Hi list,
I have Bacula ver. 1.38.11 and I want run concurrent jobs - I want two
different jobs to run simultaneously backing up the same Client to the
same Storage device.
I set Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 10 in the Director resource, the Client
resource, and the Storage resource in bacula-dir.co
I have a problem that may be simple. But trying to get a traceback is
proving to be problematic. Following the directions in the manual, and
what I could find in archives, I believe I am doing it correctly.
However a couple issues spring up.
First, the manual states that running btraceback manu
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern
Sibbald
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 12:43 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Meidal, Knut
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and tape ejects from Autoloader
On Friday 22 December 2006 2
> On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:36:38 +0100, Erik P Olsen said:
>
> I have a lot of bootstrap files from previous restore jobs. They are quite
> old
> so I wonder whether they will ever be erase or whether I should removed them
> manually. What do they serve when the restore job has long been run?
> On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 11:26:14 -0600, Mike said:
>
> I'm trying to get a list of all files saved that is in a file
> rather than only in the database. I have the Messages{} section
> below and have restarted the three bacula daemons. I am using
> a job that specifies the Messages{} section bel
>
> If you are not taking a tape off-site every night, there is no need to
> remove
> it. Bacula can very easily handle the different backup levels.
Multiple
> levels and multiple tapes is no more complicated than one. That's
what a
> good computer program will do for you ... :-)
We always enco
Which version of bacula-fd?
Tirsdag 02 januar 2007 12:35 skrev Alan Brown:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Christopher DeMarco wrote:
> > So I downloaded the latest KNOPPIX, which includes a bacula-fd.
>
> It would appear that my previous mail has already been addressed..
>
> :-)
>
> ---
Hi,
On 1/2/2007 6:19 PM, Marco Mandl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have setup bacula to make 3 generation backups to an USB disk. Now I
> want to extend it with the possibility to swap this disk to always have on
> stored remote.
>
> To give you some background, actually I make backups of two machines t
Hello,
I have setup bacula to make 3 generation backups to an USB disk. Now I
want to extend it with the possibility to swap this disk to always have on
stored remote.
To give you some background, actually I make backups of two machines to a
corresponding local USB disk. I think of swapping these
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 14:30, James Harper wrote:
> > What I would like to see, and where I would be happy to participate,
> is to
> > convince the OS vendors (i.e. RedHat/Fedora, SuSE, Debian, Ubantu,
> > FreeBSD,
> > Solaris, HP, ...) that they should have an easy way for the user to
> make a
> What I would like to see, and where I would be happy to participate,
is to
> convince the OS vendors (i.e. RedHat/Fedora, SuSE, Debian, Ubantu,
> FreeBSD,
> Solaris, HP, ...) that they should have an easy way for the user to
make a
> rescue disk that captures the state of the current harddisk(s)
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 12:51, Alan Brown wrote:
>
> Regarding SQLite.
>
> When I set up Bacula initially it was pretty clear that SQLite was for
> TEST purposes.
>
> If that has not changed, then perhaps the speed problem should be left
> as-is and the documentation changed to note that SQ
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 12:23, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >> Is there any reason that it can't be on the tape and restored first up
> >> as part of the DR process?
> >
> > That would be having the cart before the horse. The snapshot of the hard
disk
> > c
Regarding SQLite.
When I set up Bacula initially it was pretty clear that SQLite was for
TEST purposes.
If that has not changed, then perhaps the speed problem should be left
as-is and the documentation changed to note that SQLite is there for
testing, not production systems?
AB
--
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Christopher DeMarco wrote:
> My position is still that staying out of the bootup process is best.
> Let KNOPPIX, or MORPHIX or whateverix get me to a bash prompt and then
> I'll handle getting bacula-fd running. KNOPPIX will boot the majority
> of boxes out there, so I'll beg
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Christopher DeMarco wrote:
> So I downloaded the latest KNOPPIX, which includes a bacula-fd.
It would appear that my previous mail has already been addressed..
:-)
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influe
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Is there any reason that it can't be on the tape and restored first up
>> as part of the DR process?
>
> That would be having the cart before the horse. The snapshot of the hard disk
> configuration is to be able to reconfigure a broken hard disk or con
17 matches
Mail list logo
