Hi,
I wanted to take the opportunity to thank the people who responded to
my question on thinking beyond O-O. The replies form a very useful
slice through Clojure design strategies and idiomatic use of the
language.
Thanks!
Stu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
On Mar 17, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Alan wrote:
> On Mar 17, 11:00 am, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 17.03.2011 um 18:11 schrieb Alan:
>>
>>> From my uninformed position, strint looks like it should have been
>>> written as a function, not a macro, but probably there are reasons it
>>> was
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Martin Blais wrote:
> Emacs-using Clojurians may enjoy the following tidbit of
> Slime I just dreamed of:
>
>
> (defun slime-eval-at-register (reg)
> "Take the cursor to a register's location and eval
> the expression there. Useful for testing stuff without
>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote:
> Lee, while we're at it.
>
> I decided to finally give it a try, and so I implemented an alternate
> behaviour for smart indent for ccw : the version of the gist does the
> following : it uses the following function to test whether we should i
Emacs-using Clojurians may enjoy the following tidbit of
Slime I just dreamed of:
(defun slime-eval-at-register (reg)
"Take the cursor to a register's location and eval
the expression there. Useful for testing stuff without
having to 'go there' first."
(interactive "cEval at register:
Lee, while we're at it.
I decided to finally give it a try, and so I implemented an alternate
behaviour for smart indent for ccw : the version of the gist does the
following : it uses the following function to test whether we should indent
by 2 or align with the first call argument :
(def lisp-fo
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:35 PM, James Reeves wrote:
> On 17 March 2011 12:05, Lee Spector wrote:
>> FWIW the feature I describe (syntax-aware auto-indenting) is common in the
>> Lisp world, not only in emacs but also (to name just a few that are fresh in
>> my memory) in MCL, DrScheme and Lisp
On Mar 17, 11:00 am, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 17.03.2011 um 18:11 schrieb Alan:
>
> > From my uninformed position, strint looks like it should have been
> > written as a function, not a macro, but probably there are reasons it
> > was not.
>
> It can't be „simply“ a function, because
Hi,
Am 17.03.2011 um 18:11 schrieb Alan:
> From my uninformed position, strint looks like it should have been
> written as a function, not a macro, but probably there are reasons it
> was not.
It can't be „simply“ a function, because then it has no access to the local
environment.
(let [x 99]
Hi,
Am 17.03.2011 um 17:33 schrieb Lee Spector:
> There do have to be at least a few other rules, however, e.g. about how far
> to outdent after an expression closes.
Then you are either at the toplevel => indent 0. Or you are inside another (, [
or { which leads to the previous description.
Is clojureql powerful and flexible enough to support custom dynamic SQL with
tons of joins, database function invocations in the SELECT clause, sub-selects,
unions, etc.?
Most of our applications are written in Java and we have been doing parameter
substitution sometimes using string variables
On Mar 17, 8:34 am, "Bhinderwala, Shoeb"
wrote:
...use the strint *MACRO*...
...works when I specify my string [as a literal]...
...but doesn't work when I pass the string through a variable.
Macros are not functions. << is receiving as arguments a list with the
two elements 'str and 'q. It must
Perfec! Thanks a lot
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group
There do have to be at least a few other rules, however, e.g. about how far to
outdent after an expression closes.
-Lee
On Mar 17, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Lee Spector wrote:
>
> Thanks Meikel!
>
> On Mar 17, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
>>
>> I believe the Vim indentation for Lis
Hi,
here are the special cases for 2 above is currently defined as default
in VimClojure:
setlocal
lispwords=def,def-,defn,defn-,defmacro,defmacro-,defmethod,defmulti
setlocal lispwords
+=defonce,defvar,defvar-,defunbound,let,fn,letfn,binding,proxy
setlocal lispwords
+=defnk,definterface,defproto
Thanks Meikel!
On Mar 17, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
>
> I believe the Vim indentation for Lisp works quite similar to the
> emacs one. The basic heuristic - as I understood it - is:
>
> 1. Only one word after the opening paren in previous line: align with
> innermost unmatched
I have the following definitions and am trying to use the strint macro
(<<) to perform string substitutions.
test1=>(use 'clojure.contrib.strint)
test1=> (def m {:XYZ 1, :ABC 2})
test1=> (def q "select ~(:XYZ m) from ~(:ABC m)")
The following works when I specify my string directly:
test1=> (<<
Lee Spector writes:
Hi Lee,
> Does anyone know of a concise description of the default rules that
> SLIME uses to auto-indent code?
AFAICT, SLIME doesn't have on own indentation function but uses standard
emacs lisp-mode indentation. That can be tweaked somehow, to provide
custom indentation f
Hi,
On 17 Mrz., 16:24, Lee Spector wrote:
> Does anyone know of a concise description of the default rules that SLIME
> uses to auto-indent code? I'd like to tell the Bluefish community what it
> would be nice to have in their Clojure mode. I've tried some web searches and
> found this surpris
You find hard to tell the rules, and so did I.
And that's why I've tried to do with ccw the simplest thing that would be
better than nothing as far as auto indentation is concerned.
2011/3/17 Lee Spector
>
> Does anyone know of a concise description of the default rules that SLIME
> uses to aut
Does anyone know of a concise description of the default rules that SLIME uses
to auto-indent code? I'd like to tell the Bluefish community what it would be
nice to have in their Clojure mode. I've tried some web searches and found this
surprisingly hard to dig up -- tons of stuff on customizin
On 17 March 2011 12:05, Lee Spector wrote:
> FWIW the feature I describe (syntax-aware auto-indenting) is common in the
> Lisp world, not only in emacs but also (to name just a few that are fresh in
> my memory) in MCL, DrScheme and LispWorks.
It's also common in many other languages. Most IDEs
`print-dup` on any collection type generates code to call the `create`
method of the collection's class. `APersistentVector$SubVector` is missing
a `create` method.
-Stuart Sierra
clojure.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post
On Mar 17, 2011, at 7:16 AM, WoodHacker wrote:
> Bluefish does not work that way.It will indent to the last
> indentation in all cases. I've never used EMacs, but all the editors
> I've ever used work indenting the same way. All I can suggest is
> that you ask the Bluefish users group if t
Bluefish does not work that way.It will indent to the last
indentation in all cases. I've never used EMacs, but all the editors
I've ever used work indenting the same way. All I can suggest is
that you ask the Bluefish users group if there is a way to do what you
want.
On Mar 16, 9:16 am
In Clojure 1.2, I tried this:
(read-string
(binding [*print-dup* true]
(print-str (subvec [1 2 3] 1
But I get a java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No matching method found:
create
I had something else print-dup'ed out onto disk and when I read it back in
it gave me that error.
26 matches
Mail list logo
