Re: Externals within the same repository

2010-01-25 Thread Andy Levy
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:14, Asbjørn Sæbø  wrote:
>
> Assume the following situation: There is a repository  my_repo, structured 
> like this:
>
> my_repo
> my_repo/trunk
> my_repo/trunk/a
> my_repo/trunk/a/file.h
> my_repo/trunk/b
>
> where my_repo/trunk/b has an svn:external to import the contents of my_repo/a.
> That is, b will have the contents of a external-ed in.
>
> Is this valid and sound SVN?

Yes, just be careful to avoid any recursive externals - having an
external in a pointing at b, while having an external in b pointing at
a, would probably result in your WC filling all available disk space.
Last I knew, Subversion did not check for recursion in externals.


Re: Externals within the same repository

2010-01-25 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Asbjørn Sæbø!

> Assume the following situation: There is a repository  my_repo, structured 
> like this:

> my_repo
> my_repo/trunk
> my_repo/trunk/a
> my_repo/trunk/a/file.h
> my_repo/trunk/b

> where my_repo/trunk/b has an svn:external to import the contents of my_repo/a.
> That is, b will have the contents of a external-ed in.

> Is this valid and sound SVN?

I'm pretty sure file duplication is not valid in any development process, it's
not a question of versioning.
Ask yourself what REALLY you're trying to achieve. Other than creating a mess
that not reflect your workspace.


--
WBR,
 Andrey Repin (anrdae...@freemail.ru) 25.01.2010, <17:48>

Sorry for my terrible english...



RE: Externals within the same repository

2010-01-25 Thread Asbjørn Sæbø

> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:32:49 -0500
> Subject: Re: Externals within the same repository
> From: andy.l...@gmail.com
> To: gaff...@live.com
> CC: users@subversion.apache.org
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:14, Asbjørn Sæbø  wrote:
>>
>> Assume the following situation: There is a repository  my_repo, structured 
>> like this:
>>
>> my_repo
>> my_repo/trunk
>> my_repo/trunk/a
>> my_repo/trunk/a/file.h
>> my_repo/trunk/b
>>
>> where my_repo/trunk/b has an svn:external to import the contents of 
>> my_repo/a.
>> That is, b will have the contents of a external-ed in.
>>
>> Is this valid and sound SVN?
>
> Yes, just be careful to avoid any recursive externals - having an
> external in a pointing at b, while having an external in b pointing at
> a, would probably result in your WC filling all available disk space.
> Last I knew, Subversion did not check for recursion in externals.

OK.  But it does seem a bit weird, though.  When doing a fresh check out
of this, all these "internal externals" do show up as "merged" in the
check out log.

As TortoiseSVN presents it:
-
External C:\asa\my_repotrunk\a\file.h
Merged C:\asa\my_repotrunk\a\file.h


Since this was a clean check out, there should not really be any merging
going on, so this message seems a bit confusing.
Any comments?


Asbjørn

  
_
Keep your friends updated—even when you’re not signed in.
http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_5:092010