>>Spam is avoidable if care is taken
Right, but the problem is when taking care is more trouble than spam itself.
~|
Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2.
Build powerful, scalable RIAs. Free Trial
http://www.ad
On Thursday 05 Jul 2007, James Wolfe wrote:
> Spam is avoidable if care is taken
Everyone gets spam, sooner or later.
Until CompSci grads stop writing spam-ware.
> and I see no particular reason that my
> email address should be put in the outgoing emails.
In the particular case of the this mai
ssage-
From: Al Musella, DPM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 9:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Spam to my CF-Talk address - easy fix
If you want to keep this email for houseoffusion mail only, just set a
filter or whitelist/blacklist to delete mail to that email address except
If you want to keep this email for houseoffusion mail only, just set
a filter or whitelist/blacklist to delete mail to that email address
except if it comes from 64.118.74.249 .
~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade &
On 7/5/07, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/5/07, James Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >It does mean that someone else would have to do some work, however. Are you
> > >willing to pay for that work, however easy or insignificant it may seem to
> > >you?
> >
> > I'd be willing to co
On 7/5/07, James Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >It does mean that someone else would have to do some work, however. Are you
> >willing to pay for that work, however easy or insignificant it may seem to
> >you?
>
> I'd be willing to contribute time to help fix it. Does that count?
It's not bro
It's both. The web based archives work in every way as a forum that is
married to a mailing list. Anyone who wants can subscribe to the archives
only and never get any mail.
On 7/5/07, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> James Wolfe wrote:
> > This is a forum, if you want to respond t
I'd be more than happy for people to help out and plugging in components to
do a job is rather easy with the system I built. I'll even post up my
cleanbody component so people can see how I clean posts and can add in their
own ideas and code. I'm great at regular expressions but there are people
be
> I'd be willing to contribute time to help fix it. Does that count?
I don't know, since I don't administer the list. It will presumably still
require Mike to spend some of his time, so frankly it very well may not
count. It may also result in a suboptimal value; the easiest way to solve
the probl
James Wolfe wrote:
> This is a forum, if you want to respond to me, you can respond directly
in the forum.
This is not a forum, this is a mailinglist.
Jochem
~|
ColdFusion MX7 by Adobe®
Dyncamically transform webcontent into Ad
1. I would never sell or give away the email addresses from any of the
resources I run. Adobe is interested in sending out a mass mailing to all
subscribers and I told them that I would like to ask everyone to opt in/out
before I even consider and then we would do it through a bonded third party
On 7/5/07, James W wrote:
>
> >It does mean that someone else would have to do some work, however. Are
> you
> >willing to pay for that work, however easy or insignificant it may seem
> to
> >you?
>
> I'd be willing to contribute time to help fix it. Does that count?
Heck, post the relevant code
>It does mean that someone else would have to do some work, however. Are you
>willing to pay for that work, however easy or insignificant it may seem to
>you?
I'd be willing to contribute time to help fix it. Does that count?
~|
> While I am aware that spam is a way of life on the internet
> and I know that I have access to all of your email addresses
> and you therefore have access to mine, I do not need to
> approve of either one of those things.
If you continue to participate in a mailing list, you are giving tacit
On 7/5/07, James Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> While I am aware that spam is a way of life on the internet and I know
> that I have access to all of your email addresses and you
>
> This is a forum, if you want to respond to me, you can respond directly in
> the forum. If you need to contact
While I am aware that spam is a way of life on the internet and I know that I
have access to all of your email addresses and you therefore have access to
mine, I do not need to approve of either one of those things.
Spam is avoidable if care is taken and I see no particular reason that my email
BTW, here's my take on the matter.
Don't want spam? Don't use email. Or use a whitelist
challenge/response system.
I'm a lot less concerned about spam since I switched to google hosted
email. Their spam filters work very well.
Rick
On 7/5/07, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>I have shared this address with no one
>
> Wrong: we all have your address in our PC, and if only ONE of us has
> been infected by
It doesn't even take infection. I bot can 'scribe too, ya know? They're
sneaky smart, probably spam AI
On 7/5/07, James Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a custom address which only receives mail for CF-Talk. I have shared
> this address with no one and have not used it in any location other than on
> the CF-Talk forum.
You've shared your email address with no-one? I beg to differ.
You'v
http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&q=james-cftalk%40goqs.com&btnG=Google+Search
Its right out there for any bot to harvest.
On 7/5/07, James Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a custom address which only receives mail for CF-Talk. I have shared
> this address with no one and hav
>I've traded a few emails with Michael regarding this topic.
>
>All you have to do is Google your email address and you'll see that messages
>to this group are publicly viewable online. The direct sender's email
>address is stripped, but any message which was replied to and now a part of
>the mess
Yeah i second the google... They are amazing at the spam filtering.
On 7/5/07, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/5/07, James Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Its right out there for any bot to harvest.
> >
> > Since that is the case, is there anything we can do to obscure e
werd. gmail is free, and it stops 99.56789% of my spam. besides, spam is a
way of life. get used to it. it's like trying to fight junk (snail) mail,
it's a losing battle.
On 7/5/07, Casey Dougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/5/07, James Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Its right
>>I have shared this address with no one
Wrong: we all have your address in our PC, and if only ONE of us has
been infected by
some worm collecting addresses for spamer, then you will get spam. As
easy as this.
Nothing you can dou about it, except use a new address every day ;-/
--
__
On 7/5/07, James Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Its right out there for any bot to harvest.
>
> Since that is the case, is there anything we can do to obscure email
> addresses in replies so that this will not happen again?
>
> It should be simple enough to write a regex that will remove the
> Its right out there for any bot to harvest.
Since that is the case, is there anything we can do to obscure email addresses
in replies so that this will not happen again?
It should be simple enough to write a regex that will remove the domain from
all email addresses listed in this reply form
let him know that it still wasn't fixed. Now
another month later, it's still happening.
Let him know that you're concerned about this. Many voices will be louder
than a few.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: James Wolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 8:41
On Thursday 05 Jul 2007, James Wolfe wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Someone doesn't know how to quote correctly:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=james-cftalk%40goqs.com&btnG=Search
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to globally improve world-class e-business
on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Crow T. Robot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 July 2007 14:58
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Spam to my CF-Talk address
I can assure you MikeD isn't selling our addresses. I think what is
happening is that even though the addresses are taken out of the w
I can assure you MikeD isn't selling our addresses. I think what is
happening is that even though the addresses are taken out of the web archive
postings, people (me included) forget sometimes to take the poster's address
out of their reply. Then the address ends up in the archives, ready for
scr
I have a custom address which only receives mail for CF-Talk. I have shared
this address with no one and have not used it in any location other than on the
CF-Talk forum.
I have, as of yesterday, begun receiving spam on that address (3 messages thus
far).
Without accusing Michael of selling ou
31 matches
Mail list logo
