Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.

[raja sekhar]

Hi Star,

Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1.
how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command for
xenserver host?

waiting for your reply.

Regards,
Rajasekhar.

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering > the network
> rate of global configuration.
> If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of the VM
> and focus on   ... .
>
> Best Regards,
> Star Guo
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com]
> 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28
> 收件人: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> 主题: unable to test Network Throttling.
>
> Hi all,
>
> i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the Network
> Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute offering and in
> global settings i didn't changed any Network Throttling Rate(default 200
> Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate.
>
> please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Rajasekhar.
>
>

答复: unable to test Network Throttling.

[Star Guo]

Hi,

There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering > the network rate of 
global configuration. 
If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of the VM and 
focus on   ... .

Best Regards,
Star Guo

-邮件原件-
发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com] 
发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28
收件人: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: unable to test Network Throttling.

Hi all,

i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the Network Rate as 
1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute offering and in global settings i 
didn't changed any Network Throttling Rate(default 200
Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate.

please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM.



Regards,
Rajasekhar.

unable to test Network Throttling.

[raja sekhar]

Hi all,

i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the Network
Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute offering and in
global settings i didn't changed any Network Throttling Rate(default 200
Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate.

please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM.



Regards,
Rajasekhar.

Re: Desktop as a service

[John Kinsella]

> On Dec 5, 2014, at 11:08 PM, Tilak Raj Singh  wrote:
> 
> Hello Everybody,
> 
> I am new to cloudstack so I dont know if I am going off the topic here. I
> wished to know how to setup Virtual Desktop Interface (VDI) using
> cloudstack. I browsed the net and found that openstack has the capabilities
> to setup this feature. Does cloudstack can be used to deploy such a
> service? If yes some links for the same would be highly appreciated. Also
> if cloudstack does not have that capability then is there some alternative
> to this?

Hi and welcome!  CloudStack can be used with Citrix XenDesktop and XenApp to 
provide VDI services for users. It’s covered in the XenDesktop install/setup 
docs (just replace CloudPlatform with CloudStack)

> Another thing I wanted to know is how to instantiate virtual machines
> automatically if the load is increased. Have read about load balancing and
> I guess its regarding this only.

If you mean for VDI, XenDesktop can manage this once connected to CloudStack. 
If you mean outside of that setup, the phrase you’re looking for is 
“autoscaling.” Currently it works with either NetScaler load balancers or 
XenServer virtualization.

> The architecture I wish to setup is to provide VDI to several users on
> demand via browsers, where the compute is done on the virtual machines. Now
> when suppose 10 users are simultaneously using this Virtual Desktop the
> load on the VM increases so cloudstanck spawns another VM to share the load
> of these 10 users to 5 each on these two VMs created. I hope my doubt is
> clear.

Yep - XenDesktop will do that for ya. :) 

John

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

[Marcus]

It sounds like some iptables rules got broken at some point for the static
NAT, and since there's still a catch-all SNAT for outbound it gets caught
by that and still keeps working, but is broken in a subtle way that goes
unnoticed.

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Andrija Panic 
wrote:

> And just to spice things a little bit, ALL remote connections appears to
> come from main Public IP of the VPC VR.
> So we can not block some stuff on firewall onVM (while doing port
> forwading) because all connections appear to come from main Public IP of
> the VPC VR.
>
> This is terrible design/bug - can we change this ?
> I'm on the ACS 4.3 currently...
>
> cheers
>
> On 8 December 2014 at 23:42, Andrija Panic 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access
> > web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access
> > logs as remote IP.
> >
> > Why is this behaviour - and can this be changed ?
> > My understanding is that this is kind of bug (unless needed for some
> other
> > reasons) - port forwading is DNAT in essence, so only the destination
> > IP/port should be changed, not proxied all the way, as it seems to be the
> > case here...
> >
> > I read on other guys mailing list - same behavior for loadbalancer...
> >
> > Any suggestion ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

[Andrija Panic]

And just to spice things a little bit, ALL remote connections appears to
come from main Public IP of the VPC VR.
So we can not block some stuff on firewall onVM (while doing port
forwading) because all connections appear to come from main Public IP of
the VPC VR.

This is terrible design/bug - can we change this ?
I'm on the ACS 4.3 currently...

cheers

On 8 December 2014 at 23:42, Andrija Panic  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access
> web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access
> logs as remote IP.
>
> Why is this behaviour - and can this be changed ?
> My understanding is that this is kind of bug (unless needed for some other
> reasons) - port forwading is DNAT in essence, so only the destination
> IP/port should be changed, not proxied all the way, as it seems to be the
> case here...
>
> I read on other guys mailing list - same behavior for loadbalancer...
>
> Any suggestion ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>



-- 

Andrija Panić

Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

[Andrija Panic]

Hi,

when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access
web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access
logs as remote IP.

Why is this behaviour - and can this be changed ?
My understanding is that this is kind of bug (unless needed for some other
reasons) - port forwading is DNAT in essence, so only the destination
IP/port should be changed, not proxied all the way, as it seems to be the
case here...

I read on other guys mailing list - same behavior for loadbalancer...

Any suggestion ?

Thanks,

-- 

Andrija Panić

Re: Load Balancing in cloudstack

[Tilak Raj Singh]

Yeah i guess i am using basic networking...i didnt create any routers or
network groups...i just installed cloudstack and entered private and guest
ip addresses on the first run...then i created a vm and this
defaultguestnetwork was automati ally created
On 08-Dec-2014 1:52 PM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" 
wrote:

> Hi Vadim,
>
> What you are saying is Internal LB, it is there only in the VPC.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
> On 08-Dec-2014, at 12:52 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk 
>  wrote:
>
> > As far as I know -- network offer with LB is only available for VPC and
> you must expicitly select it for specific subnet.  For shared network it is
> not available.
> >
> > Vadim.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 12:34 AM
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Load Balancing in cloudstack
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Tilak Raj Singh 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I followed the quick install guide of installing cloudstack and setup
> >> a private cloud within my college..Now I created a VM in it and it was
> >> assigned an IP address of 172.31.101.250. I created another VM which
> >> has an ip address 172.31.101.248...now when I click NIC tabs of both
> >> the machines it shows the Network Name as "defaultGuestNetwork"...I
> >> wish to add load balancing to these two machine to share the load of a
> >> webservice I would be creating on these.
> >>
> >> But the problem is when I click on View IP Address inside
> >> defaultguestNetwork it shows no IP addressesWhat wrong am I doing
> >> here..Can somebody please guide me???
> >>
> >>
> > Are you using Basic networking?
> >
> > --
> > Erik
>
>

[CVE-2014-7807] Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds

[John Kinsella]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

CVE-2014-7807: Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds

CVSS:
7.5, AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Vendors:
The Apache Software Foundation
Citrix, Inc.

Versions Afffected:
Apache CloudStack 4.3, 4.4

Description:
Apache CloudStack may be configured to authenticate LDAP users.
When so configured, it performs a simple LDAP bind with the name
and password provided by a user.  Simple LDAP binds are defined
with three mechanisms (RFC 4513): 1) username and password; 2)
unauthenticated if only a username is specified; and 3) anonymous
if neither username or password is specified.  Currently, Apache
CloudStack does not check if the password was provided which could
allow an attacker to bind as an unauthenticated user.

Mitigation:
Users of Apache CloudStack 4.4 and derivatives should update to the
latest version (4.4.2)

An updated release for Apache CloudStack 4.3.2 is in testing. Until
that is released, we recommend following the mitigation below:

By default, many LDAP servers are not configured to allow unauthenticated
binds.  If the LDAP server in use allow this behaviour, a potential
interim solution would be to consider disabling unauthenticated
binds.

Credit:
This issue was identified by the Citrix Security Team.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=QqOf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: 4.3.1 API issue with importing LDAP users

[Ian Forde]

Created.  CLOUDSTACK-8046.  I¹d also like to point out that you may want
to add ³LDAP² to the Components menu in JiraŠ

 -I

On 12/6/14, 6:32 AM, "Ian Duffy"  wrote:

>Hi.
>
>Haven't looked at the code but it sounds like a casing issue.
>
>AD is case aware but not case sensitive. I'm unsure of the top of my head
>what POSIX LDAP is.
>
>Probably best if we change to suit ADs case awareness. i.e. copy across as
>same casing and allow login from any case variation.
>
>Can you open a jira ticket?
>
>Thanks,
>Ian
>On 6 Dec 2014 01:48, "ilya musayev"  wrote:
>
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> This is probably better suited for Dev list, Ian Duffy has done alot of
>> work on LDAP and CloudStack, he is cc'd to this thread. Perhaps he can
>>shed
>> some light.
>>
>> Regards
>> ilya
>>
>> On 12/5/14, 4:40 PM, Ian Forde wrote:
>>
>>> I¹ve got a bash script performing an API call (in my case, via
>>> cloudmonkey) as follows:
>>>
>>> cloudmonkey api listLdapUsers listtype=new display=default
>>> filter=username,domain
>>>
>>> (note that we¹re using Active Directory)
>>>
>>> There¹s at least one user in AD defined with a capital letter in front.
>>> Example:  ³Bjones" rather than "bjones".  Now given that we have a
>>>user in
>>> CS named bjones, Bjones shouldn¹t show up in the output from the above
>>> command, but it does.
>>>
>>> Is this supposed to happen or is the listLdapUsers supposed to perform
>>>a
>>> case-insensitive match against currently-defined Cloudstack user
>>>accounts?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>-Ian
>>>
>>>
>>

XenServer 6.2: Other 64 bit template

[Vadim Kimlaychuk]

Hello all,

I have previously set up XenServer cluster under CS and registered 
FreeBSD under „Other 64 bit“ template. It worked fine in PV mode.
Now I have stand-alone XenServer and can’t launch the same set up 
for FreeBSD manually. Can someone who is using XenServer under CS create VM 
from default „Other 64 bit“ template and print out „xe vm-param-list 
uuid=$VM-UUID“ ?? I would be very thankful for this output. It seems default 
templates are different.

Regards,

Vadim Kimlaychuk

[proposal] Purge Volumes instead of deleting them

[Andrija Panic]

Anybody interested ?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7926

Best

-- 

Andrija Panić

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

[Andrija Panic]

With KVM - I understand that there are 2 steps in general. 1) libvirts save
 - which saves memory of running VM to a file 2) qemu-img to snapshot
disks...

AS for the KVM VM snapshoting - my understanding is that the code is not
implemented at all, right ?

On 8 December 2014 at 12:11, Vadim Kimlaychuk 
wrote:

> CS does not support memory snapshots for XenServer. Disk snapshots are
> working. Not sure about VmWare, but I guess it should be the same. I
> thought the reachest feature-set is developed for KVM. But if it does not
> support memory snapshots - I wonder wich hypervisor does it ? This option
> at user interface exists, but I didn't see it worked.
>
> Vadim.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 12:51 PM
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)
>
> Hi guys,
>
> still wondering is there any interest into imlementing the VM snapshoot
> for KVM ?
>
> We desperately need it, so will try to contribute anyway we can (not me
> obviosuly, not a developer, but my colegues will).
>
> Can you give some guidance on this subject - I'm aware of the design
> documents here
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots but
> any more input would be very much appriciated.
>
> I understand, that VMware/Xen natively support this, and that it might
> have bigger user-base for Xen VS KVM - but this is one of the major KVM
> missing features...
>
> Any input greatly appreciated...
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>



-- 

Andrija Panić

RE: Load Balancing Cloudstack Management Servers

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Glenn

Assuming you are going to use the same Load Balancers for inbound access to the 
GUI by your customers, and you are going to put the SSL Cert on the LBs, then 
you need to load balance 443 which maps to 8080 on the Management Servers.

If the same LBs are also handling the traffic from the System VMs (they 
normally do) then you need to load balance 8250.

If you need to have the 'un-authenticated api port' enabled for say use with 
Cloud Portal Business Manager and you want to pass this traffic through your 
load balancers, then ensure it is only accessible from a private internal 
network, and NEVER expose to the public internet etc.

Regarding NFS, yes, if using multiple Management Servers, they should just be 
Management Servers and not providing any other services etc

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Glenn Wagner [mailto:gl...@blackeye.co.za]
Sent: 08 December 2014 10:53
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Load Balancing Cloudstack Management Servers

Good day,

When trying to load balance two Cloudstack Management servers which ports 
should be exposed so that the management function will still work


port 8080/443
port 8250
port 8096

Second question , just a confirmation if using two CS management server
, a separate NFS server should be used.

Thanks
Glenn Wagner






Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: Load Balancing Cloudstack Management Servers

[Andrija Panic]

shapeblue slides on ports:
http://image.slidesharecdn.com/cloudstacknetworking-shapebluetechnicaldeepdive-130705132746-phpapp01/95/cloud-stack-networking-shapeblue-technical-deep-dive-60-638.jpg?cb=1373048954
8250/9090 = loadbalnced internaly only for client access
8080/8096/443 - loadbalanced externaly for public access - but remove the
8080 really...

NFS location - is your preference - preferably NOT on the mgmt nodes, but
can be anywhere really.

On 8 December 2014 at 11:52, Glenn Wagner  wrote:

> Good day,
>
> When trying to load balance two Cloudstack Management servers which ports
> should be exposed so that the management function will still work
>
>
> port 8080/443
> port 8250
> port 8096
>
> Second question , just a confirmation if using two CS management server ,
> a separate NFS server should be used.
>
> Thanks
> Glenn Wagner
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

Andrija Panić

RE: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

[Vadim Kimlaychuk]

CS does not support memory snapshots for XenServer. Disk snapshots are working. 
Not sure about VmWare, but I guess it should be the same. I thought the 
reachest feature-set is developed for KVM. But if it does not support memory 
snapshots - I wonder wich hypervisor does it ? This option at user interface 
exists, but I didn't see it worked.

Vadim.


-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 12:51 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

Hi guys,

still wondering is there any interest into imlementing the VM snapshoot for KVM 
?

We desperately need it, so will try to contribute anyway we can (not me 
obviosuly, not a developer, but my colegues will).

Can you give some guidance on this subject - I'm aware of the design documents 
here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots but 
any more input would be very much appriciated.

I understand, that VMware/Xen natively support this, and that it might have 
bigger user-base for Xen VS KVM - but this is one of the major KVM missing 
features...

Any input greatly appreciated...

-- 

Andrija Panić

Load Balancing Cloudstack Management Servers

[Glenn Wagner]

Good day,

When trying to load balance two Cloudstack Management servers which 
ports should be exposed so that the management function will still work



port 8080/443
port 8250
port 8096

Second question , just a confirmation if using two CS management server 
, a separate NFS server should be used.


Thanks
Glenn Wagner

KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

[Andrija Panic]

Hi guys,

still wondering is there any interest into imlementing the VM snapshoot for
KVM ?

We desperately need it, so will try to contribute anyway we can (not me
obviosuly, not a developer, but my colegues will).

Can you give some guidance on this subject - I'm aware of the design
documents here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots but any
more input would be very much appriciated.

I understand, that VMware/Xen natively support this, and that it might have
bigger user-base for Xen VS KVM - but this is one of the major KVM missing
features...

Any input greatly appreciated...

-- 

Andrija Panić

Re: System VMs not starting

[Abhinandan Prateek]

Another issue is that the system vm templates should be seeded on secondary not 
on primary.

Looks like you have created the network on Xenserver for each traffic type.
Cloudstack is again trying to setup the networks. google the error you will 
find some leads to debug it.


Abhinandan Prateek

M +919701199011
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com




> On 08-Dec-2014, at 3:50 pm, Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour) 
>  wrote:
>
> Thanks Abhi,  Can you please be more specific about what is bad about it?
> My primary storage NFS is on a separate segment from my Xen management
> network.  In order to reach the storage NFS I create an external network on
> the Xenserver and assign an IP on that segment (vlan11).  Is this not
> supported?
>
> On 8 December 2014 at 10:10, Abhinandan Prateek <
> abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
>> The error is due to bad storage network on your Xenserver, give it another
>> check.
>>
>> -abhi
>>
>> M +919701199011 | abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com> abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com>
>>
>>
>> On 08-Dec-2014, at 3:18 pm, Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour) <
>> wvanderw...@redarmour.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have a simple lab setup:
>> 1 x CSMS v4.4.1 and 1 X Xen v6.2.
>>
>> ccsm01 (10.10.0.16)
>> cXen01 (10.10.0.14-mgmt, 10.10.1.14 storage).
>>
>> Xenserver network:
>> nic0: management (vlan 10 access port)
>> nic1: vlan interfaces vlans 2 (public), 11(storage), 12(guest)
>>
>> I followed the guide for Xen server system VM templates and they are
>> populated on the primary storage NFS (10.10.1.2:/csprimary).
>>
>> Attached is an output of:
>> grep -i -E 'exception|unable|fail|invalid|leak|warn|error'
>> /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log
>>
>> This entry makes me think that my network setup is incorrect:
>> 2014-12-08 09:41:00,204 WARN  [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
>> (DirectAgent-113:ctx-1b7ca6b6) Catch Exception: class
>> com.xensource.xenapi.Types$PifIsVlan due to You tried to create a VLAN on
>> top of another VLAN - use the underlying physical PIF/bond instead
>>
>> Any help would be much appreciated.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Wikus
>>
>> 
>>
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
>> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>> CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment framework
>> CloudStack Consulting
>> CloudStack Software Engineering<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
>> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd

Re: System VMs not starting

[Andrija Panic]

Please use:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
to troubleshoot SSVM connectivity...

On 8 December 2014 at 11:20, Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour) <
wvanderw...@redarmour.co.uk> wrote:

> Thanks Abhi,  Can you please be more specific about what is bad about it?
> My primary storage NFS is on a separate segment from my Xen management
> network.  In order to reach the storage NFS I create an external network on
> the Xenserver and assign an IP on that segment (vlan11).  Is this not
> supported?
>
> On 8 December 2014 at 10:10, Abhinandan Prateek <
> abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> > The error is due to bad storage network on your Xenserver, give it
> another
> > check.
> >
> > -abhi
> >
> > M +919701199011 | abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com > abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com>
> >
> >
> > On 08-Dec-2014, at 3:18 pm, Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour) <
> > wvanderw...@redarmour.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have a simple lab setup:
> > 1 x CSMS v4.4.1 and 1 X Xen v6.2.
> >
> > ccsm01 (10.10.0.16)
> > cXen01 (10.10.0.14-mgmt, 10.10.1.14 storage).
> >
> > Xenserver network:
> > nic0: management (vlan 10 access port)
> > nic1: vlan interfaces vlans 2 (public), 11(storage), 12(guest)
> >
> > I followed the guide for Xen server system VM templates and they are
> > populated on the primary storage NFS (10.10.1.2:/csprimary).
> >
> > Attached is an output of:
> > grep -i -E 'exception|unable|fail|invalid|leak|warn|error'
> > /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log
> >
> > This entry makes me think that my network setup is incorrect:
> > 2014-12-08 09:41:00,204 WARN  [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> > (DirectAgent-113:ctx-1b7ca6b6) Catch Exception: class
> > com.xensource.xenapi.Types$PifIsVlan due to You tried to create a VLAN on
> > top of another VLAN - use the underlying physical PIF/bond instead
> >
> > Any help would be much appreciated.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Wikus
> >
> > 
> >
> > Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> services
> >
> > IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> > http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> > CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment framework
> > CloudStack Consulting
> > CloudStack Software Engineering<
> > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> > CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> > CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >
> > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
> or
> > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
> the
> > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> > upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
> sender
> > if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> > company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is
> a
> > company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape
> Blue
> > Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> Brasil
> > and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd
> is
> > a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> > license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
> >
>



-- 

Andrija Panić

Re: System VMs not starting

[Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour)]

Thanks Abhi,  Can you please be more specific about what is bad about it?
My primary storage NFS is on a separate segment from my Xen management
network.  In order to reach the storage NFS I create an external network on
the Xenserver and assign an IP on that segment (vlan11).  Is this not
supported?

On 8 December 2014 at 10:10, Abhinandan Prateek <
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> The error is due to bad storage network on your Xenserver, give it another
> check.
>
> -abhi
>
> M +919701199011 | abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com>
>
>
> On 08-Dec-2014, at 3:18 pm, Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour) <
> wvanderw...@redarmour.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a simple lab setup:
> 1 x CSMS v4.4.1 and 1 X Xen v6.2.
>
> ccsm01 (10.10.0.16)
> cXen01 (10.10.0.14-mgmt, 10.10.1.14 storage).
>
> Xenserver network:
> nic0: management (vlan 10 access port)
> nic1: vlan interfaces vlans 2 (public), 11(storage), 12(guest)
>
> I followed the guide for Xen server system VM templates and they are
> populated on the primary storage NFS (10.10.1.2:/csprimary).
>
> Attached is an output of:
> grep -i -E 'exception|unable|fail|invalid|leak|warn|error'
> /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log
>
> This entry makes me think that my network setup is incorrect:
> 2014-12-08 09:41:00,204 WARN  [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> (DirectAgent-113:ctx-1b7ca6b6) Catch Exception: class
> com.xensource.xenapi.Types$PifIsVlan due to You tried to create a VLAN on
> top of another VLAN - use the underlying physical PIF/bond instead
>
> Any help would be much appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
> Wikus
>
> 
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>

Re: System VMs not starting

[Abhinandan Prateek]

The error is due to bad storage network on your Xenserver, give it another 
check.

-abhi

M +919701199011 | 
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com


On 08-Dec-2014, at 3:18 pm, Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour) 
mailto:wvanderw...@redarmour.co.uk>> wrote:

Hi All,

I have a simple lab setup:
1 x CSMS v4.4.1 and 1 X Xen v6.2.

ccsm01 (10.10.0.16)
cXen01 (10.10.0.14-mgmt, 10.10.1.14 storage).

Xenserver network:
nic0: management (vlan 10 access port)
nic1: vlan interfaces vlans 2 (public), 11(storage), 12(guest)

I followed the guide for Xen server system VM templates and they are populated 
on the primary storage NFS (10.10.1.2:/csprimary).

Attached is an output of:
grep -i -E 'exception|unable|fail|invalid|leak|warn|error' 
/var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log

This entry makes me think that my network setup is incorrect:
2014-12-08 09:41:00,204 WARN  [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] 
(DirectAgent-113:ctx-1b7ca6b6) Catch Exception: class 
com.xensource.xenapi.Types$PifIsVlan due to You tried to create a VLAN on top 
of another VLAN - use the underlying physical PIF/bond instead

Any help would be much appreciated.

Cheers,
Wikus



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

System VMs not starting

[Wikus van der Walt (RedArmour)]

Hi All,

I have a simple lab setup:
1 x CSMS v4.4.1 and 1 X Xen v6.2.

ccsm01 (10.10.0.16)
cXen01 (10.10.0.14-mgmt, 10.10.1.14 storage).

Xenserver network:
nic0: management (vlan 10 access port)
nic1: vlan interfaces vlans 2 (public), 11(storage), 12(guest)

I followed the guide for Xen server system VM templates and they are
populated on the primary storage NFS (10.10.1.2:/csprimary).

Attached is an output of:
grep -i -E 'exception|unable|fail|invalid|leak|warn|error'
/var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log

This entry makes me think that my network setup is incorrect:
*2014-12-08 09:41:00,204 WARN  [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-113:ctx-1b7ca6b6) Catch Exception: class
com.xensource.xenapi.Types$PifIsVlan due to You tried to create a VLAN on
top of another VLAN - use the underlying physical PIF/bond instead*

Any help would be much appreciated.

Cheers,
Wikus
2014-12-08 09:39:30,357 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl] 
(Work-Job-Executor-4:ctx-bb7dc62d job-4/job-2674 ctx-1c1671d3) VM state 
transitted from :Starting to Stopped with event: OperationFailedvm's original 
host id: null new host id: null host id before state transition: 1
2014-12-08 09:39:30,373 ERROR [c.c.v.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy] 
(Work-Job-Executor-4:ctx-bb7dc62d job-4/job-2674 ctx-1c1671d3) Invocation 
exception, caused by: com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: 
Unable to create a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-2-VM]Scope=interface 
com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
2014-12-08 09:39:30,374 INFO  [c.c.v.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy] 
(Work-Job-Executor-4:ctx-bb7dc62d job-4/job-2674 ctx-1c1671d3) Rethrow 
exception com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to 
create a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-2-VM]Scope=interface 
com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
2014-12-08 09:39:30,374 ERROR [c.c.v.VmWorkJobDispatcher] 
(Work-Job-Executor-4:ctx-bb7dc62d job-4/job-2674) Unable to complete AsyncJobVO 
{id:2674, userId: 1, accountId: 1, instanceType: null, instanceId: null, cmd: 
com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart, cmdInfo: 
rO0ABXNyABhjb20uY2xvdWQudm0uVm1Xb3JrU3RhcnR9cMGsvxz73gIAC0oABGRjSWRMAAZhdm9pZHN0ADBMY29tL2Nsb3VkL2RlcGxveS9EZXBsb3ltZW50UGxhbm5lciRFeGNsdWRlTGlzdDtMAAljbHVzdGVySWR0ABBMamF2YS9sYW5nL0xvbmc7TAAGaG9zdElkcQB-AAJMAAtqb3VybmFsTmFtZXQAEkxqYXZhL2xhbmcvU3RyaW5nO0wAEXBoeXNpY2FsTmV0d29ya0lkcQB-AAJMAAdwbGFubmVycQB-AANMAAVwb2RJZHEAfgACTAAGcG9vbElkcQB-AAJMAAlyYXdQYXJhbXN0AA9MamF2YS91dGlsL01hcDtMAA1yZXNlcnZhdGlvbklkcQB-AAN4cgATY29tLmNsb3VkLnZtLlZtV29ya5-ZtlbwJWdrAgAESgAJYWNjb3VudElkSgAGdXNlcklkSgAEdm1JZEwAC2hhbmRsZXJOYW1lcQB-AAN4cAABAAEAAnQAGVZpcnR1YWxNYWNoaW5lTWFuYWdlckltcGwAAHBwcHBwcHBwcHA,
 cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result: 
null, initMsid: 345052769882, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null, 
lastPolled: null, created: Mon Dec 08 09:39:28 GMT 2014}, job origin:4
com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a 
deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-2-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; 
id=1
2014-12-08 09:39:30,375 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] 
(Work-Job-Executor-4:ctx-bb7dc62d job-4/job-2674) Complete async job-2674, 
jobStatus: FAILED, resultCode: 0, result: 
rO0ABXNyABpqYXZhLmxhbmcuUnVudGltZUV4Y2VwdGlvbp5fBkcKNIPlAgAAeHIAE2phdmEubGFuZy5FeGNlcHRpb27Q_R8-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-AARMAAptZXRob2ROYW1lcQB-AAR4cHJ0ACBjb20uY2xvdWQudm0uVm1Xb3JrSm9iRGlzcGF0Y2hlcnQAGFZtV29ya0pvYkRpc3BhdGNoZXIuamF2YXQABnJ1bkpvYnNxAH4ACwAAAfd0AD9vcmcuYXBhY2hlLmNsb3Vkc3RhY2suZnJhbWV3b3JrLmpvYnMuaW1wbC5Bc3luY0pvYk1hbmFnZXJJbXBsJDV0ABhBc3luY0pvYk1hbmFnZXJJbXBsLmphdmF0AAxydW5JbkNvbnRleHRzcQB-AAsxdAA-b3JnLmFwYWNoZS5jbG91ZHN0YWNrLm1hbmFnZWQuY29udGV4dC5NYW5hZ2VkQ29udGV4dFJ1bm5hYmxlJDF0ABtNYW5hZ2VkQ29udGV4dFJ1bm5hYmxlLmphdmF0AANydW5zcQB-AAs4dABCb3JnLmFwYWNoZS5jbG91ZHN0YWNrLm1hbmFnZWQuY29udGV4dC5pbXBsLkRlZmF1bHRNYW5hZ2VkQ29udGV4dCQxdAAaRGVmYXVsdE1hbmFnZWRDb250ZXh0LmphdmF0AARjYWxsc3EAfgALZ3QAQG9yZy5hcGFjaGUuY2xvdWRzdGFjay5tYW5hZ2VkLmNvbnRleHQuaW1wbC5EZWZhdWx0TWFuYWdlZENvbnRleHRxAH4AGnQAD2NhbGxXaXRoQ29udGV4dHNxAH4ACwAAADVxAH4AHXEAfgAadAAOcnVuV2l0aENvbnRleHRzcQB-AAsudAA8b3JnLmFwYWNoZS5jbG91ZHN0YWNrLm1hbmFnZWQuY29udGV4dC5NYW5hZ2VkQ29udGV4dFJ1bm5hYmxlcQB-ABZxAH4AF3NxAH4ACwAAAcxxAH4AEXEAfgAScQB-ABdzcQB-AAsAAAHXdAAuamF2YS51dGlsLmNvbmN1cnJlbnQuRXhlY3V0b3JzJFJ1bm5hYmxlQWRhcHRlcnQADkV4ZWN1dG9ycy5qYXZhcQB-ABtzcQB-AAsAAAEGdAAfamF2YS51dGlsLmNvbmN1cnJlbnQuRnV0dXJlVGFz

RE: Strange instance boot issue

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Allesandro,

This is just a hunch, but could it be that Windows only uses its 1st CPU to 
handle the boot process.  If this is the case when you allocate 4vCPU @ 500Mhz 
it only has 500Mhz of CPU power to process the very intensive boot process, vs 
having 2000Mhz when you allocate a single vCPU @ 200MHz.

I believe it's always better to provide a faster single vCPU than multiple 
Slower vCPUs as there are overheads on the Guest OS and Hypervisor when dealing 
with multiple vCPUs.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Alessandro Caviglione [mailto:c.alessan...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 December 2014 02:20
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Strange instance boot issue

Ok... maybe I found the issue!!
Again... I'm learning CS in these month so you've to be patient with me! :) But 
this thing is strange...
I configure some Compute offering setting CPU speed to 500 MHz and changing 
vCPU number for each offer, all the offerings are with CPU CAP enabled.
Now, if I deploy a W2008R2 instance from a template or an ISO (yes
W2012 is working fine! :-/) with 4vCPU (4*500 MHz = 2 GHz) I get the issue... 
sloow boot time (about 15 mins).
If I deploy the same instance with 1 vCPU with 2000 MHz, the instance boot in 7 
sec!!
Why???

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Alessandro Caviglione < c.alessan...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> Hi guys,
> I'm sorry if I submit this problem, I honestly do not think it is a
> fault of CloudStack, but I do not know where to look anymore ...
> For several days (up to a week ago I did not have this problem) I have
> trouble creating templates and run instances.
> My infrastructure is composed of CS4.4.1 and 4 XenServer 6.2 hosts.
> I want to point out that the problem is not due to poor storage
> performance.
> When I create an instance from an ISO, the installation time is
> greatly increased.
> When restarting the instances, for example windows VMs, they remain in
> the boot about 30 minutes.
> The strange thing is that when instances are started, the performances
> are excellent!
> What's even more strange is that trying to install a new VM directly
> from XenServer, installation is fast and the boot issue when restart
> the VMs does not appear and also boot is very fast (about 20/30 sec.)
> In short, the problem seems to be only when the VMs are managed by
> CloudStack.
> I found this article and correct the BIOS of my server, even though I
> had never encountered this problem until a week ago. (
> http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX127395)
>
>
> Someone can give me some guidance?
>
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [DISCUSS] Any issues to be fixed for 4.3.1?

[France]

Hi Rohit,

Here are a few issues (without resolution). Maybe you can help get a fix in 
time for 4.3.2 release:

Snapshosts errors after upgrade 4.1.1 to 4.3.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8013

Failed to create a volume from snapshot:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8014

Virtual Router only with DHCP should not have DNS service
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4675

Excessive use of LVM snapshots on XenServer, that leads to snapshot failure and 
unnecessary disk usage.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6060

Possibly this one too:
Failed to create snapshot due to an internal error creating snapshot for volume 
372 -> Failure from sparse_dd: Fatal error: exception Invalid_argument("index 
out of bounds”):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8044?filter=-2

Some others, you have already back-ported. For that we thank you.

Thank you,
Regards,
F.


On 20 Nov 2014, at 10:15, Rohit Yadav  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was released and I 
> think we should at least support this branch with a 4.3.2 release in next 
> couple of weeks until a stable 4.5.0 is released in next couple of months.
> 
> I’m going through JIRA and list of issues and will help backport fixes to the 
> 4.3 branch. So, please share if you’ve found any blocker/critical/major issue 
> that you found in 4.3.0 or 4.3.1 and want to be fixed. Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> 
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
> 
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software 
> Engineering
> CloudStack Infrastructure 
> Support
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses

Re: Load Balancing in cloudstack

[Jayapal Reddy Uradi]

Hi Vadim,

What you are saying is Internal LB, it is there only in the VPC.

Thanks,
Jayapal
On 08-Dec-2014, at 12:52 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk 
 wrote:

> As far as I know -- network offer with LB is only available for VPC and you 
> must expicitly select it for specific subnet.  For shared network it is not 
> available.
> 
> Vadim.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 12:34 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Load Balancing in cloudstack
> 
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Tilak Raj Singh  wrote:
> 
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> I followed the quick install guide of installing cloudstack and setup 
>> a private cloud within my college..Now I created a VM in it and it was 
>> assigned an IP address of 172.31.101.250. I created another VM which 
>> has an ip address 172.31.101.248...now when I click NIC tabs of both 
>> the machines it shows the Network Name as "defaultGuestNetwork"...I 
>> wish to add load balancing to these two machine to share the load of a 
>> webservice I would be creating on these.
>> 
>> But the problem is when I click on View IP Address inside 
>> defaultguestNetwork it shows no IP addressesWhat wrong am I doing 
>> here..Can somebody please guide me???
>> 
>> 
> Are you using Basic networking?
> 
> --
> Erik