Not yet. Can you please help us do it?
thanks,
dims
On 1/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Are there any initiatives to port axis to gcjlib? Did someone manage to
> compile axis with gcj? And, if so, where can I find
> these libs?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
> Pru
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:59 AM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GCJ
Not yet. Can you please help us do it?
thanks,
dims
On 1/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Are there any initiatives to port axis to gcjl
I don't know about GCJ and the server functionality specifically, but the client code works nicely with GNU Classpath 0.19 (tested under IKVM). I would suspect that most of Axis would work nicely as well.I wouldn't recommend it without some fairly thorough testing, but the technology there is matu
ensaje original
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recibido: 10/01/2006 21:10
Para:
Asunto: Re:
GCJ
I don't know about GCJ and the server functionality specifically, but the
client code works nicely with GNU Classpath 0.19
(tested under IKVM). I would suspect that most of Axis would work nicely
y give it a try.
Thanks!
Mensaje original
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recibido: 10/01/2006 21:10
Para:
Asunto: Re:
GCJ
I don't know about GCJ and the server functionality specifically, but the
client code works nicely with GNU Classpath 0.19 (tested under IKVM). I
would suspect that most o
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:18 AM
> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Re: GCJ
>
> I don't know ... I tryed to run a test client I developed using eclipse with
> ax
Yes, I think it would be significantly more difficult to get the whole project to compile. In my case, I was just running under IKVM in dynamic mode, and using Sun's activation.jar/mail.jar for testing. That setup worked fairly well.
Trying to compile on top of a 100% free stack I think would sti
t; Ok, I'm new to axis but, what's the point in using Sun's
> javax.activation??
> > Dims, as I'm new to axis (and web services) I don't think I can help much
> with this issue although I may give it a try.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:44 AM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GCJ
Pratik,
Thanks for your feedback. Have u tried it? Do you have any experience with it?
We are in touch with Kaffe/Classpath/gcj/gcjx folks but we have not tried Axis2
Message-
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 10:10 AM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GCJ
jesse,
good news for you. pick up the activation jars and even mailapi jars from
Geronimo. (http://ibiblio.org/maven/geronimo-spec
nesday, January 11, 2006 10:10 AM
> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: GCJ
>
> jesse,
>
> good news for you. pick up the activation jars and even mailapi jars from
> Geronimo. (http://ibiblio.org/maven/geronimo-spec/jars/). then u can have a
> 10
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GCJ
Nope. we are just talking about running whatever code we have with an
alternative jvm. dev team strongly feels (when last polled) that if people want
to use jdk1.3 then use Axis1, if they want to use 1.4 or
1.5 then use Axis2. Note that as long as the dev team feels that
(and web services) I don't think I can help much> with this issue although I may give it a try.
> >> > Thanks!> >> >> > > > > > Mensaje original> > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Recibido: 10/01/2006 21:10> > Para: <axis-dev@ws
13 matches
Mail list logo
