bug#20255: 'search-paths' should respect both user and system profile.

2021-06-29 Thread Alex Kost
Maxim Cournoyer (2021-06-28 00:48 -0400) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: [...] >> I can modify /etc/profile with any "normal" linux distribution but I >> cannot do it with the Guix System. And I find it awful that you think >> it should stay like that. I am for provi

bug#20255: 'search-paths' should respect both user and system profile.

2021-06-27 Thread Alex Kost
Maxim Cournoyer (2021-06-25 22:37 -0400) wrote: [...] > Do you still have a vetted interest in the issue at hand? This is a > serious usability problem that's been in limbo for 6 years, apparently > for reasons of purity (not wanting to run a command in /etc/profile). > While I share the sentimen

bug#41614: It's impossible to mark "--list-generations" for guix shell commands

2020-06-15 Thread Alex Kost
ksg (2020-05-30 22:28 +0900) wrote: Hello, > Using emacs, > when I do, > > M-x guix RET, under "Sub-popups" hit "c" (guix shell commands) > > I can't mark "-l, --list-profiles", > because when I hit "-l", > 'Switches' buffer automatically mark "-l, --list-generations". BTW, you can also use "M-x

bug#20255: (old)bug#20255: 'search-paths' should respect both user and system profiles

2020-02-21 Thread Alex Kost
zimoun (2020-02-21 16:53 +0100) wrote: > Dear, > > What is the status of the bug#20255 [1]? > It is old; the last activity seems back on 2015, November. So let resume. > > The issue is, e.g.: > - perl installed into the system profile > - perl-xml-parser installed into an user profile > Then "gu

bug#38498: Fontconfig does not find fonts in non-default profiles

2019-12-06 Thread Alex Kost
Pierre Neidhardt (2019-12-05 18:52 +0100) wrote: > Thank you Alex, that's what I did and it works. > > That said, I think it'd be nice if Guix would automatically do this for > us. After all, it already handles multiple-profiles properly for so > many other things! :) TBH I don't understand all

bug#38498: Fontconfig does not find fonts in non-default profiles

2019-12-05 Thread Alex Kost
Pierre Neidhardt (2019-12-05 11:43 +0100) wrote: > The fontconfig package has this bit: > > (string-append "--with-add-fonts=" > "~/.guix-profile/share/fonts," > "/run/current-system/profile/share/fonts") > > If I understand correctly, fonts can only be installed at the system > level or in ~/

bug#34010: "guix pull -h" does not show --system option

2019-01-07 Thread Alex Kost
Hello, I have noticed that commit 5923102f7b58f0a0120926ec5b81ed48b26a188e did not add a notice of "--system" option to 'show-help' procedure, so "guix pull -h" does not show this option. -- Alex

bug#33854: StumpWM build failing.

2018-12-24 Thread Alex Kost
Alex Kost (2018-12-24 18:01 +0300) wrote: > Oleg Pykhalov (2018-12-24 09:10 +0300) wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Thank you for notice this. >> >> "bre...@posteo.net" writes: >> >>> Hi all, StumpWM is failing to build on my machine. Can a

bug#33854: StumpWM build failing.

2018-12-24 Thread Alex Kost
Oleg Pykhalov (2018-12-24 09:10 +0300) wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for notice this. > > "bre...@posteo.net" writes: > >> Hi all, StumpWM is failing to build on my machine. Can anybody >> replicate this? […] > > The build farm can https://ci.guix.info/build/721131 Actually it can't since the build

bug#33772: StumpWM broken commands?

2018-12-18 Thread Alex Kost
Pierre Langlois (2018-12-18 17:34 +) wrote: > Hello! > > Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Christopher Lemmer Webber skribis: >>> It seems to me that StumpWM broke somehow, for some reason. I can confirm there was a version change: >>

bug#32836: emacs-magit is broken (and probably others) due to package renaming

2018-09-25 Thread Alex Kost
Pierre Neidhardt (2018-09-25 17:04 +0200) wrote: > Oopsy, missed that indeed! xD > Sorry for the trouble, will fix as soon as possible. > > By the way, I think using "name" for URLs is a bad practice, we only need > "version" there. What do you people think? I totally agree! I don't like this p

bug#32646: emacs-guix doesn't build, because of guile-gcrypt

2018-09-10 Thread Alex Kost
George Clemmer (2018-09-10 10:31 -0400) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: > >> Ludovic Courtès (2018-09-06 11:09 +0200) wrote: >> >>>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:752:25: In procedure dispatch-exception: >>>> no code for module (guix hash) >>>> make[2

bug#32646: emacs-guix doesn't build, because of guile-gcrypt

2018-09-06 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2018-09-06 11:09 +0200) wrote: >> ice-9/boot-9.scm:752:25: In procedure dispatch-exception: >> no code for module (guix hash) >> make[2]: [Makefile:556: emacs-guix/hash.go] Error 1 (ignored) > > I suppose Emacs-Guix might need to use (gcrypt hash) instead. > Any ideas, Alex? Ouch

bug#32650: Nitpicking perl description

2018-09-06 Thread Alex Kost
I have noticed that description of the 'perl' package is: "Perl 5 is a highly capable, feature-rich programming language with over 24 years of development." Mentioning 24 years seems strange to me. Well, of course, "over 24 years" will always be correct (as well as "over 1 year"), but still :-)

bug#32096: [wishlist] on-line documentation

2018-07-08 Thread Alex Kost
Matt Wette (2018-07-08 09:53 -0700) wrote: > It would be nice if the guix documentation was directly readable > in HTML at https://www.gnu.org/software/guix Perhaps I miss-understood what you mean, but it is available: https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/index.html (there is

bug#31827: "guix pull" fails

2018-06-15 Thread Alex Kost
Ben Sturmfels (2018-06-15 10:25 +1000) wrote: > On 15/06/18 01:13, Alex Kost wrote: >> Hello, sorry for bothering. I tried to run "guix pull" from the guix >> git checkout (using pre-inst-env) and it failed for me with the >> following backtrace. Do I miss

bug#31827: "guix pull" fails

2018-06-14 Thread Alex Kost
Hello, sorry for bothering. I tried to run "guix pull" from the guix git checkout (using pre-inst-env) and it failed for me with the following backtrace. Do I miss anything obvious? [...] compiling...100.0% of 1 files compiling...100.0% of 40 files grafting '/gnu/store/z5fy5i0va7l3ffwlia

bug#31652: Use of ‘keymap’ vs. ‘layout’ in manual

2018-05-30 Thread Alex Kost
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice (2018-05-30 05:49 +0200) wrote: > Guix, > > Grepping the manual for ‘keyboard layout’ will get you to section > 6.1.4.1 (setting the layout temporarily during installation using > loadkeys), but not 6.2.7.1 where you might learn about using > console-keymap-service to make th

bug#31088: Use '@' as version number separator in guix output

2018-04-10 Thread Alex Kost
Chris Marusich (2018-04-09 23:38 -0700) wrote: [...] > Because I changed the package-full-name procedure, this also fixes the > package names in other places, such as graphs produced by "guix graph". I recall there was some discussion about 'package-full-name' in the past but I remember nothing a

bug#31069: emacs-smartparens: sp-forward-barf-sexp broken

2018-04-08 Thread Alex Kost
Oleg Pykhalov (2018-04-07 22:09 +0300) wrote: > Thorsten Wilms writes: > >> On 05.04.2018 21:25, Alex Kost wrote: >> >>> It probably wouldn't help but... all these commands work for me without >>> any error (I use smartparens 1.11 installed with Guix)

bug#31069: emacs-smartparens: sp-forward-barf-sexp broken

2018-04-07 Thread Alex Kost
Thorsten Wilms (2018-04-06 22:35 +0200) wrote: > On 05.04.2018 21:25, Alex Kost wrote: > >> It probably wouldn't help but... all these commands work for me without >> any error (I use smartparens 1.11 installed with Guix). >> >> I don't use "smartparen

bug#31069: emacs-smartparens: sp-forward-barf-sexp broken

2018-04-05 Thread Alex Kost
Thorsten Wilms (2018-04-05 12:12 +0200) wrote: > With both emacs and smartparens installed via guix, > sp-backward-slurp-sexp, sp-forward-slurp-sexp work, but > sp-backwards-barf-sexp and sp-forward-barf-sexp fail with: > Wrong type argument: integer-or-marker-p, :beg-in It probably wouldn't he

bug#30655: xset(1) not accepting symlink to font path

2018-03-01 Thread Alex Kost
Marco van Hulten (2018-02-28 22:54 +0100) wrote: > Hello, > > When I follow the manual at > https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Application-Setup.html#X11-Fonts > , > I get the message that there is something wrong with the directory I'm > trying to add it: > > > gast@graviton ~$ x

bug#30434: magit won’t work over TRAMP

2018-02-16 Thread Alex Kost
Mark H Weaver (2018-02-16 04:09 -0500) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: > >> Mark H Weaver (2018-02-14 13:17 -0500) wrote: >> >>> Alex Kost writes: >>> >>>> You didn't remove "git" from the inputs. I think it is not needed now. >&

bug#30434: magit won’t work over TRAMP

2018-02-15 Thread Alex Kost
Mark H Weaver (2018-02-14 13:17 -0500) wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Alex Kost writes: > >> Mark H Weaver (2018-02-14 03:51 -0500) wrote: >> >>> Ricardo Wurmus writes: >>>> I think it makes sense *not* to hardcode the path to the git executabl

bug#30434: magit won’t work over TRAMP

2018-02-14 Thread Alex Kost
Mark H Weaver (2018-02-14 03:51 -0500) wrote: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> I think it makes sense *not* to hardcode the path to the git executable >> here. > > Agreed. Done, in commit 5fe9ba59ba1cea12a70d011aacbace52e3bfda18 on > master and commit 317e8e9404058af35d9843e076934560f95d895a on > cor

bug#30434: magit won’t work over TRAMP

2018-02-12 Thread Alex Kost
Ricardo Wurmus (2018-02-12 13:53 +0100) wrote: > The default value for “magit-git-executable” (when magit is installed > via Guix) appears to be a store path, such as > “/gnu/store/l7g5r1c2i0bf3cd71g53ajy8khdcyidz-git-2.16.1/bin/git”. This > means that when magit is used over TRAMP it will try to

bug#29992: 'postgres' service doesn't stop

2018-01-08 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2018-01-08 11:59 +0100) wrote: > Perhaps the proper way to stop postgresql is via one of its client > commands, like we do for nginx? Regarding the commands: "pg_ctl" is the canonical tool to start/stop PostgreSQL server. Note: I don't use the Guix service for postgresql (instea

bug#24279: Bug in xterm and/or fontconfig

2017-11-29 Thread Alex Kost
Oleg Pykhalov (2017-11-28 10:14 +0300) wrote: > Hello John, > > John Darrington writes: > >> In GuixSD: >> >> guix package -i xterm strace >> strace xterm >> >> xterm starts as it should, however observe many failed calls similar to: >> >> open("/gnu/store/b484nvn9nnr3ddclpz2fma9yxmimg2jj-font

bug#28727: Profiles with intentionally out of date packages are upgraded to the newest version

2017-10-07 Thread Alex Kost
Ben Woodcroft (2017-10-07 16:14 +1000) wrote: > Hi, Hello, > I have a profile with python@2 in it, and running 'guix package -u' > updates it to python@3, which isn't what I want. I cannot run 'guix > package -i python@2 -u' because then it tries to install both python@2 > and python@3, which co

bug#28298: Downgrades in xfontsel and other packages using app-defaults

2017-08-31 Thread Alex Kost
John Darrington (2017-08-30 15:21 -0400) wrote: > It looks fine to me. I don't get that warning. But did you actually tried what I wrote?: $ `guix build xfontsel`/bin/xfontsel > The XAPPLRESDIR is no longer required because the libxt library has > been patched. Oh, I didn't know about this

bug#28298: Downgrades in xfontsel and other packages using app-defaults

2017-08-30 Thread Alex Kost
Hello, commit 5dc8dd07b¹ removed a wrapper from xfontsel package. And now xfontsel looks "ugly" (not as intended). You can simply check it: $ `guix build xfontsel`/bin/xfontsel It doesn't look right, and also prints the following message: Warning: app-defaults file not properly installed.

bug#27686: emacs-ess: Not installed in "${output}/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d"

2017-08-19 Thread Alex Kost
Maxim Cournoyer (2017-08-15 12:08 -0400) wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Alex Kost wrote: [...] > A side note: this is one of the reasons why I don't like "guix.d" > sub-directory.  I think it is a useless extra level in the file >

bug#27686: emacs-ess: Not installed in "${output}/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d"

2017-07-29 Thread Alex Kost
Alex Kost (2017-07-18 16:52 +0300) wrote: > Adonay Felipe Nogueira (2017-07-13 09:20 -0300) wrote: > >> It seems that Emacs ESS mode isn't installed in the same location as >> other packages are. >> >> Also note that emacs-ess doesn't use the Emacs build s

bug#27820: guix package -u: order of argument is significant

2017-07-26 Thread Alex Kost
Ricardo Wurmus (2017-07-26 10:59 +0200) wrote: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus skribis: [...] >>> This seems good to me. I just wonder if there are legitimate cases >>> where a package regexp would look like a command line option. If that’s >>> not the case could we just “unread”

bug#27686: emacs-ess: Not installed in "${output}/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d"

2017-07-18 Thread Alex Kost
e would be no need to adjust 'emacs-ess', 'magit' and probably some other packages to install *.el in "guix.d". But this is for another discussion :-), sorry: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-05/msg00241.html >From 2b36a9a5de44d162b39b351c49ec2f35c8c

bug#27491: Indentation issue in emacs

2017-06-28 Thread Alex Kost
Arun Isaac (2017-06-27 11:44 +0530) wrote: > Ok, fixed! :-) > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=2482c02f3b23b2490a6647e0717cf8a4ccf3f6a8 > > However, I think this is a hack, and the better solution would be to > actually fix the underlying indentation issue. But, I am too laz

bug#27491: Indentation issue in emacs

2017-06-26 Thread Alex Kost
Arun Isaac (2017-06-26 02:35 +0530) wrote: > I'm not entirely sure this is the right place to report this > bug. If I should report this bug elsewhere, please direct me. > > When I indent the `emacs-which-key' package definition in > gnu/packages/emacs.scm using `indent-region', the description ge

bug#27222: [PATCH] Fix ert-runner regression

2017-06-07 Thread Alex Kost
Arun Isaac (2017-06-07 15:58 +0530) wrote: >> Sorry I haven’t closely followed this discussion. Arun: Could you merge >> it if that looks good to you? I trust your judgment, comrades. :-) > > The patches are fine by me. Alex Kost is reviewing this patch. So, I > think h

bug#27222: [PATCH] emacs-build-system install phase doesn't honor directory hierarchy

2017-06-05 Thread Alex Kost
Arun Isaac (2017-06-05 15:33 +0530) wrote: > Please make any other changes you think are necessary, and push. Thanks! Thanks, but I'm afraid I'm not competent to judge about the first patch. I don't really know what is used on build side and on host side, and whether these things can be mixed li

bug#27222: [PATCH] emacs-build-system install phase doesn't honor directory hierarchy

2017-06-05 Thread Alex Kost
Arun Isaac (2017-06-05 00:55 +0530) wrote: [...] >> I also think these arguments are redundant! I suggested to remove this >> duplication at: >> >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26559#41 > > And, I did respond at > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26559#53 Sure, I

bug#27231: regression?: grub-configuration for grub-efi does not return a bootloader-configuration

2017-06-04 Thread Alex Kost
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) (2017-06-04 16:25 +0200) wrote: > On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 04:38:11PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: >> This is a limitation of 'grub-configuration' macro: that backtrace >> happened because you have 'grub' field *not* in the first p

bug#27222: [PATCH] emacs-build-system install phase doesn't honor directory hierarchy

2017-06-04 Thread Alex Kost
Maxim Cournoyer (2017-06-04 09:44 -0700) wrote: [...] >>>(phases '(@ (guix build emacs-build-system) >>>%standard-phases)) >>>(outputs '("out")) >>> - (include ''("^[^/]*\\.el$" "^[^/]*\\.info$

bug#27231: regression?: grub-configuration for grub-efi does not return a bootloader-configuration

2017-06-04 Thread Alex Kost
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) (2017-06-04 12:47 +0200) wrote: > Hello, > > My GuixSD configuration (see attachment) for UEFI got broken some > three weeks ago but I’ve only now caught up with my e-mail and “fixed” > it. > > root@floriannotebook ~# guix system reconfigure > /home/florian/keep/guixsd-

bug#27222: [PATCH] emacs-build-system install phase doesn't honor directory hierarchy

2017-06-04 Thread Alex Kost
I Cc-ed Arun, the author of the mentioned change (commit d879685176d23c111f4fc665698251b25cdf9124). [...] > From a035d07dfa6cbddccfa0476e2009d19bdf296941 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Maxim Cournoyer > Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 23:43:02 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] build-system: emacs: Install elisp f

bug#26848: procedure resolve-interface finds no code for GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH modules which are otherwise working

2017-05-09 Thread Alex Kost
ng0 (2017-05-08 22:24 +) wrote: > [user@abyayala ~/src/packages]$ sudo guix system reconfigure /etc/config.scm > guix system: error: failed to load '/etc/config.scm': > ice-9/boot-9.scm:2903:6: In procedure resolve-interface: > ice-9/boot-9.scm:2903:6: no code for module (ng0 packages personal

bug#26367: Please add emacs-adaptive-wrap package

2017-04-07 Thread Alex Kost
> From be8efedf1710a907db522002c9df1773ab1681ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: humanitiesNerd > Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:42:05 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-adaptive-wrap > > * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-adaptive-wrap): New variable. > --- > gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 24

bug#26046: ESS installed without autoloads

2017-03-11 Thread Alex Kost
Ricardo Wurmus (2017-03-10 10:03 +0100) wrote: > The “emacs-ess” package does not behave like all other Emacs packages. > Its files are installed to “$out/share/emacs/site-lisp/ess” (not > “guix.d”) and there are no autoloads. > > I don’t know how to get ESS to work like this. Should the package

bug#25884: build fails

2017-02-28 Thread Alex Kost
Catonano (2017-02-27 15:02 +0100) wrote: > Ok, > > I'm ashamed to admit that I was just confused, master builds > perfectly > > This bug can be closed. > > Sorry for the fuss > > Alex, I apologize for abusing your time :-/ No problem. BTW you can close bugs yourself simply by sending a message t

bug#25884: build fails

2017-02-27 Thread Alex Kost
Catonano (2017-02-27 00:04 +0100) wrote: > Guix master won't build > > I just pulled master and I'm at > 5d79b1bf575139dba9b3f919c7cc7b7f0853a67c I have just built it successfully. Could you try "make clean-go"; if it reports about unhandled .go files, remove them; then try "make" again. -- Al

bug#25758: Should zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler?

2017-02-16 Thread Alex Kost
Mekeor Melire (2017-02-16 18:01 +0100) wrote: > zathura is a document viewer: > > synopsis: Lightweight keyboard-driven PDF viewer > description: Zathura is a customizable document viewer. It > provides a minimalistic interface and an interface that mainly focuses > on keyboard intera

bug#25573: Adding btrfs support may break reconfigured system

2017-01-31 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2017-01-30 10:41 +0100) wrote: > Hi, > > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Hello, recently I found that "guix system" makes a "broken" system for >> me. When I boot a freshly created system, I get something like this: >> >>

bug#25573: Adding btrfs support may break reconfigured system

2017-01-29 Thread Alex Kost
Hello, recently I found that "guix system" makes a "broken" system for me. When I boot a freshly created system, I get something like this: In procedure <...> at ./gnu/build/file-systems.scm:282:4 (device) In procedure fport_seek: Invalid argument and I'm thrown at the Guile promt. The same

bug#24442: gettext: No PO mode for Emacs (or wrong description)

2016-09-29 Thread Alex Kost
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (2016-09-15 09:04 +0200) wrote: > The description for ``gettext@0.19.8`` (current) includes this sentence: > > It provides translators with the means to create message catalogs, > as well as an Emacs mode to work with them, and a runtime library to > load transla

bug#24442: gettext: No PO mode for Emacs (or wrong description)

2016-09-25 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-09-24 10:55 +0900) wrote: > Hi! > > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (2016-09-15 09:04 +0200) wrote: >> >>> The description for ``gettext@0.19.8`` (current) includes this sentence: >>> >>> It provides tr

bug#24442: gettext: No PO mode for Emacs (or wrong description)

2016-09-19 Thread Alex Kost
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (2016-09-15 09:04 +0200) wrote: > The description for ``gettext@0.19.8`` (current) includes this sentence: > > It provides translators with the means to create message catalogs, > as well as an Emacs mode to work with them, and a runtime library to > load transla

bug#24279: Bug in xterm and/or fontconfig

2016-09-02 Thread Alex Kost
Mark H Weaver (2016-09-02 00:03 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: > >> John Darrington (2016-08-21 16:18 +0300) wrote: [...] >>> Now in the xterm, hold down Ctrl and press any mouse button. >>> The xterm aborts with the following messages: >>> Warning:

bug#24335: Error when invoking usermod while reconfiguring

2016-08-30 Thread Alex Kost
Leo Famulari (2016-08-30 08:44 +0300) wrote: > While reconfiguring my GuixSD system from 1062f2451 (gnu: Add stagit), > the process fails as show below. > > When I revert 2d1a2f4af (system: Add 'create-home-directory?' field to > ) and the associated commit cb58b2cd, the reconfigure > completes su

bug#24279: Bug in xterm and/or fontconfig

2016-08-29 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-08-28 17:45 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> John Darrington (2016-08-21 16:18 +0300) wrote: > > [...] > >>> Now in the xterm, hold down Ctrl and press any mouse button. >>> The xterm aborts with the following messages: >>

bug#24279: Bug in xterm and/or fontconfig

2016-08-22 Thread Alex Kost
John Darrington (2016-08-22 16:41 +0300) wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:36:26AM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > John Darrington (2016-08-21 16:18 +0300) wrote: > > > In GuixSD: > > > > guix package -i xterm strace > > strace xterm >

bug#24279: Bug in xterm and/or fontconfig

2016-08-22 Thread Alex Kost
John Darrington (2016-08-21 16:18 +0300) wrote: > In GuixSD: > > guix package -i xterm strace > strace xterm > > xterm starts as it should, however observe many failed calls similar to: > > open("/gnu/store/b484nvn9nnr3ddclpz2fma9yxmimg2jj-fontconfig-2.11.94/lib/libXdmcp.so.6", > O_RDONLY|O_CL

bug#24275: Misnamed directory in GuixSD

2016-08-22 Thread Alex Kost
Leo Famulari (2016-08-22 02:14 +0300) wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:11:00PM +0200, John Darrington wrote: >> Installing GuixSD 0.11.0 creates a directory called /nonexistent >> Despite its name, it does actually exist. > > I checked, and it's the 'nobody' user's home directory: > http://git.

bug#24192: Gajim fails with locale.Error

2016-08-12 Thread Alex Kost
Arun Isaac (2016-08-12 09:04 +0300) wrote: >>> Isn't there a more automated way to handle these environment variables? >> >> I don't think so: if you are not on GuixSD, you have to set these >> variables yourself. > > Actually, I am on GuixSD. Does that mean there is some automated to do > this? I

bug#24192: Gajim fails with locale.Error

2016-08-11 Thread Alex Kost
Arun Isaac (2016-08-10 12:53 +0300) wrote: > I was using en_IN.UTF-8. > > After switching to en_US.UTF-8 and setting GUIX_LOCPATH and > XDG_DATA_DIRS with > > export > GUIX_LOCPATH="/gnu/store/rvc5iqmqwhhmj2mcip4x1y9g8chrlxs8-profile/lib/locale${GUIX_LOCPATH:+:}$GUIX_LOCPATH" > export > XDG_DATA

bug#24192: Gajim fails with locale.Error

2016-08-09 Thread Alex Kost
Cc-ing David Thompson (the author of haunt). Daniel Pimentel (2016-08-09 20:28 +0300) wrote: > I have a similar problem with locale in Haunt package: > > Backtrace: > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 157: 10 [catch #t # ...] > In unknown file: >?: 9 [apply-smob/1 #] > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 63: 8 [c

bug#24076: gnupg [-agent]: when signing [commits], it claims that there is no pinentry - but there is

2016-07-28 Thread Alex Kost
Danny Milosavljevic (2016-07-28 15:04 +0300) wrote: >> Another option would be to change ‘gnupg_module_name’, in homedir.c, from: >> >> --8<---cut here---start->8--- >> case GNUPG_MODULE_NAME_PINENTRY: >> #ifdef GNUPG_DEFAULT_PINENTRY >> return GNUPG_

bug#24076: gnupg [-agent]: when signing [commits], it claims that there is no pinentry - but there is

2016-07-28 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-07-27 14:01 +0300) wrote: > Hi, > > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > >>> My ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf file reads this: >>> >>> --8<---cut here---start->8--- >>> pinentry-program /home/ludo/.guix-profile/bin/pinentry-gtk-2 >>> --8<

bug#22587: ‘guix edit’ & ‘M-x guix-edit' typo, rename, & mode change

2016-06-03 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-06-02 22:40 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-20 18:31 +0300) wrote: > > [...] > >>>>> However, I think (1) the title should describe the bug, not the >>>>> solution, and (2) ‘guix edit’ does

bug#23409: unable to load free firmware

2016-05-16 Thread Alex Kost
Quilro Ordonez (2016-05-14 00:15 +0300) wrote: [...] >> So, to recap, you should try (again as root): >> >> echo -n $(guix build openfwwf-firmware)/b43-open \ >> > /sys/module/firmware_class/parameters/path >> modprobe b43 >> dmesg | tail >> >> Could you try and report back? > > # ec

bug#23409: unable to load free firmware

2016-05-05 Thread Alex Kost
Quilro Ordonez (2016-05-05 02:13 +0300) wrote: > Same errors in dmesg. If you mean after system reconfiguring, then it is expected, because nothing has changed, you just moved package definitions from you system config to another file, so that "guix build" and other commands could see these packa

bug#23409: unable to load free firmware

2016-05-04 Thread Alex Kost
Quilro Ordonez (2016-05-04 21:30 +0300) wrote: > Thank you very much for your help Alex. Below is my report. > > El 2016-05-04 04:10, Alex Kost escribió: >> you can create >> "/any/directory/you/want/my-guix-packages.scm" file > > Downloaded the file and saved

bug#23409: unable to load free firmware

2016-05-04 Thread Alex Kost
Quilro Ordonez wrote: > So the path would be: > export GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=/openfwwf-firmware-5.2 > Is that correct? No. > root@komputilo /home/quiliro# export > GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=/openfwwf-firmware-5.2 > root@komputilo /home/quiliro# echo -n $(guix build > openfwwf-firmware)/lib/firmware > \ >>

bug#22587: ‘guix edit’ & ‘M-x guix-edit' typo, rename, & mode change

2016-04-21 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-20 18:31 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-19 13:50 +0300) wrote: >> >>> Yes, using the ‘retitle’ command, described somewhere at >>> <http://debbugs.gnu.org/Developer.html>. >> >> Sor

bug#22587: ‘guix edit’ & ‘M-x guix-edit' typo, rename, & mode change

2016-04-20 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-19 13:50 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-18 20:41 +0300) wrote: >> >>> It seems to me that this bug has no clear purpose, or too broad a >>> purpose, or something. >>> >>> Coul

bug#22587: ‘guix edit’ & ‘M-x guix-edit' typo, rename, & mode change

2016-04-19 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-18 20:41 +0300) wrote: > It seems to me that this bug has no clear purpose, or too broad a > purpose, or something. > > Could you retitle it, or close it, or fix it, whichever is appropriate? > :-) Was it for me? I think the main purpose of this report was to tell us tha

bug#22587: ‘guix edit’ & ‘M-x guix-edit' typo, rename, & mode change

2016-04-18 Thread Alex Kost
myglc2 (2016-02-08 21:29 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: > >> myglc2 (2016-02-07 21:04 +0300) wrote: >> >>> From guix INFO: >>> >>> 6.2 Invoking ‘guix edit’ >>> [...] >>> launches the program specified in the ‘VISUAL’ or in the ‘E

bug#23275: 307 "Temporary Redirect" is not handled

2016-04-14 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-13 23:35 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> From d0ee21dd4e8c34e7d3f23eb69943026706d24d37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Alex Kost >> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:14:59 +0300 >> Subject: [PATCH] download: Follow HTTP 307 "Temp

bug#23275: 307 "Temporary Redirect" is not handled

2016-04-12 Thread Alex Kost
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes#3xx_Redirection [3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-10.3.8 >From d0ee21dd4e8c34e7d3f23eb69943026706d24d37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Kost Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:14:59 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] download: Follow HTTP 307 "Tempor

bug#23217: xboing bugs

2016-04-09 Thread Alex Kost
Jean Louis (2016-04-04 21:47 +0300) wrote: > I have encountered few bugs with xboing. > > xboing -debug > XBoing - Debugging mode activated. > XBoing - Command line parsed. > XBoing - Display system checked. > XBoing - Colourmap created. > XBoing - Please wait , initialising xboing ... > XBoing -

bug#22927: system-installed emacs does not find system-installed fonts

2016-04-04 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-03 23:39 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> From fc239dda52244d6bd3b645660ca0827aa17afc05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Alex Kost >> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 10:27:45 +0300 >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: fontconfig: Find fonts in the sys

bug#22927: system-installed emacs does not find system-installed fonts

2016-04-03 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-02 20:29 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> myglc2 (2016-03-06 21:57 +0300) wrote: >> >>> Not technically not a bug because the doc says ... >>> >>> 2.6.2 X11 Fonts >>> >>> The ‘fontconfig’ package

bug#22550: (require 'magit) produces error: "no such file or directory" "dash"

2016-03-25 Thread Alex Kost
myglc2 (2016-03-25 18:20 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: [...] >> This issue should be completely fixed now (after commit 092dd65¹). >> (Just to remind) the original issue is a request for auto-finding emacs >> packages installed globally (in a system profile). >>

bug#22550: (require 'magit) produces error: "no such file or directory" "dash"

2016-03-24 Thread Alex Kost
Alex Kost (2016-03-07 12:14 +0300) wrote: > myglc2 (2016-03-06 17:47 +0300) wrote: > >> Alex Kost writes: >> [...] >>>> So, should I put ... >>>> >>>> '(guix-emacs-load-autoloads "/run/current-system/profile")' >>

bug#22994: FAIL: tests/gexp.scm

2016-03-14 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-03-14 01:03 +0300) wrote: > Jean Louis skribis: > >> I have run this: >> >> guix package -i guix >> >> and it failed: >> >> FAIL: tests/gexp.scm > > What does ‘guix build guix -n’ display? I think there are 2 separate issues here: 1. A failed test: I can't reproduce it usi

bug#22981: guix-edit does not find git checkout directory

2016-03-14 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-03-14 01:01 +0300) wrote: > myglc2 skribis: > >> Guix is "stateful" because, to use a git checkout, I have to set "state" >> variables like ... >> >> (setq guix-directory "/home/glc/src/guix") >> >> (let ((dir "~/dev/guix/emacs")) >> (add-to-list 'load-path dir

bug#22981: guix-edit does not find git checkout directory

2016-03-13 Thread Alex Kost
myglc2 (2016-03-13 05:00 +0300) wrote: [...] > Thank you for this great summary. This list + the post you referenced > make me feel better that I am taking so long to figure Guix out ;) > > OTOH, guix as more state-full than I had hoped ;( > > I suggest that you think of it this way: You are runni

bug#22990: Grafts leads to inefficient substitute info retrieval

2016-03-12 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-03-11 19:52 +0300) wrote: > As of right now (v0.9.0-2007-g66a30a3), ‘graft-derivation’ works either by: > > 1. Fetching substitute info about the things being built so that it > can determine its references, which in turns allows it to determine > whether they nee

bug#22981: guix-edit does not find git checkout directory

2016-03-12 Thread Alex Kost
myglc2 (2016-03-11 17:45 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: [...] >> Anyway, you can configure any directory for "M-x guix-edit" by setting >> 'guix-directory' variable. See (info "(guix) Emacs Commands"). It is >> not in the hmtl manual yet. &

bug#22981: guix-edit does not find git checkout directory

2016-03-11 Thread Alex Kost
myglc2 (2016-03-11 00:56 +0300) wrote: > Situation: GuixSD sysetm managaed by user glc using a git checkout in > /home/glc/sre/guix. > > Problem: When I follow the manual to set up a vanila user (glc5) with a > separate git checkout in /home/glc5/src/guix, guix-edit does not find > the checkout so

bug#22970: guix edit mutt -- not working

2016-03-11 Thread Alex Kost
Jean Louis (2016-03-10 22:34 +0300) wrote: > Hello Andreas, > > I have now 2 files in gnu/guix/packages/*.scm, for mutt and postgresql: > and now I get each time on running guix, following: > > guix package: warning: failed to load '(databases)': > ERROR: no code for module (databases) > guix pack

bug#22962: Something keeps overwriting /etc/hosts

2016-03-10 Thread Alex Kost
Leo Famulari (2016-03-10 04:43 +0300) wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:28:11AM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: >> If I make it immutable, I get the following message on guix system >> reconfigure ... : >> >> guix system: error: copy-file: Permission denied: "/etc/hosts" >> >> Aha! > > I th

bug#22550: (require 'magit) produces error: "no such file or directory" "dash"

2016-03-09 Thread Alex Kost
myglc2 (2016-03-08 16:49 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: > >> myglc2 (2016-03-07 23:03 +0300) wrote: >> [...] >>> I re-read your earlier posts. AIUI now, in order to use the latest guix >>> emacs features from 'git checkout master' one must add

bug#22550: (require 'magit) produces error: "no such file or directory" "dash"

2016-03-08 Thread Alex Kost
myglc2 (2016-03-07 23:03 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: > > [...] > >> No, I mean it is fixed in the current master, but as I wrote¹ it will >> take effect only after we update our "guix" package. Currently it is >> "guix-devel" pack

bug#22933: M-x guix-edit fails gracelessly when passed an nonexistent package name

2016-03-07 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-03-08 00:03 +0300) wrote: [...] >> what about using (not tested): >> >> (and=> (or (package-by-id id-or-name) >> (match (packages-by-name id-or-name) >>(()#f) >>((pkg ..1) pkg))) >> (compose location->string pack

bug#22933: M-x guix-edit fails gracelessly when passed an nonexistent package name

2016-03-07 Thread Alex Kost
Mathieu Lirzin (2016-03-07 22:58 +0300) wrote: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> diff --git a/emacs/guix-main.scm b/emacs/guix-main.scm >> index 34da6ac..c5d5d75 100644 >> --- a/emacs/guix-main.scm >> +++ b/emacs/guix-main.scm >> @@ -954,10 +954,14 @@ GENERATIONS is a list of generatio

bug#22933: M-x guix-edit fails gracelessly when passed an nonexistent package name

2016-03-07 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-03-07 19:28 +0300) wrote: > Currently M-x guix-edit fails badly (actually ‘guix-package-location’) > pwhen passed the name of a nonexistent package: [...] > I think this patch fixes it: > > > diff --git a/emacs/guix-main.scm b/emacs/guix-main.scm > index 34da6ac..c5d5d75 1006

bug#22650: guixSD default umask is 0000

2016-03-07 Thread Alex Kost
宋文武 (2016-03-07 18:18 +0300) wrote: > 于 2016年3月7日 GMT+08:00下午8:18:44, l...@gnu.org 写到: > > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > > myglc2 skribis: > > glc@g1 ~$ ssh glc4@g1 > glc4@g1's password: > glc4@g1 ~$ umask > > >

bug#22927: system-installed emacs does not find system-installed fonts

2016-03-07 Thread Alex Kost
myglc2 (2016-03-06 21:57 +0300) wrote: > Not technically not a bug because the doc says ... > > 2.6.2 X11 Fonts > > The ‘fontconfig’ package in Guix looks for fonts in > ‘$HOME/.guix-profile’ by default. Thus, to allow graphical applications > installed with Guix to display fonts, you have to ins

bug#22550: (require 'magit) produces error: "no such file or directory" "dash"

2016-03-07 Thread Alex Kost
myglc2 (2016-03-06 17:47 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: > [...] >>> So, should I put ... >>> >>> '(guix-emacs-load-autoloads "/run/current-system/profile")' >>> >>> ... in init.el, in which case guix INFO should say so

bug#22797: Using UUID for vfat file system is impossible

2016-02-25 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-02-25 21:32 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Hello, unlike other file system types, FAT volumes have short UUIDs, >> for example: "58D7-4FA5", but such an UUID cannot be used in an >> operating system declaration: >> >&

  1   2   >