Hi all,
It's been a while since I've popped my head in, it's good to see some
familiar names. Congratulations on the latest release!
With a little gentle prodding by Nic Ferrier, I've implemented the
java.util.regex package as a facade of gnu.regexp. Currently it&#
Wes Biggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any thoughts on getting this into classpath, logistics-wise? I would
> like to continue to maintain gnu.regexp as a separately releasable
> project; I see the java.util.regex.* classes as bridge classes to its
> API from Clas
Nic Ferrier wrote:
> Is there any reason why Classpath couldn't include your source code
> in the CVS?
>
> If you hosted the CVS for gnu regexp on subversions (via the savannah
> system) we would be able to create a link from the Classpath CVS to
> your source code directories to make it seem as
Wes Biggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With a little gentle prodding by Nic Ferrier, I've implemented the
> java.util.regex package as a facade of gnu.regexp.
That's great!
> Any thoughts on getting this into classpath, logistics-wise? I would
> like to continue
> It's been a while since I've popped my head in, it's good to see some
> familiar names. Congratulations on the latest release!
>
> With a little gentle prodding by Nic Ferrier, I've implemented the
> java.util.regex package as a facade of gnu.regexp. C
I
> back went to compile Classpath, this sucked in files from rt.jar when
> they didn't appear in Classpath, and gave me a clean compile even though
> I was expecting failure (because I referenced java.util.regex, which is
> not yet in Classpath).
>
> Someone with a littl
Hi,
I read a while ago that support for java.util.regex
was to come into GNU Classpath, so I'm interested to
know what came out of it? I know there are stubs in
the CVS, but I've also read Wes wrote a
java.util.regex wrapper around his gnu.regex package,
so I'm wondering if there w
John Leuner wrote:
>>they didn't appear in Classpath, and gave me a clean compile even though
>>I was expecting failure (because I referenced java.util.regex, which is
>>not yet in Classpath).
>
> How should we build Classpath without regex?
I think the short answe
> >>they didn't appear in Classpath, and gave me a clean compile even though
> >>I was expecting failure (because I referenced java.util.regex, which is
> >>not yet in Classpath).
> >
> >How should we build Classpath without regex?
>
> I think th
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Hi,
I read a while ago that support for java.util.regex
was to come into GNU Classpath, so I'm interested to
know what came out of it? I know there are stubs in
the CVS, but I've also read Wes wrote a
java.util.regex wrapper around his gnu.regex package,
so I'
Wes Biggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I read a while ago that support for java.util.regex
> > was to come into GNU Classpath, so I'm interested to
> > know what came out of it? I know there are stubs in
e code
should reflect the underlying library (e.g., the Gtk AWT peers should
be LGPL given that Gtk itself is).
For something like java.util.regex I think it would be preferable to
have a single implementation in Classpath itself. So, yeah, in this
case I think assignment would be ideal.
Tom
_
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For something like java.util.regex I think it would be preferable to
> have a single implementation in Classpath itself. So, yeah, in this
> case I think assignment would be ideal.
The assignment is ideal also to avoid more license irregul
Hi all,
I finally imported gnu.regexp and added java.util.regex wrappers for it.
At the moment our gnu.regexp is the same as the original gnu.regexp
version, except for a few files and added copyright notices.
If this doesn't break things then I want to ship this as is with the
0.08 re
Hi,
I am playing with gnu.regexp these days and finding more and more
to do before it becomes comparable with Sun's JDK.
Although I will continue to make efforts on gnu.regexp,
I am beginning to try another thing.
I have found oniguruma, the regex library which is used as a
regex engine of Ruby,
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi all,
I finally imported gnu.regexp and added java.util.regex wrappers for it.
At the moment our gnu.regexp is the same as the original gnu.regexp
version, except for a few files and added copyright notices.
If this doesn't break things then I want to ship this as is
Hi,
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 14:38, C. Brian Jones wrote:
> Maybe I should have mentioned it earlier (list is slow)
It is slow... :{
It makes coordinating the classpath release almost impossible...
Almost done though. Release candidate today (Thursday for those
receiving this email somewhere next wee
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 19:00, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I finally imported gnu.regexp and added java.util.regex wrappers for it.
> At the moment our gnu.regexp is the same as the original gnu.regexp
> version, except for a few files and added copyright notices.
Mayb
Ito Kazumitsu wrote:
> I am playing with gnu.regexp these days and finding more and more
> to do before it becomes comparable with Sun's JDK.
>
> Although I will continue to make efforts on gnu.regexp,
> I am beginning to try another thing.
>
> I have found oniguruma, the regex library which is u
Hi there,
Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 15:29 +0100 schrieb Jeroen Frijters:
> Ito Kazumitsu wrote:
> > I am playing with gnu.regexp these days and finding more and more
> > to do before it becomes comparable with Sun's JDK.
> >
> > Although I will continue to make efforts on gnu.regexp,
> > I am
Hi,
From: Roman Kennke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:15:30 +0100
> Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 15:29 +0100 schrieb Jeroen Frijters:
> > While I'm certainly not against this option, I would like to point out
> > that for some VMs using a native library isn't really a great soluti
> > > How should we build Classpath without regex?
> >
> > I think the short answer right now is that Classpath doesn't support
> > regex, so those classes would have to come from rt.jar.
>
> Please no. Classpath is now at a point that it can be compiled with
> only free tools. Please keep it t
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 01:43:49PM -0800, Wes Biggs wrote:
>
> >>How long before this work will be finished? Would it be possible to
> >>create stubs from your code at the moment? If yes, then please send them
> >>to me and I will do it and check them in so the tree at least builds
> >>again.
> >
>>How long before this work will be finished? Would it be possible to
>>create stubs from your code at the moment? If yes, then please send them
>>to me and I will do it and check them in so the tree at least builds
>>again.
>>
>
> I'll check my stub classes in now.
Hmm.. after reading that the
24 matches
Mail list logo
