On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:31:38 -0800, Wim Lewis w...@omnigroup.com said:
On 13 Dec 2010, at 11:01 AM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
How can this seemingly minor change make such a big difference? I'm not even
*using* the synthesized accessor! Yet its mere presence breaks the project.
How can this be? m.
On Dec 13, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
self-firstResponder = tf;
Well, the proper syntax is self.firstResponder . Using the deference is
probably a back-door way to access the class struct. Unless I misunderstand
something
Keary Suska
Esoteritech, Inc.
Demystifying
On Dec 14, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Keary Suska wrote:
On Dec 13, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
self-firstResponder = tf;
Well, the proper syntax is self.firstResponder . Using the deference is
probably a back-door way to access the class struct. Unless I misunderstand
On Dec 14, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Keary Suska wrote:
On Dec 13, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
self-firstResponder = tf;
Well, the proper syntax is self.firstResponder . Using the deference is
probably a back-door way to access the class struct. Unless I misunderstand
Hmm, also, it appears that UIResponder has some undocumented methods
-firstResponder and -_firstResponder, which your synthesized property would
also interfere with.
Doubtless. But how would I have discovered this?
I would have implemented -firstResponder and set a breakpoint to see
who was
On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Matt Neuburg m...@tidbits.com wrote:
Doesn't anyone besides me want to evince any outrage that this can happen? I
mean, sheesh, if I wanted to live in a world where the namespace was polluted
with secret undocumented terminology I could collide with
I have reduced this problem (after losing an entire day of work, of course) to
a very few lines of code. They won't make much sense but just bear with me.
Here we go...
I have this code (iOS), and it works fine:
@interface TextFieldFunViewController : UIViewController {
UIView*
On 13 Dec 2010, at 11:01 AM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
How can this seemingly minor change make such a big difference? I'm not even
*using* the synthesized accessor! Yet its mere presence breaks the project.
How can this be? m.
PS A new discovery: changing the name of the ivar / property to fr
On Dec 13, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Wim Lewis wrote:
On 13 Dec 2010, at 11:01 AM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
How can this seemingly minor change make such a big difference? I'm not even
*using* the synthesized accessor! Yet its mere presence breaks the project.
How can this be? m.
PS A new
