RE: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio

2004-11-14 Thread Brett gazdzinski
rett N2DTS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Roohr Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 8:01 PM To: Discussion of AM Radio Subject: Re: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio I'd bet it's one of this guys transmitters: http:

Re: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio

2004-11-14 Thread Larry Roohr
not tried the range of the new transmitter past about 500 feet, but it was fine that far out. Brett N2DTS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Carling Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 11:57 AM To: Discussion of AM Radio Subject: RE: [AMR

RE: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio

2004-11-14 Thread Brett gazdzinski
transmitter past about 500 feet, but it was fine that far out. Brett N2DTS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Carling Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 11:57 AM To: Discussion of AM Radio Subject: RE: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy

Re: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio

2004-11-14 Thread CHRIS PAPAIOANNOU
..Found it out.. It's www.pll.gr Chris,SV1DAF. - Original Message - From: "CHRIS PAPAIOANNOU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Discussion of AM Radio" Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 9:08 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] NPR, one soluti

Re: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio

2004-11-14 Thread CHRIS PAPAIOANNOU
quot;Brian Carling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio" Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 6:57 PM Subject: RE: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio > On 13 Nov 2004 at 21:52, Brett gazdzinski wrote: > > > I got a real nice 1 watt synthesized transm

RE: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio

2004-11-14 Thread Brian Carling
On 13 Nov 2004 at 21:52, Brett gazdzinski wrote: > I got a real nice 1 watt synthesized transmitter with a digital > frequency readout, nice stereo separation and good fidelity. > With an outside antenna, it goes blocks, never tried to figure > out just how far. > 1 watt with a good antenna should

RE: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio

2004-11-13 Thread Brett gazdzinski
PM To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio >I've gone so far as to build a part 15 transmitter so I can listen to >streaming internet stations on my old radios. I have been looking for something that puts a stable, full fidelity stereo signa

Re: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio

2004-11-13 Thread SBJohnston
The best Part 15 FM transmitter kits are the ones I've purchased from DC ELectronics http://www.dckits.com/stcast.htm I've used their mono unit (PLL-MONO $59.95) in situations where I need maximum range, and the stereo unit (PLL-SFM $79.95). when two channel audio is important. Both are P

Re: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio

2004-11-13 Thread Geoff/W5OMR
> Has anyone tried the Ramsey kit, or know of any other fairly inexpensive > unit (< $100)? > > It's getting so there is more stuff available over the computer than on the > shortwave bands, but right now I have to be in the room with the computer to > listen. I'd like to be able to enjoy these st

Re: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio

2004-11-13 Thread Donald Chester
I've gone so far as to build a part 15 transmitter so I can listen to streaming internet stations on my old radios. I have been looking for something that puts a stable, full fidelity stereo signal on the FM band so I can retransmit streaming audio throughout the house and pick it up on any

Re: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio

2004-11-13 Thread Brian Carling
I have a few BC Band crystals available for that rig if anyone needs them. Several 1288 kHz and a few others here... On 13 Nov 2004 at 8:23, Larry Roohr wrote: > Alan Cohen wrote: > > > > > > > In any case, it is certainly a lot more interesting than the usual > > radio fare. It sure beats t

Re: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio

2004-11-13 Thread Larry Roohr
Oops, the grassyhill people are a '.org', not a '.com'. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Neither one of the radio sites you quoted in your email will come up but the transmitter looks neat. Thanks and 73, John, W4AWM __ AMRadio mail

Re: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio

2004-11-13 Thread W4AWM
Hi, Neither one of the radio sites you quoted in your email will come up but the transmitter looks neat. Thanks and 73, John, W4AWM

Re: [AMRadio] NPR, one solution for lousy radio

2004-11-13 Thread Larry Roohr
Alan Cohen wrote: In any case, it is certainly a lot more interesting than the usual radio fare. It sure beats the likes of morning drive blatherers like Howard Stern and Don Imus, the right wing echo chamber of Limbaugh and Hanity, the semi-automatic no-personality bad music juke boxes th