[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-28 Thread Braig, Eugene
Yes, the conferences in my own professional field that are most respected, that 
attract the greatest numbers of quality presenters, are of course those that 
publish abstracts/proceedings.  Even better are those with some kind of 
peer-review process for abstract submissions to be accepted prior to acceptance 
for presentation.  THAT's a research conference.  I'm not certain, however, 
that's the intent Penn and Stevens have for this smallish gathering.

Eugene


From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] on behalf of AJN 
[arthurjn...@verizon.net]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:55 PM
To: Braig, Eugene; vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

Dear Eugene,

   Sorry.  I did not intend to suggest you intended to mislead this
   newsgroup by suggesting that Rasch's anthology was a collection of
   essays (plural) from the Guitar Summit.  At least one other reader and
   I at first believed that from your message.  The Boccherini article on
   the guitar quintets in Rasch's anthology was apparently presented at
   the 2013 (not 2014) Guitar Summit.   Otherwise there were no other
   "Guitar Summit" papers in the anthology. I saw a list of papers for the
   2014 conference, but it has since been removed from the web site.

   As I noted at that time, the "owners" Penn and Stevens act as referees
   in selecting papers for the "research conference."  Since Penn and
   Stevens apparently are not interested in publishing the papers (or even
   abstracts) in some form (not even online), one cannot judge the "Guitar
   Summit" and the quality of their "research."  I lived for six months in
   a town on the Bodensee, and often visited Konstanz.  Like you,  I doubt
   nostalgia would be enough to draw me back for the Guitar
   Summit. (Better tourist goals are Meersburg, or the Zeppelins at
   Ludwigshafen!!  Or for a real "summit," Hohentwiel bei Singen-- three
   times I rode my bicycle 20 miles and climbed up there, I was so
   fascinated with the views. One could see for 50 miles--but no
   Boccherini guitar quintet was in view.)

   Heinrich Albert (1870-1950)?

   AJN



   On 06/27/14, Braig, Eugene wrote:

   Yes, I do not intend to mislead. I have been told the guitar article
   was presented by an attendee at the last Lake Konstanz meeting as
   posted to the Facebook group. As clearly stated, I have never attended
   in person and am not likely to do so any year soon.
   Best,
   Eugene
   -Original Message-
   From: [1]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [[2]mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of AJN
   Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:13 PM
   To: [3]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk; Braig, Eugene;
   [4]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   Eugene's information is misleading. _*Understanding Boccherini's
   Manuscripts*_ edited by prolific Dutch Musicologist (U of Utrecht,
   emeritus) Rudof Rasch contains only
   a single article on guitar, namely one about Boccherini's still
   problematic guitar quintets. The author writes "... some are not
   enthusiastic about [my] article whose punch line is that there is no
   documented evidence . . ." (Guitar Summit, 2013).
   This collection of essays probably drew inspiration from the Boccherini
   Conferences in Lucca, and the much ballyhooed forthcoming
   Boccherini critical collected edition. Editor Rasch, a recognized
   Boccherini authority, remarks that in his chapter overview "... the
   guitar quintets . . . will be mainly passed by." (page 2). Certainly
   the book is not from the "Guitar Summit" group from Konstanz. The
   owners of the conference are Gerhard Penn (Austrian) and Andreas
   Stevens (Swiss). Stevens has an on-line life and works study of
   Heinrich Albert (1870-1950)
   AJN
   ---
   
   n 06/27/14, Martyn Hodgson<[5]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
   Thank you for this Eugene. I wonder if he did really present a paper
   of the entire book (258 pages) - who knows?
   regards,
   Martyn
   __
   From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1][6]brai...@osu.edu>
   To: Vihuelalist <[2][7]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Thursday, 26 June 2014, 19:35
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   There is at least this that was presented at the last Lake Konstanz
   meeting:
   [1][3][8]http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Boccherinis-Manuscripts-Ru
   dol
   f-R
   asch/dp/1443856630
   Best,
   Eugene
   -Original Message-
   From: [2][4][9]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [mailto:[3][5][10]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Monica Hall
   Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:30 PM
   To: Martyn Hodgson
   Cc: Vihuelalist
   Subject: [V

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-27 Thread AJN
Dear Eugene,

   Sorry.  I did not intend to suggest you intended to mislead this
   newsgroup by suggesting that Rasch's anthology was a collection of
   essays (plural) from the Guitar Summit.  At least one other reader and
   I at first believed that from your message.  The Boccherini article on
   the guitar quintets in Rasch's anthology was apparently presented at
   the 2013 (not 2014) Guitar Summit.   Otherwise there were no other
   "Guitar Summit" papers in the anthology. I saw a list of papers for the
   2014 conference, but it has since been removed from the web site.

   As I noted at that time, the "owners" Penn and Stevens act as referees
   in selecting papers for the "research conference."  Since Penn and
   Stevens apparently are not interested in publishing the papers (or even
   abstracts) in some form (not even online), one cannot judge the "Guitar
   Summit" and the quality of their "research."  I lived for six months in
   a town on the Bodensee, and often visited Konstanz.  Like you,  I doubt
   nostalgia would be enough to draw me back for the Guitar
   Summit. (Better tourist goals are Meersburg, or the Zeppelins at
   Ludwigshafen!!  Or for a real "summit," Hohentwiel bei Singen-- three
   times I rode my bicycle 20 miles and climbed up there, I was so
   fascinated with the views. One could see for 50 miles--but no
   Boccherini guitar quintet was in view.)

   Heinrich Albert (1870-1950)?

   AJN



   On 06/27/14, Braig, Eugene wrote:

   Yes, I do not intend to mislead. I have been told the guitar article
   was presented by an attendee at the last Lake Konstanz meeting as
   posted to the Facebook group. As clearly stated, I have never attended
   in person and am not likely to do so any year soon.
   Best,
   Eugene
   -Original Message-
   From: [1]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [[2]mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of AJN
   Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:13 PM
   To: [3]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk; Braig, Eugene;
   [4]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   Eugene's information is misleading. _*Understanding Boccherini's
   Manuscripts*_ edited by prolific Dutch Musicologist (U of Utrecht,
   emeritus) Rudof Rasch contains only
   a single article on guitar, namely one about Boccherini's still
   problematic guitar quintets. The author writes "... some are not
   enthusiastic about [my] article whose punch line is that there is no
   documented evidence . . ." (Guitar Summit, 2013).
   This collection of essays probably drew inspiration from the Boccherini
   Conferences in Lucca, and the much ballyhooed forthcoming
   Boccherini critical collected edition. Editor Rasch, a recognized
   Boccherini authority, remarks that in his chapter overview "... the
   guitar quintets . . . will be mainly passed by." (page 2). Certainly
   the book is not from the "Guitar Summit" group from Konstanz. The
   owners of the conference are Gerhard Penn (Austrian) and Andreas
   Stevens (Swiss). Stevens has an on-line life and works study of
   Heinrich Albert (1870-1950)
   AJN
   ---
   
   n 06/27/14, Martyn Hodgson<[5]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
   Thank you for this Eugene. I wonder if he did really present a paper
   of the entire book (258 pages) - who knows?
   regards,
   Martyn
   __
   From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1][6]brai...@osu.edu>
   To: Vihuelalist <[2][7]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Thursday, 26 June 2014, 19:35
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   There is at least this that was presented at the last Lake Konstanz
   meeting:
   [1][3][8]http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Boccherinis-Manuscripts-Ru
   dol
   f-R
   asch/dp/1443856630
   Best,
   Eugene
   -Original Message-
   From: [2][4][9]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [mailto:[3][5][10]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Monica Hall
   Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:30 PM
   To: Martyn Hodgson
   Cc: Vihuelalist
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   I did actually ask if abstracts of the papers could be made available
   purely
   as a matter of ineterest - but got no response. Perhaps the organizers
   haven't got time - but really contributors should be asked to provide
   these
   preferably in advance as a matter of course There did seem to me to be
   an
   aura cronyism about the affair. .
   Monica
   - Original Message
   -[433][440][6][11]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index
   .htm
   l
   > 214. [434][441][7][12]http://www.avast.com/
   >
   > --
   >
   > References
   >
   > 1. mailto:[442][8][13]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   > 2. mailto:[443][9][14]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   > 3. m

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-27 Thread Braig, Eugene
Yes, I do not intend to mislead.  I have been told the guitar article was 
presented by an attendee at the last Lake Konstanz meeting as posted to the 
Facebook group.  As clearly stated, I have never attended in person and am not 
likely to do so any year soon.

Best,
Eugene


-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of 
AJN
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:13 PM
To: hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk; Braig, Eugene; vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

   Eugene's  information is misleading.  _*Understanding Boccherini's
   Manuscripts*_ edited by prolific Dutch Musicologist (U of Utrecht,
   emeritus) Rudof Rasch contains only
a single article on guitar, namely one about Boccherini's still
   problematic guitar quintets.  The author writes "... some are not
   enthusiastic about [my] article whose punch line is that there is no
   documented evidence . . ." (Guitar Summit, 2013).

   This collection of essays probably drew inspiration from the Boccherini
   Conferences in Lucca, and the much ballyhooed forthcoming
   Boccherini critical collected edition. Editor Rasch, a recognized
   Boccherini authority, remarks that in his chapter overview  "... the
   guitar quintets . . . will be mainly passed by."  (page 2). Certainly
   the book is not from the "Guitar Summit" group from Konstanz.  The
   owners of the conference are Gerhard Penn (Austrian) and Andreas
   Stevens (Swiss). Stevens has an on-line life and works study of
   Heinrich Albert (1870-1950)

   AJN
   ---
   


   n 06/27/14, Martyn Hodgson wrote:

   Thank you for this Eugene. I wonder if he did really present a paper
   of the entire book (258 pages) - who knows?
   regards,
   Martyn
   __
   From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1]brai...@osu.edu>
   To: Vihuelalist <[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Thursday, 26 June 2014, 19:35
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   There is at least this that was presented at the last Lake Konstanz
   meeting:
   [1][3]http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Boccherinis-Manuscripts-Rudol
   f-R
   asch/dp/1443856630
   Best,
   Eugene
   -Original Message-
   From: [2][4]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [mailto:[3][5]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Monica Hall
   Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:30 PM
   To: Martyn Hodgson
   Cc: Vihuelalist
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   I did actually ask if abstracts of the papers could be made available
   purely
   as a matter of ineterest - but got no response. Perhaps the organizers
   haven't got time - but really contributors should be asked to provide
   these
   preferably in advance as a matter of course There did seem to me to be
   an
   aura cronyism about the affair. .
   Monica
   - Original Message
   -[433][440][6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.htm
   l
   > 214. [434][441][7]http://www.avast.com/
   >
   > --
   >
   > References
   >
   > 1. mailto:[442][8]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   > 2. mailto:[443][9]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   > 3. mailto:[444][10]jel...@gmail.com
   > 4. mailto:[445][11]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   > 5. mailto:[446][12]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   > 6. mailto:[447][13]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   > 7. mailto:[448][14]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   > 8. mailto:[449][15]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   > 9. mailto:[450][16]brai...@osu.edu
   > 10. mailto:[451][17]vihu...@cs.dart

References

   1. mailto:brai...@osu.edu
   2. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   3. http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Boccherinis-Manuscripts-Rudolf-R
   4. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   5. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/
   7. http://www.avast.com/
   8. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   9. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  10. mailto:jel...@gmail.com
  11. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
  12. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  13. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  14. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
  15. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  16. mailto:brai...@osu.edu
  17. mailto:[451]vihu...@cs.dart


To get on or off this list see list information at 
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html






[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-27 Thread AJN
   Eugene's  information is misleading.  _*Understanding Boccherini's
   Manuscripts*_ edited by prolific Dutch Musicologist (U of Utrecht,
   emeritus) Rudof Rasch contains only
a single article on guitar, namely one about Boccherini's still
   problematic guitar quintets.  The author writes "... some are not
   enthusiastic about [my] article whose punch line is that there is no
   documented evidence . . ." (Guitar Summit, 2013).

   This collection of essays probably drew inspiration from the Boccherini
   Conferences in Lucca, and the much ballyhooed forthcoming
   Boccherini critical collected edition. Editor Rasch, a recognized
   Boccherini authority, remarks that in his chapter overview  "... the
   guitar quintets . . . will be mainly passed by."  (page 2). Certainly
   the book is not from the "Guitar Summit" group from Konstanz.  The
   owners of the conference are Gerhard Penn (Austrian) and Andreas
   Stevens (Swiss). Stevens has an on-line life and works study of
   Heinrich Albert (1870-1950)

   AJN
   ---
   


   n 06/27/14, Martyn Hodgson wrote:

   Thank you for this Eugene. I wonder if he did really present a paper
   of the entire book (258 pages) - who knows?
   regards,
   Martyn
   __
   From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1]brai...@osu.edu>
   To: Vihuelalist <[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Thursday, 26 June 2014, 19:35
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   There is at least this that was presented at the last Lake Konstanz
   meeting:
   [1][3]http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Boccherinis-Manuscripts-Rudol
   f-R
   asch/dp/1443856630
   Best,
   Eugene
   -Original Message-
   From: [2][4]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [mailto:[3][5]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Monica Hall
   Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:30 PM
   To: Martyn Hodgson
   Cc: Vihuelalist
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   I did actually ask if abstracts of the papers could be made available
   purely
   as a matter of ineterest - but got no response. Perhaps the organizers
   haven't got time - but really contributors should be asked to provide
   these
   preferably in advance as a matter of course There did seem to me to be
   an
   aura cronyism about the affair. .
   Monica
   - Original Message
   -[433][440][6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.htm
   l
   > 214. [434][441][7]http://www.avast.com/
   >
   > --
   >
   > References
   >
   > 1. mailto:[442][8]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   > 2. mailto:[443][9]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   > 3. mailto:[444][10]jel...@gmail.com
   > 4. mailto:[445][11]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   > 5. mailto:[446][12]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   > 6. mailto:[447][13]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   > 7. mailto:[448][14]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   > 8. mailto:[449][15]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   > 9. mailto:[450][16]brai...@osu.edu
   > 10. mailto:[451][17]vihu...@cs.dart

References

   1. mailto:brai...@osu.edu
   2. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   3. http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Boccherinis-Manuscripts-Rudolf-R
   4. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   5. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/
   7. http://www.avast.com/
   8. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   9. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  10. mailto:jel...@gmail.com
  11. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
  12. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  13. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  14. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
  15. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  16. mailto:brai...@osu.edu
  17. mailto:[451]vihu...@cs.dart


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-27 Thread Monica Hall


- Original Message - 
From: "Martyn Hodgson" 

To: "Monica Hall" ; "Braig, Eugene" 
Cc: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 5:03 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit



  Well, as we've just discussed -  up to a point.  This is why it's
  important to try and have wider informed comment (if not good peer
  review) of papers presented at conferences which, maybe, assert some
  pet thoery only very lightly, if at all, supported by historical
  evidence.  The point of all this is that such asserted views can
  sometimes become widely established by default - and then the very
  devil to shift.
  Martyn


If we lived in an ideal world this might happen.   But we don't and it 
doesn't.

Monica
__


  From: Monica Hall 
  To: "Braig, Eugene" 
  Cc: Vihuelalist 
  Sent: Friday, 27 June 2014, 15:38
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  How right you are.  The problem with historic performance practices is
  that
  most of what is written about them is nothing more than  speculation
  and
  conjecture.
  Unfortunately people are not willing to admit this and will fight to
  the
  death over things which will be forever unknown.
  Monica
  - Original Message -
  From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1]brai...@osu.edu>
  To: "Vihuelalist" <[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:31 PM
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  > An academic on the day job, I recognize flaws inherent in the
  peer-review
  > process, that randomly sampling the wrong set from a population of
  > potential reviewers can have substantial subjective impacts on
  whether or
  > not a thing comes to be published.  However, I do operate on both
  sides of
  > the process (more often as reviewer) and also recognize that it tends
  to
  > make contributions to any academic field generally stronger and more
  > defensible.  I suspect dealing with fish, ecology, and statistical
  > procedures better lends itself to a purer objectivity than dealing
  with
  > historic performance practices that have to depend upon a certain
  amount
  > of speculation and conjecture.
  >
  > Eugene
  >
  >
  >
  > -Original Message-
  > From: [3]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  [mailto:[4]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
  > Behalf Of Monica Hall
  > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:42 AM
  > To: Lex Eisenhardt
  > Cc: Vihuelalist
  > Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  >
  > To be honest - even if these articles are read by outside readers
  there is
  > no guarantee that they are gold standard.
  >
  > I do get asked to peer review things.  What happens is that you write
  your
  > comments and recommendations but the editor decides whether the
  article is
  > acceptable as it is or whether the writer should be asked to make any
  > changes.
  >
  > I have also had things I have written  myself peer reviewed and
  rejected
  > by people who didn't know what they were talking about!  (and
  subsequently
  > published by someone else)!
  >
  > At the end of the day - anyone can get a group of likeminded peole
  > together
  > for a conferance and call it what they like.  And with the internet
  > anyone
  > can publish whatever they like however bizarre it may be.
  >
  > It is really a matter of "caveat emptor".  You need to evaluate
  > everything
  > that you read and check all the information for yourself.  It goes
  > without
  > saying that you should never copy anyone  elses work without checking
  > sources and ensuring that it is  accurate.
  >
  > The problem today is that most people don't - a lot of what passes
  for
  > original research today is just a rehash of other peoples work -
  often
  > written so long ago as to be completely obsolete.
  >
  > As Pontius Pilate said "What is truth?".
  >
  > Monica
  >
  >
  > - Original Message -
  > From: "Lex Eisenhardt" <[5]eisenha...@planet.nl>
  > To: "Vihuelalist" <[6]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:01 PM
  > Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  >
  >
  >>
  >> As I understand it, the (9!) guitar related articles in Early Music
  41/4
  >> and
  >> 42/1 were all reviewed by outside readers.
  >>
  >> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
  >> Van: [7]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  [mailto:[8]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
  >> Martyn Hodgson
  >> Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 10:59
  >> Aan: Monica Hall; Braig, Eugene
  >> CC: Vihuelalist
  >> Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  >>
  >>
  >>  Well yes... th

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-27 Thread Monica Hall


- Original Message - 
From: "WALSH STUART" 

To: "Monica Hall" ; "Braig, Eugene" 
Cc: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 4:11 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit



On 27/06/2014 15:38, Monica Hall wrote:
How right you are.   The problem with historic performance practices is 
that most of what is written about them is nothing more than  speculation 
and conjecture.
Unfortunately people are not willing to admit this and will fight to the 
death over things which will be forever unknown.


I suspect you would fight to the death, Monica, to defend the utter and 
complete unknowability of certain Baroque guitar practices!




Stuart


Which ones?

Monica


- Original Message - From: "Braig, Eugene" 
To: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:31 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


An academic on the day job, I recognize flaws inherent in the 
peer-review

process, that randomly sampling the wrong set from a population of
potential reviewers can have substantial subjective impacts on whether 
or
not a thing comes to be published.  However, I do operate on both sides 
of

the process (more often as reviewer) and also recognize that it tends to
make contributions to any academic field generally stronger and more
defensible.  I suspect dealing with fish, ecology, and statistical
procedures better lends itself to a purer objectivity than dealing with
historic performance practices that have to depend upon a certain amount
of speculation and conjecture.

Eugene



-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
Behalf Of Monica Hall
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:42 AM
To: Lex Eisenhardt
Cc: Vihuelalist
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

To be honest - even if these articles are read by outside readers there 
is

no guarantee that they are gold standard.

I do get asked to peer review things.  What happens is that you write 
your
comments and recommendations but the editor decides whether the article 
is

acceptable as it is or whether the writer should be asked to make any
changes.

I have also had things I have written  myself peer reviewed and rejected
by people who didn't know what they were talking about!  (and 
subsequently

published by someone else)!

At the end of the day - anyone can get a group of likeminded peole
together
for a conferance and call it what they like.   And with the internet
anyone
can publish whatever they like however bizarre it may be.

It is really a matter of "caveat emptor".   You need to evaluate
everything
that you read and check all the information for yourself.   It goes
without
saying that you should never copy anyone  elses work without checking
sources and ensuring that it is  accurate.

The problem today is that most people don't - a lot of what passes for
original research today is just a rehash of other peoples work - often
written so long ago as to be completely obsolete.

As Pontius Pilate said "What is truth?".

Monica


- Original Message -
From: "Lex Eisenhardt" 
To: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:01 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit




As I understand it, the (9!) guitar related articles in Early Music 
41/4

and
42/1 were all reviewed by outside readers.

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] 
Namens

Martyn Hodgson
Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 10:59
Aan: Monica Hall; Braig, Eugene
CC: Vihuelalist
Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


  Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not disseminated 
by

  the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the problem
  (alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into 
generally

  accepted fact?
  Martyn
__

  From: Monica Hall 
  To: "Braig, Eugene" 
  Cc: Vihuelalist 
  Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake Konstanz
  meeting
  were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to discuss
  their
  interests.  No need for any peer reviewing or the like.
  Monica
  - Original Message -
  From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1]brai...@osu.edu>
  To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  > The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last 
note

  for
  > redirection.  Here it is again with the offending word deleted.
  >
  > E
  >
  >
  > -Original Message-
  > From: Braig, Eugene
  > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
  > To: Vihuela Dmth
  > Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  >
  > I think more people are reading more

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-27 Thread Martyn Hodgson
   Well, as we've just discussed -  up to a point.  This is why it's
   important to try and have wider informed comment (if not good peer
   review) of papers presented at conferences which, maybe, assert some
   pet thoery only very lightly, if at all, supported by historical
   evidence.  The point of all this is that such asserted views can
   sometimes become widely established by default - and then the very
   devil to shift.
   Martyn
 __

   From: Monica Hall 
   To: "Braig, Eugene" 
   Cc: Vihuelalist 
   Sent: Friday, 27 June 2014, 15:38
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   How right you are.  The problem with historic performance practices is
   that
   most of what is written about them is nothing more than  speculation
   and
   conjecture.
   Unfortunately people are not willing to admit this and will fight to
   the
   death over things which will be forever unknown.
   Monica
   - Original Message -
   From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1]brai...@osu.edu>
   To: "Vihuelalist" <[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:31 PM
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   > An academic on the day job, I recognize flaws inherent in the
   peer-review
   > process, that randomly sampling the wrong set from a population of
   > potential reviewers can have substantial subjective impacts on
   whether or
   > not a thing comes to be published.  However, I do operate on both
   sides of
   > the process (more often as reviewer) and also recognize that it tends
   to
   > make contributions to any academic field generally stronger and more
   > defensible.  I suspect dealing with fish, ecology, and statistical
   > procedures better lends itself to a purer objectivity than dealing
   with
   > historic performance practices that have to depend upon a certain
   amount
   > of speculation and conjecture.
   >
   > Eugene
   >
   >
   >
   > -Original Message-
   > From: [3]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [mailto:[4]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
   > Behalf Of Monica Hall
   > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:42 AM
   > To: Lex Eisenhardt
   > Cc: Vihuelalist
   > Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   >
   > To be honest - even if these articles are read by outside readers
   there is
   > no guarantee that they are gold standard.
   >
   > I do get asked to peer review things.  What happens is that you write
   your
   > comments and recommendations but the editor decides whether the
   article is
   > acceptable as it is or whether the writer should be asked to make any
   > changes.
   >
   > I have also had things I have written  myself peer reviewed and
   rejected
   > by people who didn't know what they were talking about!  (and
   subsequently
   > published by someone else)!
   >
   > At the end of the day - anyone can get a group of likeminded peole
   > together
   > for a conferance and call it what they like.  And with the internet
   > anyone
   > can publish whatever they like however bizarre it may be.
   >
   > It is really a matter of "caveat emptor".  You need to evaluate
   > everything
   > that you read and check all the information for yourself.  It goes
   > without
   > saying that you should never copy anyone  elses work without checking
   > sources and ensuring that it is  accurate.
   >
   > The problem today is that most people don't - a lot of what passes
   for
   > original research today is just a rehash of other peoples work -
   often
   > written so long ago as to be completely obsolete.
   >
   > As Pontius Pilate said "What is truth?".
   >
   > Monica
   >
   >
   > - Original Message -
   > From: "Lex Eisenhardt" <[5]eisenha...@planet.nl>
   > To: "Vihuelalist" <[6]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:01 PM
   > Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   >
   >
   >>
   >> As I understand it, the (9!) guitar related articles in Early Music
   41/4
   >> and
   >> 42/1 were all reviewed by outside readers.
   >>
   >> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
   >> Van: [7]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [mailto:[8]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
   >> Martyn Hodgson
   >> Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 10:59
   >> Aan: Monica Hall; Braig, Eugene
   >> CC: Vihuelalist
   >> Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   >>
   >>
   >>  Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not
   disseminated by
   >>  the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the problem
   >>  (alas too common) of mere speculation being transf

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-27 Thread WALSH STUART

On 27/06/2014 15:38, Monica Hall wrote:
How right you are.   The problem with historic performance practices 
is that most of what is written about them is nothing more than  
speculation and conjecture.
Unfortunately people are not willing to admit this and will fight to 
the death over things which will be forever unknown.


I suspect you would fight to the death, Monica, to defend the utter and 
complete unknowability of certain Baroque guitar practices!




Stuart


Monica

- Original Message - From: "Braig, Eugene" 
To: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:31 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


An academic on the day job, I recognize flaws inherent in the 
peer-review

process, that randomly sampling the wrong set from a population of
potential reviewers can have substantial subjective impacts on 
whether or
not a thing comes to be published.  However, I do operate on both 
sides of

the process (more often as reviewer) and also recognize that it tends to
make contributions to any academic field generally stronger and more
defensible.  I suspect dealing with fish, ecology, and statistical
procedures better lends itself to a purer objectivity than dealing with
historic performance practices that have to depend upon a certain amount
of speculation and conjecture.

Eugene



-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
Behalf Of Monica Hall
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:42 AM
To: Lex Eisenhardt
Cc: Vihuelalist
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

To be honest - even if these articles are read by outside readers 
there is

no guarantee that they are gold standard.

I do get asked to peer review things.  What happens is that you write 
your
comments and recommendations but the editor decides whether the 
article is

acceptable as it is or whether the writer should be asked to make any
changes.

I have also had things I have written  myself peer reviewed and rejected
by people who didn't know what they were talking about!  (and 
subsequently

published by someone else)!

At the end of the day - anyone can get a group of likeminded peole
together
for a conferance and call it what they like.   And with the internet
anyone
can publish whatever they like however bizarre it may be.

It is really a matter of "caveat emptor".   You need to evaluate
everything
that you read and check all the information for yourself.   It goes
without
saying that you should never copy anyone  elses work without checking
sources and ensuring that it is  accurate.

The problem today is that most people don't - a lot of what passes for
original research today is just a rehash of other peoples work - often
written so long ago as to be completely obsolete.

As Pontius Pilate said "What is truth?".

Monica


- Original Message -
From: "Lex Eisenhardt" 
To: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:01 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit




As I understand it, the (9!) guitar related articles in Early Music 
41/4

and
42/1 were all reviewed by outside readers.

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] 
Namens

Martyn Hodgson
Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 10:59
Aan: Monica Hall; Braig, Eugene
CC: Vihuelalist
Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


  Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not 
disseminated by

  the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the problem
  (alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into 
generally

  accepted fact?
  Martyn
__

  From: Monica Hall 
  To: "Braig, Eugene" 
  Cc: Vihuelalist 
  Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake Konstanz
  meeting
  were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to discuss
  their
  interests.  No need for any peer reviewing or the like.
  Monica
  - Original Message -
  From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1]brai...@osu.edu>
  To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  > The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last 
note

  for
  > redirection.  Here it is again with the offending word deleted.
  >
  > E
  >
  >
  > -Original Message-
  > From: Braig, Eugene
  > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
  > To: Vihuela Dmth
  > Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  >
  > I think more people are reading more into this thing than they
  should.
  > While many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar Research
  > Meeting operated independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.  You 
can

  see a
  > concise summary of what the Lak

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-27 Thread Braig, Eugene
Indeed.

Eugene


-Original Message-
From: Monica Hall [mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk] 
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:38 AM
To: Braig, Eugene
Cc: Vihuelalist
Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

How right you are.   The problem with historic performance practices is that 
most of what is written about them is nothing more than  speculation and 
conjecture.
Unfortunately people are not willing to admit this and will fight to the death 
over things which will be forever unknown.

Monica

- Original Message -
From: "Braig, Eugene" 
To: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:31 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


> An academic on the day job, I recognize flaws inherent in the peer-review
> process, that randomly sampling the wrong set from a population of
> potential reviewers can have substantial subjective impacts on whether or
> not a thing comes to be published.  However, I do operate on both sides of
> the process (more often as reviewer) and also recognize that it tends to
> make contributions to any academic field generally stronger and more
> defensible.  I suspect dealing with fish, ecology, and statistical
> procedures better lends itself to a purer objectivity than dealing with
> historic performance practices that have to depend upon a certain amount
> of speculation and conjecture.
>
> Eugene
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
> Behalf Of Monica Hall
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:42 AM
> To: Lex Eisenhardt
> Cc: Vihuelalist
> Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>
> To be honest - even if these articles are read by outside readers there is
> no guarantee that they are gold standard.
>
> I do get asked to peer review things.  What happens is that you write your
> comments and recommendations but the editor decides whether the article is
> acceptable as it is or whether the writer should be asked to make any
> changes.
>
> I have also had things I have written  myself peer reviewed and rejected
> by people who didn't know what they were talking about!  (and subsequently
> published by someone else)!
>
> At the end of the day - anyone can get a group of likeminded peole
> together
> for a conferance and call it what they like.   And with the internet
> anyone
> can publish whatever they like however bizarre it may be.
>
> It is really a matter of "caveat emptor".   You need to evaluate
> everything
> that you read and check all the information for yourself.   It goes
> without
> saying that you should never copy anyone  elses work without checking
> sources and ensuring that it is  accurate.
>
> The problem today is that most people don't - a lot of what passes for
> original research today is just a rehash of other peoples work - often
> written so long ago as to be completely obsolete.
>
> As Pontius Pilate said "What is truth?".
>
> Monica
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Lex Eisenhardt" 
> To: "Vihuelalist" 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:01 PM
> Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>
>
>>
>> As I understand it, the (9!) guitar related articles in Early Music 41/4
>> and
>> 42/1 were all reviewed by outside readers.
>>
>> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>> Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
>> Martyn Hodgson
>> Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 10:59
>> Aan: Monica Hall; Braig, Eugene
>> CC: Vihuelalist
>> Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>>
>>
>>   Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not disseminated by
>>   the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the problem
>>   (alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into generally
>>   accepted fact?
>>   Martyn
>> __
>>
>>   From: Monica Hall 
>>   To: "Braig, Eugene" 
>>   Cc: Vihuelalist 
>>   Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08
>>   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>>   That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake Konstanz
>>   meeting
>>   were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to discuss
>>   their
>>   interests.  No need for any peer reviewing or the like.
>>   Monica
>>   - Original Message -
>>   From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1]brai...@osu.edu>
>>   To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>>   Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
>>   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>>   > 

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-27 Thread Monica Hall
How right you are.   The problem with historic performance practices is that 
most of what is written about them is nothing more than  speculation and 
conjecture.
Unfortunately people are not willing to admit this and will fight to the 
death over things which will be forever unknown.


Monica

- Original Message - 
From: "Braig, Eugene" 

To: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:31 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit



An academic on the day job, I recognize flaws inherent in the peer-review
process, that randomly sampling the wrong set from a population of
potential reviewers can have substantial subjective impacts on whether or
not a thing comes to be published.  However, I do operate on both sides of
the process (more often as reviewer) and also recognize that it tends to
make contributions to any academic field generally stronger and more
defensible.  I suspect dealing with fish, ecology, and statistical
procedures better lends itself to a purer objectivity than dealing with
historic performance practices that have to depend upon a certain amount
of speculation and conjecture.

Eugene



-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
Behalf Of Monica Hall
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:42 AM
To: Lex Eisenhardt
Cc: Vihuelalist
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

To be honest - even if these articles are read by outside readers there is
no guarantee that they are gold standard.

I do get asked to peer review things.  What happens is that you write your
comments and recommendations but the editor decides whether the article is
acceptable as it is or whether the writer should be asked to make any
changes.

I have also had things I have written  myself peer reviewed and rejected
by people who didn't know what they were talking about!  (and subsequently
published by someone else)!

At the end of the day - anyone can get a group of likeminded peole
together
for a conferance and call it what they like.   And with the internet
anyone
can publish whatever they like however bizarre it may be.

It is really a matter of "caveat emptor".   You need to evaluate
everything
that you read and check all the information for yourself.   It goes
without
saying that you should never copy anyone  elses work without checking
sources and ensuring that it is  accurate.

The problem today is that most people don't - a lot of what passes for
original research today is just a rehash of other peoples work - often
written so long ago as to be completely obsolete.

As Pontius Pilate said "What is truth?".

Monica


- Original Message -
From: "Lex Eisenhardt" 
To: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:01 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit




As I understand it, the (9!) guitar related articles in Early Music 41/4
and
42/1 were all reviewed by outside readers.

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
Martyn Hodgson
Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 10:59
Aan: Monica Hall; Braig, Eugene
CC: Vihuelalist
Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


  Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not disseminated by
  the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the problem
  (alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into generally
  accepted fact?
  Martyn
__

  From: Monica Hall 
  To: "Braig, Eugene" 
  Cc: Vihuelalist 
  Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake Konstanz
  meeting
  were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to discuss
  their
  interests.  No need for any peer reviewing or the like.
  Monica
  - Original Message -
  From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1]brai...@osu.edu>
  To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  > The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last note
  for
  > redirection.  Here it is again with the offending word deleted.
  >
  > E
  >
  >
  > -Original Message-
  > From: Braig, Eugene
  > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
  > To: Vihuela Dmth
  > Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  >
  > I think more people are reading more into this thing than they
  should.
  > While many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar Research
  > Meeting operated independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.  You can
  see a
  > concise summary of what the Lake Konstanz/Constance meeting is at the
  > bottom this GFA page: [3]http://www.guitarfoundation.org/?ArchForums
  . . . as
  > well as the organizers' own Facebook group:
  > [4]https://www.faceb

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-27 Thread Braig, Eugene
An academic on the day job, I recognize flaws inherent in the peer-review 
process, that randomly sampling the wrong set from a population of potential 
reviewers can have substantial subjective impacts on whether or not a thing 
comes to be published.  However, I do operate on both sides of the process 
(more often as reviewer) and also recognize that it tends to make contributions 
to any academic field generally stronger and more defensible.  I suspect 
dealing with fish, ecology, and statistical procedures better lends itself to a 
purer objectivity than dealing with historic performance practices that have to 
depend upon a certain amount of speculation and conjecture.

Eugene



-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of 
Monica Hall
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:42 AM
To: Lex Eisenhardt
Cc: Vihuelalist
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

To be honest - even if these articles are read by outside readers there is no 
guarantee that they are gold standard.

I do get asked to peer review things.  What happens is that you write your 
comments and recommendations but the editor decides whether the article is 
acceptable as it is or whether the writer should be asked to make any changes.

I have also had things I have written  myself peer reviewed and rejected by 
people who didn't know what they were talking about!  (and subsequently 
published by someone else)!

At the end of the day - anyone can get a group of likeminded peole together 
for a conferance and call it what they like.   And with the internet anyone 
can publish whatever they like however bizarre it may be.

It is really a matter of "caveat emptor".   You need to evaluate everything 
that you read and check all the information for yourself.   It goes without 
saying that you should never copy anyone  elses work without checking sources 
and ensuring that it is  accurate.

The problem today is that most people don't - a lot of what passes for original 
research today is just a rehash of other peoples work - often written so long 
ago as to be completely obsolete.

As Pontius Pilate said "What is truth?".

Monica


- Original Message -
From: "Lex Eisenhardt" 
To: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:01 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


>
> As I understand it, the (9!) guitar related articles in Early Music 41/4 
> and
> 42/1 were all reviewed by outside readers.
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
> Martyn Hodgson
> Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 10:59
> Aan: Monica Hall; Braig, Eugene
> CC: Vihuelalist
> Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>
>
>   Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not disseminated by
>   the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the problem
>   (alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into generally
>   accepted fact?
>   Martyn
> __
>
>   From: Monica Hall 
>   To: "Braig, Eugene" 
>   Cc: Vihuelalist 
>   Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08
>   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>   That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake Konstanz
>   meeting
>   were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to discuss
>   their
>   interests.  No need for any peer reviewing or the like.
>   Monica
>   - Original Message -----
>   From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1]brai...@osu.edu>
>   To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>   Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
>   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>   > The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last note
>   for
>   > redirection.  Here it is again with the offending word deleted.
>   >
>   > E
>   >
>   >
>   > -Original Message-
>   > From: Braig, Eugene
>   > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
>   > To: Vihuela Dmth
>   > Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>   >
>   > I think more people are reading more into this thing than they
>   should.
>   > While many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar Research
>   > Meeting operated independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.  You can
>   see a
>   > concise summary of what the Lake Konstanz/Constance meeting is at the
>   > bottom this GFA page: [3]http://www.guitarfoundation.org/?ArchForums
>   . . . as
>   > well as the organizers' own Facebook group:
>   > [4]https://www.facebook.com/groups/131072740286508/. I've never
>   managed to
>   > attend the Lake Konstanz meeting in person.
>   >
>   > T

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-27 Thread Monica Hall

Dear Lex and List

Well - O.U.P. - one of the most distinguished of academic publishers  of 
books about music - published Jim Tyler's book on the early guitar in 2002, 
I suspect without its being read, edited or proof read by anyone else.


With all due respect to Jim - may he rest in peace and rise in glory - it is 
riddled with errors.  Nevertheless it is the standard work of reference on 
the subject and will be for our lifetimes.


And then there is Groves... still flaunting Craig Russell's fictional 
biography of Santiago de Murcia...probably to the end of time...


Better not go on.   Plumber is currently ripping my house apart to replace 
toilet and I am dying to go...


Monica


- Original Message - 
From: "Lex Eisenhardt" 

To: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:23 AM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit



Good point for mr. Pilatus!

Nevertheless, the recent articles in EM generally seem well researched and
they are worthwhile reading.
I haven't read the book on Boccherini's manuscripts yet, but Cambridge
Scholars Publishing and the book editor (Rudof Rasch) have a very good
scholarly reputation.

Lex



-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
Monica Hall
Verzonden: vrijdag 27 juni 2014 9:42
Aan: Lex Eisenhardt
CC: Vihuelalist
Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

To be honest - even if these articles are read by outside readers there is
no guarantee that they are gold standard.

I do get asked to peer review things.  What happens is that you write your
comments and recommendations but the editor decides whether the article is
acceptable as it is or whether the writer should be asked to make any
changes.

I have also had things I have written  myself peer reviewed and rejected 
by

people who didn't know what they were talking about!  (and subsequently
published by someone else)!

At the end of the day - anyone can get a group of likeminded peole 
together
for a conferance and call it what they like.   And with the internet 
anyone

can publish whatever they like however bizarre it may be.

It is really a matter of "caveat emptor".   You need to evaluate 
everything
that you read and check all the information for yourself.   It goes 
without

saying that you should never copy anyone  elses work without checking
sources and ensuring that it is  accurate.

The problem today is that most people don't - a lot of what passes for
original research today is just a rehash of other peoples work - often
written so long ago as to be completely obsolete.

As Pontius Pilate said "What is truth?".

Monica


- Original Message -
From: "Lex Eisenhardt" 
To: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:01 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit




As I understand it, the (9!) guitar related articles in Early Music 41/4
and
42/1 were all reviewed by outside readers.

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
Martyn Hodgson
Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 10:59
Aan: Monica Hall; Braig, Eugene
CC: Vihuelalist
Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


  Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not disseminated by
  the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the problem
  (alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into generally
  accepted fact?
  Martyn
__

  From: Monica Hall 
  To: "Braig, Eugene" 
  Cc: Vihuelalist 
  Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake Konstanz
  meeting
  were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to discuss
  their
  interests.  No need for any peer reviewing or the like.
  Monica
  - Original Message -
  From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1]brai...@osu.edu>
  To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  > The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last note
  for
  > redirection.  Here it is again with the offending word deleted.
  >
  > E
  >
  >
  > -Original Message-
  > From: Braig, Eugene
  > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
  > To: Vihuela Dmth
  > Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  >
  > I think more people are reading more into this thing than they
  should.
  > While many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar Research
  > Meeting operated independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.  You can
  see a
  > concise summary of what the Lake Konstanz/Constance meeting is at the
  > bottom this GFA page: [3]http://www.guitarfoundation.org/?ArchForums
  . . . as
  > well as the organizers

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-27 Thread Lex Eisenhardt
Good point for mr. Pilatus!

Nevertheless, the recent articles in EM generally seem well researched and
they are worthwhile reading. 
I haven't read the book on Boccherini's manuscripts yet, but Cambridge
Scholars Publishing and the book editor (Rudof Rasch) have a very good
scholarly reputation.  

Lex



-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
Monica Hall
Verzonden: vrijdag 27 juni 2014 9:42
Aan: Lex Eisenhardt
CC: Vihuelalist
Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

To be honest - even if these articles are read by outside readers there is
no guarantee that they are gold standard.

I do get asked to peer review things.  What happens is that you write your
comments and recommendations but the editor decides whether the article is
acceptable as it is or whether the writer should be asked to make any
changes.

I have also had things I have written  myself peer reviewed and rejected by
people who didn't know what they were talking about!  (and subsequently
published by someone else)!

At the end of the day - anyone can get a group of likeminded peole together 
for a conferance and call it what they like.   And with the internet anyone 
can publish whatever they like however bizarre it may be.

It is really a matter of "caveat emptor".   You need to evaluate everything 
that you read and check all the information for yourself.   It goes without 
saying that you should never copy anyone  elses work without checking
sources and ensuring that it is  accurate.

The problem today is that most people don't - a lot of what passes for
original research today is just a rehash of other peoples work - often
written so long ago as to be completely obsolete.

As Pontius Pilate said "What is truth?".

Monica


- Original Message -
From: "Lex Eisenhardt" 
To: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:01 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


>
> As I understand it, the (9!) guitar related articles in Early Music 41/4 
> and
> 42/1 were all reviewed by outside readers.
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
> Martyn Hodgson
> Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 10:59
> Aan: Monica Hall; Braig, Eugene
> CC: Vihuelalist
> Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>
>
>   Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not disseminated by
>   the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the problem
>   (alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into generally
>   accepted fact?
>   Martyn
> __
>
>   From: Monica Hall 
>   To: "Braig, Eugene" 
>   Cc: Vihuelalist 
>   Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08
>   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>   That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake Konstanz
>   meeting
>   were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to discuss
>   their
>   interests.  No need for any peer reviewing or the like.
>   Monica
>   - Original Message -----
>   From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1]brai...@osu.edu>
>   To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>   Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
>   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>   > The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last note
>   for
>   > redirection.  Here it is again with the offending word deleted.
>   >
>   > E
>   >
>   >
>   > -Original Message-
>   > From: Braig, Eugene
>   > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
>   > To: Vihuela Dmth
>   > Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>   >
>   > I think more people are reading more into this thing than they
>   should.
>   > While many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar Research
>   > Meeting operated independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.  You can
>   see a
>   > concise summary of what the Lake Konstanz/Constance meeting is at the
>   > bottom this GFA page: [3]http://www.guitarfoundation.org/?ArchForums
>   . . . as
>   > well as the organizers' own Facebook group:
>   > [4]https://www.facebook.com/groups/131072740286508/. I've never
>   managed to
>   > attend the Lake Konstanz meeting in person.
>   >
>   > The "Guitar Summit" was a discussion forum (not unlike the present
>   suite
>   > of Dartmouth lute lists) that was hosted by Topica beginning in 2007.
>   > However, it went through earlier incarnations hosted by a couple
>   different
>   > online services (most notably as the "Classical Guitar History List")
>   that
>   > sl

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-27 Thread Monica Hall
To be honest - even if these articles are read by outside readers there is 
no guarantee that they are gold standard.


I do get asked to peer review things.  What happens is that you write your 
comments and recommendations but the editor decides whether the article is 
acceptable as it is or whether the writer should be asked to make any 
changes.


I have also had things I have written  myself peer reviewed and rejected by 
people who didn't know what they were talking about!  (and subsequently 
published by someone else)!


At the end of the day - anyone can get a group of likeminded peole together 
for a conferance and call it what they like.   And with the internet anyone 
can publish whatever they like however bizarre it may be.


It is really a matter of "caveat emptor".   You need to evaluate everything 
that you read and check all the information for yourself.   It goes without 
saying that you should never copy anyone  elses work without checking 
sources and ensuring that it is  accurate.


The problem today is that most people don't - a lot of what passes for 
original research today is just a rehash of other peoples work - often 
written so long ago as to be completely obsolete.


As Pontius Pilate said "What is truth?".

Monica


- Original Message - 
From: "Lex Eisenhardt" 

To: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 2:01 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit




As I understand it, the (9!) guitar related articles in Early Music 41/4 
and

42/1 were all reviewed by outside readers.

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
Martyn Hodgson
Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 10:59
Aan: Monica Hall; Braig, Eugene
CC: Vihuelalist
Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


  Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not disseminated by
  the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the problem
  (alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into generally
  accepted fact?
  Martyn
__

  From: Monica Hall 
  To: "Braig, Eugene" 
  Cc: Vihuelalist 
  Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake Konstanz
  meeting
  were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to discuss
  their
  interests.  No need for any peer reviewing or the like.
  Monica
  - Original Message -
  From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1]brai...@osu.edu>
  To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  > The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last note
  for
  > redirection.  Here it is again with the offending word deleted.
  >
  > E
  >
  >
  > -Original Message-----
  > From: Braig, Eugene
  > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
  > To: Vihuela Dmth
  > Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  >
  > I think more people are reading more into this thing than they
  should.
  > While many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar Research
  > Meeting operated independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.  You can
  see a
  > concise summary of what the Lake Konstanz/Constance meeting is at the
  > bottom this GFA page: [3]http://www.guitarfoundation.org/?ArchForums
  . . . as
  > well as the organizers' own Facebook group:
  > [4]https://www.facebook.com/groups/131072740286508/. I've never
  managed to
  > attend the Lake Konstanz meeting in person.
  >
  > The "Guitar Summit" was a discussion forum (not unlike the present
  suite
  > of Dartmouth lute lists) that was hosted by Topica beginning in 2007.
  > However, it went through earlier incarnations hosted by a couple
  different
  > online services (most notably as the "Classical Guitar History List")
  that
  > slightly predate the first Lake Konstanz meeting.  I have been a
  spotty
  > contributor to each iteration of the discussion fora/listservs since
  2005.
  > When I was active there, there was a great deal of discussion
  centered on
  > transitional periods at either end of the 19th c.  Yes, Matanya Ophee
  > served as an organizing hub for these listservs; his contributions to
  and
  > prominent voice in this particular arena are hard to deny, whatever
  your
  > opinion of them are.  Still, at its core, the "summit" was really
  only a
  > listserv of guitar geeks (like me), scholars, and professional
  performers
  > who liked to ask interesting questions of a collective body of
  knowledge
  > (I tended to do more asking than ans!
  > wering).
  >
  > Best,
  > Eugene
  >
  >
  > -Original Message---

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-26 Thread Monica Hall
I did actually ask if abstracts of the papers could be made available purely 
as a matter of ineterest - but got no response.   Perhaps the organizers 
haven't got time - but really contributors should be asked to provide these 
preferably in advance as a matter of course   There did seem to me to be an 
aura cronyism about the affair.   .


Monica

- Original Message - 
From: "Martyn Hodgson" 
To: "Lex Eisenhardt" ; "Vihuelalist" 


Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 4:11 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit



  Thanks for this Lex.
  I thought I'd said: if a paper is presented at a conference, thus
  giving it something of an aura of authority, then if not peer
  appraised/reviewed (which isn't always possible or practicable) it
  ought to be made generally available. Preferably in full or at least in
  synopsis (both methods adopted by the Lute Society for example).
  You'll see from what Jelma writes that, other than the recent articles
  in Early Music, this isn't the case with papers presented at the
  'Summit'.
  regards,
  Martyn
__

  From: Lex Eisenhardt 
  To: Vihuelalist 
  Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 15:37
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  What would you do about it? No more talks at Lute or Guitar meetings,
  unless
  approved by the musicological authorities?
  -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
  Van: [1]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:[2]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu]
  Namens
  Martyn Hodgson
  Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 15:27
  Aan: Jelma van Amersfoort
  CC: Monica Hall; Vihuelalist
  Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
Thanks for this Jelma,
However I really didn't suggest that ANY paper presented at the
'Summit' would always automatically transform speculation (or even
  mere
personal assertion) into generally accepted fact, but that some
speculation/assertion presented in the past has, indeed, been
transformed into widely believed practice by some players. Without
  the
possibility of critical appraisal (through being generally available)
the same can happen to any of the pet theories floated at the
  'Summit'
or, indeed, any other such fora.
Two striking examples will suffice:
- the use of thumb-under on the lute which became de rigueur for
decades (and still persists in some circles) and is only recently
  being
seen as an appropriate technique mostly for certain early lute music;
- the use of a high octave on the third course of the 5 course
'baroque' guitar - a practice for which there is no historical
evidence.
In short, whilst like you I welcome  the 'integration of guitar
research into mainstream musicology'  I'm a bit less willing to
  accept
thoeries which are not able to be subject to some sort of critical
review/appraisal by being openly published or otherwise made
  available.
This is not, of course, the case with the few articles in the recent
guitar centred editions of Early Music, some of which you tell me
  first
appeared at one of these 'Summits'.
Martyn
  __
From: Jelma van Amersfoort <[3]jel...@gmail.com>
To: Martyn Hodgson <[4]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: Monica Hall <[5]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>; Vihuelalist
<[6]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 10:18
Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
I don't know, Martyn. Generally, any paper being presented at any
conference or festival does not turn into generally accepted fact,
  does
it? If there is such a thing as 'fact' in historical research :-)
I certainly attend these things with a healthy dose of scepticism.
However, I think the tentative integration of guitar research into
mainstream musicology that we see happening these days is a good
  thing.
Jelma
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Martyn Hodgson
<[1][7]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
  Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not
  disseminated by
  the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the
  problem
  (alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into
  generally
  accepted fact?
Martyn

  __
From: Monica Hall <[2][8]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
      To: "Braig, Eugene" <[3][9]brai...@osu.edu>
  Cc: Vihuelalist <[4][10]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake
  Konstanz
meeting
were opportunit

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-25 Thread Martyn Hodgson
   Thanks for this Lex.
   I thought I'd said: if a paper is presented at a conference, thus
   giving it something of an aura of authority, then if not peer
   appraised/reviewed (which isn't always possible or practicable) it
   ought to be made generally available. Preferably in full or at least in
   synopsis (both methods adopted by the Lute Society for example).
   You'll see from what Jelma writes that, other than the recent articles
   in Early Music, this isn't the case with papers presented at the
   'Summit'.
   regards,
   Martyn
 __

   From: Lex Eisenhardt 
   To: Vihuelalist 
   Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 15:37
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   What would you do about it? No more talks at Lute or Guitar meetings,
   unless
   approved by the musicological authorities?
   -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
   Van: [1]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:[2]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu]
   Namens
   Martyn Hodgson
   Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 15:27
   Aan: Jelma van Amersfoort
   CC: Monica Hall; Vihuelalist
   Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 Thanks for this Jelma,
 However I really didn't suggest that ANY paper presented at the
 'Summit' would always automatically transform speculation (or even
   mere
 personal assertion) into generally accepted fact, but that some
 speculation/assertion presented in the past has, indeed, been
 transformed into widely believed practice by some players. Without
   the
 possibility of critical appraisal (through being generally available)
 the same can happen to any of the pet theories floated at the
   'Summit'
 or, indeed, any other such fora.
 Two striking examples will suffice:
 - the use of thumb-under on the lute which became de rigueur for
 decades (and still persists in some circles) and is only recently
   being
 seen as an appropriate technique mostly for certain early lute music;
 - the use of a high octave on the third course of the 5 course
 'baroque' guitar - a practice for which there is no historical
 evidence.
 In short, whilst like you I welcome  the 'integration of guitar
 research into mainstream musicology'  I'm a bit less willing to
   accept
 thoeries which are not able to be subject to some sort of critical
 review/appraisal by being openly published or otherwise made
   available.
 This is not, of course, the case with the few articles in the recent
 guitar centred editions of Early Music, some of which you tell me
   first
 appeared at one of these 'Summits'.
 Martyn
   __
 From: Jelma van Amersfoort <[3]jel...@gmail.com>
 To: Martyn Hodgson <[4]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
 Cc: Monica Hall <[5]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>; Vihuelalist
 <[6]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
 Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 10:18
 Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 I don't know, Martyn. Generally, any paper being presented at any
 conference or festival does not turn into generally accepted fact,
   does
 it? If there is such a thing as 'fact' in historical research :-)
 I certainly attend these things with a healthy dose of scepticism.
 However, I think the tentative integration of guitar research into
 mainstream musicology that we see happening these days is a good
   thing.
 Jelma
 On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Martyn Hodgson
 <[1][7]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
   Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not
   disseminated by
   the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the
   problem
   (alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into
   generally
   accepted fact?
 Martyn

   __
 From: Monica Hall <[2][8]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
   To: "Braig, Eugene" <[3][9]brai...@osu.edu>
   Cc: Vihuelalist <[4][10]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08
 Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake
   Konstanz
 meeting
 were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to
   discuss
 their
   interests.  No need for any peer reviewing or the like.
 Monica
 - Original Message -
 From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1][5][11]brai...@osu.edu>
 To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2][6][12]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
 Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
 Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Su

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-25 Thread Lex Eisenhardt
What would you do about it? No more talks at Lute or Guitar meetings, unless
approved by the musicological authorities? 


-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
Martyn Hodgson
Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 15:27
Aan: Jelma van Amersfoort
CC: Monica Hall; Vihuelalist
Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


   Thanks for this Jelma,
   However I really didn't suggest that ANY paper presented at the
   'Summit' would always automatically transform speculation (or even mere
   personal assertion) into generally accepted fact, but that some
   speculation/assertion presented in the past has, indeed, been
   transformed into widely believed practice by some players. Without the
   possibility of critical appraisal (through being generally available)
   the same can happen to any of the pet theories floated at the 'Summit'
   or, indeed, any other such fora.
   Two striking examples will suffice:
   - the use of thumb-under on the lute which became de rigueur for
   decades (and still persists in some circles) and is only recently being
   seen as an appropriate technique mostly for certain early lute music;
   - the use of a high octave on the third course of the 5 course
   'baroque' guitar - a practice for which there is no historical
   evidence.
   In short, whilst like you I welcome  the 'integration of guitar
   research into mainstream musicology'  I'm a bit less willing to accept
   thoeries which are not able to be subject to some sort of critical
   review/appraisal by being openly published or otherwise made available.
   This is not, of course, the case with the few articles in the recent
   guitar centred editions of Early Music, some of which you tell me first
   appeared at one of these 'Summits'.
   Martyn
 __

   From: Jelma van Amersfoort 
   To: Martyn Hodgson 
   Cc: Monica Hall ; Vihuelalist
   
   Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 10:18
   Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   I don't know, Martyn. Generally, any paper being presented at any
   conference or festival does not turn into generally accepted fact, does
   it? If there is such a thing as 'fact' in historical research :-)

   I certainly attend these things with a healthy dose of scepticism.
   However, I think the tentative integration of guitar research into
   mainstream musicology that we see happening these days is a good thing.
   Jelma
   On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Martyn Hodgson
   <[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not
 disseminated by
the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the
 problem
(alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into
 generally
accepted fact?

  Martyn
__
  From: Monica Hall <[2]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>

To: "Braig, Eugene" <[3]brai...@osu.edu>
    Cc: Vihuelalist <[4]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08

  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake Konstanz

  meeting
  were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to discuss
  their

interests.  No need for any peer reviewing or the like.

  Monica
  - Original Message -

  From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1][5]brai...@osu.edu>
      To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2][6]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  > The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last
   note
  for

  > redirection.  Here it is again with the offending word deleted.
  >
  > E
  >
  >
  > -Original Message-
  > From: Braig, Eugene
  > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
  > To: Vihuela Dmth
  > Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  >
  > I think more people are reading more into this thing than they
  should.
  > While many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar
   Research

> Meeting operated independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.
 You can

  see a
  > concise summary of what the Lake Konstanz/Constance meeting is at
   the

> bottom this GFA page:
 [3][7]http://www.guitarfoundation.org/?ArchForums

  . . . as
  > well as the organizers' own Facebook group:

> [4][8]https://www.facebook.com/groups/131072740286508/. I've
 never

  managed to
  > attend the Lake Konstanz meeting in person.
  >
  > The "G

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-25 Thread Martyn Hodgson
   Thanks for this Jelma,
   However I really didn't suggest that ANY paper presented at the
   'Summit' would always automatically transform speculation (or even mere
   personal assertion) into generally accepted fact, but that some
   speculation/assertion presented in the past has, indeed, been
   transformed into widely believed practice by some players. Without the
   possibility of critical appraisal (through being generally available)
   the same can happen to any of the pet theories floated at the 'Summit'
   or, indeed, any other such fora.
   Two striking examples will suffice:
   - the use of thumb-under on the lute which became de rigueur for
   decades (and still persists in some circles) and is only recently being
   seen as an appropriate technique mostly for certain early lute music;
   - the use of a high octave on the third course of the 5 course
   'baroque' guitar - a practice for which there is no historical
   evidence.
   In short, whilst like you I welcome  the 'integration of guitar
   research into mainstream musicology'  I'm a bit less willing to accept
   thoeries which are not able to be subject to some sort of critical
   review/appraisal by being openly published or otherwise made available.
   This is not, of course, the case with the few articles in the recent
   guitar centred editions of Early Music, some of which you tell me first
   appeared at one of these 'Summits'.
   Martyn
 __

   From: Jelma van Amersfoort 
   To: Martyn Hodgson 
   Cc: Monica Hall ; Vihuelalist
   
   Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 10:18
   Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   I don't know, Martyn. Generally, any paper being presented at any
   conference or festival does not turn into generally accepted fact, does
   it? If there is such a thing as 'fact' in historical research :-)

   I certainly attend these things with a healthy dose of scepticism.
   However, I think the tentative integration of guitar research into
   mainstream musicology that we see happening these days is a good thing.
   Jelma
   On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Martyn Hodgson
   <[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not
 disseminated by
the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the
 problem
(alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into
 generally
accepted fact?

  Martyn
__
  From: Monica Hall <[2]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>

To: "Braig, Eugene" <[3]brai...@osu.edu>
    Cc: Vihuelalist <[4]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08

  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake Konstanz

  meeting
  were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to discuss
  their

interests.  No need for any peer reviewing or the like.

  Monica
  - Original Message -

  From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1][5]brai...@osu.edu>
      To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2][6]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  > The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last
   note
  for

  > redirection.  Here it is again with the offending word deleted.
  >
  > E
  >
  >
  > -Original Message-
  > From: Braig, Eugene
  > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
  > To: Vihuela Dmth
  > Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
  >
  > I think more people are reading more into this thing than they
  should.
  > While many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar
   Research

> Meeting operated independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.
 You can

  see a
  > concise summary of what the Lake Konstanz/Constance meeting is at
   the

> bottom this GFA page:
 [3][7]http://www.guitarfoundation.org/?ArchForums

  . . . as
  > well as the organizers' own Facebook group:

> [4][8]https://www.facebook.com/groups/131072740286508/. I've
 never

  managed to
  > attend the Lake Konstanz meeting in person.
  >
  > The "Guitar Summit" was a discussion forum (not unlike the present
  suite
  > of Dartmouth lute lists) that was hosted by Topica beginning in
   2007.
  > However, it went through earlier incarnations hosted by a couple
  different
  > online services (most notably as the "Classical Guitar History
   List")
  that

   

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-25 Thread Martyn Hodgson
   Indeed . But I'm referring to the many other papers presented at the
   'Summits'  which, I'm told, are not usually published or otherwise made
   generally available.
 __

   From: Lex Eisenhardt 
   To: Vihuelalist 
   Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 14:01
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   As I understand it, the (9!) guitar related articles in Early Music
   41/4 and
   42/1 were all reviewed by outside readers.
   -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
   Van: [1]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:[2]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu]
   Namens
   Martyn Hodgson
   Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 10:59
   Aan: Monica Hall; Braig, Eugene
   CC: Vihuelalist
   Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not disseminated
   by
 the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the problem
 (alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into
   generally
 accepted fact?
 Martyn
   __
 From: Monica Hall <[3]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
 To: "Braig, Eugene" <[4]brai...@osu.edu>
 Cc: Vihuelalist <[5]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
 Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08
 Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake Konstanz
 meeting
 were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to discuss
 their
 interests.  No need for any peer reviewing or the like.
 Monica
 - Original Message -
 From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1][6]brai...@osu.edu>
 To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2][7]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
 Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
 Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 > The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last
   note
 for
 > redirection.  Here it is again with the offending word deleted.
 >
 > E
 >
 >
 > -Original Message-
     > From: Braig, Eugene
 > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
 > To: Vihuela Dmth
 > Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 >
 > I think more people are reading more into this thing than they
 should.
 > While many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar Research
 > Meeting operated independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.  You
   can
 see a
 > concise summary of what the Lake Konstanz/Constance meeting is at
   the
 > bottom this GFA page:
   [3][8]http://www.guitarfoundation.org/?ArchForums
 . . . as
 > well as the organizers' own Facebook group:
 > [4][9]https://www.facebook.com/groups/131072740286508/. I've never
 managed to
 > attend the Lake Konstanz meeting in person.
 >
 > The "Guitar Summit" was a discussion forum (not unlike the present
 suite
 > of Dartmouth lute lists) that was hosted by Topica beginning in
   2007.
 > However, it went through earlier incarnations hosted by a couple
 different
 > online services (most notably as the "Classical Guitar History
   List")
 that
 > slightly predate the first Lake Konstanz meeting.  I have been a
 spotty
 > contributor to each iteration of the discussion fora/listservs
   since
 2005.
 > When I was active there, there was a great deal of discussion
 centered on
 > transitional periods at either end of the 19th c.  Yes, Matanya
   Ophee
 > served as an organizing hub for these listservs; his contributions
   to
 and
 > prominent voice in this particular arena are hard to deny, whatever
 your
 > opinion of them are.  Still, at its core, the "summit" was really
 only a
 > listserv of guitar geeks (like me), scholars, and professional
 performers
 > who liked to ask interesting questions of a collective body of
 knowledge
 > (I tended to do more asking than ans!
 > wering).
 >
 > Best,
 > Eugene
 >
 >
     > -----Original Message-
 > From: [5][10]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
 [mailto:[6][11]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
 > Behalf Of jelmaa
 > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 12:43 PM
 > To: Martyn Hodgson
 > Cc: Vihuela Dmth
 > Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 >
 > Hi Martin and others,
 >
 > No, the papers are not peer reviewed and not published by the
 organizers,
 > but I know many of them end up in journals later through the
   efforts
 of
 > the individual researchers. A list of speakers and subjects is
 published
 > though (I believe). You should really contact Andreas about tha

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-25 Thread Lex Eisenhardt

As I understand it, the (9!) guitar related articles in Early Music 41/4 and
42/1 were all reviewed by outside readers. 

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
Martyn Hodgson
Verzonden: woensdag 25 juni 2014 10:59
Aan: Monica Hall; Braig, Eugene
CC: Vihuelalist
Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


   Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not disseminated by
   the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the problem
   (alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into generally
   accepted fact?
   Martyn
 __

   From: Monica Hall 
   To: "Braig, Eugene" 
   Cc: Vihuelalist 
   Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake Konstanz
   meeting
   were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to discuss
   their
   interests.  No need for any peer reviewing or the like.
   Monica
   - Original Message -
   From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1]brai...@osu.edu>
   To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   > The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last note
   for
   > redirection.  Here it is again with the offending word deleted.
   >
   > E
   >
   >
   > -Original Message-
   > From: Braig, Eugene
   > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
   > To: Vihuela Dmth
   > Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   >
   > I think more people are reading more into this thing than they
   should.
   > While many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar Research
   > Meeting operated independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.  You can
   see a
   > concise summary of what the Lake Konstanz/Constance meeting is at the
   > bottom this GFA page: [3]http://www.guitarfoundation.org/?ArchForums
   . . . as
   > well as the organizers' own Facebook group:
   > [4]https://www.facebook.com/groups/131072740286508/. I've never
   managed to
   > attend the Lake Konstanz meeting in person.
   >
   > The "Guitar Summit" was a discussion forum (not unlike the present
   suite
   > of Dartmouth lute lists) that was hosted by Topica beginning in 2007.
   > However, it went through earlier incarnations hosted by a couple
   different
   > online services (most notably as the "Classical Guitar History List")
   that
   > slightly predate the first Lake Konstanz meeting.  I have been a
   spotty
   > contributor to each iteration of the discussion fora/listservs since
   2005.
   > When I was active there, there was a great deal of discussion
   centered on
   > transitional periods at either end of the 19th c.  Yes, Matanya Ophee
   > served as an organizing hub for these listservs; his contributions to
   and
   > prominent voice in this particular arena are hard to deny, whatever
   your
   > opinion of them are.  Still, at its core, the "summit" was really
   only a
   > listserv of guitar geeks (like me), scholars, and professional
   performers
   > who liked to ask interesting questions of a collective body of
   knowledge
   > (I tended to do more asking than ans!
   > wering).
   >
   > Best,
   > Eugene
   >
   >
   > -Original Message-
   > From: [5]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [mailto:[6]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
   > Behalf Of jelmaa
   > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 12:43 PM
   > To: Martyn Hodgson
   > Cc: Vihuela Dmth
   > Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   >
   > Hi Martin and others,
   >
   > No, the papers are not peer reviewed and not published by the
   organizers,
   > but I know many of them end up in journals later through the efforts
   of
   > the individual researchers. A list of speakers and subjects is
   published
   > though (I believe). You should really contact Andreas about that if
   you
   > want to know more.
   >
   > Best, Jelma
   >
   >
   > On Jun 24, 2014, at 17:26 , Martyn Hodgson wrote:
   >
   >>  Thank you Jelma.
   >>  Do you know if this 'Summit' ever publish any of these papers or
   are
   >>  they available as downloads? Were they peer reviewed?
   >>  regards
   >>  Martyn
   >>
   __
   >>
   >>  From: Jelma van Amersfoort <[7]jel...@gmail.com>
   >>  To: Lex Eisenhardt <[8]eisenha...@planet.nl>
   >>  Cc: Vihuela Dmth <[9]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   >>  Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2014, 11:31
   >>  Subject: [VIHU

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-25 Thread Jelma van Amersfoort
   I don't know, Martyn. Generally, any paper being presented at any
   conference or festival does not turn into generally accepted fact, does
   it? If there is such a thing as 'fact' in historical research :-)

   A

   I certainly attend these things with a healthy dose of scepticism.
   However,A I think the tentative integration of guitar research into
   mainstream musicology that we see happening these days is a good thing.

   Jelma

   On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Martyn Hodgson
   <[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

 A  A Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not
 disseminated by
 A  A the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the
 problem
 A  A (alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into
 generally
 A  A accepted fact?

   A  A Martyn
   A  A
   A __
   A  A From: Monica Hall <[2]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>

 A  A To: "Braig, Eugene" <[3]brai...@osu.edu>
 A  A Cc: Vihuelalist <[4]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
 A  A Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08

   A  A Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

 A  A That sums it up very nicely. A Both the list and the Lake
 Konstanz

   A  A meeting
   A  A were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to
   discuss
   A  A their

 A  A interests. A No need for any peer reviewing or the like.

   A  A Monica
   A  A - Original Message -

   A  A From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1][5]brai...@osu.edu>
   A  A To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2][6]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   A  A Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
   A  A Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   A  A > The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last
   note
   A  A for

   A  A > redirection. A Here it is again with the offending word deleted.
   A  A >
   A  A > E
   A  A >
   A  A >
   A  A > -Original Message-
   A  A > From: Braig, Eugene
   A  A > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
   A  A > To: Vihuela Dmth
   A  A > Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   A  A >
   A  A > I think more people are reading more into this thing than they
   A  A should.
   A  A > While many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar
   Research

 A  A > Meeting operated independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.
 A You can

   A  A see a
   A  A > concise summary of what the Lake Konstanz/Constance meeting is
   at the

 A  A > bottom this GFA page:
 [3][7]http://www.guitarfoundation.org/?ArchForums

   A  A . . . as
   A  A > well as the organizers' own Facebook group:

 A  A > [4][8]https://www.facebook.com/groups/131072740286508/. I've
 never

   A  A managed to
   A  A > attend the Lake Konstanz meeting in person.
   A  A >
   A  A > The "Guitar Summit" was a discussion forum (not unlike the
   present
   A  A suite
   A  A > of Dartmouth lute lists) that was hosted by Topica beginning in
   2007.
   A  A > However, it went through earlier incarnations hosted by a couple
   A  A different
   A  A > online services (most notably as the "Classical Guitar History
   List")
   A  A that

 A  A > slightly predate the first Lake Konstanz meeting. A I have
 been a

   A  A spotty
   A  A > contributor to each iteration of the discussion fora/listservs
   since
   A  A 2005.
   A  A > When I was active there, there was a great deal of discussion
   A  A centered on

 A  A > transitional periods at either end of the 19th c. A Yes,
 Matanya Ophee

   A  A > served as an organizing hub for these listservs; his
   contributions to
   A  A and
   A  A > prominent voice in this particular arena are hard to deny,
   whatever
   A  A your

 A  A > opinion of them are. A Still, at its core, the "summit" was
 really

   A  A only a
   A  A > listserv of guitar geeks (like me), scholars, and professional
   A  A performers
   A  A > who liked to ask interesting questions of a collective body of
   A  A knowledge
   A  A > (I tended to do more asking than ans!
   A  A > wering).
   A  A >
   A  A > Best,
   A  A > Eugene
   A  A >
   A  A >
   A  A > -Original Message-----

   A  A > From: [5][9]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   A  A [mailto:[6][10]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
   A  A > Behalf Of jelmaa
   A  A > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 12:43 PM
   A  A > To: Martyn Hodgson
   A  A > Cc: Vihuela Dmth
   A  A > Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   A  A >
   A  A > Hi Martin and others,
   A  A >
   A  A > No, the papers are not peer reviewed and not published by the
   A  A organizers,
   A  A > but I know many of them end up in journals later through the
   efforts
   A  A of

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-25 Thread Martyn Hodgson
   Well yes... though if papers are presented, but not disseminated by
   the 'Summit' and/or are not peer reviewed is there not the problem
   (alas too common) of mere speculation being transformed into generally
   accepted fact?
   Martyn
 __

   From: Monica Hall 
   To: "Braig, Eugene" 
   Cc: Vihuelalist 
   Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2014, 7:08
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   That sums it up very nicely.  Both the list and the Lake Konstanz
   meeting
   were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to discuss
   their
   interests.  No need for any peer reviewing or the like.
   Monica
   - Original Message -
   From: "Braig, Eugene" <[1]brai...@osu.edu>
   To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   > The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last note
   for
   > redirection.  Here it is again with the offending word deleted.
   >
   > E
   >
   >
   > -Original Message-
   > From: Braig, Eugene
   > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
   > To: Vihuela Dmth
   > Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   >
   > I think more people are reading more into this thing than they
   should.
   > While many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar Research
   > Meeting operated independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.  You can
   see a
   > concise summary of what the Lake Konstanz/Constance meeting is at the
   > bottom this GFA page: [3]http://www.guitarfoundation.org/?ArchForums
   . . . as
   > well as the organizers' own Facebook group:
   > [4]https://www.facebook.com/groups/131072740286508/. I've never
   managed to
   > attend the Lake Konstanz meeting in person.
   >
   > The "Guitar Summit" was a discussion forum (not unlike the present
   suite
   > of Dartmouth lute lists) that was hosted by Topica beginning in 2007.
   > However, it went through earlier incarnations hosted by a couple
   different
   > online services (most notably as the "Classical Guitar History List")
   that
   > slightly predate the first Lake Konstanz meeting.  I have been a
   spotty
   > contributor to each iteration of the discussion fora/listservs since
   2005.
   > When I was active there, there was a great deal of discussion
   centered on
   > transitional periods at either end of the 19th c.  Yes, Matanya Ophee
   > served as an organizing hub for these listservs; his contributions to
   and
   > prominent voice in this particular arena are hard to deny, whatever
   your
   > opinion of them are.  Still, at its core, the "summit" was really
   only a
   > listserv of guitar geeks (like me), scholars, and professional
   performers
   > who liked to ask interesting questions of a collective body of
   knowledge
   > (I tended to do more asking than ans!
   > wering).
   >
   > Best,
   > Eugene
   >
   >
   > -Original Message-
   > From: [5]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [mailto:[6]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
   > Behalf Of jelmaa
   > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 12:43 PM
   > To: Martyn Hodgson
   > Cc: Vihuela Dmth
   > Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   >
   > Hi Martin and others,
   >
   > No, the papers are not peer reviewed and not published by the
   organizers,
   > but I know many of them end up in journals later through the efforts
   of
   > the individual researchers. A list of speakers and subjects is
   published
   > though (I believe). You should really contact Andreas about that if
   you
   > want to know more.
   >
   > Best, Jelma
   >
   >
   > On Jun 24, 2014, at 17:26 , Martyn Hodgson wrote:
   >
   >>  Thank you Jelma.
   >>  Do you know if this 'Summit' ever publish any of these papers or
   are
   >>  they available as downloads? Were they peer reviewed?
   >>  regards
   >>  Martyn
   >>
   __
   >>
   >>  From: Jelma van Amersfoort <[7]jel...@gmail.com>
   >>  To: Lex Eisenhardt <[8]eisenha...@planet.nl>
   >>  Cc: Vihuela Dmth <[9]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   >>  Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2014, 11:31
   >>  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   >>Dear all,
   >>A
   >>"Lake Konstanz" is a bi-annual international conference on
   >>guitar-related research, historical and otherwise. It was
   established
   >>in 2007 by Gerhard Penn and Andreas Stevens.A The next meeting is
   in
   >>2015.
   >>A
   >>I was there

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-25 Thread Jelma van Amersfoort
   "guitar enthusiasts".That is not what I wrote. I have no opinion on
   the Summit List, but the Lake Konstanz meeting is attended by serious
   scholars, playersA and publishers as well as the usual assortment of
   kooks.

   A

   Jelma

   On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Monica Hall <[1]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
   wrote:

 That sums it up very nicely. A  Both the list and the Lake Konstanz
 meeting were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to
 discuss their interests. A  No need for any peer reviewing or the
 like.
 Monica
 - Original Message - From: "Braig, Eugene"
 <[2]brai...@osu.edu>
 To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[3]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
 Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM

   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

 The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last
 note for redirection. A Here it is again with the offending word
 deleted.
 E
 -Original Message-
 From: Braig, Eugene
 Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
     To: Vihuela Dmth
 Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 I think more people are reading more into this thing than they
 should. While many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar
 Research Meeting operated independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.
 A You can see a concise summary of what the Lake Konstanz/Constance
 meeting is at the bottom this GFA page:
 [4]http://www.guitarfoundation.org/?ArchForums . . . as well as the
 organizers' own Facebook group:
 [5]https://www.facebook.com/groups/131072740286508/. A I've never
 managed to attend the Lake Konstanz meeting in person.
 The "Guitar Summit" was a discussion forum (not unlike the present
 suite of Dartmouth lute lists) that was hosted by Topica beginning
 in 2007. However, it went through earlier incarnations hosted by a
 couple different online services (most notably as the "Classical
 Guitar History List") that slightly predate the first Lake Konstanz
 meeting. A I have been a spotty contributor to each iteration of the
 discussion fora/listservs since 2005. When I was active there, there
 was a great deal of discussion centered on transitional periods at
 either end of the 19th c. A Yes, Matanya Ophee served as an
 organizing hub for these listservs; his contributions to and
 prominent voice in this particular arena are hard to deny, whatever
 your opinion of them are. A Still, at its core, the "summit" was
 really only a listserv of guitar geeks (like me), scholars, and
 professional performers who liked to ask interesting questions of a
 collective body of knowledge (I tended to do more asking than ans!
 wering).
 Best,
 Eugene
 -Original Message-
 From: [6]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
 [mailto:[7]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of jelmaa
 Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 12:43 PM
 To: Martyn Hodgson
 Cc: Vihuela Dmth
 Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 Hi Martin and others,
 No, the papers are not peer reviewed and not published by the
 organizers, but I know many of them end up in journals later through
 the efforts of the individual researchers. A list of speakers and
 subjects is published though (I believe). You should really contact
 Andreas about that if you want to know more.
 Best, Jelma
 On Jun 24, 2014, at 17:26 , Martyn Hodgson wrote:

 A  Thank you Jelma.
 A  Do you know if this 'Summit' ever publish any of these papers or
 are
 A  they available as downloads? Were they peer reviewed?
 A  regards
 A  Martyn
 A  A
 __
 A  From: Jelma van Amersfoort <[8]jel...@gmail.com>
 A  To: Lex Eisenhardt <[9]eisenha...@planet.nl>
 A  Cc: Vihuela Dmth <[10]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
 A  Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2014, 11:31
 A  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 A  A  Dear all,
 A  A  A
 A  A  "Lake Konstanz" is a bi-annual international conference on
 A  A  guitar-related research, historical and otherwise. It was
 established
 A  A  in 2007 by Gerhard Penn and Andreas Stevens.A The next meeting
 is in
 A  A  2015.
 A  A  A
 A  A  I was there last year and presented a paper on guitar songs by
 the
 A  A  composer Pauline Duchambge (1776-1858). There were speakers
 from many
 A  A  different countries and backgrounds, it was quite interesting
 and
 A  fun.
 A  A  As Lex Eisenhardt mentioned, four or five of the people who
 recently
 A  A  published in Early Music were there as well, and Matanya Ophee
 too.
 A  A  A
 A  A  If any of you want to present or just listen it is best to

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-24 Thread Monica Hall
That sums it up very nicely.   Both the list and the Lake Konstanz meeting 
were opportunities for guitar enthusiasts to get together to discuss their 
interests.   No need for any peer reviewing or the like.


Monica

- Original Message - 
From: "Braig, Eugene" 

To: "Vihuela Dmth" 
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:01 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last note for 
redirection.  Here it is again with the offending word deleted.


E


-Original Message-
From: Braig, Eugene
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
To: Vihuela Dmth
Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

I think more people are reading more into this thing than they should. 
While many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar Research 
Meeting operated independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.  You can see a 
concise summary of what the Lake Konstanz/Constance meeting is at the 
bottom this GFA page: http://www.guitarfoundation.org/?ArchForums . . . as 
well as the organizers' own Facebook group: 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/131072740286508/.  I've never managed to 
attend the Lake Konstanz meeting in person.


The "Guitar Summit" was a discussion forum (not unlike the present suite 
of Dartmouth lute lists) that was hosted by Topica beginning in 2007. 
However, it went through earlier incarnations hosted by a couple different 
online services (most notably as the "Classical Guitar History List") that 
slightly predate the first Lake Konstanz meeting.  I have been a spotty 
contributor to each iteration of the discussion fora/listservs since 2005. 
When I was active there, there was a great deal of discussion centered on 
transitional periods at either end of the 19th c.  Yes, Matanya Ophee 
served as an organizing hub for these listservs; his contributions to and 
prominent voice in this particular arena are hard to deny, whatever your 
opinion of them are.  Still, at its core, the "summit" was really only a 
listserv of guitar geeks (like me), scholars, and professional performers 
who liked to ask interesting questions of a collective body of knowledge 
(I tended to do more asking than ans!

wering).

Best,
Eugene


-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On 
Behalf Of jelmaa

Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 12:43 PM
To: Martyn Hodgson
Cc: Vihuela Dmth
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

Hi Martin and others,

No, the papers are not peer reviewed and not published by the organizers, 
but I know many of them end up in journals later through the efforts of 
the individual researchers. A list of speakers and subjects is published 
though (I believe). You should really contact Andreas about that if you 
want to know more.


Best, Jelma


On Jun 24, 2014, at 17:26 , Martyn Hodgson wrote:


  Thank you Jelma.
  Do you know if this 'Summit' ever publish any of these papers or are
  they available as downloads? Were they peer reviewed?
  regards
  Martyn
__

  From: Jelma van Amersfoort 
  To: Lex Eisenhardt 
  Cc: Vihuela Dmth 
  Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2014, 11:31
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
Dear all,
A
"Lake Konstanz" is a bi-annual international conference on
guitar-related research, historical and otherwise. It was established
in 2007 by Gerhard Penn and Andreas Stevens.A The next meeting is in
2015.
A
I was there last year and presented a paper on guitar songs by the
composer Pauline Duchambge (1776-1858). There were speakers from many
different countries and backgrounds, it was quite interesting and
  fun.
As Lex Eisenhardt mentioned, four or five of the people who recently
published in Early Music were there as well, and Matanya Ophee too.
A
If any of you want to present or just listen it is best to approach
Andreas or Gerhard with a proposal. They are quite keen to involve
  more
researchers. I believe there is no website, but there is a rather
active facebook page.
([1][1]https://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/131072740286508/)
A
Best, Jelma van Amersfoort
A
A
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Lex Eisenhardt
<[2][2]eisenha...@planet.nl> wrote:
  Some of you may have seen the 'guitar issues' of Early Music (41/4
  A and
  42/1). Some of the authors lectured at the 'Lake Konstanz' (Summit)
  meetings.
  -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
  Van: [3][3]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  [mailto:[4][4]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
  WALSH STUART
  Verzonden: dinsdag 24 juni 2014 11:54
  Aan: Martyn Hodgson; Vihuela Dmth
  Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
On 24/06/2014 09:25, Martyn Hodgson wrote:

A  A  - Forwarded Message -
A  A  From: Martyn Hodgson <[5][

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-24 Thread Braig, Eugene
The word " s u b s c r i b e r " ended up robot flagging my last note for 
redirection.  Here it is again with the offending word deleted.

E


-Original Message-
From: Braig, Eugene 
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:59 PM
To: Vihuela Dmth
Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

I think more people are reading more into this thing than they should.  While 
many contributors coincide, the Lake Konstanz Guitar Research Meeting operated 
independently of the Topica Guitar Summit.  You can see a concise summary of 
what the Lake Konstanz/Constance meeting is at the bottom this GFA page: 
http://www.guitarfoundation.org/?ArchForums . . . as well as the organizers' 
own Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/131072740286508/.  I've 
never managed to attend the Lake Konstanz meeting in person.

The "Guitar Summit" was a discussion forum (not unlike the present suite of 
Dartmouth lute lists) that was hosted by Topica beginning in 2007.  However, it 
went through earlier incarnations hosted by a couple different online services 
(most notably as the "Classical Guitar History List") that slightly predate the 
first Lake Konstanz meeting.  I have been a spotty contributor to each 
iteration of the discussion fora/listservs since 2005.  When I was active 
there, there was a great deal of discussion centered on transitional periods at 
either end of the 19th c.  Yes, Matanya Ophee served as an organizing hub for 
these listservs; his contributions to and prominent voice in this particular 
arena are hard to deny, whatever your opinion of them are.  Still, at its core, 
the "summit" was really only a listserv of guitar geeks (like me), scholars, 
and professional performers who liked to ask interesting questions of a 
collective body of knowledge (I tended to do more asking than ans!
 wering).

Best,
Eugene


-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of 
jelmaa
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 12:43 PM
To: Martyn Hodgson
Cc: Vihuela Dmth
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

Hi Martin and others,

No, the papers are not peer reviewed and not published by the organizers, but I 
know many of them end up in journals later through the efforts of the 
individual researchers. A list of speakers and subjects is published though (I 
believe). You should really contact Andreas about that if you want to know more.

Best, Jelma


On Jun 24, 2014, at 17:26 , Martyn Hodgson wrote:

>   Thank you Jelma.
>   Do you know if this 'Summit' ever publish any of these papers or are
>   they available as downloads? Were they peer reviewed?
>   regards
>   Martyn
> __
> 
>   From: Jelma van Amersfoort 
>   To: Lex Eisenhardt 
>   Cc: Vihuela Dmth 
>   Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2014, 11:31
>   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
> Dear all,
> A
> "Lake Konstanz" is a bi-annual international conference on
> guitar-related research, historical and otherwise. It was established
> in 2007 by Gerhard Penn and Andreas Stevens.A The next meeting is in
> 2015.
> A
> I was there last year and presented a paper on guitar songs by the
> composer Pauline Duchambge (1776-1858). There were speakers from many
> different countries and backgrounds, it was quite interesting and
>   fun.
> As Lex Eisenhardt mentioned, four or five of the people who recently
> published in Early Music were there as well, and Matanya Ophee too.
> A
> If any of you want to present or just listen it is best to approach
> Andreas or Gerhard with a proposal. They are quite keen to involve
>   more
> researchers. I believe there is no website, but there is a rather
> active facebook page.
> ([1][1]https://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/131072740286508/)
> A
> Best, Jelma van Amersfoort
> A
> A
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Lex Eisenhardt
> <[2][2]eisenha...@planet.nl> wrote:
>   Some of you may have seen the 'guitar issues' of Early Music (41/4
>   A and
>   42/1). Some of the authors lectured at the 'Lake Konstanz' (Summit)
>   meetings.
>   -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>   Van: [3][3]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
>   [mailto:[4][4]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
>   WALSH STUART
>   Verzonden: dinsdag 24 juni 2014 11:54
>   Aan: Martyn Hodgson; Vihuela Dmth
>   Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
> On 24/06/2014 09:25, Martyn Hodgson wrote:
>> A  A  - Forwarded Message -
>> A  A  From: Martyn Hodgson <[5][5]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> A  A
>> To: Monica Hall <[6][6]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk> A  A  Sent: Tuesday,

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-24 Thread jelmaa
Hi Martin and others,

No, the papers are not peer reviewed and not published by the organizers, but I 
know many of them end up in journals later through the efforts of the 
individual researchers. A list of speakers and subjects is published though (I 
believe). You should really contact Andreas about that if you want to know more.

Best, Jelma


On Jun 24, 2014, at 17:26 , Martyn Hodgson wrote:

>   Thank you Jelma.
>   Do you know if this 'Summit' ever publish any of these papers or are
>   they available as downloads? Were they peer reviewed?
>   regards
>   Martyn
> __
> 
>   From: Jelma van Amersfoort 
>   To: Lex Eisenhardt 
>   Cc: Vihuela Dmth 
>   Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2014, 11:31
>   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
> Dear all,
> A
> "Lake Konstanz" is a bi-annual international conference on
> guitar-related research, historical and otherwise. It was established
> in 2007 by Gerhard Penn and Andreas Stevens.A The next meeting is in
> 2015.
> A
> I was there last year and presented a paper on guitar songs by the
> composer Pauline Duchambge (1776-1858). There were speakers from many
> different countries and backgrounds, it was quite interesting and
>   fun.
> As Lex Eisenhardt mentioned, four or five of the people who recently
> published in Early Music were there as well, and Matanya Ophee too.
> A
> If any of you want to present or just listen it is best to approach
> Andreas or Gerhard with a proposal. They are quite keen to involve
>   more
> researchers. I believe there is no website, but there is a rather
> active facebook page.
> ([1][1]https://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/131072740286508/)
> A
> Best, Jelma van Amersfoort
> A
> A
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Lex Eisenhardt
> <[2][2]eisenha...@planet.nl> wrote:
>   Some of you may have seen the 'guitar issues' of Early Music (41/4
>   A and
>   42/1). Some of the authors lectured at the 'Lake Konstanz' (Summit)
>   meetings.
>   -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>   Van: [3][3]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
>   [mailto:[4][4]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
>   WALSH STUART
>   Verzonden: dinsdag 24 juni 2014 11:54
>   Aan: Martyn Hodgson; Vihuela Dmth
>   Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
> On 24/06/2014 09:25, Martyn Hodgson wrote:
>> A  A  - Forwarded Message -----
>> A  A  From: Martyn Hodgson <[5][5]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
>> A  A  To: Monica Hall <[6][6]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
>> A  A  Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2014, 7:26
>> A  A  Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>> A  A  Thanks for this.
>> A  A  I was intrigued by the use of the word 'summit' which implied
> some
> sort
>> A  A  of self-proclaimed central authority!
> I think that would be about right. Surrounded by worshippers.
>> But from what you write, it seems
>> A  A  to be/have been more of a social event
>> A  A  Martyn
>> A  A  A
> ______________
>> 
>> A  A  From: Monica Hall <[7][7]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
>> A  A  To: Martyn Hodgson <[8][8]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
>> A  A  Cc: Vihuelalist <[9][9]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>> A  A  Sent: Monday, 23 June 2014, 19:29
>> A  A  Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>> A  A  Well it was started a few years ago under the auspices of
> Matanya
>> A  A  Ophee.
>> A  A  Most of the people on it were continental - i.e. from
>   Germany,
> and
> such
>> A  A  like
>> A  A  places. A They hold/held a summit meeting in Switzerland
>   every
> two
>> A  A  years.
>> A  A  The last one was in 2012 I think.
>> A  A  There used to be a discussion list but messages I have sent
> have not
>> A  A  got
>> A  A  through and I haven't received any for ages.
>> A  A  Monica
>> A  A  - Original Message -
>> A  A  From: "Martyn Hodgson" <[1][10][10]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
>> A  A  To: "Monica Hall" <[2][11][11]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>;
>   "Vihuelalist"
>> A  A  <[3][12][12]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>> A  A  Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 6:37 PM
>> A  A  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>> A  A  > A To be frank Monica, I've never heard of it! A What is/was
> it
> supposed
>> A  A  to
>> A  A  > A do?
>> A  A  > A Martyn
>> A  A 

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-24 Thread Martyn Hodgson
   Thank you Jelma.
   Do you know if this 'Summit' ever publish any of these papers or are
   they available as downloads? Were they peer reviewed?
   regards
   Martyn
 __

   From: Jelma van Amersfoort 
   To: Lex Eisenhardt 
   Cc: Vihuela Dmth 
   Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2014, 11:31
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 Dear all,
 A
 "Lake Konstanz" is a bi-annual international conference on
 guitar-related research, historical and otherwise. It was established
 in 2007 by Gerhard Penn and Andreas Stevens.A The next meeting is in
 2015.
 A
 I was there last year and presented a paper on guitar songs by the
 composer Pauline Duchambge (1776-1858). There were speakers from many
 different countries and backgrounds, it was quite interesting and
   fun.
 As Lex Eisenhardt mentioned, four or five of the people who recently
 published in Early Music were there as well, and Matanya Ophee too.
 A
 If any of you want to present or just listen it is best to approach
 Andreas or Gerhard with a proposal. They are quite keen to involve
   more
 researchers. I believe there is no website, but there is a rather
 active facebook page.
 ([1][1]https://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/131072740286508/)
 A
 Best, Jelma van Amersfoort
 A
 A
 On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Lex Eisenhardt
 <[2][2]eisenha...@planet.nl> wrote:
   Some of you may have seen the 'guitar issues' of Early Music (41/4
   A and
   42/1). Some of the authors lectured at the 'Lake Konstanz' (Summit)
   meetings.
   -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
   Van: [3][3]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [mailto:[4][4]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
   WALSH STUART
   Verzonden: dinsdag 24 juni 2014 11:54
   Aan: Martyn Hodgson; Vihuela Dmth
   Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 On 24/06/2014 09:25, Martyn Hodgson wrote:
 > A  A  - Forwarded Message -
 > A  A  From: Martyn Hodgson <[5][5]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
 > A  A  To: Monica Hall <[6][6]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
 > A  A  Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2014, 7:26
 > A  A  Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 > A  A  Thanks for this.
 > A  A  I was intrigued by the use of the word 'summit' which implied
 some
 sort
 > A  A  of self-proclaimed central authority!
 I think that would be about right. Surrounded by worshippers.
 > But from what you write, it seems
 > A  A  to be/have been more of a social event
 > A  A  Martyn
 > A  A  A
 __
 >
 > A  A  From: Monica Hall <[7][7]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
 > A  A  To: Martyn Hodgson <[8][8]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
 > A  A  Cc: Vihuelalist <[9][9]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
 > A  A  Sent: Monday, 23 June 2014, 19:29
 > A  A  Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 > A  A  Well it was started a few years ago under the auspices of
 Matanya
 > A  A  Ophee.
 > A  A  Most of the people on it were continental - i.e. from
   Germany,
 and
 such
 > A  A  like
 > A  A  places. A They hold/held a summit meeting in Switzerland
   every
 two
 > A  A  years.
 > A  A  The last one was in 2012 I think.
 > A  A  There used to be a discussion list but messages I have sent
 have not
 > A  A  got
 > A  A  through and I haven't received any for ages.
 > A  A  Monica
 > A  A  - Original Message -
 > A  A  From: "Martyn Hodgson" <[1][10][10]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
 > A  A  To: "Monica Hall" <[2][11][11]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>;
   "Vihuelalist"
 > A  A  <[3][12][12]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
 > A  A  Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 6:37 PM
 > A  A  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
 > A  A  > A To be frank Monica, I've never heard of it! A What is/was
 it
 supposed
 > A  A  to
 > A  A  > A do?
 > A  A  > A Martyn
 > A  A  >
 __
 > A  A  >
 > A  A  > A From: Monica Hall <[4][13][13]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
 > A  A  > A To: Vihuelalist <[5][14][14]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
 > A  A  > A Sent: Monday, 23 June 2014, 15:30
 > A  A  > A Subject: [VIHUELA] Guitar Summit
 > A  A  > A  A I just wondered whether anyone else on this list is on
 the Guitar
 > A  A  > A  A Summit list and if so whether they ever get any
 messages. A I
 > A  A  haven't
 > A  A  > 

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-24 Thread Jelma van Amersfoort
   Dear all,

   A

   "Lake Konstanz" is a bi-annual international conference on
   guitar-related research, historical and otherwise. It was established
   in 2007 by Gerhard Penn and Andreas Stevens.A The next meeting is in
   2015.

   A

   I was there last year and presented a paper on guitar songs by the
   composer Pauline Duchambge (1776-1858). There were speakers from many
   different countries and backgrounds, it was quite interesting and fun.
   As Lex Eisenhardt mentioned, four or five of the people who recently
   published in Early Music were there as well, and Matanya Ophee too.

   A

   If any of you want to present or just listen it is best to approach
   Andreas or Gerhard with a proposal. They are quite keen to involve more
   researchers. I believe there is no website, but there is a rather
   active facebook page.
   ([1]https://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/131072740286508/)

   A

   Best, Jelma van Amersfoort

   A

   A

   On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Lex Eisenhardt
   <[2]eisenha...@planet.nl> wrote:

 Some of you may have seen the 'guitar issues' of Early Music (41/4
 A and
 42/1). Some of the authors lectured at the 'Lake Konstanz' (Summit)
 meetings.
 -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
 Van: [3]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
 [mailto:[4]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
 WALSH STUART
 Verzonden: dinsdag 24 juni 2014 11:54
 Aan: Martyn Hodgson; Vihuela Dmth
 Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

   On 24/06/2014 09:25, Martyn Hodgson wrote:
   > A  A  - Forwarded Message -
   > A  A  From: Martyn Hodgson <[5]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
   > A  A  To: Monica Hall <[6]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
   > A  A  Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2014, 7:26
   > A  A  Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   > A  A  Thanks for this.
   > A  A  I was intrigued by the use of the word 'summit' which implied
   some
   sort
   > A  A  of self-proclaimed central authority!
   I think that would be about right. Surrounded by worshippers.
   > But from what you write, it seems
   > A  A  to be/have been more of a social event
   > A  A  Martyn
   > A  A  A
   __
   >
   > A  A  From: Monica Hall <[7]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
   > A  A  To: Martyn Hodgson <[8]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
   > A  A  Cc: Vihuelalist <[9]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   > A  A  Sent: Monday, 23 June 2014, 19:29
   > A  A  Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   > A  A  Well it was started a few years ago under the auspices of
   Matanya
   > A  A  Ophee.
   > A  A  Most of the people on it were continental - i.e. from Germany,
   and
   such
   > A  A  like
   > A  A  places. A They hold/held a summit meeting in Switzerland every
   two
   > A  A  years.
   > A  A  The last one was in 2012 I think.
   > A  A  There used to be a discussion list but messages I have sent
   have not
   > A  A  got
   > A  A  through and I haven't received any for ages.
   > A  A  Monica
   > A  A  - Original Message -
   > A  A  From: "Martyn Hodgson" <[1][10]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
   > A  A  To: "Monica Hall" <[2][11]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>; "Vihuelalist"
   > A  A  <[3][12]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   > A  A  Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 6:37 PM
   > A  A  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   > A  A  > A To be frank Monica, I've never heard of it! A What is/was
   it
   supposed
   > A  A  to
   > A  A  > A do?
   > A  A  > A Martyn
   > A  A  >
   __
   > A  A  >
   > A  A  > A From: Monica Hall <[4][13]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
   > A  A  > A To: Vihuelalist <[5][14]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   > A  A  > A Sent: Monday, 23 June 2014, 15:30
   > A  A  > A Subject: [VIHUELA] Guitar Summit
   > A  A  > A  A I just wondered whether anyone else on this list is on
   the Guitar
   > A  A  > A  A Summit list and if so whether they ever get any
   messages. A I
   > A  A  haven't
   > A  A  > A  A had any for months and was wondering whether it is
   defunct or
   > A  A  whether
   > A  A  > A I
   > A  A  > A  A have been struck off!
   > A  A  > A  A Thanks to all
   > A  A  > A  A Monica
   > A  A  > A  A --
   > A  A  > A To get on or off this list see list information at
   > A  A  >
   A [1][6][15]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   > A  A  >
   > A  A  > A --
   > A  A  >
   > A  A  > References
   > A  A  >
   > A  A  > A 1.
   [7][16]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   > A  A  >
   >
   >

[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-24 Thread Lex Eisenhardt
Some of you may have seen the 'guitar issues' of Early Music (41/4  and
42/1). Some of the authors lectured at the 'Lake Konstanz' (Summit)
meetings. 

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Namens
WALSH STUART
Verzonden: dinsdag 24 juni 2014 11:54
Aan: Martyn Hodgson; Vihuela Dmth
Onderwerp: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

On 24/06/2014 09:25, Martyn Hodgson wrote:
> - Forwarded Message -
> From: Martyn Hodgson 
> To: Monica Hall 
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2014, 7:26
>     Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
> Thanks for this.
> I was intrigued by the use of the word 'summit' which implied some
sort
> of self-proclaimed central authority!


I think that would be about right. Surrounded by worshippers.



> But from what you write, it seems
> to be/have been more of a social event
> Martyn
>   __
>
> From: Monica Hall 
> To: Martyn Hodgson 
> Cc: Vihuelalist 
> Sent: Monday, 23 June 2014, 19:29
> Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
> Well it was started a few years ago under the auspices of Matanya
> Ophee.
> Most of the people on it were continental - i.e. from Germany, and
such
> like
> places.  They hold/held a summit meeting in Switzerland every two
> years.
> The last one was in 2012 I think.
> There used to be a discussion list but messages I have sent have not
> got
> through and I haven't received any for ages.
> Monica
> - Original Message -
> From: "Martyn Hodgson" <[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
> To: "Monica Hall" <[2]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>; "Vihuelalist"
> <[3]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 6:37 PM
> Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
> >  To be frank Monica, I've never heard of it!  What is/was it
supposed
> to
> >  do?
> >  Martyn
> >
__
> >
> >  From: Monica Hall <[4]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
> >  To: Vihuelalist <[5]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
> >  Sent: Monday, 23 June 2014, 15:30
> >  Subject: [VIHUELA] Guitar Summit
> >I just wondered whether anyone else on this list is on the Guitar
> >Summit list and if so whether they ever get any messages.  I
> haven't
> >had any for months and was wondering whether it is defunct or
> whether
> >  I
> >have been struck off!
> >Thanks to all
> >Monica
> >--
> >  To get on or off this list see list information at
> >  [1][6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> >
> >  --
> >
> > References
> >
> >  1. [7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> >
>
> --
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
> 2. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
> 3. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
> 4. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
> 5. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
> 6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
>


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com







[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-24 Thread WALSH STUART

On 24/06/2014 09:25, Martyn Hodgson wrote:

- Forwarded Message -
From: Martyn Hodgson 
To: Monica Hall 
Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2014, 7:26
Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
Thanks for this.
I was intrigued by the use of the word 'summit' which implied some sort
of self-proclaimed central authority!



I think that would be about right. Surrounded by worshippers.




But from what you write, it seems
to be/have been more of a social event
Martyn
  __

From: Monica Hall 
To: Martyn Hodgson 
Cc: Vihuelalist 
Sent: Monday, 23 June 2014, 19:29
Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
Well it was started a few years ago under the auspices of Matanya
Ophee.
Most of the people on it were continental - i.e. from Germany, and such
like
places.  They hold/held a summit meeting in Switzerland every two
years.
The last one was in 2012 I think.
There used to be a discussion list but messages I have sent have not
got
through and I haven't received any for ages.
Monica
- Original Message -
From: "Martyn Hodgson" <[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
To: "Monica Hall" <[2]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>; "Vihuelalist"
<[3]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
    Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 6:37 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>  To be frank Monica, I've never heard of it!  What is/was it supposed
to
>  do?
>  Martyn
>__
>
>  From: Monica Hall <[4]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
>  To: Vihuelalist <[5]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>  Sent: Monday, 23 June 2014, 15:30
>  Subject: [VIHUELA] Guitar Summit
>I just wondered whether anyone else on this list is on the Guitar
>Summit list and if so whether they ever get any messages.  I
haven't
>had any for months and was wondering whether it is defunct or
whether
>  I
>have been struck off!
>Thanks to all
>Monica
>--
>  To get on or off this list see list information at
>  [1][6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
>  --
>
> References
>
>  1. [7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>

--

References

1. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
2. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
3. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
4. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
5. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com




[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-24 Thread Martyn Hodgson

   - Forwarded Message -
   From: Martyn Hodgson 
   To: Monica Hall 
   Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2014, 7:26
   Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   Thanks for this.
   I was intrigued by the use of the word 'summit' which implied some sort
   of self-proclaimed central authority! But from what you write, it seems
   to be/have been more of a social event
   Martyn
 __

   From: Monica Hall 
   To: Martyn Hodgson 
   Cc: Vihuelalist 
   Sent: Monday, 23 June 2014, 19:29
   Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   Well it was started a few years ago under the auspices of Matanya
   Ophee.
   Most of the people on it were continental - i.e. from Germany, and such
   like
   places.  They hold/held a summit meeting in Switzerland every two
   years.
   The last one was in 2012 I think.
   There used to be a discussion list but messages I have sent have not
   got
   through and I haven't received any for ages.
   Monica
   - Original Message -
   From: "Martyn Hodgson" <[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
   To: "Monica Hall" <[2]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>; "Vihuelalist"
   <[3]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 6:37 PM
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
   >  To be frank Monica, I've never heard of it!  What is/was it supposed
   to
   >  do?
   >  Martyn
   >__
   >
   >  From: Monica Hall <[4]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
   >  To: Vihuelalist <[5]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   >  Sent: Monday, 23 June 2014, 15:30
   >  Subject: [VIHUELA] Guitar Summit
   >I just wondered whether anyone else on this list is on the Guitar
   >Summit list and if so whether they ever get any messages.  I
   haven't
   >had any for months and was wondering whether it is defunct or
   whether
   >  I
   >have been struck off!
   >Thanks to all
   >Monica
   >--
   >  To get on or off this list see list information at
   >  [1][6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >
   >  --
   >
   > References
   >
   >  1. [7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >

   --

References

   1. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   2. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   3. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   4. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   5. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-23 Thread Braig, Eugene
Ah . . .  Thanks for the update.

Eugene


-Original Message-
From: Monica Hall [mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk] 
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 3:28 PM
To: Braig, Eugene
Cc: Vihuelalist
Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

Well - I logged on to Topica and got this message - so perhaps that explains it 
all...or at least some of it...
The Topica Discussion List service will go completely off-line on June 29th, 
2014. The final shut-down of the Discussion Lists will coincide with several 
new product releases. We are confident that our improved technology will allow 
us to provide you with the most effective & innovative services. We will 
continue to post updates and dates, but feel free to send any questions to 
cs.topica.com.

The Guitar-Summit must have died I think...

Monica

- Original Message -
From: "Braig, Eugene" 
To: "Monica Hall" 
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 7:55 PM
Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


So, I went to the list's web interface 
(http://lists.topica.com/lists/guitar-summit) to look for any of Monica's 
e-mail notes to have been recently archived.  To get to a log-in page, you 
have to click a button labeled "Join this list."  I did so, but didn't 
remember my password.  In clicking a "Forgot your password??" link 
(superfluous question mark theirs, not mine) and entering my e-mail address, 
the system informed me that it had sent me a new password.  I did so twice. 
Nothing appears to have arrived from the system yet.  Ah well . . .

Eugene


-Original Message-
From: Monica Hall [mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 2:25 PM
To: Braig, Eugene
Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

I could never find the messages on the web.  Are they even archived?
I sent a message to that list  a few weeks ago but it never showed up as far 
as I know.
A mystery.

Monica

- Original Message -
From: "Braig, Eugene" 
To: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 6:11 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


> I'm a member, but never took their posts by e-mail, always reading there
> via the web.  Unfortunately, I haven't found time to look in on the
> activities of that list in years.
>
> Best,
> Eugene
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
> Behalf Of Matthew Daillie
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 10:41 AM
> To: Monica Hall
> Cc: Vihuelalist
> Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit
>
> Dear Monica,
>
> I appear to be on the list but can't recall having received any messages
> either so I suppose it's just rather low key!
>
> best
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On 23 juin 2014, at 16:30, Monica Hall  wrote:
>
>>   I just wondered whether anyone else on this list is on the Guitar
>>   Summit list and if so whether they ever get any messages.   I haven't
>>   had any for months and was wondering whether it is defunct or whether I
>>   have been struck off!
>>
>>
>>
>>   Thanks to all
>>
>>
>>
>>   Monica
>>
>>   --
>>
>>
>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
>
>
>
>
>









[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-23 Thread Monica Hall
Well - I logged on to Topica and got this message - so perhaps that explains 
it all...or at least some of it...
The Topica Discussion List service will go completely off-line on June 29th, 
2014. The final shut-down of the Discussion Lists will coincide with several 
new product releases. We are confident that our improved technology will 
allow us to provide you with the most effective & innovative services. We 
will continue to post updates and dates, but feel free to send any questions 
to cs.topica.com.


The Guitar-Summit must have died I think...

Monica

- Original Message - 
From: "Braig, Eugene" 

To: "Monica Hall" 
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 7:55 PM
Subject: RE: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit


So, I went to the list's web interface 
(http://lists.topica.com/lists/guitar-summit) to look for any of Monica's 
e-mail notes to have been recently archived.  To get to a log-in page, you 
have to click a button labeled "Join this list."  I did so, but didn't 
remember my password.  In clicking a "Forgot your password??" link 
(superfluous question mark theirs, not mine) and entering my e-mail address, 
the system informed me that it had sent me a new password.  I did so twice. 
Nothing appears to have arrived from the system yet.  Ah well . . .


Eugene


-Original Message-
From: Monica Hall [mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 2:25 PM
To: Braig, Eugene
Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

I could never find the messages on the web.  Are they even archived?
I sent a message to that list  a few weeks ago but it never showed up as far 
as I know.

A mystery.

Monica

- Original Message -
From: "Braig, Eugene" 
To: "Vihuelalist" 
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 6:11 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit



I'm a member, but never took their posts by e-mail, always reading there
via the web.  Unfortunately, I haven't found time to look in on the
activities of that list in years.

Best,
Eugene


-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
Behalf Of Matthew Daillie
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 10:41 AM
To: Monica Hall
Cc: Vihuelalist
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

Dear Monica,

I appear to be on the list but can't recall having received any messages
either so I suppose it's just rather low key!

best

Matthew


On 23 juin 2014, at 16:30, Monica Hall  wrote:


  I just wondered whether anyone else on this list is on the Guitar
  Summit list and if so whether they ever get any messages.   I haven't
  had any for months and was wondering whether it is defunct or whether I
  have been struck off!



  Thanks to all



  Monica

  --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html














[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-23 Thread Monica Hall
Well it was started a few years ago under the auspices of Matanya Ophee. 
Most of the people on it were continental - i.e. from Germany, and such like 
places.   They hold/held a summit meeting in Switzerland every two years. 
The last one was in 2012 I think.


There used to be a discussion list but messages I have sent have not got 
through and I haven't received any for ages.


Monica




- Original Message - 
From: "Martyn Hodgson" 
To: "Monica Hall" ; "Vihuelalist" 


Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 6:37 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit



  To be frank Monica, I've never heard of it!  What is/was it supposed to
  do?
  Martyn
__

  From: Monica Hall 
  To: Vihuelalist 
  Sent: Monday, 23 June 2014, 15:30
  Subject: [VIHUELA] Guitar Summit
I just wondered whether anyone else on this list is on the Guitar
Summit list and if so whether they ever get any messages.  I haven't
had any for months and was wondering whether it is defunct or whether
  I
have been struck off!
Thanks to all
Monica
--
  To get on or off this list see list information at
  [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

  --

References

  1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html






[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-23 Thread Martyn Hodgson
   To be frank Monica, I've never heard of it!  What is/was it supposed to
   do?
   Martyn
 __

   From: Monica Hall 
   To: Vihuelalist 
   Sent: Monday, 23 June 2014, 15:30
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Guitar Summit
 I just wondered whether anyone else on this list is on the Guitar
 Summit list and if so whether they ever get any messages.  I haven't
 had any for months and was wondering whether it is defunct or whether
   I
 have been struck off!
 Thanks to all
 Monica
 --
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-23 Thread Braig, Eugene
I'm a member, but never took their posts by e-mail, always reading there via 
the web.  Unfortunately, I haven't found time to look in on the activities of 
that list in years.

Best,
Eugene


-Original Message-
From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of 
Matthew Daillie
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 10:41 AM
To: Monica Hall
Cc: Vihuelalist
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

Dear Monica,

I appear to be on the list but can't recall having received any messages either 
so I suppose it's just rather low key!

best

Matthew


On 23 juin 2014, at 16:30, Monica Hall  wrote:

>   I just wondered whether anyone else on this list is on the Guitar
>   Summit list and if so whether they ever get any messages.   I haven't
>   had any for months and was wondering whether it is defunct or whether I
>   have been struck off!
> 
> 
> 
>   Thanks to all
> 
> 
> 
>   Monica
> 
>   --
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at 
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html








[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-23 Thread Rockford Mjos
Perhaps someone on the Guitar Summit list was asking the same of the Vihuela 
list!

We have also been having a quiet year.

— R


On Jun 23, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Monica Hall  wrote:

>   I just wondered whether anyone else on this list is on the Guitar
>   Summit list and if so whether they ever get any messages.   I haven't
>   had any for months and was wondering whether it is defunct or whether I
>   have been struck off!
> 
> 
> 
>   Thanks to all
> 
> 
> 
>   Monica
> 
>   --
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-23 Thread Nelson, Jocelyn
Hi Monica,

I'm not familiar with the Guitar Summit list. Perhaps I'm on it if I got your 
message?

Best,
J


Jocelyn Nelson, DMA
Teaching Assistant Professor
506 School of Music
East Carolina University
252.328.1255 office
252.328.6258 fax
nels...@ecu.edu

From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] on behalf of 
Matthew Daillie [dail...@club-internet.fr]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 10:40 AM
To: Monica Hall
Cc: Vihuelalist
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

Dear Monica,

I appear to be on the list but can't recall having received any messages either 
so I suppose it's just rather low key!

best

Matthew


On 23 juin 2014, at 16:30, Monica Hall  wrote:

>   I just wondered whether anyone else on this list is on the Guitar
>   Summit list and if so whether they ever get any messages.   I haven't
>   had any for months and was wondering whether it is defunct or whether I
>   have been struck off!
>
>
>
>   Thanks to all
>
>
>
>   Monica
>
>   --
>
>
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html






[VIHUELA] Re: Guitar Summit

2014-06-23 Thread Matthew Daillie
Dear Monica,

I appear to be on the list but can't recall having received any messages either 
so I suppose it's just rather low key!

best

Matthew


On 23 juin 2014, at 16:30, Monica Hall  wrote:

>   I just wondered whether anyone else on this list is on the Guitar
>   Summit list and if so whether they ever get any messages.   I haven't
>   had any for months and was wondering whether it is defunct or whether I
>   have been struck off!
> 
> 
> 
>   Thanks to all
> 
> 
> 
>   Monica
> 
>   --
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html