On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Ahmed Munir wrote:
> I figured out the problem. Actually the sending fax machine speed was set
> as 33000 bps, later I set to 14400 bps and in my dial plan, I forcefully
> set to use T.38 protocol. After that I was able to receive fax.
>
> Thanks Tim for assisting
- Original Message -
> Hi Tim,
> ...
> While the fax machine starts to send the fax after a while it gives
> the message, 'Fax failed' with error code: '388'. Is it the end
> point fax machine issue or else? Please assist me out to resolve
> this issue at earliest.
Please do not email
- Original Message -
> Hi Tim,
> I'm using Asterisk 10 and on Cisco GW the protocol is set for FAX is
> T.38 and when I try to send the fax from a fax machine i.e. HP 3180,
> I'm getting some warnings as listed below;
> -- Executing [4112345678@default:1] Goto("SIP/192.168.1.69-0005
Hi Tim,
I'm using Asterisk 10 and on Cisco GW the protocol is set for FAX is T.38
and when I try to send the fax from a fax machine i.e. HP 3180, I'm getting
some warnings as listed below;
-- Executing [4112345678@default:1] Goto("SIP/192.168.1.69-0005",
"fax-detect,fax,1") in new stack
- Original Message -
> Hi Tim,
> Thanks for your response. Here is my topology as listing down below;
> PSTN Line --> Cisco Voice GW --> IP Cloud --> Asterisk
> Will Asterisk able to receive the fax (as in topology above) using
> its' fax module? In sip.conf I enabled fax detection and
't
want
to use Hylafax + iaxmodem as per requirement.
Please advice.
> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:19:12 -0400
> From: Ahmed Munir
> Subject: [asterisk-users] Fax over IP ?
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Message-ID:
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; cha
- Original Message -
> Hi all,
> Couple of things I would like ask, does Asterisk provides free
> license for FoIP (for 1 channel) or need to purchase it? Couple of
> years back, I was able to send and receive the fax using Digium T1
> card, in term of FoIP how can I able to receive fax fr
Hi all,
Couple of things I would like ask, does Asterisk provides free license for
FoIP (for 1 channel) or need to purchase it? Couple of years back, I was
able to send and receive the fax using Digium T1 card, in term of FoIP how
can I able to receive fax from traditional telephone lines / T1 lin
On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 21:19 -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> > What is the situation with Asterisk and fax over IP ? Can Asterisk
> > receive a fax over a POTS or ISDN line ?? Do I then need a Digium
> > TDM-card and an FXO-module or a T38-gateway ?
>
> Despite what anyone may say about Fax over IP
On 01/23/2010 09:11 AM, jonas kellens wrote:
> Dear members of the list,
>
> a customer of mine has some questions and I would like to pose some of
> them further to you guys.
>
> What is the situation with Asterisk and fax over IP ? Can Asterisk
> receive a fax over a POTS or ISDN line ?? Do I th
Dear members of the list,
a customer of mine has some questions and I would like to pose some of
them further to you guys.
What is the situation with Asterisk and fax over IP ? Can Asterisk
receive a fax over a POTS or ISDN line ?? Do I then need a Digium
TDM-card and an FXO-module or a T38-gatew
Christopher,
Also, how am i supposed to get my fax machine onto my ethernet network? i
assume it needs some kind of Aanalog Telephone Adapter, just like with VOIP.
You need a T.38 capable ATA. There are a few but not too many. I
believe the Grandstream ATAs have T.38 support or will have it
("
I have an trixbox system setup, and all my phones are IP based, different Grandstream phones to be exact. I have some fax machines that are still around, using analog lines of course. I've read a little into FOIP and the changing of the signals form t30(traditional fax machines) to t.38 ( ip f
Dear Steve,
I can't understand from your mail can I use SpanDSP or not?
Today we try this fax-modem:
http://www.openh323.org/t38.html
The problem now is that we can't start it with HylaFAX.
Best Regards,
Miroslav Nachev
SU> Hi Miroslav,
SU> It sounds like you don't rea
Hi Miroslav,
It sounds like you don't really understand what T.38 is. You need some
form of modem to get from a normal FAX machine to a T.38 channel.
spandsp can do that. A normal FAX modem can do that. You need a modem
somewhere, though. That is why developing the FAX modems was the first
step
Dear Steve,
SU> So how does the FAX get from the fax machine to the T.38 channel
SU> with spandsp?
In our case we will try to strip spandsp and will use directly
OpenH323. We do tests for compatibility with one of the biggest
national telecom and if they are OK, they will offer Asterisk bas
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 11:59 -0600, Michael Welter wrote:
> I've had absolutely no problems with spandsp. I've got rxfax to email
> working now
Any chance of a clue as to how you did it?
I've had some success utilities from Hylafax, it works perfectly on one
machine but fails on my actual * box
Steve Underwood wrote:
So what changes with T.38? You still need spandsp to interwork with the
PSTN. What was so hard about getting spandsp to work? (I'm genuinely
interested)
I switched to spandsp rather that purchase an expensive multi-port
FaxModem card for a fax server.
I've had absolutely
Miroslav Nachev wrote:
Hello Steve,
In the project OpenH323 the T.38 is supported. The easyest way is to
correct Asterisk logic with OpenH323.
Maybe, but from a quick look last year it didn't appear easy to make
their version of T.38 play nicely with *. I've been working on the basis
that I wi
Hello Steve,
In the project OpenH323 the T.38 is supported. The easyest way is to
correct Asterisk logic with OpenH323.
--
Best regards,
Miroslavmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, October 19, 2004, 7:38:19 PM, you wrote:
SU> Michael Loftis wrote:
>> Just my $0.02
Miroslav Nachev wrote:
Hello Steve,
There is another way to send fax if you use Fax Machine on some FXS
port.
and exactly how does that get the FAX into the T.38 channel? :-\
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.c
Hello Steve,
There is another way to send fax if you use Fax Machine on some FXS
port.
--
Best regards,
Miroslavmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, October 19, 2004, 7:50:52 PM, you wrote:
SU> So what changes with T.38? You still need spandsp to interwork with the
S
Darren Sessions wrote:
We used spandsp on the voip side. Our inbound vendor sets the call up
G711 and spandsp answers. It's a bit slow as it seems to only
negotiate v29 terbo, but it works.
Finding the correct version of libtiff was a pain. One sub version
off, and it wouldn't work. Wasn't so m
TECTED]
YC> Yiannis.
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pedro Howat
>> Rodrigues
>> Sent: 19 October 2004 15:53
>> To: Miroslav Nachev; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
>> Discussion
>> Subj
We used spandsp on the voip side. Our inbound vendor sets the call up
G711 and spandsp answers. It's a bit slow as it seems to only negotiate
v29 terbo, but it works.
Finding the correct version of libtiff was a pain. One sub version off,
and it wouldn't work. Wasn't so much that it was a hard
So what changes with T.38? You still need spandsp to interwork with the
PSTN. What was so hard about getting spandsp to work? (I'm genuinely
interested)
Regards,
Steve
Darren Sessions wrote:
Someone should put a bounty on T38. We're using spandsp right now and
have had success - but it was an a
Someone should put a bounty on T38. We're using spandsp right now and
have had success - but it was an absolute pain to get it to work.
On Oct 19, 2004, at 12:38 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
Michael Loftis wrote:
Just my $0.02 but seems to me the VoIP community as a whole needs to
extend SIP (or I
Michael Loftis wrote:
Just my $0.02 but seems to me the VoIP community as a whole needs to
extend SIP (or IAX?) with a special 'fax data' mode wherein the
gateways either act locally as the modem and queue/push bits (not
audio data) for the remote end or transparently bridge them through in
the
Yiannis Costopoulos wrote:
Well,
assuming that some of these CODECS do error correction and drop any
information that hasn't come through instead of doing error detection and
request to re-transmit the lost information, is somewhat expected. Are there
any Fax over IP protocols?
Yes. T.38. * doe
Just my $0.02 but seems to me the VoIP community as a whole needs to extend
SIP (or IAX?) with a special 'fax data' mode wherein the gateways either
act locally as the modem and queue/push bits (not audio data) for the
remote end or transparently bridge them through in the case of a
passthrough
Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pedro Howat
> Rodrigues
> Sent: 19 October 2004 15:53
> To: Miroslav Nachev; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
> Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fax over IP doesn't works
>
Hi ,
I tried this a lot, but with no sucess , even in a local network , there
is always some loss and you receive only chunks of the original file .
Pedro.
Miroslav Nachev wrote:
Hi,
We try to send Fax through IP Network but without success. The
other party use NetCentrex SoftSwitch and our c
Hi,
We try to send Fax through IP Network but without success. The
other party use NetCentrex SoftSwitch and our communication protocol
between us is H.323 (OpenH323). The error that the other party receive
is: "bearer capability not imoplemented".
Is it possible to send Fax using Asteri
33 matches
Mail list logo