Re: SMSC's that work with kannel
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:46:36 +0330 "Mostafa Hadian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All > > I suggest that kannel technical team test and release a list of modems and SMSCs > which compatible with kannel, (not just brands) This is a tall order for any open source project. It is unreasonable to ask the developers (I'm guessing that's who you mean by "technical team") to test so many different modems and SMSCs (there are hundreds, if not more). They have already put in so much time developing a great product - don't burden them with requests that would only detract from the time spent developing. > or kannel users send their list and any special config parameters to kannel > mailing-list. > This is a much more reasonable request. Just my $0.02 - Dimitri -- Dimitri Aivaliotis EveryWare AG Birmensdorferstrasse 125 8003 Zurich tel: +41 (1) 466 60 00 fax: +41 (1) 466 60 10
Delivery reports: asked or not ?
My SMSC operator ask a fee for each delivery receipt I get. In the user guide I can read: "The value is a bit mask composed of: 1: Delivered to phone, 2: Non-Delivered to Phone, 4: Queued on SMSC, 8: Delivered to SMSC, 16: Non-Delivered to SMSC (...)" So, my question is: will my operator bill me the Delivery Reports upon setting the dlr-mask as 4+8+16 or it will bill me only upon any sum in which the 1bit or the 2bit is present ? This is very important to me because I cant' ask the operator about kannel and because I will receive the bill of my messages after 2 months and cannot do a debug check. Thanks Julien
Does kannel work as a proxy for WAP 2.0?
Hi, only a question: Does kannel work as a proxy for WAP 2.0? Thanks in advance. Davinia. _ Dale rienda suelta a tu tiempo libre. Encuentra mil ideas para exprimir tu ocio con MSN Entretenimiento. http://entretenimiento.msn.es/
RE: SMSC's that work with kannel
Title: RE: SMSC's that work with kannel Hi Thanks for quick reply, It seems that there is some missundrestanding - by technical team I don' mean Developers, there is other rule and people in a software projects rather than just programmers, I mean anybody who may concerned in such technical issues. do you use any modem or special SMSC ? you can post your information to list as a kannel user ;-) is it resonable or not ;-) Regards, Mostafa -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dimitri Aivaliotis Sent: Tue 9/21/2004 10:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SMSC's that work with kannel On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:46:36 +0330 "Mostafa Hadian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All > > I suggest that kannel technical team test and release a list of modems and SMSCs which compatible with kannel, (not just brands) This is a tall order for any open source project. It is unreasonable to ask the developers (I'm guessing that's who you mean by "technical team") to test so many different modems and SMSCs (there are hundreds, if not more). They have already put in so much time developing a great product - don't burden them with requests that would only detract from the time spent developing. > or kannel users send their list and any special config parameters to kannel mailing-list. > This is a much more reasonable request. Just my $0.02 - Dimitri -- Dimitri Aivaliotis EveryWare AG Birmensdorferstrasse 125 8003 Zurich tel: +41 (1) 466 60 00 fax: +41 (1) 466 60 10
Re: SMSC's that work with kannel
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 08:46:36AM +0330, Mostafa Hadian wrote: > >Hi All I suggest that kannel technical team test and release a list >of modems and SMSCs which compatible with kannel, (not just brands)or >kannel users send their list and any special config parameters to >kannel mailing-list. Mavecom Fastrack M1206: speed=115200 >init-string="AT+CMGF=0" AT2 mode. Regards- Mostafa Thanks Mostafa and good idea! I agree all kannel users should submit their successful config. In kannel src there is doc/examples/modems.conf Would this be a good place to keep that information? Having to submit changes as a patch may be difficult for many users actually but if the config is posted to the list others of us e.g. me maybe and others that are inclined could make the patch. So is this a good idea or would that overload that modems.conf file too much? I think it would be good. group = modems id = WavecomFastrackM1206 name = "Wavecom Fastrack M1206" # use with smsc = at2 #Mostafa? could you see what a good detect string might be? #I think in response to ATI command? #detect-string = "Wavecom Fastrack" #detect-string2 = "M1206" speed = 115200 init-string="AT+CMGF=0" # Mostafa Hadian Sep 21 2004 It would also be nice if we could link to that file from the kannel.org compatibility web page. http://www.kannel.org/compatibility.shtml#NokiaPremicell e.g. link to here: http://www.kannel.org/cgi-bin/lxr/source/gateway/doc/examples/modems.conf The userguide refers to modems.conf and lists the modems there. http://www.kannel.org/download/1.2.1/userguide-1.2.1/userguide.html#AEN848 SMS gateway configuration; SMS centers; GSM modem As it lists the modems we should keep that up to date too. There are other lists of linux compatible modems on the web http://www.physiol.usyd.edu.au/daved/linux/gsm-modem.html GSM Mobile Phones and Linux Anyway. Thoughts. James.
DLR and WaveCom
Hi all, waiting for a SMSC connection, my University is studing Kannel DLR. Can i test this with a WaveCom interface? Thanks, Nicola Provenzano
Modems compatibility
Title: Modems compatibility Hi Thanks James, I think users can post their information to list and share their experience, Hope Kannel Technical team consider a best place to keep them :-) Our Config # Fastrack Wavecom CMGF should be udh mode group = modems id = wavecom name = Wavecom #detect-string = "WAVECOM" detect-string = "Wavecom Fastrack" detect-string2 = "M1206" init-string="AT+CMGF=0" #GSM MODEM group = smsc smsc-id = modem smsc = at2 modemtype = wavecom device = /dev/ttyS0 speed = 115200 Cheers Mostafa -Original Message- From: James Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 9/21/2004 1:16 PM To: Mostafa Hadian Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SMSC's that work with kannel On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 08:46:36AM +0330, Mostafa Hadian wrote: > > Hi All I suggest that kannel technical team test and release a list > of modems and SMSCs which compatible with kannel, (not just brands)or > kannel users send their list and any special config parameters to > kannel mailing-list. Mavecom Fastrack M1206: speed=115200 > init-string="AT+CMGF=0" AT2 mode. Regards- Mostafa Thanks Mostafa and good idea! I agree all kannel users should submit their successful config. In kannel src there is doc/examples/modems.conf Would this be a good place to keep that information? Having to submit changes as a patch may be difficult for many users actually but if the config is posted to the list others of us e.g. me maybe and others that are inclined could make the patch. So is this a good idea or would that overload that modems.conf file too much? I think it would be good. group = modems id = WavecomFastrackM1206 name = "Wavecom Fastrack M1206" # use with smsc = at2 #Mostafa? could you see what a good detect string might be? #I think in response to ATI command? #detect-string = "Wavecom Fastrack" #detect-string2 = "M1206" speed = 115200 init-string="AT+CMGF=0" # Mostafa Hadian Sep 21 2004 It would also be nice if we could link to that file from the kannel.org compatibility web page. http://www.kannel.org/compatibility.shtml#NokiaPremicell e.g. link to here: http://www.kannel.org/cgi-bin/lxr/source/gateway/doc/examples/modems.conf The userguide refers to modems.conf and lists the modems there. http://www.kannel.org/download/1.2.1/userguide-1.2.1/userguide.html#AEN848 SMS gateway configuration; SMS centers; GSM modem As it lists the modems we should keep that up to date too. There are other lists of linux compatible modems on the web http://www.physiol.usyd.edu.au/daved/linux/gsm-modem.html GSM Mobile Phones and Linux Anyway. Thoughts. James.
RE: Message Inbox full T68i
What you really want to do is have the phone deliver SMS messages to the TE (terminal equipment). You can change your CNMI settings in the init string to do what you want to achieve. CNMI settings tend to differ from phone to phone so look yours up in the Ericsson manual or somewhere on the internet. Cheers, Rene Kluwen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Carlson Sent: maandag 20 september 2004 13:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Message Inbox full T68i I am using a T68i as an SMSC and every few days it stops because its inbox is full, I have to manually clear them out and start again. Is there a setting in kannels conf file I can make to send them straight to the linux box without being stored in memory please?
Re: Bind TON / NPI
Hi, I am trying to configure Optus link here in australia, and optus have specified values for Bind NPI and TON which are different from default. The log details of interest are: 2004-09-22 13:23:50 [2619] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x8196c78 dump: 2004-09-22 13:23:50 [2619] [8] DEBUG: type_name: bind_receiver 2004-09-22 13:23:50 [2619] [8] DEBUG: command_id: 1 = 0x0001 2004-09-22 13:23:50 [2619] [8] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2004-09-22 13:23:50 [2619] [8] DEBUG: sequence_number: 2 = 0x0002 2004-09-22 13:23:50 [2619] [8] DEBUG: system_id: "" 2004-09-22 13:23:50 [2619] [8] DEBUG: password: "" 2004-09-22 13:23:50 [2619] [8] DEBUG: system_type: "smpp" 2004-09-22 13:23:50 [2619] [8] DEBUG: interface_version: 52 = 0x0034 2004-09-22 13:23:50 [2619] [8] DEBUG: addr_ton: 0 = 0x 2004-09-22 13:23:50 [2619] [8] DEBUG: addr_npi: 0 = 0x 2004-09-22 13:23:50 [2619] [8] DEBUG: address_range: NULL Notice the: 2004-09-22 13:23:50 [2619] [8] DEBUG: addr_ton: 0 = 0x 2004-09-22 13:23:50 [2619] [8] DEBUG: addr_npi: 0 = 0x But optus specifies the following: Bind TON: 0 Bind NPI: 4 How can I configure this in kannel 1.3.2, or is it not possible. Thanks Jason
wap push - 202 accepted always?
Seems like WAP push (at least in 1.3.2. and I see no changes in CVS ChangeLog) interface returns "202 Accepted" even if it really does not accept the message.. 2004-09-21 17:36:37 [18052] [11] DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. 2004-09-21 17:36:37 [18055] [14] INFO: PPG: Accept request from <127.0.0.1> 2004-09-21 17:36:37 [18055] [14] DEBUG: PPG: http_read_thread: pap multipart accepted 2004-09-21 17:36:37 [18055] [14] DEBUG: PPG: send_bad_message_response: telling pi 2004-09-21 17:36:37 [18055] [14] DEBUG: HTTP: Resetting HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. 2004-09-21 17:36:37 [18055] [14] WARNING: PPG: pap control entity erroneous, the request unacceptable 2004-09-21 17:36:37 [18051] [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient area 0x81e31c0. 2004-09-21 17:36:37 [18051] [10] DEBUG: HTTP: Destroying HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. Is this intentional? (yes, I know that the error is written to reply XML) -- &Kalle Marjola ::: Development ::: Helsinki ::: Enpocket
