] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 4:34 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes?
Al speaking of QoS (and feel free to mail me offline [whoever] if it's too
off-topic)... I have never really bothered with QoS on XP because most
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes?
I don't know the answer to that exact question. What I was after was
the
WAN link QoS vs. the desktop to server. The reason for that is that
it's
likely that you have a 10/100/1000 ethernet network at the remote
] single login size in bytes?
Thanks Bob... I actually used that article too, once upon a time, though
it's way more detail than I was looking for. There's another one more
recent, it goes into server authentication details - way TMI. You know,
we're not even talking multiple machines, just one
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 1:54 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes?
Thanks Bob... I actually used that article too, once upon a time, though
it's way
: RE: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes?
Thanks Bob... I actually used that article too, once upon a time, though
it's way more detail than I was looking for. There's another one more
recent, it goes into server authentication details - way TMI. You know,
we're not even talking multiple
disregard).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 12:37 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes?
Thanks Al -
The factor at issue here is simply
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes?
Ah. I see where you're coming from then.
Layer 8 issues can be tough to solve. I like to add l1 to l7 and see if
I
can match.
I wouldn't expect auth traffic to tip the scales, but I really think the
should be asked to investigate QoS
Rich-
This paper isn't XP/2003 but essentially a lot of the same principals
apply. I found this paper very illuminating in it's day so maybe it will
be of some use to you. As far as the feasibility, I spent a lot of time
at the wrong end of an ISDN line and it wasn't that bad but I never had
bandwidth it uses, not how much of a noticeable delay
might there be :)
Rich
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Free, Bob
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 2:18 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes
Totally guessing here from the Dr. J password literature I've read...but
wouldn't it depend on the auth method involved as to the traffic size?
Since NTLMv2 is MS specific... you might have to fire up the sniff tools
on that one.
Chapter 11 in the Riley/Johansson book on passwords
LMhash ...
10 matches
Mail list logo