Re: Replacing email list for users with a web forum software called Discourse, what's your opinion?
> I'm wondering how the people who regularly use fedora-users mailing > list feel about that. Which would you prefer? Unfortunately, it's an > either / or proposal, because there is no interface in Discourse for > emails from an email list to be put in their forums, though they do > have email notification for new web messages. Would you willingly or > reluctantly migrate to the new platform? Given the replies so far, my opinion is that this list should not switch to Discourse. As pointed out by others, another active and modern forum exists already: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/questions/ Personally, as I don't have any time to filter emails from fedora-users and fedora-devel, I'll use HyperKitty forum to post to this list and skim through topics when I have some spare time for it. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: PHP-FPM, PHP code in browser
Il giorno lun 8 ott 2018 alle 5:04, Benjamin Smith ha scritto: [...] I have apache/php-fpm running on an ubuntu vm. File layouts are different from fedora but enough is similar that this may help. Again, this is ubuntu... /etc/php/7.2/fpm/php.ini engine = On /etc/php/7.2/pool.d/www.conf listen = /run/php/php7.2-fpm.sock /etc/apache2/apache2.conf SetHandler "proxy:unix:/var/run/php/php7.2-fpm.sock|fcgi://localhost/" These three things are pretty straight forward. Enable the php-fpm engine, Specify where the php-fpm socket is to be created, Tell apache where to find the socket and how to access it On fedora these files may reside elsewhere. Use "locate" and "grep". On Fedora it's named differently. I use the following socket (with Caddy server): /run/php-fpm/www.sock ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: directories at the top ??
Il giorno mer 29 ago 2018 alle 7:12, ToddAndMargo ha scritto: Hi All, Fedora 28, x64 Xfce 4.12 I have noticed lately when opening and saving files, that my folders (directories) are mixed in with my files in alphabetical order. This annoys the snot out of me. Is there a way to tell them to put the folders at the top like it use to do? In Nautilus there's an option in the Preferences. Which file manager are you using in XFCE? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Split tunnelling
Il giorno mar 21 ago 2018 alle 11:46, Patrick O'Callaghan ha scritto: On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote: Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan ha scritto: > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling > is > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is > tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through > normal > channels. I've tried messing with network namespaces, which would seem > to be the way to go, but not managed to get everything lined up so > far. > All the howto's I've seen are for various flavours of Ubuntu. > > I guess I'm asking if anyone has already done the work and feels like > sharing it. > If you use NetworkManager, you can check the option "Use this connection only for resources on its network", in the IPv4 tab of the VPN settings. I do use NM, but I'm not seeing that option, at least under KDE. I'll look using Gnome just to be sure but it seems unlikely that they would be different. Strange... this option has been present for a long time. Did you install NetworkManager-openvpn package? Are you using Fedora 28? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZXOUFDJCHDLP4KAG5JY7XHUED543EOUK/
Re: Split tunnelling
Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan ha scritto: Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through normal channels. I've tried messing with network namespaces, which would seem to be the way to go, but not managed to get everything lined up so far. All the howto's I've seen are for various flavours of Ubuntu. I guess I'm asking if anyone has already done the work and feels like sharing it. If you use NetworkManager, you can check the option "Use this connection only for resources on its network", in the IPv4 tab of the VPN settings. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/T5HKZHNFBESQCFGIGVAD452WTDZ7M3PH/
Re: Touchpad right/middle click?
Il giorno mer 25 lug 2018 alle 6:44, Federico Bruni ha scritto: I can't make the 3-finger tap work on my laptop. When I play with it in GNOME touchpad test settings, I see always first a very quick "secondary clic", followed immediately by "central clic". In Nautilus and Firefox, it's always interpreted as a 2-finger tap. Perhaps it's a Wayland bug. I should check if it works in Xorg. I forgot that I was using Xorg. I switched to Wayland and everything works perfect: one-finger tap for the primary button, two-finger tap for the secondary button and three-finger tap for the middle clic. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6ARCH3FRRIEWWG667E2WPHIAQV67NSYL/
Re: Touchpad right/middle click?
Il giorno mar 24 lug 2018 alle 21:55, Christopher ha scritto: On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:26 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: If you go into the Gnome mouse configuration, do you have tap-to-click turned on for the touchpad? For right-click, are you trying to click on a certain spot or are you using two fingers? The multi-finger right and middle click work for me on the laptops I use. If you have it turned on and it still doesn't work, then file a bug on libinput and see what they suggest. The 2-finger tap for right-click seems to work if I turn that on, and for fun I checked 3-finger tap also... which apparently performs middle click. I can't make the 3-finger tap work on my laptop. When I play with it in GNOME touchpad test settings, I see always first a very quick "secondary clic", followed immediately by "central clic". In Nautilus and Firefox, it's always interpreted as a 2-finger tap. Perhaps it's a Wayland bug. I should check if it works in Xorg. > Also, on a whim, I ended up changing the "click-method" from the default of "fingers" to "areas" (the opposite of many blog posts I read said to do), which works with the regular button press using: gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.peripherals.touchpad click-method 'areas' Apparently, there's no UI for that setting... you just have to know to set it. *shrug* There is actually, but in GNOME Tweak Tool. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L7Q5NCV74BL2CPLZM2T4IEVEVBUBPNHZ/
Re: Touchpad right/middle click?
Il giorno mar 24 lug 2018 alle 12:26, Christopher ha scritto: I noticed today that F28 Gnome 3 doesn't seem to support right or middle click on my multi-touch area touchpad (standard Dell touchpad) on Wayland or Xorg. I've read that this is related to libinput, but for all the discussions I've found on various forums, I've yet to find a solution. Usually I use a mouse, so I haven't noticed before, but this is hugely inconvenient not to have right or middle click. When did this break in Fedora? I know it used to work fine. Had anybody found a reliable solution to restore full touchpad functionality? I use regularly the touchpad right-click on my Dell XPS 13. (I don't think middle click is available on my touchpad) Fedora 28 Gnome 3 on Wayland. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U62LYX5UX27Q7KJVMLQQY4GA3SPQ7V3C/
Re: GNOME shell / login crash
Il giorno gio 14 giu 2018 alle 8:34, andrea via users ha scritto: On 14/06/18 05:27, Federico Bruni wrote: I haven't followed all the thread... Have you tried GNOME Classic? I guess I'm having the same problem on Fedora 28, but I didn't have the time to debug it yet so I switched to GNOME Classic, which works fine. When you say "same problem" and "works fine": is your problem 100% reproducible? Difficult to tell if it works or not as the problem seems to appear only after hours from the boot. Ok, then it's different. And I did read that GNOME improved garbage collection in javascript... If you have 100% login crash, it is probably something else. Which one are you? The first time I upgraded to Fedora 28, about 10 days ago, it crashed at login only at first try, not the second try. Recently it crashed 100% of times, so I changed to GNOME Classic, which works. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/D3KWARE2PDURJLVBTQ324OSJVUXDISAD/
Re: GNOME shell / login crash
Il giorno ven 8 giu 2018 alle 21:49, andrea via users ha scritto: On 03/06/18 16:40, andrea via users wrote: On 03/06/18 16:16, andrea via users wrote: On 31/05/18 19:27, Samuel Sieb wrote: Have you checked the journal to see if there's a message or stack trace about what happened? Here is it username connecting is "jackie" this is the only thing I can see between the login and logout Jun 03 16:10:27 bomba gnome-session[9922]: gnome-session-binary[9922]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file powerdevil.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binary Jun 03 16:10:27 bomba gnome-session-binary[9922]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file powerdevil.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binary Have performed a full reinstall of Fedora 28. Deleted (for some users) every single . file. After a few day it stated again. Have now reluctantly switched to KDE + SDDM. I haven't followed all the thread... Have you tried GNOME Classic? I guess I'm having the same problem on Fedora 28, but I didn't have the time to debug it yet so I switched to GNOME Classic, which works fine. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MJ2WFH7PJVQ4N3NSYDVLPPG5JMDML3KC/
Re: Reports of gcc8 vector-validation problems in F28
Il giorno lun 7 mag 2018 alle 13:28, John Pilkington ha scritto: On 07/05/18 12:14, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 10:40:39AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote: On 07/05/18 10:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 09:51:52AM +0100, John Pilkington wrote: The MythTV lists have had several reports of problems apparently arising from new (and improved) vector-validation in gcc8. Is there a temporary workaround? If you don't provide details (links to the reports, etc.), then it is impossible to tell anything. Jakub As I said, the bug-tracker is currently out of action. Here's the original report: http://lists.mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-commits/2018-May/117389.html If mythtv invoked UB, then you really just want to fix the UB, not look for workarounds. Jakub Agreed. But it seems unlikely that MythTV will be the only programme affected, and people who rely on packaged builds won't immediately have that option. I'm still on F26...and SL7 In fact, lilypond is another package affected: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568274 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2018-05/msg00081.html ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: troubles with lyluatex package in Fedora
I installed native TeX Live 2017 and now everything works fine. As it works also in Debian 9 with TeX Live 2016, it looks like a problem in some texlive Fedora package. I saw a tiny difference in the version of some packages between Debian and Fedora, for example luaotfload module. See my comment here: https://github.com/jperon/lyluatex/issues/180#issuecomment-381689254 Il giorno mar 3 apr 2018 alle 18:34, Federico Bruni ha scritto: Hi I hope there's some savvy TeX user here who can help me to debug this problem: https://github.com/jperon/lyluatex/issues/180 https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2018-03/msg00707.html I tried lyluatex using TexLive 2016 in a Debian container and it works fine. But for some reason it doesn't work on Fedora 27, which has also TexLive 2016. This was confirmed by another Fedora user (see above link to lilypond-user mailing list). I also tried upgrading TexLive to 2017¹ (in a container I use for testing), but then found another problem: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2018-03/msg00741.html It looks like I need a more recent version of TexLive 2017, containing these critical luatex fixes committed in June: http://git.preining.info/texlive/log/?h=branch2017 I'm Cc-ing spot, author of below copr repository. I was about to try to update his .spec file, but I see that the latest release of TexLive 2017 is dated 24th of May, while it seems I need a later version. Before investigating more, I'd like to know if someone is already working on it. Thanks in advance! Federico ¹ https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/spot/texlive/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
troubles with lyluatex package in Fedora
Hi I hope there's some savvy TeX user here who can help me to debug this problem: https://github.com/jperon/lyluatex/issues/180 https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2018-03/msg00707.html I tried lyluatex using TexLive 2016 in a Debian container and it works fine. But for some reason it doesn't work on Fedora 27, which has also TexLive 2016. This was confirmed by another Fedora user (see above link to lilypond-user mailing list). I also tried upgrading TexLive to 2017¹ (in a container I use for testing), but then found another problem: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2018-03/msg00741.html It looks like I need a more recent version of TexLive 2017, containing these critical luatex fixes committed in June: http://git.preining.info/texlive/log/?h=branch2017 I'm Cc-ing spot, author of below copr repository. I was about to try to update his .spec file, but I see that the latest release of TexLive 2017 is dated 24th of May, while it seems I need a later version. Before investigating more, I'd like to know if someone is already working on it. Thanks in advance! Federico ¹ https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/spot/texlive/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: cannot connect to a bluetooth speaker
Il giorno gio 22 mar 2018 alle 22:32, Federico Bruni ha scritto: Il giorno gio 22 mar 2018 alle 9:26, Federico Bruni ha scritto: Il giorno gio 22 mar 2018 alle 8:21, Federico Bruni ha scritto: Let me add that I've tried also bluetoothctl. I can pair it but after a few seconds it's disconnected: [bluetooth]# trust AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Changing AC:89:95:DA:52:5E trust succeeded [bluetooth]# pair AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Attempting to pair with AC:89:95:DA:52:5E [CHG] Device AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Connected: yes Failed to pair: org.bluez.Error.AuthenticationCanceled [CHG] Device AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Connected: no I've now searched this error and found a possible solution here: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=180165 It says that installing bluez-hid2hci would solve the problem. It was not installed on my system, so I'll give it a try when I'm back home. I'm doing some progress. Now the bluetooth connection is kept and the speaker appears in the Sound settings (see attached screenshot). But the speaker is mute. It might be some audio library missing or what? I tried `dnf search a2dp` and found only package sbc, which is already installed. Some problem with PulseAudio? I disabled pulseaudio respawning and added verbosity (pulseaudio -vv) and I got this interesting information: I: [pulseaudio] module-suspend-on-idle.c: Sink alsa_output.pci-_00_1b.0.analog-stereo idle for too long, suspending ... which brought me to the solution suggested here: https://askubuntu.com/questions/218444/sound-output-starts-delayed i.e. commenting load-module module-suspend-on-idle in /etc/pulse/default.pa Now I can play music on that speaker. Success :-) Sorry for this "solo thread", but I hope it can be helpful for others. Best Federico ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: cannot connect to a bluetooth speaker
Il giorno gio 22 mar 2018 alle 8:21, Federico Bruni ha scritto: Let me add that I've tried also bluetoothctl. I can pair it but after a few seconds it's disconnected: [bluetooth]# trust AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Changing AC:89:95:DA:52:5E trust succeeded [bluetooth]# pair AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Attempting to pair with AC:89:95:DA:52:5E [CHG] Device AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Connected: yes Failed to pair: org.bluez.Error.AuthenticationCanceled [CHG] Device AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Connected: no I've now searched this error and found a possible solution here: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=180165 It says that installing bluez-hid2hci would solve the problem. It was not installed on my system, so I'll give it a try when I'm back home. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: cannot connect to a bluetooth speaker
Let me add that I've tried also bluetoothctl. I can pair it but after a few seconds it's disconnected: [bluetooth]# trust AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Changing AC:89:95:DA:52:5E trust succeeded [bluetooth]# pair AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Attempting to pair with AC:89:95:DA:52:5E [CHG] Device AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Connected: yes Failed to pair: org.bluez.Error.AuthenticationCanceled [CHG] Device AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Connected: no ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
cannot connect to a bluetooth speaker
Hi all I've tried posting this message via the web interface yesterday, but I don't see it in the archives. So I'm sending it again by regular email. I have two speakers: $ hcitool scan Scanning ... AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Beoplay M5_27502524 00:12:6F:3F:BD:D5 Mu-so Qb BT 7047 I can connect via bluetooth to both using my Android phone. I can connect via bluetooth only to Mu-so using Fedora 27. If I try the bluetooth connection using GNOME setting, I don't get much information. I just see that it tries the connection and after a while it fails. On a terminal I get a timeout: $ bt-device -c AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Connecting to: AC:89:95:DA:52:5E Error: Timeout was reached Finally, journalctl seems to suggest that may be some kernel problem?!? Mar 22 07:36:45 fedora kernel: Bluetooth: hci0: last event is not cmd complete (0x0f) I found the same error message in this bug report, which is for Fedora 28 though: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514836#c15 Thanks in advance for any suggestion Federico PS The bluetooth service is running fine: $ systemctl status bluetooth * bluetooth.service - Bluetooth service Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/bluetooth.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Thu 2018-03-22 07:25:05 CET; 26min ago Docs: man:bluetoothd(8) Main PID: 759 (bluetoothd) Status: "Running" Tasks: 1 (limit: 4915) CGroup: /system.slice/bluetooth.service `-759 /usr/libexec/bluetooth/bluetoothd Mar 22 07:25:05 fedora systemd[1]: Starting Bluetooth service... Mar 22 07:25:05 fedora bluetoothd[759]: Bluetooth daemon 5.48 Mar 22 07:25:05 fedora bluetoothd[759]: Starting SDP server Mar 22 07:25:05 fedora systemd[1]: Started Bluetooth service. Mar 22 07:25:05 fedora bluetoothd[759]: Bluetooth management interface 1.14 initialized Mar 22 07:25:19 fedora bluetoothd[759]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.69 path=/MediaEndpoint/A2DPSource Mar 22 07:25:19 fedora bluetoothd[759]: Endpoint registered: sender=:1.69 path=/MediaEndpoint/A2DPSink Mar 22 07:42:45 fedora bluetoothd[759]: No cache for AC:89:95:DA:52:5E ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Top-posting & list guidelines
Il giorno gio 22 mar 2018 alle 0:47, Richard England <"pdx.limey"@gmail.com> ha scritto: On 03/21/2018 02:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Same in Evolution. In fact even the Gmail web client used to do this when properly configured, but Google seem to have broken it now. Same in Thunberbird. Same in Geary. (well, not in current master for me.. the project moved from Cmake to Meson recently and this is the most annoying regression, not fixed yet) Gmail used to have an extensione which allowed "selective reply", but they dropped it: https://www.lifewire.com/how-to-reply-quoting-only-highlighted-text-in-gmail-1172095 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org