On Sat Aug 11 2012 Sriram Karra wrote:
Further, throwing them away could just be stashing the fields
into the notes list.
Certainly. But if you then decide to give v3 a second try, you will
not get back what you had before.
Just for the record, can you tell us about all the changes in the
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote:
I would like to capture this question and a summary of your
answers as a FAQ on the updated project site on sourceforge.
Thanks a lot, that will be helpful
I have updated site (http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/) with a
On Fri Aug 10 2012 Sriram Karra wrote:
I have updated site (http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/) with a note
pointing to Savannah. That done, I now feel it is best to just
leave that site alone. Any FAQ etc. should reside on the Savannah
site. Thoughts?
Thanks a lot for doing this. Two things:
-
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote:
Thanks a lot for doing this. Two things:
- My first name is Roland
Ah, indeed :)
- I suggest to replace the 2nd paragraph by something like the
following
I have rewritten along lines you have suggested and
On Sat Aug 11 2012 Sriram Karra wrote:
I have rewritten along lines you have suggested and pushed it. Please take a
look.
Looks fine to me, thanks,
Backwards compatibility for me would mean a few distinct things:
1. Will my old customizations work with the new code
#1 might never get
