On Mon, 8 May 2023, 22:19 William Herrin, wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 9:46 AM Noah wrote:
> > Firstly, leasing should never be an option. Its an idea that the
> community has rejected the leasing IPv4 for a very long time and often led
> to mix reactions.
>
> Hi Noah
r
need them, then the RIR allocates the space to those resource members with
need.
Please let me know what you think and if a policy proposal would be
> warranted.
>
I will vehemently oppose such a proposal if it were ever be drafted.
Noah
___
ARIN-
dwith and capacity if it
will be able to continue serving the community as it always did.
Noah
___
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe o
Hi Matthew
While I appreciate the legal teams opinion, I am not yet convinced to this
end on this issue and as such my sentiments remain and I still oppose the
idea entirely.
Noah
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022, 22:50 Matthew Wilder, wrote:
> Hi PPML,
>
> Staff and Legal review has been cond
Hi Matthew
Thank you so much for the update and community input consideration to that
end.
Cheers
Noah
On Wed, 3 Aug 2022, 22:25 Matthew Wilder, wrote:
> Hi PPML,
>
> I appreciate the lively discussion thus far on ARIN-2022-3, including
> concerns around what prosecutorial pow
/www.arin.net/announcements/20220621-consultopen/
>
>
Is the consultation open to all internet community which includes we folks
who are not from the ARIN region in terms of participating on the same?
Noah
>
___
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving thi
issue
> raised by anyone and everyone. Not many CEOs even answer 1-2 emails.
>
I would also like to echo the same sentiment as Hank... it's refreshing to
see how John engages with this ARIN community.
Cheers
Noah
___
ARIN-PPML
You are recei
gt;
> Louie
>
Hi Louie
That is very true and I am one such participant.
Noah
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:15 PM John Santos wrote:
>
>> Hi Ronald -
>>
>> "Members" are people (or more typically corporations or other legal
>> entiti
overlook the need for a legitimate
process.
Cheers
Noah
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022, 19:06 Matthew Wilder, wrote:
> Hi Noah, et al.
>
> It appears that a few of you are not convinced of the problem statement
> for this Draft policy. Just a reminder this is a draft policy authored by
> the Po
t of Admin Contacts
being clueless to what its that Tech contacts do.
So I oppose the policy for using time as an excuse to remove an important
process that ensures legitimacy.
Noah
___
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribe
rget.
https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/013810.html
On that thread, your response was in full defence of NRS as you really went
on to explaib what they are all about as though you had insider knowledge
of the organization.
Cheers,
Noah
___
ARIN-
in that video is not misinformation as we have other members
who have collaborated openly what is being stated in the video.
Noah
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022, 01:07 Daniel Schroder,
wrote:
>
> I second this as well, Owens presenting arguments with what seems like
> good logic with short term
ff the rails at this point.
>
> Owen
>
Owen
Please be honest and dont mislead the Arin community.
There is a second side to each story. Time will tell.
Noah
>
>
> > On May 31, 2022, at 23:05 , Steve Spence
> wrote:
> >
> > This is a well done video. I
rs until ARIN was forced to make a contract
> to make us feel special.
>
This is a reasonable advice.
You got 25 years of special rights, is that not enough?
>
You got that right :-)
> Sign the RSA. The same RSA anyone else signs.
>
Yap
Cheers
Noah
t the LIR but folks who are not LIR but figured they would profit from
brokering the limited addresses.
I am curious? Why an LIR whose ARIN membership fees is peanuts could go
about leasing addresses instead of profiting from only the services they
pro
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021, 13:40 Owen DeLong, wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 21, 2021, at 16:16 , Noah wrote:
>
> If it makes business sense to lease, the best is to seek sub-allocations
> from existing LIR by requesting a service from the said LIR.
>
> Chances are the cost of direct su
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021, 02:56 Mike Burns, wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> Will you concede that lessors and lessees are willingly engaging in
> leasing today?
>
There is no such thing. You are calling end-user assignments and
suballocations that result from LIR/ISP connectivity services
policy is all about?
Noah
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021, 02:23 Mike Burns, wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> No, the LIR who provides backbone connectivity to the WIPS can't spare a
> /21 for a potentially temporary use.
> They told the WISP to get their own addresses.
> This is the world we l
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021, 01:58 Mike Burns, wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> "I dont see why a small startup WISP would prefer brokers or IPv4 leasers
> to an LIR.!"
>
> It's because we are out of addresses here in ARIN.
>
But the LIR who provide IP based services and circu
an LIR.!
Noah
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021, 00:47 Mike Burns, wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your thoughts, my replies are inline.
>
>
>
> “Transfers are generally a prerogative of brokers who don't necessarily
> provide any form of network services. It does
registry useless and thereby essentially
> lead to no need for the registry after all.
>
>
>
> Noah
>
>
>
> Hi Noah,
>
>
>
> Are you aware that there has been no needs-test for RIPE transfers for
> many years and the RIR system hasn’t collapsed?
>
Tran
with your sentiment and the requirement for a
circuit should continue to stand.
Any policy that removes such a requirement would render the management of
Internet Number Resources by the registry useless and thereby essentially
lead to no need for the registry after a
assigned IPv4
addresses to end-user customers.
This business model would set a dangerous precedence not only in the ARIN
region but across other regions.
What does "Users of network even mean"? Does that include any Tom, Mary and
Jack with a smart handset?
Noah
___
rovide services as was justified in their initial request based in need.
I oppose this change and draft policy. Also we should not be creating
policies like this. An Internet number resource should remain under the
management of the RIR not IPv4 leasers.
Noah
_
e value of
> the stakes."
>
On the contrary, the organization will come out of it strong and better and
the lessons will make AFRINIC improve a great deal across all aspects from
its community, to its governance and above all, the intern
/net/45.199.159.0/24
Just random ones I could pick up since the list is long across multiple
countries.
So Mr.John Curran is 100% correct that your Cloud Innovation Afrinic
allocations are used in the USA as originated in the USA by above networks
which are USA based.
Simply put, BG
On Thu, 2 Sep 2021, 05:31 Michel Py via ARIN-PPML,
wrote:
> >
> > Noah wrote :
> > About 80k.
> > Cloud Innovation become a resource member back in 2013, meaning they
> have been a member for 7 - 8 years now.
> > As such, assuming they pay $10,000/- times 8
hey pay $10,000/- times 8 years = $80,000/- in my humble
opinion.
Cheers
Noah
___
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscrip
he place while
pretending to be a mini-RIR, then you certainly will spend 99% of the time
updating the whois for every LOA you dash out per prefixes you lease all
over the globe.
Noah
___
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscrib
to provide an analysis
> (technical, financial, legal or other), of the impact of the draft policy
> proposal."
>
+1 Gregory and just to add that indeed AFRINIC staff have since indicated
that they are in touch with all RIR including ARIN to this effect.
Noah
___
30 matches
Mail list logo