Hi Ambarish,
the first point is not valid. Please, ignore it.
--Semyon
On 3/1/2016 11:14 AM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hi Ambarish,
- The over scroll remains after the proposed fix.
- The bug is a regression of 7092551 and should be labeled
correspondingly.
- An automatic test may and
Hi Semyon,
Although the execution time of the previous version was shorter, but it was
also failing many times, the extra execution time got introduced after repacing
mouseMove() from java.awt.Robot with mouseMove() from
test.java.awt.regtesthelpers.Util , this performes the mouse movement a
Hi, Alexander.
I suggest to add these lines to the test instead of replace the old
lines. The test will pass after the fix for 8151060.
On 03.03.16 17:45, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Could you please review the updated version of the test?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8150724/webrev.01
In general the fix looks fine to me. All other cases can be covered via
separate CRs.
On 03.03.16 18:31, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
Hi,
CCC is now in final state.
For these raised questions I filed following issues:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151184 [macosx] window does
not
I think that this fine is at is.
Regarding permissions I filed the JDK-8151190 issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151190 Revise permissions for
java.awt.Desktop and java.awt.Taskbar
--
Thanks,
Alexander.
On 02/24/2016 08:12 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Small question about
Hi,
CCC is now in final state.
For these raised questions I filed following issues:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151184 [macosx] window does
not receive normal window events indicating the window is hidden
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151189 Possible
getAppContext()
Could you please review the updated version of the test?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8150724/webrev.01
Line
106 tabbedPane.addTab("", icon, p);
was replaced with
109 tabbedPane.addTab("", p);
110 tabbedPane.setTabComponentAt(0, new JLabel(icon));
- in such a
Hi, Vikrant,
I ran the new test version on Windows. It's execution time is about 20 seconds
while the previous version was instant.
Is that expected?
--Semyon
On 2/26/2016 3:53 PM, Vikrant Agarwal wrote:
Hi Sergey,
I have updated the test to a standalone test.
Updated Webrev:
In general it looks fine to me. I will try to patch my local ws and run
some sanity test.
On 03.03.16 8:51, Rajeev Chamyal wrote:
Hello All,
Please review the updated webrev.
Added a free call for duplicate file name in splashscreen_sys.c ::
SplashGetScaledImageName
In general it looks fine to me. I will try to patch my local ws and run
some sanity test.
On 03.03.16 8:50, Rajeev Chamyal wrote:
Hello All,
Please review the updated webrev.
Added a free call for duplicate file name in splashscreen_sys.c ::
SplashGetScaledImageName
10 matches
Mail list logo