse serio_raw r852 sm_common nand r592 nand_ids mtd nand_bch bch memstick joydev nand_ecc snd btusb k8temp soundcore bluetooth snd_page_alloc b43 mac80211 nv_tco cfg80211 i2c_nforce2 bcma ssb_hcd wmi video mac_hid ext2 hid_generic usbhid hid firewire_ohci sdhci_pci uas usb_storage sdhci firewire_core crc_itu_t pata_amd forcedeth sata_nv ssb Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560377] Pid: 5, comm: kworker/u:0 Tainted: PW O 3.5.0-21-generic #32-Ubuntu Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560380] Call Trace: Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560391] [c1044802] warn_slowpath_common+0x72/0xa0 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560400] [c12c9dba] ? kobject_add_internal+0x1ea/0x200 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560409] [c12c9dba] ? kobject_add_internal+0x1ea/0x200 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560419] [c10448d3] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x33/0x40 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560428] [c12c9dba] kobject_add_internal+0x1ea/0x200 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560438] [c113e293] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x103/0x110 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560448] [c12ca075] kobject_add+0x35/0x80 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560457] [c13aad36] device_add+0xe6/0x620 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560469] [c12d5543] ? kvasprintf+0x43/0x60 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560479] [c12ca022] ? kobject_set_name_vargs+0x42/0x60 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560503] [f9ec53a3] hci_conn_add_sysfs+0x43/0x80 [bluetooth] Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560527] [f9eb9695] hci_conn_complete_evt.isra.47+0xb5/0x360 [bluetooth] Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560575] [f9ebb370] hci_event_packet+0x8f0/0x2170 [bluetooth] Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560644] [f9d80cae] ? __ieee80211_recalc_idle+0x13e/0x290 [mac80211] Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560674] [c101003c] ? __switch_to+0xbc/0x260 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560683] [c107d53a] ? idle_balance+0x10a/0x150 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560692] [c1037b08] ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x8/0x10 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560702] [c15ca9dd] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2d/0x40 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560723] [f9eb1502] hci_rx_work+0x222/0x2e0 [bluetooth] Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560731] [c105fa8f] process_one_work+0x10f/0x380 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560751] [f9eb12e0] ? le_scan_work+0xd0/0xd0 [bluetooth] Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560759] [c1060cd9] worker_thread+0xf9/0x290 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560767] [c10707de] ? complete+0x4e/0x60 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560775] [c1060be0] ? manage_workers.isra.25+0x1d0/0x1d0 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560784] [c1064e72] kthread+0x72/0x80 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560794] [c1064e00] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x60/0x60 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560804] [c15d1c7e] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10 Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560808] ---[ end trace 130847ee8b7fb170 ]--- Jan 19 14:25:50 quanta4g kernel: [ 213.560814] Bluetooth: Failed to register connection device Jan 19 14:25:53 quanta4g kernel: [ 216.852108] power_supply hid-00:60:D1:00:C3:15-battery: driver failed to report `capacity' property: 4294967291 Jan 19 14:25:53 quanta4g kernel: [ 216.897600] [ cut here ] Jan 19 14:25:53 quanta4g kernel: [ 216.897629] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-3.5.0/lib/kobject.c:200 kobject_add_internal+0xef/0x200() Jan 19 14:25:53 quanta4g kernel: [ 216.897634] Hardware name: Presario V3000 (RD462PA#AB0) Jan 19 14:25:53 quanta4g kernel: [ 216.897641] kobject_add_internal failed for 0005:0A5C:0001.0004 (error: -2 parent: hci0:11) Jan 19
[Bug 1098959] Re: 12.10 Bluetooth Battery Indicator Interferes with Bluetooth Mouse Moves
** Also affects: gnome-power Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098959 Title: 12.10 Bluetooth Battery Indicator Interferes with Bluetooth Mouse Moves To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/1098959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159016] [NEW] 12.10 64bit live-USB successfully boots, but without persistence on UEFI pc
Public bug reported: The 64but 12.10 2G live USB was set up on a 32bit 12.04.1 non-UEFI host with 1G persistence. The USB boots and persistence works on the non-UEFI host. The USB boots in Secure boot mode but without persistence on a UEFI host. The /proc/cmdline on the running live media shows the running kernel to be vmlinuz.efi.signed, which of course does not appear in any syslinux config files. Looks like something got left out in the secure boot procedure to have persistence. Live media created with the following iso: 800063488 Mar 18 11:14 ubuntu-12.10-desktop-amd64.iso md5sum 7ad57cadae955bd04019389d4b9c1dcb ubuntu-12.10-desktop-amd64.iso The UEFI host is a Toshiba Satellite S855-5378 and has Windows 8 preinstalled, so no legacy BIOS is present. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: usb-creator-gtk 0.2.38 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-39.62-generic-pae 3.2.39 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-39-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 22 16:48:52 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/usb-creator-gtk InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20120423) InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7 MarkForUpload: True ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: usb-creator UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: usb-creator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise running-unity third-party-packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159016 Title: 12.10 64bit live-USB successfully boots, but without persistence on UEFI pc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/1159016/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090829] Re: grub-efi fails to install with Input/output error
How I corrupted the ubuntu directory: On a Toshiba Satellite S855 with Windows 8 preinstalled and Secure boot enabled, successfully installed 12.10 64b to a 4G stick, without making a efi partition on it. This created a good EFI/ubuntu directory on the hard disk, but left the EFI/Boot directory containing ony a grub.cfg file to boot the stick (so Windows would no longer boot), (although the 4G stick would boot). In this condition, I then installed 12.10 to a previously freed up space on the hard disk, which failed at the bootloader part, but did end up in a condition which Windows booted.Tried again to install to the 4G stick, this time with an efi partition on the stick, which failed with the grub-install dummy error. Looking at the EFI with ls -l, the ubuntu directory just showed a name the d for directory, and all else appeared as ?s. Apparently, the second (or maybe third) install of Ubuntu corrupted the ubuntu directory in the Windows EFI directory,. Examining the failed stick, the /etc/fstab file refers to the hard disk's EFI partition (by UUID), not the one on the stick (which was empty). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090829 Title: grub-efi fails to install with Input/output error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dosfstools/+bug/1090829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090829] Re: grub-efi fails to install with Input/output error
@yannbuntu: My issue is the same as yours: the underlying bad EFI/ubuntu directory. I think I can narrow the cause to grub-efi itself: 1) I have never booted the pc with Secure boot disabled. 2) I have never run any third party tools like your boot-repair. 3) I have never added, changed or renamed anything in the EFI partition. 4) First installation of 12.10 did produce a normal ubuntu directory, which allowed the installation (but not Windows) to run. 5) Second and third attempts at installation failed at the grub part. And yes, after the ubuntu directory is corrupted, grub-efi will complain about it, along with virtually every other tool attempting to access it. Repeated runs of dosfsck -r did eventually fix the corruption, by deleting the ubuntu directory. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090829 Title: grub-efi fails to install with Input/output error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dosfstools/+bug/1090829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090829] Re: grub-efi fails to install with Input/output error
I see lots of Input/Output errors when accessing the EFI/ubuntu directory, and see a (bogus?) read only filesystem message in dmesg: dmesg lines (probably caused by the ls command): FAT-fs (sda2); error, fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 0) FAT-fs (sda2): Filesystem has been set read only But the mount command still lists the sda2 mount as rw. The Input/Output error appears with any attempted access to the directory: ls ubuntu, sudo mv ubuntu ..., sudo rm -rf ubuntu all produce the Input/Output error. I forget the error message from the third installation attempt, but it was a failure I expected and might have been the IO error (it was NOT the error window produced from the second installation attempt which apparently caused the corrupted directory). The error window on the second installation (to hard disk) was: Window title: Unable to install Grub in a dummy Text: Executing 'grub-install dummy' failed This is a fatal error. Since I fixed the bad directory, and I'm not really working on my own UEFI machine, I'll hold off on doing anything more, like running the grub-install. I hope this helps in improving things. A guess as to what's wrong: Looks like an off-by-one error on a loop index in grub install when it encounters an existing EFI/ubuntu directory. The directory is probably rewritten with an extra (free) block added at the start. The dosfsck reports such in the below terminal capture. Confirm this by looking at the filesystem image posted above. The fix to get rid of the corrupted directory (since rm won't work) applying Phillip's (comment #25) suggestion: $ sudo mount -tvfat /dev/sda2 /mnt/sda2 ubuntu@ubuntu:/mnt/sda7/etc$ ls !$ ls /mnt/sda2 EFI ubuntu@ubuntu:/mnt/sda7/etc$ sudo dosfsck -r /dev/sda2 dosfsck 3.0.13, 30 Jun 2012, FAT32, LFN /EFI/ubuntu Contains a free cluster (12149). Assuming EOF. Reclaimed 277 unused clusters (1134592 bytes). Perform changes ? (y/n) y /dev/sda2: 326 files, 12146/65536 clusters ubuntu@ubuntu:/mnt/sda7/etc$ sudo dosfsck -r /dev/sda2 dosfsck 3.0.13, 30 Jun 2012, FAT32, LFN /EFI/ubuntu Start does point to root directory. Deleting dir. Reclaimed 276 unused clusters (1130496 bytes). Perform changes ? (y/n) y /dev/sda2: 326 files, 12146/65536 clusters ubuntu@ubuntu:/mnt/sda7/etc$ sudo dosfsck -r /dev/sda2 dosfsck 3.0.13, 30 Jun 2012, FAT32, LFN Orphaned long file name part ubuntu 1: Delete. 2: Leave it. ? 1 Perform changes ? (y/n) y /dev/sda2: 325 files, 12146/65536 clusters ubuntu@ubuntu:/mnt/sda7/etc$ sudo dosfsck -r /dev/sda2 dosfsck 3.0.13, 30 Jun 2012, FAT32, LFN /dev/sda2: 325 files, 12146/65536 clusters ubuntu@ubuntu:/mnt/sda7/etc$ ls /mnt/sda2/EFI Boot Microsoft toshiba -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090829 Title: grub-efi fails to install with Input/output error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dosfstools/+bug/1090829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1090829] Re: grub-efi fails to install with Input/output error
@yannubuntu: Sorry, bug 1159016 had me running non-persistent on my live media. At the time I didn't remember to capture any log files on another usb. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090829 Title: grub-efi fails to install with Input/output error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dosfstools/+bug/1090829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384633] Re: Grub Installer uses device name instead of UUID, leading to unbootable system
The problem is still present with the 12.04 release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384633 Title: Grub Installer uses device name instead of UUID, leading to unbootable system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/384633/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1091464] Re: Unable to chainload Windows 8 with Secure Boot enabled
A forums question http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2197141 indicated that the bug could be made to go away in secure boot by putting the os I wanted to boot on on the top of the list of bootable drives. Now my UEFI Settings for devices does NOT contain OSes, just devices. When I select the hard disk on the efi menu, I get another window listing the OSes to boot. Maybe this second level of choice has something to do with the source of the bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091464 Title: Unable to chainload Windows 8 with Secure Boot enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1091464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 876734] Re: gnome-terminal scroll position indicator invisible when left scroll is selected
** Description changed: - Under Unity and Unity-2D, selecting left scroll for a gnome-terminal - scroll bar position results in the little red bar, indicating where the - scroll elevator will appear , being invisible, making it difficult to - find, since random clicks must be applied along the left window border - to make the scroll elevator appear. + Under Unity and Unity-2D gnome-terminal profiles, selecting right scroll + (the default) for a gnome-terminal scroll bar position results in the + little red bar on the right edge of the terminal, indicating where the + scroll elevator will appear. Selecting the left scroll in the profile + however, does not result in the little red tag appearing, so being + invisible, it is difficult to find the position to make the scroll bar + appear. Random movement of the cursor along the left window border is + necessary to make the scroll elevator appear, which then may be grabbed + and used normally. Still a problem in 12.04.3 and 13.10 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gnome-terminal 3.0.1-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Oct 17 11:22:25 2011 ProcEnviron: - PATH=(custom, user) - LANG=en_US.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + PATH=(custom, user) + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gnome-terminal UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876734 Title: gnome-terminal scroll position indicator invisible when left scroll is selected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/876734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs