Tested
+1
I opened http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-577 but Joakim fixed it and
proposed a workaround (we have to be sure to document it).
I'll test this workaround on monday
Thx
Arnaud
On Oct 31, 2007 5:35 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> checked the licenses, and tested
Sorry about that Wendy, it was either today or Sunday and Sunday seems a
bit late to finalize the release and be made available to the everyone.
Anyway, it'd still be good to test beta-3 even if it has been officially
released :)
Thanks,
Deng
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 11/1/07, Maria Odea Ching <[
On 11/1/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Below are the results of this vote:
>
> +5 Binding Votes (Fabrice, Joakim, Brett, John T. and Myself)
> +1 Non-binding Votes (James)
>
> I'll finalize the release and will send an update.
Has it been 72 hours? I thought I had another day...
+1 :)
On 10/31/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's my +1, btw :)
>
> -Deng
>
> On 10/30/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > Take 2.. :)
> >
> > Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
> >
> > The highlights of this release are:
> >
Here's my +1, btw :)
-Deng
On 10/30/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Take 2.. :)
>
> Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
>
> The highlights of this release are:
> - major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers)
> - fixes in u
+1
checked the licenses, and tested with a clean local repository. Found
a bug, but it wasn't a regression so I'm all for release.
Thanks!
- Brett
On 30/10/2007, at 8:32 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Take 2.. :)
Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
The highlights of
+1
ArgumentNullException! ;)
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 17:32 +0800, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Take 2.. :)
>
> Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
>
> The highlights of this release are:
> - major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers)
> - fixe
+1 lets do it!
- Joakim
Maria Odea Ching wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Take 2.. :)
Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
The highlights of this release are:
- major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers)
- fixes in updating of metadata files
- fixes in proxying
- fix
Still +1!
:-)
Fabrice
On 10/30/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Take 2.. :)
>
> Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
>
> The highlights of this release are:
> - major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers)
> - fixes in updatin
Hi Everyone,
Take 2.. :)
Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
The highlights of this release are:
- major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers)
- fixes in updating of metadata files
- fixes in proxying
- fixes in proxy connectors configuration
- tomcat deploy
Okay then, I think I can start the release now :)
-Deng
Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
I say do it now, and start the vote now.
I've got a security related issue I'm working on now.
But I'd like to vet that for the 1.0-beta-4 release, not this
1.0-beta-3 release.
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
Any re
I say do it now, and start the vote now.
I've got a security related issue I'm working on now.
But I'd like to vet that for the 1.0-beta-4 release, not this 1.0-beta-3
release.
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
Any reason not to move forward now? (time permitting, of course :)
Things seem to be o
Any reason not to move forward now? (time permitting, of course :)
Things seem to be ok at the moment... I'm using the current trunk and
did a whole lot of building without a local repo with a mix of new
and existing artifacts yesterday without issues (other than one or
two non-blocking one
I tested the last snapshot of archiva and now everything seems to work fine.
Arnaud
On 10/26/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> These are the results of the vote:
>
> +3 Binding votes (Fabrice, Brett and Myself)
> -1 Binding vote (Arnaud)
> +2 Non-binding votes (James, Olivier)
>
On 28/10/2007, at 12:53 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 10/25/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
These are the results of the vote:
+3 Binding votes (Fabrice, Brett and Myself)
-1 Binding vote (Arnaud)
+2 Non-binding votes (James, Olivier)
With all the regressions that were discovered
On 10/25/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These are the results of the vote:
>
> +3 Binding votes (Fabrice, Brett and Myself)
> -1 Binding vote (Arnaud)
> +2 Non-binding votes (James, Olivier)
>
> With all the regressions that were discovered in 1.0-beta-3, it seems
> that it would
These are the results of the vote:
+3 Binding votes (Fabrice, Brett and Myself)
-1 Binding vote (Arnaud)
+2 Non-binding votes (James, Olivier)
With all the regressions that were discovered in 1.0-beta-3, it seems
that it would be better to postpone the release. I will remove the tag
for 1.0-be
I encountered this error in 1.0-beta-3, could anyone please verify if
this really exists or its just me? :)
jvm 1| 2007-10-24 10:44:46,186 [pool-1-thread-1] INFO
org.apache.maven.archiva.consumers.DatabaseUnprocessedArtifactConsumer:update-db-project
- Adding project model to database -
I revert my +1
-1 for http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-567
We can't use SNAPSHOTS :-(
Arnaud
On 23/10/2007, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For MRM-561 I forgot to say that there's a work around : You delete the
> managed repository.
>
> Cheers
>
> Arnaud
>
> On 23/10/2007, Bret
For MRM-561 I forgot to say that there's a work around : You delete the
managed repository.
Cheers
Arnaud
On 23/10/2007, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 23/10/2007, at 6:52 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>
> > On 10/22/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This release has
MRM-565 created.
As this makes archiva totaly unusable to maven1 users, I consider this as
blocker, but maven2-only users will never get this issue, and this is only a
beta-release. Based on this "release often" principle wins.
I've no idea how many archiva users use it as maven1 proxy. In my cas
*sigh*. Confirmed.
I can see exactly where it is broken too. The resourceExists is using
what appears to be the request path to look in the managed repository
which is of a different layout. The error message is also wrong,
leaving out the repository ID.
I'm going to be bold and say this
I tried the same maven1 request on an from-scratch archiva instance running
in plexus (my corporate archiva runs on tomcat5). Same 404 error for legacy
requests.
I also still have the wrapper.conf issue I noticed on beta 2 for windows :
[ERROR] Specified initial heap size (3 MB) is less than the
Sorry to come late on this thread.
I made some test as a maven1 client and can't get any content from the
repository :
http://localhost:8080/archiva/repository/internal/javax/servlet/servlet-api/2.3/servlet-api-2.3.jarreturns
the expected jar
http://localhost:8080/archiva/repository/internal/jav
On 23/10/2007, at 11:06 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
I get a "Configuration can not be saved when it is loaded from two
sources" error when I use this standalone build.
I can't get any of the admin screens to work.
Works OK if I use the war file on tomcat tho. (Wow! what a
difference from a
I'd go for the latter.. the 2 issues don't seem to be blocker issues for
this release, so I think it should still push through..
-Deng
Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
This release has a few exceptions visible to the user. (MRM-560, MRM-561)
Should we fix these, and wait on 1.0-beta-3? or just make 1.0-b
I get a "Configuration can not be saved when it is loaded from two
sources" error when I use this standalone build.
I can't get any of the admin screens to work.
Works OK if I use the war file on tomcat tho. (Wow! what a difference
from a month ago)
- Joakim
Maria Odea Ching wrote:
Hi All
On 23/10/2007, at 12:45 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
and when I start it I have it saying "welcome you to maven Archiva
Unknown",
already fixed this one on trunk
instead to have 1.0-beta-3
Otherwise it seems to work fine (tested only with maven 2).
+1
On 22/10/2007, Brett Porter <[EMAIL
On 23/10/2007, at 6:52 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 10/22/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This release has a few exceptions visible to the user. (MRM-560,
MRM-561)
Should we fix these, and wait on 1.0-beta-3? or just make 1.0-beta-4
come out quickly after 1.0-beta-3?
I don't thi
MRM-560 : Dependency Tree causes an Exception
MRM-561 : Error 500 while deleting a proxy connector
Those are the ones.
- Joakim
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 10/22/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This release has a few exceptions visible to the user. (MRM-560, MRM-561)
Should we fix
On 10/22/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This release has a few exceptions visible to the user. (MRM-560, MRM-561)
> Should we fix these, and wait on 1.0-beta-3? or just make 1.0-beta-4
> come out quickly after 1.0-beta-3?
I don't think it's a good idea to "re-do" builds after they
This release has a few exceptions visible to the user. (MRM-560, MRM-561)
Should we fix these, and wait on 1.0-beta-3? or just make 1.0-beta-4
come out quickly after 1.0-beta-3?
- Joakim
Maria Odea Ching wrote:
Hi All,
Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
The highlights of this rele
On 22/10/2007, at 11:57 PM, olivier lamy wrote:
+1
I found the following logger a little noisy for a end user
distribution :
agreed: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-185
--
Olivier
2007/10/22, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1, thanks Deng
On 22/10/2007, at 3:3
+1
I found the following logger a little noisy for a end user distribution :
--
Olivier
2007/10/22, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> +1, thanks Deng
>
> On 22/10/2007, at 3:31 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
> >
> >
+1, thanks Deng
On 22/10/2007, at 3:31 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
Hi All,
Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
The highlights of this release are:
- major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and
consumers)
- fixes in updating of metadata files
- fixes in proxy conn
Of course +1!
:-)
Fabrice
On 10/22/07, Maria Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
>
> The highlights of this release are:
> - major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers)
> - fixes in updating of metadata fil
Sorry, this is the correct url for the binaries.. :)
http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/archiva/1.0-beta-3/
-Deng
On 10/22/07, James William Dumay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not sure if I can vote or not but heres my +1.
>
> James
>
>
> On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 13:31 +0800, Maria Odea Ching
Not sure if I can vote or not but heres my +1.
James
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 13:31 +0800, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
>
> The highlights of this release are:
> - major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers)
> - fi
Hi All,
Archiva 1.0-beta-3 is now ready for release.
The highlights of this release are:
- major fixes in path resolution of artifacts (for proxying and consumers)
- fixes in updating of metadata files
- fixes in proxy connectors configuration
- tomcat deployment issues
- additional fixes in prox
39 matches
Mail list logo
