RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974]

2002-05-07 Thread Kent Hundley
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Zeitz Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 9:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974] Dumb question, does any of these devices use nat? I just read that pix to DMZ interface uses dNat, not sure

RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974]

2002-05-07 Thread Greene, Patrick
: Subject: RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974] Dumb question, does any of these devices use nat? I just read that pix to DMZ interface uses dNat, not sure if that is faster. I was reading my Alteon Web Switch book last night, it says you CAN do nat, but

RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974]

2002-05-07 Thread Brian Zeitz
should be switching right, the translation gets done in layer 4. kinda confused. -Original Message- From: Gragido, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Brian Zeitz; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974] The best way to lo

RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974]

2002-05-07 Thread Gragido, William
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Zeitz Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 8:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974] Load balancing is supposed to be done on content switches according to what I am reading. I cannot be done on the firewall withing the site,

RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974]

2002-05-07 Thread Brian Zeitz
, 2002 6:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pix load balance? [7:42974] What's the reason? I'm not disputing the fact, just wondering what the limitation is. I take it that the limitation is only that it cannot do stateful failover with two active PIXes? Cheers, Gaz wrote in mess

Re: Pix load balance? [7:42974]

2002-05-07 Thread Gaz
respond to "Patrick" > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject:Re: Pix load balance? [7:42974] > > > No. > > ""GEORGE"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > &g

Re: Pix load balance? [7:42974]

2002-05-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Pix load balance? [7:42974] No. ""GEORGE"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can you load balance to pix firewalls? > Has anyone done this? Message Posted at: http:

Re: Pix load balance? [7:42974]

2002-05-06 Thread Engelhard M. Labiro
://www.cisco.com/warp/public/117/fw_load_balancing.html Thanks in advance - Original Message - From: "Greene, Patrick" To: Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:03 AM Subject: RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974] > Yes if you front-end them with a Cisco Content Switch...the CSS110

RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974]

2002-05-05 Thread Greene, Patrick
: Re: Pix load balance? [7:42974] No. ""GEORGE"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can you load balance to pix firewalls? > Has anyone done this? Message Posted

Re: Pix load balance? [7:42974]

2002-05-05 Thread Patrick
No. ""GEORGE"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can you load balance to pix firewalls? > Has anyone done this? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43346&t=42974 -- FAQ, list archives,

RE: Pix load balance? [7:42974]

2002-05-01 Thread Kent Hundley
George, Yes, you can LB PIXen, but there are caveats: 1) PIXes can only do state sharing if one is in failover mode. If you have 2 active PIXen, you cannot share state so if one PIX fails, all active sessions on that PIX will drop and have to start over on the other PIX. 2) It's usually not n