http://tempdocs.cakephp.org/#TOC70554
This says " The $conditions should be formed just as they would in an
SQL statement"
Is the new way of doing it just pure SQL without all this array
garbage that doesn't really work?
-Ben
On Dec 12, 4:02 pm, Mr-Yellow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> https://
https://trac.cakephp.org/ticket/1674
This is a great idea, much better then the current confusing, limited,
exploitable implementation.
Saying "Coders should always add =" "worksforme" doesn't make it any
more secure or usable.
Coders don't know to do so, no amount of education will fix it.
Wai
Needed to use 'DISTINCT Pack.PackID' hack too.
What does the unique attribute do in models,? Can't find it documented
anywhere.
-Ben
On Dec 12, 12:44 pm, "Chris Hartjes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007 7:46 PM, jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I know what you mean. I've sp
On Dec 11, 2007 10:25 PM, Mr-Yellow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As for writting CakePHP I think that would be better left to those
> with an eye on the direction and conventions of the project, those who
> should realise this is a feature at the basis of being able to use
> CakePHP for DB a
The new "with" attribute seems to go some way to fixing it, however
the functionality has changed since first included and the tutorials
out there are dated.
If you include a model for your HABTM "with", then query that model.
Sorry for the non-naming convention tables, from older legacy system.
On Dec 11, 2007 7:46 PM, jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know what you mean. I've spent three days to solve a problem that's
> three lines of regular PHP code and still no solution. Apparently
> CakePHP 'just works!' so doesn't need documentation. Yeah, well if it
> works, it's on minimum wag
I know what you mean. I've spent three days to solve a problem that's
three lines of regular PHP code and still no solution. Apparently
CakePHP 'just works!' so doesn't need documentation. Yeah, well if it
works, it's on minimum wage and giving surly customer service! And
except for those days whe
Hacking the core really wouldn't do it for me, I guess the only proper
way to use Cake is with hardcoded queries.
As without this simple ability I'd rate the database abstraction as
"broken".
Has it really be a year since the bug was posted???
Nothing?
Am I choosing the wrong framework?
-Ben
Yeah this is one that has plagued me too. I found some code for a workaround
by defining a simple extra association in your model, and requiring some
small changes to the model::find method that can be implemented in your
app_model. I found this code in the bakery I think, modded it a bit though
t
