gt; "Brian" 02/14/02 07:58PM >>>
Begging for problems with non compliant hardware/software??
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Kent Yu"
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: WAN IP [7:35405]
> You should be able to use /31 o
Begging for problems with non compliant hardware/software??
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Kent Yu"
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: WAN IP [7:35405]
> You should be able to use /31 on some IOS.
>
> Kent
>
>
> "&qu
erman
> Cisco Systems
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Steven A. Ridder
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: WAN IP [7:35405]
>
>
> Unless
Tom,
You should first understand what protocol you are running across
your wan. This is very important. Because of this importance, I would
suggest that you subnet down to 2 host per subnet, and configure
point-to-point sub interfaces, with each sub interface being on a
seperate subnet.
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WAN IP [7:35405]
Unless I'm reading your question totally wrong, that one address will only
cover 1 link between 2 sites, .1 and .2. I have to imagine I'm reading it
wrong.
""Tom Richs"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Unless I'm reading your question totally wrong, that one address will only
cover 1 link between 2 sites, .1 and .2. I have to imagine I'm reading it
wrong.
""Tom Richs"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If you have lets say 4 WAN sites or 3 WAN sites connecting a
If you have lets say 4 WAN sites or 3 WAN sites connecting as a triangle,
does it make sense to use one network lets say 192.168.5.0/30 as the
subnetted ip address for all the WAN serial interfaces between all the
sites.
_
MSN
7 matches
Mail list logo
