Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bilinski, John
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 3:51 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: Question: Is anyone out there running Mid-Tier v7.1.0 on a
> 64-bit Windows 2003 OS with a 64-bit JVM?
>
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bilinski, John
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 3:51 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: Question: Is anyone out there running Mid-Tier v7.1.0 on a
> 64-bit Windows 2003 OS with a 64-bit JVM?
>
> Chris,
>
> I figured that muc
(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of strauss
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 4:32 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Question: Is anyone out there running Mid-Tier v7.1.0 on a 64-bit
Windows 2003 OS with a 64-bit JVM?
No - and think I barfed up the specs on the AR server two
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:10 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Question: Is anyone out there running Mid-Tier v7.1.0 on a 64-bit
Windows 2003 OS with a 64-bit JVM?
**
Chris, are your app server and web server on the same server?
Thanks,
Gary Opela, Jr., RSP
Remedy Engineer
Leader Commu
So run the 32-bit jvm on your 64-bit hardware. It's that easy. While
much of the 7.1 java api is native java starting with 7.1 (oncrpc,
etc.), you still have some 32-bit native libraries that the jvm is
going to attempt to load via jni. Your jvm flavor needs to match that
of the native libraries
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of strauss
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:50 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Question: Is anyone out there running Mid-Tier v7.1.0 on a 64-bit
Windows 2003 OS with a 64-bit JVM
@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Question: Is anyone out there running Mid-Tier v7.1.0 on a
64-bit Windows 2003 OS with a 64-bit JVM?
**
We rate the mid-tier 7.1.00.002 performance (as we have it configured
and the application forms pre-fetched) as follows:
On XP...
IE 7 is 10-20% faster than the User
st System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bilinski, John
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:11 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Question: Is anyone out there running Mid-Tier v7.1.0 on a
64-bit Windows 2003 OS with a 64-bit JVM?
**
Thanks Strauss,
What would
I tried to install on 64 bit and it would not install, so I used the 32 bit
java.
Good luck
Howard
On 6/12/08, Bilinski, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ** All,
>
> I just got off the phone with BMC Technical Support and they told me
> that they do not support nor recommend running Mid-Tier v
rauss
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:04 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Question: Is anyone out there running Mid-Tier v7.1.0 on a
64-bit Windows 2003 OS with a 64-bit JVM?
**
I cannot address load balancing or the 64-bit JVM, but I have had very
good performance and stability (knock on wood
I cannot address load balancing or the 64-bit JVM, but I have had very
good performance and stability (knock on wood) with mid-tier 7.1.00.002
on Win2K3 Enterprise R2 x64 using the 32-bit Tomcat 5.5.26 (app server
AND web server) on top of the 32-bit JDK 1.5.0_14. I give the JVM 1536
mb min and m
11 matches
Mail list logo
