Daniel Carrera scripsit:
> I just tried Chibi, but even with (chibi repl) I think its REPL is
> not as good as CSI with GNU Readline. I guess that in my ideal world I
> would like to play with a mature Scheme with many modules, that can be
> compiled, has FFI, a nice interpreter, and plans to supp
On 2 March 2014 18:27, John Cowan wrote:
>
> Chicken is primarily a compiled Scheme: the interpreter is slow
> and inefficient, and provided mostly for testing, debugging, and
> simple scripting. If you are interested in interpreter-based Schemes
> exclusively, I recommend Chibi Scheme.
>
>
Chib
On 2014-03-02 17:20, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> On 2 March 2014 17:00, Matt Gushee wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Does this mean that I am loading the module wrong?
>>> [...]
>> No. The numbers egg redefines all the standard arithmetic 'operators'
>> [...]
> Ok. Does this also mean that there is no way to sup
Daniel Carrera scripsit:
> Does that apply to other languages like Python?
Python does not work in the Chicken interpreter either. :-) (Though in
principle one could write a Python egg using the Python/C API.)
But Python's FFI is accessible from the CPython interpreter, since there
is no other
On 2 March 2014 17:34, John Cowan wrote:
> Daniel Carrera scripsit:
>
> > Error: unbound variable: foreign-lambda*
>
> The Chicken FFI does not work in the interpreter.
>
Ok. :-(
Does that apply to other languages like Python?
> > I have installed the numbers egg. When I run (use numbers) I
Daniel Carrera scripsit:
> Error: unbound variable: foreign-lambda*
The Chicken FFI does not work in the interpreter.
> I have installed the numbers egg. When I run (use numbers) I get a lot of
> warnings to the effect of:
I can't replicate this. The procedures are being overridden as explaine
On 2 March 2014 17:00, Matt Gushee wrote:
> > Does this mean that I am loading the module wrong?
>
> No. The numbers egg redefines all the standard arithmetic 'operators'
> (quotes because, as you are probably aware, they are really functions
> that just happen to be represented with the symbols
Hi, Daniel--
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> I have installed the numbers egg. When I run (use numbers) I get a lot of
> warnings to the effect of:
> Note: re-importing already imported identifier: +
>
> Does this mean that I am loading the module wrong?
No. The n
Hello,
I have installed the numbers egg. When I run (use numbers) I get a lot of
warnings to the effect of:
Note: re-importing already imported identifier: +
Note: re-importing already imported identifier: -
Note: re-importing already imported identifier: *
Note: re-importing already imported ide
Hello,
I installed Chicken for the first time last night and today I'm starting to
play with it. I installed the "dollar" egg and I'm having some trouble:
http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/dollar
I tried the example on that page, and this is what I got:
--//--
#;1> ($ pri
Hi Alex,
> I've used irregex-replace{,/all} and equivalents in other
> languages for a long time, and find the current semantics
> most convenient. I can see in some cases wanting to test
> for a replacement, or in irregex-replace-all the number of
> replacements, but it seems to be by far the ra
Hi Michele,
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Michele La Monaca <
mikele.chic...@lamonaca.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed that irregex-replace returns the original string
> if no replacement takes place. I think its a very poor choice.
>
> Whether or not a replacement was actually made can be an
12 matches
Mail list logo
