Guys,
Picking though /usr/ (because I've nothing better to do...) I ran across two
directories that look like they do not belong where they are. The directories
are:
02:19 alchemy:/usr find x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/ -type d
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/arm-elf
Guys,
I cannibalized a cool dark blue gradient kdm/xdm greeter theme for Arch from
kubuntu (it's GPL). Works great. Just unzip the file (it has full path
information to /usr/share/apps/kdm/themes). Then I just used kde
systemsettings - System - login manager - themes to select it and then log
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 03:22:44 and regarding:
Guys,
I cannibalized a cool dark blue gradient kdm/xdm greeter theme for Arch
from kubuntu (it's GPL). Works great. Just unzip the file (it has full
path information to /usr/share/apps/kdm/themes). Then I just used kde
systemsettings -
On Monday 30 November 2009 18:08:21 and regarding:
I'd guess that you have a corrupt filesystem and due to an fsck (or
something else) the modules are gone.
Thank you for your help Flavio!
fsck was fine, but see my other post about files in /usr/x86_84-unknown-linux-
gnu and
On Thursday 19 November 2009 01:44:06 and regarding:
So recently Verizon has stopped letting me do free tethering and I've
been looking for a replacement. Apparently all of the free ISPs I can
find all require that you use their shitty Windows program to connect,
so I decided, I have a phone
obviously i do NOT want to remove xorg-server.
i don't need evdev, but:
:: xorg-server: requires xf86-input-evdev=2.2.5
so no removing it either.
the mirror i'm using has been updated today (December 1th), and i'm not
using testing.
mirrors package versions:
xorg-server 1.7.2-2
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 12:43 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
obviously i do NOT want to remove xorg-server.
i don't need evdev, but:
:: xorg-server: requires xf86-input-evdev=2.2.5
so no removing it either.
the mirror i'm using has been updated today (December 1th), and i'm not
using
On 12/01/2009 01:43 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote:
obviously i do NOT want to remove xorg-server.
i don't need evdev, but:
:: xorg-server: requires xf86-input-evdev=2.2.5
so no removing it either.
the mirror i'm using has been updated today (December 1th), and i'm not
using testing.
mirrors package
Does pacman -Qo some of this weird files return anything?
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
Picking though /usr/ (because I've nothing better to do...) I ran across
two
directories that look like they do not belong where they are.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:32 AM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
03:26 alchemy:~/dt/kdm/themes ls -la /lib/modules/2.6.31-
ARCH/kernel/sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.ko
ls: cannot access /lib/modules/2.6.31-ARCH/kernel/sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-
intel.ko: No such file or
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:42:33 -0500
Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
On 11/20/2009 07:24 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
Upstream update. Signoff both.
signoff
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 12:43 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
obviously i do NOT want to remove xorg-server.
i don't need evdev, but:
:: xorg-server: requires xf86-input-evdev=2.2.5
so no removing it either.
the mirror i'm using has been updated today (December 1th), and i'm not
Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
can you give some examples of sites worth reading that don't work in
webkit?
actually it looks like webkit wins over opera right now. The only quirks
i found were worse in opera. I'm amazed.
going for uzbl. yey.
--
Arvid
Asgaard Technologies
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:32 AM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
03:26 alchemy:~/dt/kdm/themes ls -la /lib/modules/2.6.31-
ARCH/kernel/sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.ko
ls: cannot access
Arvid Picciani wrote:
warning: cannot resolve hal=0.5.13, a dependency of xorg-server
never mind my bitching. rebuilding xorg-server without hal was a matter
of abs,edit,makepkg
3 arch
--
Arvid
Asgaard Technologies
2009/12/1 Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org:
Arvid Picciani wrote:
warning: cannot resolve hal=0.5.13, a dependency of xorg-server
never mind my bitching. rebuilding xorg-server without hal was a matter of
abs,edit,makepkg
3 arch
Are you using -Syu or are you trying to just randomly -S
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Alexander Duscheleit
ji...@huntemann.uni-oldenburg.de wrote:
Does this [1] affect arch? I guess it does for users building from aur
or abs, but I'm not really familiar with most build-environments.
[1]
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 09:11:00 and regarding:
Maybe you also need to understand what you are doing and what the
commands mean instead of brainless copy/paste.
Xavier,
I appologize if I sounded flippant in my approach to copying files back to
replace the sound modules, but rest
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/1 Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org:
Arvid Picciani wrote:
warning: cannot resolve hal=0.5.13, a dependency of xorg-server
never mind my bitching. rebuilding xorg-server without hal was a
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 12:39:23 and regarding:
Google is your friend:
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=sound-preoss.tar.bz2
Click the first link and it'll shed some light.
DR
Oh brother
Thank you DR:
checking dependencies...
Remove (1): oss-4.2_2002-1.1
Total Removed Size:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/12/1 Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org:
Arvid Picciani wrote:
warning: cannot resolve hal=0.5.13, a dependency of
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 12:48:02 and regarding:
Remove (1): oss-4.2_2002-1.1
Total Removed Size: 5.82 MB
Do you want to remove these packages? [Y/n]
OSS not loaded.
(1/1) removing oss
[#] 100%
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:54 PM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 07:33:17 and regarding:
Does pacman -Qo some of this weird files return anything?
Flavio,
Strangely, yes:
13:49 alchemy:/usr/x86_64-unknown-linux-uclibc/bin for i in
Aaron,
Oh shit, seriously? Looks like I'll have to rebuild this as well.
It's your distro. I fail to see the whole reason why you have always
been in support of KISS and the arch way, but never seem to take action
to enforce it. Maybe it's something social, which i tend to be ignorant
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 14:10:20 and regarding:
Those packages are not essential to your system. binutils-uclibc and
cross-arm-elf-binutils are primarily developer tools.
Yes,
I loaded them because there are a couple of apps that I want to try and
cross
compile. I guess they
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote:
Aaron,
Oh shit, seriously? Looks like I'll have to rebuild this as well.
It's your distro. I fail to see the whole reason why you have always been in
support of KISS and the arch way, but never seem to take action to enforce
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:27 PM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 14:10:20 and regarding:
Those packages are not essential to your system. binutils-uclibc and
cross-arm-elf-binutils are primarily developer tools.
Yes,
I loaded them
Hi,
I'm part of the Paktahn development team; Paktahn is a yaourt-like
frontend to Arch package management written in Common Lisp.
At the moment SBCL is our main deployment Lisp, and we depend on
the 1.0.32 release of SBCL because this release includes a critical
patch.
We have noticed that
On 12/01/2009 11:17 PM, Leslie P. Polzer wrote:
Hi,
I'm part of the Paktahn development team; Paktahn is a yaourt-like
frontend to Arch package management written in Common Lisp.
At the moment SBCL is our main deployment Lisp, and we depend on
the 1.0.32 release of SBCL because this release
You could try to check /var/log/pacman.log to see why oss was installed.
(If it was still installed pacman -Qi would give you this sort of info I
guess)
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:18 PM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 12:48:02 and regarding:
On 12/01/2009 11:17 PM, Leslie P. Polzer wrote:
We have noticed that SBCL i686 in extra is now marked as orphaned.
Adopted. orphan was by accident.
If this is true, what are the implications of it? Will SBCL for i686
move to AUR/Community? And can we do anything to remedy this situation
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 15:23:22 and regarding:
You could try to check /var/log/pacman.log to see why oss was installed.
(If it was still installed pacman -Qi would give you this sort of info I
guess)
Flavio,
It was installed on 11/6 along with emovix, libmms, cdrdao,
Aaron Griffin wrote:
Which package has patches to add these features? Looking at
xorg-server, I only see one extraneous patch that simple replaces the
default grey stipple pattern with black. The rest seem (at a glance)
to fix real bugs
You have a point here, in that i have used a fuzzy
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 19:45 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
nope. The hal crap has been added to X a while ago as optional
(meaning X would just freeze without it, but at least pretend to
start)
, but the forced dependency is new (as in, it doesnt start when
compiled
with hal, but no hal
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:27 PM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 14:10:20 and regarding:
Those packages are not essential to your system. binutils-uclibc and
cross-arm-elf-binutils are primarily developer tools.
Yes,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote:
...stuff...
Not sure what just happened here. I thought we were having a
legitimate discussion about xorg-server and this ballooned into
something crazy. Apparently, you've been holding onto this for some
time.
If you have
Jan de Groot wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 19:45 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
nope. The hal crap has been added to X a while ago as optional
(meaning X would just freeze without it, but at least pretend to
start)
, but the forced dependency is new (as in, it doesnt start when
compiled
with
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote:
...stuff...
Not sure what just happened here. I thought we were having a
legitimate discussion about xorg-server and this ballooned into
something crazy.
You wanted detailed proof, here you are.
i
Giovanni Scafora wrote:
2009/12/1, Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org:
I take that as an invite to post packages to the tracker that adhere to the
arch way. If this turns out to be another false promise, i will add that to
the next iteration.
is this a threat? :-)
if patches are lethal, YES :D
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 00:03 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
If you have legitimate, actionable fixes for anything you take issue
with, please post them to the bug tracker. Until then, this is just
hot air.
I take that as an invite to post packages to the tracker that
2009/12/1, Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
When I started on here the mantra was Arch is what you make it.
Packagers strive to make packages which are as vanilla as possible
(without breaking) and provide the utility expected of such packages. Of
course, if you want a system without hal/dbus,
Giovanni Scafora wrote:
2009/12/1, Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
When I started on here the mantra was Arch is what you make it.
Packagers strive to make packages which are as vanilla as possible
(without breaking) and provide the utility expected of such packages. Of
course, if you want a
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote:
Giovanni Scafora wrote:
2009/12/1, Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
When I started on here the mantra was Arch is what you make it.
Packagers strive to make packages which are as vanilla as possible
(without breaking) and
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote:
I take that as an invite to post packages to the tracker that adhere to the
arch way. If this turns out to be another false promise, i will add that to
the next iteration.
Assuming you meant packages to
On 02.12.2009 00:22, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 00:03 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
If you have legitimate, actionable fixes for anything you take issue
with, please post them to the bug tracker. Until then, this is just
hot air.
I take that
Flavio,
It was installed on 11/6 along with emovix, libmms, cdrdao,
libmodplug,
speex, libshout, mpg123, libasyncns, pulseaudio, wavpack and quanta. I'm not
sure which recommended it as an option. The weird part is that sound continued
working as normal until just this past week.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote:
I take that as an invite to post packages to the tracker that adhere to
the
arch way. If this turns out to be another false promise, i
2009/12/1 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
When I started on here the mantra was Arch is what you make it.
Packagers strive to make packages which are as vanilla as possible
(without breaking) and provide the utility expected of such packages. Of
course, if you want a system without hal/dbus,
Ray Kohler wrote:
2009/12/1 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
When I started on here the mantra was Arch is what you make it.
Packagers strive to make packages which are as vanilla as possible
(without breaking) and provide the utility expected of such packages. Of
course, if you want a system
I'm having two seperate issues here, one is simply a question or request
for an AUR, but the other is dependancy hell and I can't resolv without
removing some components.
For several reasons I'd like to try leafnode 2 (beta), they have a git
repo which should be easy enough - But I'd like to
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote:
Ray Kohler wrote:
2009/12/1 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
When I started on here the mantra was Arch is what you make it.
Packagers strive to make packages which are as vanilla as possible
(without breaking) and provide the
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 18:56, Geoffrey Lane freebal...@gmail.com wrote:
Anybody know of a repo or a template for making a arch package out of a
svn/git repo?
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_guidelines
newpkg in pkgtools does a little bit of the work for you.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Alexander Duscheleit
ji...@huntemann.uni-oldenburg.de wrote:
Does this [1] affect arch? I guess it does for users building from aur
or abs, but I'm not really familiar with most
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh shit, seriously? Looks like I'll have to rebuild this as well.
Serious question: does ANYONE have a keyboard that didn't
automatically work before this debacle? External keyboard always Just
Worked without
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
I have yet to see someone serious and informed saying input hotplug
sucks. All xorg developers I have seen (on the web : ML, blogs, irc,
...) seem to agree this new infrastructure is much better.
Just to be clear, I am one of
Why is hal dead?
More information on this and on libudev?
Vlad
--
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 03:09 +0100, vlad wrote:
Why is hal dead?
More information on this and on libudev?
Vlad
I'd like to know more about this as well. The articles I've found online
seem more marketing than details orientated (udev will cook your lunch
while paying your income tax stuff).
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 19:57 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
I have yet to see someone serious and informed saying input hotplug
sucks. All xorg developers I have seen (on the web : ML, blogs, irc,
...) seem to agree this new
It seems that devicekit will replace some functions of hal, while udev
replaces some other parts. But I don't know much further details
either. Maybe a roadmap would make all these stuff clear~
Regards
2009/12/2 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 03:09 +0100, vlad wrote:
Why is
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Hi there,
I am still not sure if we can move Qt 4.6 to [testing] or even [extra]. In
theory it should be comptabile with all previous 4.x releases but my
experience tells me that there might be broken things.
So it would be nice if you have a look at my packages and
Hello All,
I am having trouble doing a system upgrade.
---
r...@presario pacman.d]# pacman -Sy
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
[r...@presario pacman.d]# pacman -Su
::
At Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009 05:03 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
Installed here (i686 at this moment). Font looks a bit bigger than with
previus qt.
Do you have a vertical LCD display perhaps? I ask because of this elder
discussion about problems in qt 4.5.0 with fonts and certain monitors:
Ray Kohler wrote:
What I personally am in support of, in the general case, is
suckless.org-style minimalism, rather than following upstream's
direction.
So if upstream changes the default to enable the hal and
dbus bits, I will then be in favor of Arch disabling them, and we'll
be in
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 08:38 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
Ray Kohler wrote:
What I personally am in support of, in the general case, is
suckless.org-style minimalism, rather than following upstream's
direction.
So if upstream changes the default to enable the hal and
dbus bits, I will
64 matches
Mail list logo
