Re: Firewall methods for fedora25
On 11/26/16 09:31, Alex wrote: > We typically offer submission, simap/spop, smtp, http/https, ssh, and > domain services on our Internet servers. We also need snmp and nrpe > for monitoring. Except for "nrpe" (maybe known by a different name?) all of the services you mention can be selected in the firewalld-applet and can also be specified in the firewall-cmd command line interface. -- You're Welcome Zachary Quinto ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firewall methods for fedora25
Alex writes: We typically offer submission, simap/spop, smtp, http/https, ssh, and domain services on our Internet servers. We also need snmp and nrpe for monitoring. Does anyone have a set of reasonable firewalld rules and understand how it interacts with fail2ban that they could share? firewalld doesn't even include all these services by default, so it's necessary to do it one port at a time... firewalld just doesn't seem to be appropriate for anything more than a desktop. I'd appreciate any ideas on how you build a firewall for fedora servers, particularly as it relates to interoperating with fail2ban and standard Internet services. Well, you can simply start with the stock server firewall configuration. I don't recall, offhand, which ports it opens by default. Simply look at the default configuration, and make sure that all those ports are open. That's it. pgpCve3xLQ05p.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firewall methods for fedora25
I don't use fail2ban, so I can't vouch that these instructions work. That being said, a quick google search of "firewalld fail2ban" led me to the very first search result of: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fail2ban_with_FirewallD Do those instructions work? On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > I'm most familiar and comfortable with iptables, and use shorewall on > my firewalls. With fedora23, it appears the default has shifted to > firewalld. This has created a problem for me ever since, particularly > with trying to build a reasonable firewall on my mail servers, as well > as interacting with fail2ban. > > We typically offer submission, simap/spop, smtp, http/https, ssh, and > domain services on our Internet servers. We also need snmp and nrpe > for monitoring. > > Does anyone have a set of reasonable firewalld rules and understand > how it interacts with fail2ban that they could share? firewalld > doesn't even include all these services by default, so it's necessary > to do it one port at a time... > > firewalld just doesn't seem to be appropriate for anything more than a > desktop. I'd appreciate any ideas on how you build a firewall for > fedora servers, particularly as it relates to interoperating with > fail2ban and standard Internet services. > > Thanks, > Alex > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Down(up)grading from desktop to server
On 21/11/16 23:19, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/21/2016 09:00 PM, Robin Laing wrote: I have an old desktop that is being re-purposed to a file server. What is the best procedure with F25 coming out. Presently running F23. As a desktop, it was dual purpose but now will be just a file server. Is it better to just remove the extra packages manually before the upgrade or to remove some and upgrade the rest? It's not clear me what the difference is between these two options. They sound the same to me. I don't want to rebuild the whole system from scratch as I have a number of systems to do that to already. There is no need to remove the extra packages, but if you're concerned about them or want the disk space back, then I would remove them before doing the upgrade. Less packages to download and quicker upgrade time. If you just don't want the desktop login running or available, then you could change the default run target to multiuser instead of graphical. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org This machine is going to be just a file server for DLNA so doesn't meed many packages. Disk space is not an issue so I guess I will just upgrade over the next couple of days and see what happens. Know I have to get rid of rpmfusion nvidia driver due to issues. Thank you. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Firewall methods for fedora25
Hi, I'm most familiar and comfortable with iptables, and use shorewall on my firewalls. With fedora23, it appears the default has shifted to firewalld. This has created a problem for me ever since, particularly with trying to build a reasonable firewall on my mail servers, as well as interacting with fail2ban. We typically offer submission, simap/spop, smtp, http/https, ssh, and domain services on our Internet servers. We also need snmp and nrpe for monitoring. Does anyone have a set of reasonable firewalld rules and understand how it interacts with fail2ban that they could share? firewalld doesn't even include all these services by default, so it's necessary to do it one port at a time... firewalld just doesn't seem to be appropriate for anything more than a desktop. I'd appreciate any ideas on how you build a firewall for fedora servers, particularly as it relates to interoperating with fail2ban and standard Internet services. Thanks, Alex ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Redshift and Dropbox not quite working after F24-F25 upgrade
On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 14:21 -0500, Eric Griffith wrote: > Not sure about Dropbox, but RedShift is a known issue. Redshift's > model doesn't work under Wayland, the default session in F25. The > same idea as RedShift has been / is working on being integrated into > upstream Gnome and will work its way down to users in a future > update. It still works under X, however. > > You can go back to using X by logging out, and hitting the gear next > to the "login" button. From there, hit "Gnome on Xorg" and login. OK Thanks. Good information. > > Cheers! > Eric > > > On Nov 25, 2016, at 12:39, Matthew Saltzman > > wrote: > > > > I have two GNOME workstations upgraded from F24 to F25. Before the > > upgrade, Dropbox and Redshift were accessible from the little > > slide-out > > task bar at the lower left of the screen. Now, on one I see Dropbox > > but > > not Redshift and on the other, I don't have the slide-out drawer at > > all. According to GNOME Tweak-Tool, both apps are listed on the > > startup > > panel. > > > > So far, everything else seems to have gone smoothly. > > > > How to debug? TIA. > > -- > > Matthew Saltzman > > Clemson University Math Sciences > > mjs AT clemson DOT edu > > ___ > > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Google chrome gets deadlocked on F25
On 11/25/16 18:38, Paul Smith wrote: > Yes, Ed, I can now confirm that disabling gpu when calling Chrome > fizes the problem. > > My video hardware and drivers are below. OK I have no similar HW available to me to test. :-( -- You're Welcome Zachary Quinto ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Continuing dnf weirdness
On 11/25/2016 08:42 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: Can anyone explain this output? http://pastebin.com/1xtjpB5s I.e. why is dnf complaining about broken dependencies in libreoffice-gtk2 and libreoffice-x11 when neither package is installed or required by any of the updates being installed? I don't have F25 installed anywhere yet, but from something I've seen mentioned on one of the lists, dnf currently prints that message for weak dependencies. And libreoffice-x11 is a weak dependency of libreoffice-core. So this is not a problem and will be corrected soon. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Hdd not seen in bios after installing Fedora
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:44 AM, wrote: > So I am currently having this issues : my hdd is not listed in the bios > boot menu after installing Fedora in dual boot with Windows 10. To check if > all the partitions are ok, I used the Fedora live and everything seems ok. > It lists both windows and the freshly created Fedora partitions. Still, > when i reboot and get into BIOS the only boot option is the DVD. Is it > possible that the windows didn't shut down completely before installing > Fedora and now the hdd is still mounted somehow , hiding it from the bios > boot menu? Any ideas for making the hdd visible again? Is this a UEFI box or is it running classic BIOS? In my limited experience, classic BIOS will list all the detected devices if that box supports booting from that type of device. UEFI boxes (again, in my limited experience) will only offer to boot from a device if it has the appropriate filesystems/files on it. If you booted in classic BIOS mode to install Fedora, the installer would setup the bootloader accordingly. If you then switch back to UEFI mode and try to boot from the HDD, it won't work. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
High cpu usge and high io percentage
ext4-rsv-conver ?? In kernel source /fs/ext4/super.c we see /* * The maximum number of concurrent works can be high and * concurrency isn't really necessary. Limit it to 1. */ EXT4_SB(sb)->rsv_conversion_wq = alloc_workqueue("ext4-rsv-conversion", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_UNBOUND, 1); if (!EXT4_SB(sb)->rsv_conversion_wq) { printk(KERN_ERR "EXT4-fs: failed to create workqueue\n"); ret = -ENOMEM; goto failed_mount4; } However, there is no other reference to this symbol in the rest of the kernel source. Reason I am asking is that it is often shown using much cpu bandwidth, and much io percentage (/bin/iotop -d 3). ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Redshift and Dropbox not quite working after F24-F25 upgrade
Not sure about Dropbox, but RedShift is a known issue. Redshift's model doesn't work under Wayland, the default session in F25. The same idea as RedShift has been / is working on being integrated into upstream Gnome and will work its way down to users in a future update. It still works under X, however. You can go back to using X by logging out, and hitting the gear next to the "login" button. From there, hit "Gnome on Xorg" and login. Cheers! Eric > On Nov 25, 2016, at 12:39, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > I have two GNOME workstations upgraded from F24 to F25. Before the > upgrade, Dropbox and Redshift were accessible from the little slide-out > task bar at the lower left of the screen. Now, on one I see Dropbox but > not Redshift and on the other, I don't have the slide-out drawer at > all. According to GNOME Tweak-Tool, both apps are listed on the startup > panel. > > So far, everything else seems to have gone smoothly. > > How to debug? TIA. > -- > Matthew Saltzman > Clemson University Math Sciences > mjs AT clemson DOT edu > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: SELinux forces Fedora 25 upgrade into a reboot loop
Patrick O'Callaghan writes: On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 11:08 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Wondering if all upgrades with selinux enabled are broken, or just something > with this particular laptop. This doesn't look like a system-specific > failure to me, but if all upgrades with enforcing selinux blow up like this, > I would've expected a lot of noise in here, by now… More details in bug > 1398696. My system has been enforcing for at least the last 5 versions (possibly more), and I had no problem with this. What output do you get from: ls -alZd /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade On the one with the problem I get: drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 233472 Nov 25 10:31 /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade Now, another one of my laptops shows: drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root unconfined_u:object_r:rpm_var_lib_t:s0 221184 Nov 23 16:09 system-upgrade However that laptop was already running in permissive mode. Still, according to rpm: file /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade is not owned by any package After rmdir-ing and mkdir-ing /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade its selinux context is changed to unconfined_u:object_r:rpm_var_lib_t:s0, so I think that's where the problem was. Unclear how the former selinux context was what it was. pgpoHccMsScwd.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Redshift and Dropbox not quite working after F24-F25 upgrade
I have two GNOME workstations upgraded from F24 to F25. Before the upgrade, Dropbox and Redshift were accessible from the little slide-out task bar at the lower left of the screen. Now, on one I see Dropbox but not Redshift and on the other, I don't have the slide-out drawer at all. According to GNOME Tweak-Tool, both apps are listed on the startup panel. So far, everything else seems to have gone smoothly. How to debug? TIA. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
dbus spamming syslog
I've got zillions of these messages (f25): Nov 23 12:42:11 nbecker2 dbus-daemon[776]: [system] Connection ":1.28" is not allowed to add more match rules (increase limits in configuration file if required; max_match_rules_per_connection=2048) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Continuing dnf weirdness
Can anyone explain this output? http://pastebin.com/1xtjpB5s I.e. why is dnf complaining about broken dependencies in libreoffice-gtk2 and libreoffice-x11 when neither package is installed or required by any of the updates being installed? -- Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: SELinux forces Fedora 25 upgrade into a reboot loop
On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 11:08 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Wondering if all upgrades with selinux enabled are broken, or just something > with this particular laptop. This doesn't look like a system-specific > failure to me, but if all upgrades with enforcing selinux blow up like this, > I would've expected a lot of noise in here, by now… More details in bug > 1398696. My system has been enforcing for at least the last 5 versions (possibly more), and I had no problem with this. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: SELinux forces Fedora 25 upgrade into a reboot loop
On 25 November 2016 at 16:08, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > With selinux set to enforcing, my system-upgrade to 25 failed to start, > resulting in a reboot loop. I fished the following out of journalctl: > > Nov 25 09:51:55 thinkpenguin.email-scan.com audit[1]: AVC avc: denied { > open } for pid=1 comm="systemd" > path="/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/.dnf-system-upgrade" dev="dm-1" > ino=1181602 scontext=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 > > I had to drop to an emergency shell, and set selinux to permissive, in order > for the upgrade to do its thing. > > Wondering if all upgrades with selinux enabled are broken, or just something > with this particular laptop. This doesn't look like a system-specific > failure to me, but if all upgrades with enforcing selinux blow up like this, > I would've expected a lot of noise in here, by now… More details in bug > 1398696. > > For what it's worth my systems are always Enforcing ... two laptops upgraded (one in beta and one in RC) with no problem and a headless server at release with no problem There must be something off with your setup somehow ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
SELinux forces Fedora 25 upgrade into a reboot loop
With selinux set to enforcing, my system-upgrade to 25 failed to start, resulting in a reboot loop. I fished the following out of journalctl: Nov 25 09:51:55 thinkpenguin.email-scan.com audit[1]: AVC avc: denied { open } for pid=1 comm="systemd" path="/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/.dnf- system-upgrade" dev="dm-1" ino=1181602 scontext=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 I had to drop to an emergency shell, and set selinux to permissive, in order for the upgrade to do its thing. Wondering if all upgrades with selinux enabled are broken, or just something with this particular laptop. This doesn't look like a system-specific failure to me, but if all upgrades with enforcing selinux blow up like this, I would've expected a lot of noise in here, by now… More details in bug 1398696. pgp_PTYGvaAZN.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25-Atomic - Error creating Vagrant synced folder
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 03:46:46PM +0100, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > > Yes please. An issue at https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/ is probably the > > best place. > Created: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/181 Thanks! Since it's holidays in the US, it might be a little while before there's a response, but we definitely appreciate the report. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hdd not seen in bios after installing Fedora
So I am currently having this issues : my hdd is not listed in the bios boot menu after installing Fedora in dual boot with Windows 10. To check if all the partitions are ok, I used the Fedora live and everything seems ok. It lists both windows and the freshly created Fedora partitions. Still, when i reboot and get into BIOS the only boot option is the DVD. Is it possible that the windows didn't shut down completely before installing Fedora and now the hdd is still mounted somehow , hiding it from the bios boot menu? Any ideas for making the hdd visible again? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25-Atomic - Error creating Vagrant synced folder
2016-11-25 15:12 GMT+01:00 Matthew Miller : > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:09:16AM +0100, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: >> I'm launching a fedora/25-atomic-host with Vagrant but it fails to >> create the synced folder although the VM boots fine and I can ssh in >> it. I haven't done any customization, just launching the box like >> explained in the instructions to get Fedora 25 Atomic. >> Should I open a bug? > > Yes please. An issue at https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/ is probably the > best place. > Created: https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/181 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25-Atomic - Error creating Vagrant synced folder
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:09:16AM +0100, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > I'm launching a fedora/25-atomic-host with Vagrant but it fails to > create the synced folder although the VM boots fine and I can ssh in > it. I haven't done any customization, just launching the box like > explained in the instructions to get Fedora 25 Atomic. > Should I open a bug? Yes please. An issue at https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/ is probably the best place. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F25: XFCE won't start
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Marco Guazzone wrote: > Hello, > > I've installed F25 Workstation x64 from Live iso (GNOME window manager). > Now I want to run XFCE window manager. > > I installed it with: > >dnf groupinstall Xfce > > Then rebooted and tried to log in (by selecting XFCE from GDM). > But after clicking on the log in button, XFCE seems to have problems and > the screen immediately comes back to the GDM login. > > Any idea? > > It turns out that GDM doesn't like XFCE Indeed, after enabling lightdm in place of GDM: sudo systemctl enable lightdm --force XFCE can start. Best, Marco ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Umatrix Firefox Addon -
2016-11-25 12:54 GMT+01:00, Bob Goodwin : > On 11/25/16 05:23, Andras Simon wrote: >> FWIW Umatrix works here on F23 with Firefox 50. >> >> Andras > + > Strange, one more reason for me to go > back and try again. I certainly had a > problem I never saw before, doing > nothing out of the ordinary ... > > This is Fedora 25, began as the alpha > version, updated everyday since > initially installed, if that matters. I > have two more computers to upgrade to > F25, may try another one later today. Perhaps you should first see if umatrix works with FF50 in F24. Andras ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Umatrix Firefox Addon -
On 11/25/16 05:23, Andras Simon wrote: FWIW Umatrix works here on F23 with Firefox 50. Andras + Strange, one more reason for me to go back and try again. I certainly had a problem I never saw before, doing nothing out of the ordinary ... This is Fedora 25, began as the alpha version, updated everyday since initially installed, if that matters. I have two more computers to upgrade to F25, may try another one later today. Thanks, Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-25/64it LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Umatrix Firefox Addon -
On 11/25/16 03:49, Samuel Sieb wrote: That looks like a nice addon, I'll probably add it shortly. :-) If you got it from there, I don't see any reason it wouldn't work. I don't have FF50 yet so I can't test it myself. There are no open issues about that either. Was there any more info in the error message? + Sorry but that's all I have for now. I'll try FF05 again when I have time but for the moment I will just "# dnf upgrade --exclude=firefox" since FF49 works. Thanks, Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-25/64it LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Google chrome gets deadlocked on F25
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> It appears that by disabling gpu when calling Chrome, the problem is fixed: >> >> google-chrome-stable --disable-gpu >> >> I will confirm that later. > > Well, if that does fix your problem then the obvious follow-up question would > be. > What is your Video Hardware and drivers. Yes, Ed, I can now confirm that disabling gpu when calling Chrome fizes the problem. My video hardware and drivers are below. Thanks, Paul -- $ lspci -k | grep -A 2 VGA 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] RV710 [Radeon HD 4350/4550] Subsystem: Dell Device 904e Kernel driver in use: radeon $ $ grep driver /var/log/Xorg.0.log [64.635] X.Org XInput driver : 24.1 [65.083] (==) Matched ati as autoconfigured driver 0 [65.083] (==) Matched ati as autoconfigured driver 1 [65.083] (==) Matched modesetting as autoconfigured driver 2 [65.083] (==) Matched fbdev as autoconfigured driver 3 [65.083] (==) Matched vesa as autoconfigured driver 4 [65.083] (==) Assigned the driver to the xf86ConfigLayout [65.206] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so [65.247] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so [65.377] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/modesetting_drv.so [65.425] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/fbdev_drv.so [65.449] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.so [65.476] (II) FBDEV: driver for framebuffer: fbdev [65.476] (II) VESA: driver for VESA chipsets: vesa [65.730] (II) RADEON(0): [DRI2] DRI driver: r600 [65.730] (II) RADEON(0): [DRI2] VDPAU driver: r600 [71.825] ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 24.1 [71.825] (II) Using input driver 'evdev' for 'Power Button' [73.220] (II) Using input driver 'evdev' for 'Power Button' [73.221] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device. [73.222] (II) Using input driver 'evdev' for 'USB Optical Mouse' [73.224] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device. [73.225] (II) Using input driver 'evdev' for 'Dell Dell USB Entry Keyboard' [73.226] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device. [73.226] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device. [73.227] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device. [73.227] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device. [73.228] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device. [73.228] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device. [73.229] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device. [73.229] (II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device. $ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Umatrix Firefox Addon -
2016-11-25 1:47 GMT+01:00, Bob Goodwin : > Does anyone know why Firefox no longer > allows the umatrix addon, not since the > update to Firefox 50 two days ago. > Umatrix was removed and would not > install. I had to downgrade to Firefox > 49 and install a copy from the umatrix > web page to get it back again. FWIW Umatrix works here on F23 with Firefox 50. Andras ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
F25-Atomic - Error creating Vagrant synced folder
Hi, I'm launching a fedora/25-atomic-host with Vagrant but it fails to create the synced folder although the VM boots fine and I can ssh in it. I haven't done any customization, just launching the box like explained in the instructions to get Fedora 25 Atomic. Should I open a bug? This is the error: --- The following SSH command responded with a non-zero exit status. Vagrant assumes that this means the command failed! mkdir -p /vagrant Stdout from the command: Stderr from the command: mkdir: cannot create directory ‘/vagrant’: Operation not permitted --- Thanks. -- Juan Orti https://apuntesderootblog.wordpress.com/ GPG: 61F0 8272 6882 BCA6 3A35 88F6 B630 4B72 DEEB D08B ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
F25: XFCE won't start
Hello, I've installed F25 Workstation x64 from Live iso (GNOME window manager). Now I want to run XFCE window manager. I installed it with: dnf groupinstall Xfce Then rebooted and tried to log in (by selecting XFCE from GDM). But after clicking on the log in button, XFCE seems to have problems and the screen immediately comes back to the GDM login. Any idea? Thanks. Best, -- Marco ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Umatrix Firefox Addon -
On 11/25/2016 12:20 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: On 11/25/16 01:44, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/24/2016 10:34 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: My question is why has Mozilla decided not to allow it? In the past it has said an addon is not compatible with a new version, however in this case it just says Firefox will not install it implying something else ... Most likely it's not signed. Where did you get it from? I believe it was from: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/umatrix/ That looks like a nice addon, I'll probably add it shortly. :-) If you got it from there, I don't see any reason it wouldn't work. I don't have FF50 yet so I can't test it myself. There are no open issues about that either. Was there any more info in the error message? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Umatrix Firefox Addon -
On 11/25/16 01:44, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/24/2016 10:34 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: My question is why has Mozilla decided not to allow it? In the past it has said an addon is not compatible with a new version, however in this case it just says Firefox will not install it implying something else ... Most likely it's not signed. Where did you get it from? + I believe it was from: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/umatrix/ -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-25/64it LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org