Just pondering - Rev CGI & iPhone
After fiddling with some Rev CGI stuff here for a couple of weeks, I'm wondering how far this might take someone towards a sophisticated web app for the iPhone. Just think'in, mind you. They wouldn't be sold via the Apple App store, but that just might have some upside, especially when considering the restrictions Apple can throw at developers ;-) I wonder what cool Rev CGI apps already exist out there? sims ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Last-Minute Enterprise Upgrade Question
Perhaps they should post a stack which tells you what to buy, so we can see the source code =) Programming in Rev is a lot easier than understanding the marketing folks. ;^) Jim ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Last-Minute Enterprise Upgrade Question
Programming in Rev is a lot easier than understanding the marketing folks. ;^) Jim On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Judy Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oooohhh > > Thank you for explaining that! > > Now I'm feeling sufficiently secure in my understanding of the offer > to go process my order. > > :-) > > Judy > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Jim Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The upgrade alone is for another year of updates, and the additional >> early assurance extends that for a second year. >> >> Jim >> >> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Judy Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Jim and Mark: >>> >>> Thank you for your replies, but I'm still confused because the >>> following is *verbatim* from the email notice sent to me: >>> >>> "We're offering you the chance to upgrade your Studio license to >>> Revolution Enterprise 3.0. Get the upgrade for just $299 *including* a >>> year of updates." >>> >>> I read that as saying that I'm upgrading my existing Studio license to >>> and Enterprise 3.0 license AND a year of updates "for just $299." >>> >>> What am I not understanding? >>> >>> Judy >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Jim Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's a better deal. The upgrade is $250, not $299, and the software assurance pack is an early renewal of the annual subscription so you can continue to get all upgrades for an additional year for $133 instead of $199. If you let your annual subscription lapse and then decide to upgrade, the regular Enterprise renewal is $399. Hope this helps. Jim On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Judy Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am, of course, happy that the mothership thought to send me an email > reminding me that the Studio -> Enterprise upgrade/purchase of 3.0 > ends tonight. I have credit card in hand. > > But I'm confused... after following the link provided in the email > which said the price was US$299, the webpage says it's US$250, with an > Enterprise Early Software Assurance Pack for an additional US$133, > bringing the total to US$383, not US$299. > > What am I not understanding? And, exactly what *is* said "Enterprise > Early Software Assurance Pack"? > > Kindest thanks for any insights anyone can offer. > > Judy > _ ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution >>> ___ >>> use-revolution mailing list >>> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com >>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >>> subscription preferences: >>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution >>> >> ___ >> use-revolution mailing list >> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription >> preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution >> > ___ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Last-Minute Enterprise Upgrade Question
Oooohhh Thank you for explaining that! Now I'm feeling sufficiently secure in my understanding of the offer to go process my order. :-) Judy On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Jim Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The upgrade alone is for another year of updates, and the additional > early assurance extends that for a second year. > > Jim > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Judy Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jim and Mark: >> >> Thank you for your replies, but I'm still confused because the >> following is *verbatim* from the email notice sent to me: >> >> "We're offering you the chance to upgrade your Studio license to >> Revolution Enterprise 3.0. Get the upgrade for just $299 *including* a >> year of updates." >> >> I read that as saying that I'm upgrading my existing Studio license to >> and Enterprise 3.0 license AND a year of updates "for just $299." >> >> What am I not understanding? >> >> Judy >> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Jim Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> It's a better deal. The upgrade is $250, not $299, and the software >>> assurance pack is an early renewal of the annual subscription so you >>> can continue to get all upgrades for an additional year for $133 >>> instead of $199. If you let your annual subscription lapse and then >>> decide to upgrade, the regular Enterprise renewal is $399. >>> >>> Hope this helps. >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Judy Perry >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I am, of course, happy that the mothership thought to send me an email reminding me that the Studio -> Enterprise upgrade/purchase of 3.0 ends tonight. I have credit card in hand. But I'm confused... after following the link provided in the email which said the price was US$299, the webpage says it's US$250, with an Enterprise Early Software Assurance Pack for an additional US$133, bringing the total to US$383, not US$299. What am I not understanding? And, exactly what *is* said "Enterprise Early Software Assurance Pack"? Kindest thanks for any insights anyone can offer. Judy _ >>> ___ >>> use-revolution mailing list >>> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com >>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >>> subscription preferences: >>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution >>> >> ___ >> use-revolution mailing list >> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription >> preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution >> > ___ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Last-Minute Enterprise Upgrade Question
The upgrade alone is for another year of updates, and the additional early assurance extends that for a second year. Jim On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Judy Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim and Mark: > > Thank you for your replies, but I'm still confused because the > following is *verbatim* from the email notice sent to me: > > "We're offering you the chance to upgrade your Studio license to > Revolution Enterprise 3.0. Get the upgrade for just $299 *including* a > year of updates." > > I read that as saying that I'm upgrading my existing Studio license to > and Enterprise 3.0 license AND a year of updates "for just $299." > > What am I not understanding? > > Judy > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Jim Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It's a better deal. The upgrade is $250, not $299, and the software >> assurance pack is an early renewal of the annual subscription so you >> can continue to get all upgrades for an additional year for $133 >> instead of $199. If you let your annual subscription lapse and then >> decide to upgrade, the regular Enterprise renewal is $399. >> >> Hope this helps. >> >> Jim >> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Judy Perry >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am, of course, happy that the mothership thought to send me an email >>> reminding me that the Studio -> Enterprise upgrade/purchase of 3.0 >>> ends tonight. I have credit card in hand. >>> >>> But I'm confused... after following the link provided in the email >>> which said the price was US$299, the webpage says it's US$250, with an >>> Enterprise Early Software Assurance Pack for an additional US$133, >>> bringing the total to US$383, not US$299. >>> >>> What am I not understanding? And, exactly what *is* said "Enterprise >>> Early Software Assurance Pack"? >>> >>> Kindest thanks for any insights anyone can offer. >>> >>> Judy >>> _ >> ___ >> use-revolution mailing list >> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription >> preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution >> > ___ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Last-Minute Enterprise Upgrade Question
Jim and Mark: Thank you for your replies, but I'm still confused because the following is *verbatim* from the email notice sent to me: "We're offering you the chance to upgrade your Studio license to Revolution Enterprise 3.0. Get the upgrade for just $299 *including* a year of updates." I read that as saying that I'm upgrading my existing Studio license to and Enterprise 3.0 license AND a year of updates "for just $299." What am I not understanding? Judy On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Jim Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's a better deal. The upgrade is $250, not $299, and the software > assurance pack is an early renewal of the annual subscription so you > can continue to get all upgrades for an additional year for $133 > instead of $199. If you let your annual subscription lapse and then > decide to upgrade, the regular Enterprise renewal is $399. > > Hope this helps. > > Jim > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Judy Perry > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am, of course, happy that the mothership thought to send me an email >> reminding me that the Studio -> Enterprise upgrade/purchase of 3.0 >> ends tonight. I have credit card in hand. >> >> But I'm confused... after following the link provided in the email >> which said the price was US$299, the webpage says it's US$250, with an >> Enterprise Early Software Assurance Pack for an additional US$133, >> bringing the total to US$383, not US$299. >> >> What am I not understanding? And, exactly what *is* said "Enterprise >> Early Software Assurance Pack"? >> >> Kindest thanks for any insights anyone can offer. >> >> Judy >> _ > ___ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Last-Minute Enterprise Upgrade Question
Hi Judy, The Early Software Assurance Pack provides you with free upgrades to Rev for 1 year instead of what comes with Rev (I think it's 90 days free upgrades). You can purchase an Assurance Pack later, within the next year, but it will be at a higher price than now when upgrading Rev. If you wait more than a year, then you'll pay for a renewal again, which is a bit less than a new license... This is how Rev explained it to me HTH, Mark on 9/30/08 8:24 PM, Judy Perry at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > > I am, of course, happy that the mothership thought to send me an email > reminding me that the Studio -> Enterprise upgrade/purchase of 3.0 > ends tonight. I have credit card in hand. > > But I'm confused... after following the link provided in the email > which said the price was US$299, the webpage says it's US$250, with an > Enterprise Early Software Assurance Pack for an additional US$133, > bringing the total to US$383, not US$299. > > What am I not understanding? And, exactly what *is* said "Enterprise > Early Software Assurance Pack"? > > Kindest thanks for any insights anyone can offer. > > Judy > ___ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Last-Minute Enterprise Upgrade Question
It's a better deal. The upgrade is $250, not $299, and the software assurance pack is an early renewal of the annual subscription so you can continue to get all upgrades for an additional year for $133 instead of $199. If you let your annual subscription lapse and then decide to upgrade, the regular Enterprise renewal is $399. Hope this helps. Jim On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Judy Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am, of course, happy that the mothership thought to send me an email > reminding me that the Studio -> Enterprise upgrade/purchase of 3.0 > ends tonight. I have credit card in hand. > > But I'm confused... after following the link provided in the email > which said the price was US$299, the webpage says it's US$250, with an > Enterprise Early Software Assurance Pack for an additional US$133, > bringing the total to US$383, not US$299. > > What am I not understanding? And, exactly what *is* said "Enterprise > Early Software Assurance Pack"? > > Kindest thanks for any insights anyone can offer. > > Judy > _ ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Last-Minute Enterprise Upgrade Question
Hi all, I am, of course, happy that the mothership thought to send me an email reminding me that the Studio -> Enterprise upgrade/purchase of 3.0 ends tonight. I have credit card in hand. But I'm confused... after following the link provided in the email which said the price was US$299, the webpage says it's US$250, with an Enterprise Early Software Assurance Pack for an additional US$133, bringing the total to US$383, not US$299. What am I not understanding? And, exactly what *is* said "Enterprise Early Software Assurance Pack"? Kindest thanks for any insights anyone can offer. Judy ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Tutorial - MacAddict Forum Reader on RevJournal Website - Webpage Won't Open
> Thanks so much for your help with this and your tutorial, Sarah! > > Meanwhile, didn't realize that tutorial is only written for MacAddict forum. > I was trying to use another forum's web address that I visit often. > > So, would be great as long as you're updating tutorial to add some comments > regarding getting this to work with other forums if that's not too much > trouble. Sarah Reichelt Tue Sep 30 19:35:05 CDT 2008 wrote: >>Here is my basic method: >>- in your browser, load the page listing the forum categories and forum names. >>- look at the source for this page and work out a method of >>identifying the category & forum names, most likely a class name or >>id. >>- use my script for loading the page into memory, but edit the >>processWebPage script to use the identifiers you found, the same way >>my script for the MacAddict page used "cattitle" and "forumlink" >>I can't really give specific instructions because each web page is >>structured differently. You just have to look at the raw source and >>script accordingly. >>HTH, >>Sarah Thanks again for your help, Sarah! Think I get the basic concepthowever, whether or not I can get it to work in Rev. ;-) Thanks, Mark ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Tutorial - MacAddict Forum Reader on RevJournal Website - Webpage Won't Open
> Thanks so much for your help with this and your tutorial, Sarah! > > Meanwhile, didn't realize that tutorial is only written for MacAddict forum. > I was trying to use another forum's web address that I visit often. > > So, would be great as long as you're updating tutorial to add some comments > regarding getting this to work with other forums if that's not too much > trouble. Here is my basic method: - in your browser, load the page listing the forum categories and forum names. - look at the source for this page and work out a method of identifying the category & forum names, most likely a class name or id. - use my script for loading the page into memory, but edit the processWebPage script to use the identifiers you found, the same way my script for the MacAddict page used "cattitle" and "forumlink" I can't really give specific instructions because each web page is structured differently. You just have to look at the raw source and script accordingly. HTH, Sarah ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Tutorial - MacAddict Forum Reader on RevJournal Website - Webpage Won't Open
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Mark Srebnik wrote: > Just got Rev3 about 2 weeks ago...so just getting started > > Found Sarah's tutorial - "MacAddict Forum Reader" on RevJournal website. > > Tried tutorial, but so far not getting web page to open... > > on mouseUp > show image "Busy" > put field "Address" into tAddress > load URL tAddress with message processWebPage > end mouseUp > > > I notice that it uses command "load URL", while in RunRev's beginning > tutorial video, they use 'revGoURL'... although checked Dictionary and it > says 'revGoURL' is now deprecated.. ;-) > > Have tried both but neither are opening up a browser window after clicking > the "Load" button... On Tue, Sep 30 16:00:03 CDT 2008, Sarah Reichelt wrote: >>The real problem is that MacAddict is no more. It has morphed into >>Mac|Life, lost all it's enthusiasm and become boring as well as filled >>with ads for Sony & Vista. Having been a MacAddict subscriber since >>issue 1, this was very sad to see and I did not renew my subscription. >>Anyway, I will need to re-write the scripts to use the Mac|Life forums >>instead of the MacAddict ones. The base address has changed but so has >>the structure of the page. One I have done that, I will send it to >>Richard for the revJournal site and notify people on the list. >>One other issue is that the "load" command does not go to your browser >>the way revGoURL or launch does. It just loads the HTML source into >>memory, and when it is finished, it goes to the specified callback >>handler, if one has been specified. If this was all working, you would >>just see a list of forum names appear on the left. Then you would be >>able to click on one of them to see a list of sub-forums names. >>Cheers, >>Sarah Thanks so much for your help with this and your tutorial, Sarah! Meanwhile, didn't realize that tutorial is only written for MacAddict forum. I was trying to use another forum's web address that I visit often. So, would be great as long as you're updating tutorial to add some comments regarding getting this to work with other forums if that's not too much trouble. Thanks, Mark ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Tutorial - MacAddict Forum Reader on RevJournal Website - Webpage Won't Open
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Mark Srebnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just got Rev3 about 2 weeks ago...so just getting started > > Found Sarah's tutorial - "MacAddict Forum Reader" on RevJournal website. > > Tried tutorial, but so far not getting web page to open... > > on mouseUp > show image "Busy" > put field "Address" into tAddress > load URL tAddress with message processWebPage > end mouseUp > > > I notice that it uses command "load URL", while in RunRev's beginning > tutorial video, they use 'revGoURL'... although checked Dictionary and it > says 'revGoURL' is now deprecated.. ;-) > > Have tried both but neither are opening up a browser window after clicking > the "Load" button... The real problem is that MacAddict is no more. It has morphed into Mac|Life, lost all it's enthusiasm and become boring as well as filled with ads for Sony & Vista. Having been a MacAddict subscriber since issue 1, this was very sad to see and I did not renew my subscription. Anyway, I will need to re-write the scripts to use the Mac|Life forums instead of the MacAddict ones. The base address has changed but so has the structure of the page. One I have done that, I will send it to Richard for the revJournal site and notify people on the list. One other issue is that the "load" command does not go to your browser the way revGoURL or launch does. It just loads the HTML source into memory, and when it is finished, it goes to the specified callback handler, if one has been specified. If this was all working, you would just see a list of forum names appear on the left. Then you would be able to click on one of them to see a list of sub-forums names. Cheers, Sarah ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: question about find and replace
Just for diversity's sake, I have often used a function like the following: function zeroPad pText,pLength repeat max(0, pLength - length(pText)) put "0" before pText end repeat return pText end zeroPad put zeroPad("13", 4) => "0013" put zeroPad("5", 4) => "0004" etc. Recently, Peter Alcibiades wrote: How do you pad out a series of numbers with leading zeros? Like for instance the series is .1. .2. .3. .11. .42. .98. and you want them to be .001. .002. .003. .011. .042. .098. You can use the format function. For example: answer format("%03s",1) will display 001 (the 3 means pad with zeros to 3 places). So if the decimal points in your number series are intentional, you could make a function like: function padNumbers pSeries repeat for each line tNum in pSeries put "." & format("%03s",char 2 to -2 of tNum) & "." & cr after newSet end repeat return newSet end padNumbers Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, Multimedia & Design ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: revBrowser snapshot not working in 3.0
Klaus, Thanks, off to repair permissions, etc. Tom McGrath III On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:37 AM, Klaus Major wrote: Hi Thomas, Can anyone verify the sample revBrowser stack does not work for snapshots? It is called "Browser Sampler.rev" and the snapshot command sample is on page 10. Thanks in advance, works here for me: MC/Rev 3.0 gm3 OS X 10.5.5 MacMini Intel Tom McGrath III Best Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.major-k.de ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: question about find and replace
Peter Alcibiades wrote: How do you pad out a series of numbers with leading zeros? Like for instance the series is .1. .2. .3. .11. .42. .98. and you want them to be .001. .002. .003. .011. .042. .098. My solution, among the many: function paddedList pList put "" into tPadding repeat for each line l in pList put char 2 to -2 of l into tNum put "." & char 1 to (3 - len(tNum)) of tPadding & \ tNum & "." & cr after tList end repeat return tList end paddedList -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Button to stop a repeating script?
Hi: Thanks all, those were excellent techniques, especially Scott's mention of the pendingMessages() function! I had no idea about that, I think I will read up on it, as I think it would be interesting to write a simple log of them and read it to understand "what's really going on" behind the scenes of a stack. m ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: question about find and replace
> answer format("%03s",1) > > will display 001 (the 3 means pad with zeros to 3 places). So if the > decimal points in your number series are intentional, you could make a > function like: > > function padNumbers pSeries > repeat for each line tNum in pSeries > put "." & format("%03s",char 2 to -2 of tNum) & "." & cr after newSet > end repeat >return newSet > end padNumbers Actually, you can put the periods into the format function: put format(".%03s.",1) --> .001. Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software, Inc. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Tutorial - MacAddict Forum Reader on RevJournal Website - Webpage Won't Open
Mark Srebnik wrote: So just tried to do what you suggested as follows: on mouseUp show image "Busy" put field "Address" into theAddress revGoURL theAddress with message processWebPage end mouseUp on revGoURL pUrl launch url pUrl end revGoURL However, now I get error message: Object: button "Load Button" Line: revGoURL the address with message processWebPage Hint: with Looks like Rev is choking on the "with" part. You could comment that portion out, but maybe even better to just replace the call to "revGoURL" with the "launch url" command right in the mouseUp handler. -- Richard Gaskin Managing Editor, revJournal ___ Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: question about find and replace
On 30.09.2008 at 8:54 Uhr +0100 Peter Alcibiades apparently wrote: How do you pad out a series of numbers with leading zeros? Like for instance the series is .1. .2. .3. .11. .42. .98. and you want them to be .001. .002. .003. .011. .042. .098. I know how to find them, using the fact that they appear as shown between two . characters, but then I don't know how to use regular expressions to put part of what has been found back along with the padding zeros. Or should you not be trying to use regex at all? I seem to recall something about look ahead and greediness but never really understood it, is this relevant? Peter Simple brute force method is: put length(theNumber) into theNumberLength if theNumberLength < 5 then get zero if theNumberLength < 4 then get zero & zero put it after char 1 of theNumber end if same -- a bit less efficient but shorter: if length(theNumber) < 4 then put zero after char 1 of theNumber if length(theNumber) < 5 then put zero after char 1 of theNumber If the numbers are part of a longer string, you may need to use offset function to find the insert position. Robert ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Tutorial - MacAddict Forum Reader on RevJournal Website - Webpage Won't Open
Mark Srebnik wrote: > Found Sarah's tutorial - "MacAddict Forum Reader" on RevJournal website. > > Tried tutorial, but so far not getting web page to open... > > on mouseUp > show image "Busy" > put field "Address" into tAddress > load URL tAddress with message processWebPage > end mouseUp > > > I notice that it uses command "load URL", while in RunRev's beginning > tutorial video, they use 'revGoURL'... although checked Dictionary and it > says 'revGoURL' is now deprecated.. ;-) > > Have tried both but neither are opening up a browser window after clicking > the "Load" button... > > I did get browser window to open when trying Rev's beginning tutorial using > ŒrevGoURL¹ > > So can't figure out what's wrong...any suggestions??? From: Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>You can make a "stub" handler to route revGoURL to the new "launch URL" >>command - just add this to the stack script: on revGoUrl pUrl launch url pUrl end revGoURL >>I'm surprised Rev hasn't maintained compatibility for their handler, but >>Sarah, if you have time to update that tutorial stack just send it to me >>at your convenience and I'll replace the one at revJournal.com. >>-- >> Richard Gaskin >> Managing Editor, revJournal >> ___ >> Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com Thanks for your help, Richard! So just tried to do what you suggested as follows: on mouseUp show image "Busy" put field "Address" into theAddress revGoURL theAddress with message processWebPage end mouseUp on revGoURL pUrl launch url pUrl end revGoURL However, now I get error message: Object: button "Load Button" Line: revGoURL the address with message processWebPage Hint: with ??? Thanks, Mark ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Tutorial - MacAddict Forum Reader on RevJournal Website - Webpage Won't Open
Mark Srebnik wrote: Found Sarah's tutorial - "MacAddict Forum Reader" on RevJournal website. Tried tutorial, but so far not getting web page to open... on mouseUp show image "Busy" put field "Address" into tAddress load URL tAddress with message processWebPage end mouseUp I notice that it uses command "load URL", while in RunRev's beginning tutorial video, they use 'revGoURL'... although checked Dictionary and it says 'revGoURL' is now deprecated.. ;-) Have tried both but neither are opening up a browser window after clicking the "Load" button... I did get browser window to open when trying Rev's beginning tutorial using ŒrevGoURL¹ So can't figure out what's wrong...any suggestions??? You can make a "stub" handler to route revGoURL to the new "launch URL" command - just add this to the stack script: on revGoUrl pUrl launch url pUrl end revGoURL I'm surprised Rev hasn't maintained compatibility for their handler, but Sarah, if you have time to update that tutorial stack just send it to me at your convenience and I'll replace the one at revJournal.com. -- Richard Gaskin Managing Editor, revJournal ___ Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Tutorial - MacAddict Forum Reader on RevJournal Website - Webpage Won't Open
Just got Rev3 about 2 weeks ago...so just getting started Found Sarah's tutorial - "MacAddict Forum Reader" on RevJournal website. Tried tutorial, but so far not getting web page to open... on mouseUp show image "Busy" put field "Address" into tAddress load URL tAddress with message processWebPage end mouseUp I notice that it uses command "load URL", while in RunRev's beginning tutorial video, they use 'revGoURL'... although checked Dictionary and it says 'revGoURL' is now deprecated.. ;-) Have tried both but neither are opening up a browser window after clicking the "Load" button... I did get browser window to open when trying Rev's beginning tutorial using revGoURL¹ So can't figure out what's wrong...any suggestions??? Thanks for any help! Mark ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Classic Stack
As usual, I panicked too quickly. It was just a matter of new paths for the players on the different set up. Music now plays perfectly. Joe Wilkins On Sep 30, 2008, at 9:05 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote: For those of you who may find this interesting: After Saving my 3.0 stack as a Legacy Revolution Stack, I was able to open it using 2.6.1 and run it using the included DreamCard Player. There were only a couple of very minor things that will need fixing. The new "Alex" Mac voice was not available when running 9.2.1 and the stack is close by clicking in the upper left hand corner rather than being able to utilize Quit from the File menu. Not sure if that will eventually be fixed or not. It appears that I need to do something so that the Players play the sound clips using this version. Anyone know what might be the problem? The Player objects can be seen in the Inspector, but they don't appear the same as they do in 3.0, so some change with them must have been made. TIA, Joe Wilkins ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Classic Stack
For those of you who may find this interesting: After Saving my 3.0 stack as a Legacy Revolution Stack, I was able to open it using 2.6.1 and run it using the included DreamCard Player. There were only a couple of very minor things that will need fixing. The new "Alex" Mac voice was not available when running 9.2.1 and the stack is close by clicking in the upper left hand corner rather than being able to utilize Quit from the File menu. Not sure if that will eventually be fixed or not. It appears that I need to do something so that the Players play the sound clips using this version. Anyone know what might be the problem? The Player objects can be seen in the Inspector, but they don't appear the same as they do in 3.0, so some change with them must have been made. TIA, Joe Wilkins ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: message box history - confused
Thank you, Eric. You're a star. I doubt I'll ever know as much as you do, because you're already so far ahead :-) So, I'm guessing that this revPreferences stack is updated every returnInField in the MB. I'll have to go and have a look at that. Bernard On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Eric Chatonet < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bonjour Bernard, > > All this is normal :-) > All messages are stored in the cREVSingleLineHistory of stack > "revPreferences" and there is only one stack "revPreferences" for > consistency when working with different Rev versions. > > Le 30 sept. 08 à 13:57, Bernard Devlin a écrit : > > But this new behaviour (well, new to me) looks like the MB history is >> being >> shared between both 2.9 and 3.0. If I had the standard installation, >> where >> someone had upgraded to Rev 3.0 from 2.9 (using check for updates), I >> might >> understand that Rev was saving the MB history. But since I'm running two >> independent installations of Rev, I'm confused by the MB history being >> shared. >> >> Is this normal? And if so, how is it that Rev is sharing this history? >> I've checked for hidden (dot) files in my Linux user directory, and there >> are none there that seem to be associated with this. >> > > Best regards from Paris, > Eric Chatonet. > > Plugins and tutorials for Revolution: http://www.sosmartsoftware.com/ > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > > > > ___ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: I cannot paste in any field in an app (consisting of up to 7 stacks)
On Sep 30, 2008, at 7:33 AM, Ben Rubinstein wrote: Neal Campbell wrote: Are you using PC or OS X? I had a similar situation on the PC version this weekend and never figured out what it was. Moved over to OS X for the project. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I have an application with up to 7 stacks where I cannot paste in the fields. What did I do to "set this feature" - I do not find the clue. Any idea? Franz, This may not be it - you don't say whether you can do other typing in the fields - but I've been utterly stumped in the past by fields that I can only edit using the property inspector (or otherwise programmatically). I finally tracked it down to the autoHilite property - this is presented on the first tab of the property inspector for fields, and the documentation on it is very clear, so I don't really have an excuse - but the behaviour has nothing to do with the name, so it's nonetheless very confusing. The effect of autoHilite on a button is exactly what you'd expect. The effect on a field is that if this property is false, you/the user can't select the text or set the insertion point - and hence can't type or paste into the field. (Depending on the 'focusable' property - you may still be able to tab into the field.) This may have nothing to do with your problem, but it's worth checking. Along these lines, if you want your field to be editable, the following three properties should be set to true. Each of them represents a different reason why you might not be able to type in a field: the lockText - obvious the traversalOn - (controlled by the Focusable checkbox) if false, prevents you from focusing on the field with mouse or tab key the autoHilite - if false, prevents user from clicking to select text or an input cursor. I believe you can still tab to the field however. HTH Devin Devin Asay Humanities Technology and Research Support Center Brigham Young University ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: question about find and replace
The same thing answer format("%_3s",1) ?? instead of a zero use a dash would work so that you could make numbers line up that are in a field left aligned instead of right aligned? ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: revBrowser snapshot not working in 3.0
Hi Thomas, Can anyone verify the sample revBrowser stack does not work for snapshots? It is called "Browser Sampler.rev" and the snapshot command sample is on page 10. Thanks in advance, works here for me: MC/Rev 3.0 gm3 OS X 10.5.5 MacMini Intel Tom McGrath III Best Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.major-k.de ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: revBrowser snapshot not working in 3.0
Can anyone verify the sample revBrowser stack does not work for snapshots? It is called "Browser Sampler.rev" and the snapshot command sample is on page 10. Thanks in advance, Tom McGrath III On Sep 29, 2008, at 9:39 PM, Thomas McGrath III wrote: Yeah Chipp that's what the docs say but I'm using the sample stack that has the sample and that states the size requirement. So I assumed the sample stack should be following this gotcha. Tom McGrath III On Sep 29, 2008, at 8:04 PM, Chipp Walters wrote: I can't remember, but I think you need to make sure and match the image size with the imagedata. I'm not in front of Rev at this moment. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: OT Font Question
On Sep 29, 2008, at 10:31 PM, Mark Swindell wrote: Devin, Thanks for the link. I'm actually after something that I think may not exist. It would be similar in function to an IPA font, but with regular English character pairs whose kerning would be reduced so that they would represent a single visual unit, mirroring how they represent sound. "Good" would be "G oo d" and "shallow" would be "sh a ll ow." It would require tweaking the kerning between digraph letter pairs and dipthongs to tighten them up, while keeping regular spacing between these double letters, single letters, and words. I'm not sure it's worth the trouble to create, but in teaching I find that some children have a difficult time seeing that "sh" for example, is not "s h" but rather its own phonetic unit. (A parallel: until fairly recently, "ch" was the fourth letter of the Spanish alphabet, though it was never represented with tighter kerning... I think the Real Academia might have done away with that one, as well as the "ll", at least for purposes of alphabetizing. (Wikpedia: In 1994, it ruled that the Spanish consonants CH (ché) and LL (elle) would hence be alphabetized under C and under L, respectively, and not as separate, discrete letters, as in the past.) The idea was to be able to present text to kids written with these combinations emphasized while retaining a somewhat natural look. Mark, Clever idea, but you're probably right--it seems unlikely that someone would have created such a specialized font. I guess if I were going to do something similar I'd use color or style differences to show the letter combinations. Or I supposed you could use Photoshop or some other tool that will let you play with the kerning. Of course with PS, you're stuck with only the words you create beforehand. This is a place where the old Mac compressed font style would come in handy! Devin Devin Asay Humanities Technology and Research Support Center Brigham Young University ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: I cannot paste in any field in an app (consisting of up to 7 stacks)
Neal Campbell wrote: Are you using PC or OS X? I had a similar situation on the PC version this weekend and never figured out what it was. Moved over to OS X for the project. On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have an application with up to 7 stacks where I cannot paste in the fields. What did I do to "set this feature" - I do not find the clue. Any idea? Franz, This may not be it - you don't say whether you can do other typing in the fields - but I've been utterly stumped in the past by fields that I can only edit using the property inspector (or otherwise programmatically). I finally tracked it down to the autoHilite property - this is presented on the first tab of the property inspector for fields, and the documentation on it is very clear, so I don't really have an excuse - but the behaviour has nothing to do with the name, so it's nonetheless very confusing. The effect of autoHilite on a button is exactly what you'd expect. The effect on a field is that if this property is false, you/the user can't select the text or set the insertion point - and hence can't type or paste into the field. (Depending on the 'focusable' property - you may still be able to tab into the field.) This may have nothing to do with your problem, but it's worth checking. - Ben ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: I cannot paste in any field in an app (consisting of up to 7 stacks)
hi, may sound stupid. Have you tried adding a menubar that has an edit menu to the main stack? If not could you try and see if you can paste then? If so I might be close to a godzilla report. Cheers, Malte ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: message box history - confused
Bonjour Bernard, All this is normal :-) All messages are stored in the cREVSingleLineHistory of stack "revPreferences" and there is only one stack "revPreferences" for consistency when working with different Rev versions. Le 30 sept. 08 à 13:57, Bernard Devlin a écrit : But this new behaviour (well, new to me) looks like the MB history is being shared between both 2.9 and 3.0. If I had the standard installation, where someone had upgraded to Rev 3.0 from 2.9 (using check for updates), I might understand that Rev was saving the MB history. But since I'm running two independent installations of Rev, I'm confused by the MB history being shared. Is this normal? And if so, how is it that Rev is sharing this history? I've checked for hidden (dot) files in my Linux user directory, and there are none there that seem to be associated with this. Best regards from Paris, Eric Chatonet. Plugins and tutorials for Revolution: http://www.sosmartsoftware.com/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: I cannot paste in any field in an app (consisting of up to 7 stacks)
Franz Are you using PC or OS X? I had a similar situation on the PC version this weekend and never figured out what it was. Moved over to OS X for the project. Neal On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have an application with up to 7 stacks where I cannot paste in the fields. > What did I do to "set this feature" - I do not find the clue. Any idea? > > Regards, Franz > ___ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > -- Neal Campbell Abroham Neal Software Programming Services for Windows, OS X and Linux (540) 242 0911 - Try Spot for OS X, the intelligent DXCluster Client at www.abrohamnealsoftware.com - $15.99 - For a great dog book, visit www.abrohamneal.com - See the FlexRadio Systems Flex-5000a in action at www.flex-videos.com ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
message box history - confused
In trying to track down these crashing bugs, I've noticed something strange about the MB history. Whilst working in 3.0 on Linux today it crashed. I decided to try to use my MessageLog to see if it could help determine precisely what was happening before the crash. However, rather than process the log using 3.0 I started 2.9 (in the hope that it wouldn't crash whilst I was trying to find the information). When I started 2.9 I saw (to my surprise) that the MB contained the last command I used on 3.0. I had noticed that when 3.0 has crashed before, on restart the MB history contained the last few commands that I'd used before the crash. That puzzled me and I entered into the bug report. I would not expect the MB history to contain any command issued since Rev was last quit (i.e. the last orderly shutdown of Rev). I'd assumed that maybe this meant that Rev was not crashing but just quitting, and in the process was saving the MB history. But this new behaviour (well, new to me) looks like the MB history is being shared between both 2.9 and 3.0. If I had the standard installation, where someone had upgraded to Rev 3.0 from 2.9 (using check for updates), I might understand that Rev was saving the MB history. But since I'm running two independent installations of Rev, I'm confused by the MB history being shared. Is this normal? And if so, how is it that Rev is sharing this history? I've checked for hidden (dot) files in my Linux user directory, and there are none there that seem to be associated with this. Bernard ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: conference videos
Hi, in support of Runrev i have to admit, that i received such an email with the coupon, which i by the way already used. Okay updated information about the status of the dvd and the delivery date would have been nice. But i got to know Rurnev as a fair partner in the last years. So i was certain, that i will not loose my money. Regards, Matthias Regards, Matthias - Original Message - From: "Tiemo Hollmann TB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'How to use Revolution'" Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:06 PM Subject: AW: conference videos I've paid also and got an answer from support to my request, that they HAD "technical" problems and it still would take "a little" time... That's really not the nice kind to treat your customers, taking the money and... Tiemo -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:use-revolution- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Marian Petrides Gesendet: Samstag, 27. September 2008 15:17 An: How to use Revolution Betreff: Re: conference videos I haven't gotten mine either. Just emailed support as per Kevin's request. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 26, 2008, at 5:07 PM, Kevin Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 26/9/08 20:54, "Stephen Barncard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Anyone know what happened to the videos from the RunRev conference? >> This year. I paid for them when the first announcement came out, then >> got an email saying it would be delayed for an unspecified time. > > Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Kind regards, > > Kevin > > Kevin Miller ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.runrev.com/ > Runtime Revolution - User-Centric Development Tools > > ___ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: conference videos
On 30/9/08 11:35, "Alex Tweedly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I asked those affected to write to support because we have >> been keeping individual customers in the loop and did offer a coupon to >> those affected. >> > Isn't everyone who paid for them 'affected' ? And presumably you have a > list of those who paid ... so the list of affected customers is already > in your hands. > > A proactive email to all those folks, explaining the delay (and giving > any forward schedule estimate) would go a long way to making them happy. > Waiting until some of them get unhappy enough to complain, and then > asking the others to also write in to support, is not so good. > > (Or - to put it another way - I can't remember whether I paid for these > or not :-) I know I intended to, but maybe I didn't actually get round > to it. So maybe I should email support, or maybe that would just be > embarassing We did indeed send an email to everyone who had purchased as soon as we were aware of the problem. Either you didn't purchase the DVD or the email was blocked in your spam filter. Kind regards, Kevin Kevin Miller ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.runrev.com/ Runtime Revolution - User-Centric Development Tools ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: conference videos
Kevin Miller wrote: I asked those affected to write to support because we have been keeping individual customers in the loop and did offer a coupon to those affected. Isn't everyone who paid for them 'affected' ? And presumably you have a list of those who paid ... so the list of affected customers is already in your hands. A proactive email to all those folks, explaining the delay (and giving any forward schedule estimate) would go a long way to making them happy. Waiting until some of them get unhappy enough to complain, and then asking the others to also write in to support, is not so good. (Or - to put it another way - I can't remember whether I paid for these or not :-) I know I intended to, but maybe I didn't actually get round to it. So maybe I should email support, or maybe that would just be embarassing -- Alex. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: conference videos
On 30/9/08 09:06, "Bernard Devlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got burned by this a couple of years ago. I bought the videos to (I > think) the Monterey conference. After 5 months of delay and repeated > complaints to runrev (some of which never got a reply), the videos did > finally arrive. They kindly re-imbursed me for the delay, but I decided > after that I would not buy anything except software from them in future (I > seem to remember similar problems years ago with printed documentation > orders). We did indeed have some problems years ago, for which we reimbursed the customers affected at the time. However generally our shipping operation has been running smoothly since then. The cause of the exception with this particular conference DVD was rather more complex: when we got deep into editing all the video capture data it became clear that some of the sessions had not been supplied to us by the all the presenters who were screen capturing them. Some of the sessions we had did not play back properly either due to a couple of different data corruption issues. Its been a long process and we've had to work both on the technical side and with the presenters to put all that right. Everyone has been really helpful and we now have pretty much a complete DVD which truly will be shipping any day now. I do apologize for the obvious inconvenience in this delay. I asked those affected to write to support because we have been keeping individual customers in the loop and did offer a coupon to those affected. Kind regards, Kevin Kevin Miller ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.runrev.com/ Runtime Revolution - User-Centric Development Tools ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
AW: I cannot paste in any field in an app (consisting of up to 7 stacks)
Hi Franz, assuming you checked the standard properties like lock text in and out, could it be, that you just don't see the text, because it has a couple of CRs at the beginning and doesn't fit in your fields? Probably useless to ask for Tiemo > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:use-revolution- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. September 2008 09:48 > An: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Betreff: I cannot paste in any field in an app (consisting of up to 7 > stacks) > > Hello, > > I have an application with up to 7 stacks where I cannot paste in the > fields. What did I do to "set this feature" - I do not find the clue. Any > idea? > > Regards, Franz > ___ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
AW: conference videos
I've paid also and got an answer from support to my request, that they HAD "technical" problems and it still would take "a little" time... Thats really not the nice kind to treat your customers, taking the money and... Tiemo > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:use-revolution- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Marian Petrides > Gesendet: Samstag, 27. September 2008 15:17 > An: How to use Revolution > Betreff: Re: conference videos > > I haven't gotten mine either. Just emailed support as per Kevin's > request. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 26, 2008, at 5:07 PM, Kevin Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 26/9/08 20:54, "Stephen Barncard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> Anyone know what happened to the videos from the RunRev conference? > >> This year. I paid for them when the first announcement came out, then > >> got an email saying it would be delayed for an unspecified time. > > > > Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Kevin > > > > Kevin Miller ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.runrev.com/ > > Runtime Revolution - User-Centric Development Tools > > > > ___ > > use-revolution mailing list > > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > > subscription preferences: > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > ___ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Painting on an image in a group?
Recently, David Bovill wrote: > a couple of > questions - you use "the text of image" for the contents - just wandering > why you like that syntax (it was new to me) I do, in fact, like the syntax -- it transfers both the image and alphaData to the grouped image in one action. > oh and where's the script to select the paint tools See the card script. You won't need this but I used a mouseMove handler to automatically show/hide the proxy image and switch the tools. When you are painting in the demo stack, you are painting in the proxy image; when the mouse moves outside the image rect, the proxy image is hidden and its data is transferred to the grouped image. BTW, an opaque object is required here to define the limits of the active paint region, which is why a graphic with noop ink is positioned behind the group. Mouse tracking will not work on a transparent object (ie. an image with no paint in it). Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, Multimedia & Design ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: question about find and replace
Recently, Peter Alcibiades wrote: > How do you pad out a series of numbers with leading zeros? Like for instance > the series is > > .1. > .2. > .3. > .11. > .42. > .98. > > and you want them to be > > .001. > .002. > .003. > .011. > .042. > .098. You can use the format function. For example: answer format("%03s",1) will display 001 (the 3 means pad with zeros to 3 places). So if the decimal points in your number series are intentional, you could make a function like: function padNumbers pSeries repeat for each line tNum in pSeries put "." & format("%03s",char 2 to -2 of tNum) & "." & cr after newSet end repeat return newSet end padNumbers Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, Multimedia & Design ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Painting on an image in a group?
Thanks Scott, Joe - I'll go with Scotts solution. Scott a couple of questions - you use "the text of image" for the contents - just wandering why you like that syntax (it was new to me) - oh and where's the script to select the paint tools :) ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: conference videos
I got burned by this a couple of years ago. I bought the videos to (I think) the Monterey conference. After 5 months of delay and repeated complaints to runrev (some of which never got a reply), the videos did finally arrive. They kindly re-imbursed me for the delay, but I decided after that I would not buy anything except software from them in future (I seem to remember similar problems years ago with printed documentation orders). Bernard On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Mark Wieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marian- > > Saturday, September 27, 2008, 6:16:41 AM, you wrote: > > > I haven't gotten mine either. Just emailed support as per Kevin's > > request. > > Good luck. I never got a response to the email I sent in May. > > -- > -Mark Wieder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: question about find and replace
Hi Peter, Here's a possibility. Perhaps someone can come up with a shorter version. constant dot = "." function formatDottedNumbers set the numberformat to "000" set the itemDel to dot repeat for each line myLine in myData put dot & item 2 of myLine * 1 & dot & cr after myNewData end repeat return char 1 to -2 of myNewData end formatDottedNumbers I believe regex is great to find data, but you can't use it to find and edit all instances of a search pattern, if all new values have to be different. -- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering http://economy-x-talk.com http://www.salery.biz Dutch forum: http://runrev.info/rrforum/ Benefit from our inexpensive hosting services. See http://economy-x-talk.com/server.html for more info. On 30 sep 2008, at 09:54, Peter Alcibiades wrote: How do you pad out a series of numbers with leading zeros? Like for instance the series is .1. .2. .3. .11. .42. .98. and you want them to be .001. .002. .003. .011. .042. .098. I know how to find them, using the fact that they appear as shown between two . characters, but then I don't know how to use regular expressions to put part of what has been found back along with the padding zeros. Or should you not be trying to use regex at all? I seem to recall something about look ahead and greediness but never really understood it, is this relevant? ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: debugging log engine build request
No, unfortunately there is no clear pattern. I'm definitely not doing a lot of work with images (barely an image in any of my work). The crashes on Windows mostly happened over a 3 month period using mostly one stack (and its substacks). As I'm not prepared for that work to be viewed by others (confidentiality issues), I cannot send that stack to Runrev. At the beginning of August I sent the Windows crash reports for July to Runrev, but they were inconclusive. The Linux crashes last week are on a totally new and unrelated project. Hence my suggestion for this enhancement to the engine. As I've seen how large my message log can get in a matter of hours (despite them being in a condensed format that's about 10-20% of verboseLog.txt), I doubt that the Windows crash logs contain a replay log. Bernard On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:48 PM, J. Landman Gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Are you by chance working a lot with images? I had a severe series of > crashes in a current project on both 2.9 and 3.0 which turned out to be > image-related, particularly when manipulating large images (there's a bug > report about that.) I sent the team my stack and it blew up for them on > demand. I have a scripted work-around for my particular situation. > > I've forgotten if you said you sent them your stack, but I've found that's > the most reliable way to get things fixed, especially if the crash log is > inconclusive. > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
question about find and replace
How do you pad out a series of numbers with leading zeros? Like for instance the series is .1. .2. .3. .11. .42. .98. and you want them to be .001. .002. .003. .011. .042. .098. I know how to find them, using the fact that they appear as shown between two . characters, but then I don't know how to use regular expressions to put part of what has been found back along with the padding zeros. Or should you not be trying to use regex at all? I seem to recall something about look ahead and greediness but never really understood it, is this relevant? Peter ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
I cannot paste in any field in an app (consisting of up to 7 stacks)
Hello, I have an application with up to 7 stacks where I cannot paste in the fields. What did I do to "set this feature" - I do not find the clue. Any idea? Regards, Franz ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: get the icon found in address bar in browser
Colin Holgate wrote: At 5:39 PM +0200 9/29/08, Mark Schonewille wrote: I don't think you can safely assume that you will find the ico file in the root of a web site. You should check whether a link to an ico file has been specified for a particular page. Of course, I was only showing root examples. Rev not being able to load ico files does slow down the whole idea anyway! I think Colin and Mark are both right... Microsoft 'invented' the favicon, in typically bull-in-a-china-shop manner; some version of IE was released that just unilaterally checked for /favicon.ico at the top level of any site for which a page was bookmarked - initially of course just the sites they controlled got a special icon, so people wanted to get this treatment, figured out what was happening, and started adding the file to their sites. Soon every browser was checking for every page they displayed, causing vast numbers of 404 errors to site operators everywhere. Eventually some responsible grown-ups introduced a more sensible and flexible scheme, by which a page can specify an icon to be associated with it; allowing both the URL and the file format to be varied, and also allowing different pages on the same site to have different icons. But the genie was out, and I think (on very little evidence) that this is used by a tiny minority of sites; and most of those will just do belt-and-braces, and point at a standard favicon.ico at the top level. Re not being able to load the ico files: it's a pretty straightforward format (no compression) and widely documented - should be easy to convert into an image. - Ben ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution