Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-14 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Stephen Colebourne wrote: Demote [latka] to dormant status (It has no activity and no release) [X] +1 - Demote [ ] -1 - Keep [latka] alive, because... Demote [reosurces] to dormant status (It's main customer Struts isn't using it now) [X] +1 - Demote [ ] -1 - Keep [resources] alive, because...

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-13 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 3/12/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > PS: I'm hoping that someone will volunteer to do the actual svn moves > and demotion ;-) > I can do SVN moves (in any direction) as and when volunteers are needed. Sites too, probably, if they build on the first (or second ;-) attempt

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-13 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 23:22 +0100, Christian Meder wrote: > On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 22:04 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > Demote [reosurces] to dormant status > > (It's main customer Struts isn't using it now) > > [ ] +1 - Demote > > [ ] -1 - Keep [resources] alive, because... > > Hi, > > I us

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-13 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 12:23 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 20:47 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 05:25 -0500, James Mitchell wrote: > > > I agree with Niall. > > > > > > I've written several database-based implementations for resources, > > > a

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-13 Thread Simon Kitching
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 20:47 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 05:25 -0500, James Mitchell wrote: > > I agree with Niall. > > > > I've written several database-based implementations for resources, > > and there already exists a Struts plugin for resources that let's our

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-13 Thread Christian Meder
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 22:04 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Demote [reosurces] to dormant status > (It's main customer Struts isn't using it now) > [ ] +1 - Demote > [ ] -1 - Keep [resources] alive, because... Hi, I use a resources snapshot too and I'd really like it to see a release because i

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-13 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 05:25 -0500, James Mitchell wrote: > I agree with Niall. > > I've written several database-based implementations for resources, > and there already exists a Struts plugin for resources that let's our > users use commons-resources now (and is backward compatible to Struts

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-13 Thread James Mitchell
I agree with Niall. I've written several database-based implementations for resources, and there already exists a Struts plugin for resources that let's our users use commons-resources now (and is backward compatible to Struts 1.1). The only thing commons-resources really suffers from is

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-12 Thread Torsten Curdt
Demote [latka] to dormant status (It has no activity and no release) [ ] +1 - Demote +1 Demote [reosurces] to dormant status (It's main customer Struts isn't using it now) +0 cheers -- Torsten smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-12 Thread Sandy McArthur
On 3/12/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Demote [latka] to dormant status > (It has no activity and no release) > [ ] +1 - Demote +0 > [ ] -1 - Keep [latka] alive, because... > > Demote [reosurces] to dormant status > (It's main customer Struts isn't using it now) > [ ] +1 - Demo

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-12 Thread Niall Pemberton
- Original Message - From: "Stephen Colebourne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 10:04 PM > Demote [latka] to dormant status > (It has no activity and no release) > [ ] +1 - Demote > [ ] -1 - Keep [latka] alive, because... +1 > Demote [reosurces] to dormant status > (It

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-12 Thread Simon Kitching
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 14:40 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote: > On 3/12/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Demote [latka] to dormant status > > +1 > > > Demote [reosurces] to dormant status > > +1 > > Are we relegating these to the sandbox, or are we expanding the > dormant concept

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-12 Thread Dion Gillard
On 3/13/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Demote [latka] to dormant status > (It has no activity and no release) > [ ] +1 - Demote > [ ] -1 - Keep [latka] alive, because... +1. As one of the few committers that has worked on latka. Demote [reosurces] to dormant status > (It'

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-12 Thread Henri Yandell
On 3/12/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri Yandell wrote: > > Are we relegating these to the sandbox, or are we expanding the > > dormant concept to contain released projects? > These are unreleased. > > (Latka has an official alpha - > http://jakarta.apache.org/site/download

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-12 Thread robert burrell donkin
i'm not sure that it's a good idea to call this a demotion. hopefully one day some components will actually be finished and graduate to dormant... On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 22:04 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Demote [latka] to dormant status > (It has no activity and no release) > [X] +1 - Demote

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-12 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Henri Yandell wrote: Are we relegating these to the sandbox, or are we expanding the dormant concept to contain released projects? These are unreleased. (Latka has an official alpha - http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_commons-latka.cgi, but this doesn't really count.) Steph

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-12 Thread Henri Yandell
On 3/12/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Demote [latka] to dormant status +1 > Demote [reosurces] to dormant status +1 Are we relegating these to the sandbox, or are we expanding the dormant concept to contain released projects? Hen -

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-12 Thread Brian K. Wallace
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Demote [latka] to dormant status > (It has no activity and no release) > [ ] +1 - Demote > [ ] -1 - Keep [latka] alive, because... +1 (non-binding) > > Demote [reosurces] to dormant status > (It's main customer Struts isn'

Re: [VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-12 Thread Simon Kitching
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 22:04 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Demote [latka] to dormant status +1 > Demote [reosurces] to dormant status > (It's main customer Struts isn't using it now) +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

[VOTE] Demote Latka and Resources to Dormant

2006-03-12 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Demote [latka] to dormant status (It has no activity and no release) [ ] +1 - Demote [ ] -1 - Keep [latka] alive, because... Demote [reosurces] to dormant status (It's main customer Struts isn't using it now) [ ] +1 - Demote [ ] -1 - Keep [resources] alive, because... PS: I'm hoping that someon