On 11 Jun 2007, at 00:00, Andrew Crystall wrote:
> On 10 Jun 2007 at 16:27, PAT MATHEWS wrote:
>
>> High taxes on liquor = "moonshiners' full employment act"
>
> I disagree, that's cultural. There's plenty of tax on alcohol here,
> and we don't get much moonshine.
It's not just tax, it's the oth
On 10 Jun 2007 at 16:27, PAT MATHEWS wrote:
> High taxes on liquor = "moonshiners' full employment act"
I disagree, that's cultural. There's plenty of tax on alcohol here,
and we don't get much moonshine.
AndrewC
Dawn Falcon
___
http://www.mccmedia.c
High taxes on liquor = "moonshiners' full employment act"
http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/
__
I am NOT senile. I've ALWAYS been this way.
>From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Taxes, Te
http://fallbackbelmont.blogspot.com/2007/06/monzers-ball.html
One of the PajamasMedia cronies posted this (and further spread by
Glen Reynolds).
So I wonder, just how much liability do we incur when we heavily tax
vices?
That we enable a black market seems to be a no-brainer, but do things
bala
