ll via Af
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 7:09 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] For Cambium
Sean,
We have a 12 mile 11 Ghz link engineered by SAF for 99.994 with 3 ft. dishes
(again in Florida – heavy humidity ALL the time) . It is installed within 1 dB
of the calculated sp
Friends don't let friends build Rohn 25. ;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Paul McCall via Af"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 8:09:06 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] For C
though it has multiple custom anti-twist supports.
Paul
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sean Heskett via Af
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 10:04 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] For Cambium
6ghz is now able to use smaller antenna sizes.
Also 11ghz with adaptive
.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
From: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Monday, November 24, 2014 at 10:30 PM
To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com&
Depends very much on how close to full utilization the links are (in Mbps).
If you have a link drop to QPSK 1/2 during massive rain fades and only 40
Mbps of throughput, for a very short time, will that cause massive packet
loss and customer problems? There's lots of good radios that can stay
linke
om
> ] *On Behalf Of *Sean
> Heskett via Af
> *Sent:* Monday, November 24, 2014 2:25 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] For Cambium
>
>
>
> i would go licensed gear from SAF (or your favorite licensed PTP vendor).
>
> we keep all the unlicensed b
onday, November 24, 2014 at 10:30 PM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] For Cambium
Unfortunately, the 14, 15, 16 mile links in Florida would be fairly difficult
at 11 ghz, even with 4ft dishes, which I cant load up on a Rohn 25G tower.
: [AFMUG] For Cambium
i would go licensed gear from SAF (or your favorite licensed PTP vendor).
we keep all the unlicensed bands available for PMP...we use licensed for PTP.
the difference between a wifi backhaul and a licensed backhaul is like the
difference between a Ford Focus and a Ferrari
ght...?
>
> *From:* Chuck Macenski via Af
> *Sent:* Monday, November 24, 2014 2:57 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] For Cambium
>
> We are working on a couple of thing you are going to like :)
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Eric Kuhnke via Af wrote
And you will release them at AnimalFarm, right...?
From: Chuck Macenski via Af
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 2:57 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] For Cambium
We are working on a couple of thing you are going to like :)
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Eric Kuhnke via Af wrote
Where is my hack saw...
-Original Message-
From: Matt Jenkins via Af
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 2:57 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] For Cambium (and WBMFG)
Sounds like we need an AirFiber WaveGuide test adapter.
Chuck, are you busy this Thanksgiving weekend?
Matthew
Anything you'd want to test on a Chicago area network? :-p
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Macenski via Af"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:57:08 PM
Subject:
Af" mailto:af@afmug.com>>
*To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent: *Monday, November 24, 2014 3:37:19 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] For Cambium
I agree, I want an AF5 connectorized. From the perspective of ubnt
engineering in Chicago, I bet a connectorized AF5 scar
We are working on a couple of thing you are going to like :)
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Eric Kuhnke via Af wrote:
> Any plans for a 3.5 or 3.65 GHz AirFiber, using a similar system to the
> AF5?
>
> With integrated antennas, it'd be pretty big, but I could see it being
> useful in some app
> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke via Af"
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Monday, November 24, 2014 3:37:19 PM
>
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] For Cambium
>
> I agree, I want an AF5 connectorized. From the perspective of ubnt
> engineering in Chicago, I bet a co
.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Kuhnke via Af"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:37:19 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] For Cambium
I agree, I want an AF5 connectorized. From the pers
/www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>
> --
> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke via Af"
> *To: *af@afmug.com
>
Until they give me what I want (connectorized).
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Kuhnke via Af"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:32:48 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] For Cambi
Any plans for a 3.5 or 3.65 GHz AirFiber, using a similar system to the
AF5?
With integrated antennas, it'd be pretty big, but I could see it being
useful in some applications where an AF24 won't reach far enough (8-9km and
99.999% max modulation over one year).
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:28 PM,
he's asking for a 12 mile link... if the goal is to maximize the clean,
empty 5.x GHz spectrum for PtMP use by end user customers, an airfiber5
backhaul is ruled out.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Chuck Macenski via Af
wrote:
> Why not Zoidburg (airFiber)?
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:24 P
Young lady, I'm an expert on humans. Now open your mouth and lets have a
look at that brain.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Chuck Macenski via Af wrote:
> uh Zoidberg that is...
>
> On Mon, Nov 24
uh Zoidberg that is...
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Chuck Macenski via Af wrote:
> Why not Zoidburg (airFiber)?
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Sean Heskett via Af wrote:
>
>> i would go licensed gear from SAF (or your favorite licensed PTP vendor).
>>
>> we keep all the unlicensed ban
Why not Zoidburg (airFiber)?
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Sean Heskett via Af wrote:
> i would go licensed gear from SAF (or your favorite licensed PTP vendor).
>
> we keep all the unlicensed bands available for PMP...we use licensed for
> PTP.
>
> the difference between a wifi backhaul and
i would go licensed gear from SAF (or your favorite licensed PTP vendor).
we keep all the unlicensed bands available for PMP...we use licensed for
PTP.
the difference between a wifi backhaul and a licensed backhaul is like the
difference between a Ford Focus and a Ferrari F12berlinetta. they are
If your budget extends as far as an unrestricted-license version of the
PTP650 in the 5.x GHz bands, you are in my opinion better served by going
to a licensed part 101 type solution...
The PTP650 is the same price or higher than some 11 GHz licensed band
full-link products on the market today, wh
PTP 650 with Sync.
On 11/24/2014 9:51 AM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote:
Ptp 450
Gino A. Villarini
@gvillarini
On Nov 24, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Paul McCall via Af wrote:
Cambium,
Can you please make a suggestion as to what equipment that you recommend to us
for this type of problem/solution?
Ptp 450
Gino A. Villarini
@gvillarini
> On Nov 24, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Paul McCall via Af wrote:
>
> Cambium,
>
> Can you please make a suggestion as to what equipment that you recommend to
> us for this type of problem/solution?
>
> Paul
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Af [mailto:
Af
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 8:48 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] For Cambium
Cambium,
Can you please make a suggestion as to what equipment that you recommend to us
for this type of problem/solution?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf
Cambium,
Can you please make a suggestion as to what equipment that you recommend to us
for this type of problem/solution?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Paul McCall via Af
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 12:32 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject:
29 matches
Mail list logo
