"Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 19/11/2003 04:52:48 AM:
> Noel wrote:
> > As far as I know, all sites are supposed to be in CVS, and checked out
> into
> > the file system. Amongst the reasons for this are to ensure that
> > infrastructure can recover them rapidly in the event of a
> I'm just waiting for a definitive answer from infrastructure,
> or whomever else wants to make the official judgment.
Unless infrastructure replies otherwise to the e-mail I sent this morning, I
think you should assume that the currently posted policy stands.
--- Noel
Anyone from Latka got a clue what's screwed up with their docs/CVS?
Lots of clashes if I attempt to cvs update those.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Still need to sort them out. The HttpClient cvs diffs could just be
something daft like a bad line ending, but if so then it's confusing cvs
enough to suggest everything is different. I'll mess around with the -b
options to diff etc to see if it's just dos/unix formatting.
The HttpClient docs in CV
Noel wrote:
> As far as I know, all sites are supposed to be in CVS, and checked out
into
> the file system. Amongst the reasons for this are to ensure that
> infrastructure can recover them rapidly in the event of a problem. This
> includes sites generated by Forrest or Maven.
Martin Cooper wro
On 18 Nov 2003, at 04:55, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
It seems there are a large number of commons sites that do not exist
in
CVS. Is there a standard for this? Should the HttpClient entries in
CVS be removed?
As far as I know, they should all be checked into CVS, regardless of
whether
they are bui
Ditto. But in the case of Latka and HttpClient, I expect anything checked
into CVS to be using CVS.
Still need to sort them out. The HttpClient cvs diffs could just be
something daft like a bad line ending, but if so then it's confusing cvs
enough to suggest everything is different. I'll mess aro
Is this a definite rule?
Is there somewhere it's mandated?
I'm asking as I don't remember it being required.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
"Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/11/2003 02:29:18 PM:
> > I assume you are talk
I know for Jelly when I've rebuilt the site, I've never checked it in to
CVS.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
"Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/11/2003 03:55:47 PM:
> > It seems there are a large number of commons sites th
> It seems there are a large number of commons sites that do not exist in
> CVS. Is there a standard for this? Should the HttpClient entries in
> CVS be removed?
As far as I know, they should all be checked into CVS, regardless of whether
they are built with anakia, forrest or maven.
--
Do you suggest removing the HttpClient docs from CVS?
Mike
On Nov 17, 2003, at 10:16 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
They are however in CVS, so if we do a cvs update it'll change those
files.
cvs server: Updating httpclient
M httpclient/applications.html
M httpclient/downloads.html
M httpclient/featur
It seems there are a large number of commons sites that do not exist in
CVS. Is there a standard for this? Should the HttpClient entries in
CVS be removed?
Mike
On Nov 17, 2003, at 10:29 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I assume you are talking about the docs at
/www/jakarta.apache.org/commons/htt
> I assume you are talking about the docs at
> /www/jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/. The HttpClient site is
> not maintained in CVS. It is generated via Maven and published with
> maven site:deploy.
As far as I know, all sites are supposed to be in CVS, and checked out into
the file syste
They are however in CVS, so if we do a cvs update it'll change those
files.
cvs server: Updating httpclient
M httpclient/applications.html
M httpclient/downloads.html
M httpclient/features.html
M httpclient/index.html
M httpclient/news.html
M httpclient/overview.html
M httpclient/proposal.html
M
Hen,
I assume you are talking about the docs at
/www/jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/. The HttpClient site is
not maintained in CVS. It is generated via Maven and published with
maven site:deploy. What are you planning to do with the docs here?
Mike
On Nov 16, 2003, at 11:58 PM, Henr
Closer looking showed that these files had already been updated with cvs
clashes. I've reset them to the local cvs.
Thanks,
Hen
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Dirk Verbeeck wrote:
> Local changes to dbcp.html and pool.html can be removed.
> The cvs version is correct.
>
> -- Dirk
>
> Henri Yandell wrote
Local changes to dbcp.html and pool.html can be removed.
The cvs version is correct.
-- Dirk
Henri Yandell wrote:
There are some problems on the Commons site cvs-wise at the moment.
dbcp.html and pool.html have been edited locally.
httpclient/ has also been edited locally.
These will get merges w
> Any thoughts?
You want my view? As a matter of policy, changes that are not in CVS should
not be considered changes. If you care to be nice, you could do cvs diff -u
and e-mail the diff to the list before you blow the renegade file(s) away.
--- Noel
-
18 matches
Mail list logo
