I have a problem that may be simple. But trying to get a traceback is proving to be problematic. Following the directions in the manual, and what I could find in archives, I believe I am doing it correctly. However a couple issues spring up.
First, the manual states that running btraceback manually should send the current state of bacula and exit leaving the processes running. This is true if there are no jobs running. http://pixelhammer.com/DAve/Bacula/btraceback2.txt But if jobs are running, bacula-dir goes away. Should btraceback stop bacula-dir? http://pixelhammer.com/DAve/Bacula/btraceback3.txt And finally, the traceback I get when I see the problem I am trying to report. I get the strange feeling that I need more information to properly report the problem to Kern. http://pixelhammer.com/DAve/Bacula/btraceback1.txt I am running Bacula 1.38.5 FreeBSD 5.4 Bacula installed from ports. I have debug set to a value of 99. I am running btraceback manually as root with the following command. btraceback /usr/local/sbin/bacula-dir 86459 The PID is correct and /usr/local/sbin/btraceback has been correctly edited. Thanks, any assistance is appreciated. DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international holidays, but nothing for Veterans? Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
