On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:50:12 -0500
Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I say what I do (opinion, that is), is because I bought a
> couple of new SATA drives (7200 rpm, 500 gigabytes) recently for less
> than $80.00 each.
>
> Prices are incredible (here in the USA, anyway). I b
2008/4/22, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> > Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> I would like to add RPM to BLFS because it is required for a system to be
> >> compliant with the Linux Standards Base.
> >
> > Which version? 4.x and 5.x are completely different beasts.
>
>
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I would like to add RPM to BLFS because it is required for a system to be
>> compliant with the Linux Standards Base.
>
> Which version? 4.x and 5.x are completely different beasts.
According to www.rpm.org, the current version is 4.4.2.3.
>
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> There are a few unclaimed 6.3 tickets that we need to address:
>
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/2065 : Sane UDEV
>
> Looks like this one should be handled by Randy or Alexander
Or retitled to "drop the usb group" and moved to the future, because it is a
too-
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/21/08 22:56 CST:
>> I would like to add RPM to BLFS because it is required for a system to be
>> compliant with the Linux Standards Base.
>
> Cool. You're thinking it would be just another package like all the
> others?
>
> What I mean
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I would like to add RPM to BLFS because it is required for a system to be
> compliant with the Linux Standards Base.
Which version? 4.x and 5.x are completely different beasts. Anyway, LFS
contains
a severe deviation from LSB (no libncurses.so.5 by default, only a non-stand
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/21/08 22:56 CST:
> I would like to add RPM to BLFS because it is required for a system to be
> compliant with the Linux Standards Base.
Cool. You're thinking it would be just another package like all the
others?
What I mean is; that we won't be recommending fo
I would like to add RPM to BLFS because it is required for a system to be
compliant with the Linux Standards Base. It doesn't have to be for 6.3, but it
is relatively easy. The install issues:
Requires beecrypt (CMMI)
RPM is basically CMMI, but needs --without-selinux for LFS
The install puts
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 04/21/08 19:37 CST:
> It's not me you need to convince, but the other LFS users. Our man
> utility supports compressed pages, and people seem to want this
> functionality. I'm just trying to keep the script maintained while
> fixing obvious bugs in it.
Well, per
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
> > Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 04/21/08 18:37 CST:
> >> Today I finally spent some time addressing a few patches people have
> >> sent in about compressdoc and some other bugs I noticed along
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 04/21/08 18:37 CST:
>> Today I finally spent some time addressing a few patches people have
>> sent in about compressdoc and some other bugs I noticed along the way.
>
> I appreciate your efforts, though I sort of look at repairing the
> c
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 04/21/08 18:37 CST:
> Today I finally spent some time addressing a few patches people have
> sent in about compressdoc and some other bugs I noticed along the way.
I appreciate your efforts, though I sort of look at repairing the
compressdoc script akin to fixing
Today I finally spent some time addressing a few patches people have
sent in about compressdoc and some other bugs I noticed along the way.
Here's the current copy:
http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/files/BLFS/svn/compressdoc
This has the automatic compression that Lars sent in a long time ago,
Hi all,
I don't want to resign, however I currently do not have ssh available
and may lose internet access for a time.
I have Mpg123 assigned to me, they are at 1.4 and climbing, I will not
be updating it. Someone should reassign it, I cannot. I hope to be
active one day soon!
---
David Jense
Audio File-0.2.6 should have it's m4 fixed, the distros patch it.
averting this warning on every invocation of aclocal:
warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_AUDIOFILE
run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
or see blah ...
this sed could be prepended to the instructions:
sed -
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:45:14AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> There are a few unclaimed 6.3 tickets that we need to address:
>
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/2479 : goffice
>
> Reported by Ken
>
Thanks for the reminder - I've moved it to "future".
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Trag
There are a few unclaimed 6.3 tickets that we need to address:
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/2065 : Sane UDEV
Looks like this one should be handled by Randy or Alexander
-
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/2395 : /etc/X11/
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/t
17 matches
Mail list logo
