re: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-18 Thread dion
"Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 19/11/2003 04:52:48 AM: > Noel wrote: > > As far as I know, all sites are supposed to be in CVS, and checked out > into > > the file system. Amongst the reasons for this are to ensure that > > infrastructure can recover them rapidly in the event of a

RE: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-18 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> I'm just waiting for a definitive answer from infrastructure, > or whomever else wants to make the official judgment. Unless infrastructure replies otherwise to the e-mail I sent this morning, I think you should assume that the currently posted policy stands. --- Noel

Re: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-18 Thread Henri Yandell
Anyone from Latka got a clue what's screwed up with their docs/CVS? Lots of clashes if I attempt to cvs update those. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-18 Thread Michael Becke
Still need to sort them out. The HttpClient cvs diffs could just be something daft like a bad line ending, but if so then it's confusing cvs enough to suggest everything is different. I'll mess around with the -b options to diff etc to see if it's just dos/unix formatting. The HttpClient docs in CV

re: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-18 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Noel wrote: > As far as I know, all sites are supposed to be in CVS, and checked out into > the file system. Amongst the reasons for this are to ensure that > infrastructure can recover them rapidly in the event of a problem. This > includes sites generated by Forrest or Maven. Martin Cooper wro

Re: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-18 Thread John Keyes
On 18 Nov 2003, at 04:55, Noel J. Bergman wrote: It seems there are a large number of commons sites that do not exist in CVS. Is there a standard for this? Should the HttpClient entries in CVS be removed? As far as I know, they should all be checked into CVS, regardless of whether they are bui

RE: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-18 Thread Henri Yandell
Ditto. But in the case of Latka and HttpClient, I expect anything checked into CVS to be using CVS. Still need to sort them out. The HttpClient cvs diffs could just be something daft like a bad line ending, but if so then it's confusing cvs enough to suggest everything is different. I'll mess aro

RE: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-18 Thread dion
Is this a definite rule? Is there somewhere it's mandated? I'm asking as I don't remember it being required. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/11/2003 02:29:18 PM: > > I assume you are talk

RE: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-18 Thread dion
I know for Jelly when I've rebuilt the site, I've never checked it in to CVS. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/11/2003 03:55:47 PM: > > It seems there are a large number of commons sites th

RE: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> It seems there are a large number of commons sites that do not exist in > CVS. Is there a standard for this? Should the HttpClient entries in > CVS be removed? As far as I know, they should all be checked into CVS, regardless of whether they are built with anakia, forrest or maven. --

Re: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-17 Thread Michael Becke
Do you suggest removing the HttpClient docs from CVS? Mike On Nov 17, 2003, at 10:16 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: They are however in CVS, so if we do a cvs update it'll change those files. cvs server: Updating httpclient M httpclient/applications.html M httpclient/downloads.html M httpclient/featur

Re: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-17 Thread Michael Becke
It seems there are a large number of commons sites that do not exist in CVS. Is there a standard for this? Should the HttpClient entries in CVS be removed? Mike On Nov 17, 2003, at 10:29 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: I assume you are talking about the docs at /www/jakarta.apache.org/commons/htt

RE: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> I assume you are talking about the docs at > /www/jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/. The HttpClient site is > not maintained in CVS. It is generated via Maven and published with > maven site:deploy. As far as I know, all sites are supposed to be in CVS, and checked out into the file syste

Re: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-17 Thread Henri Yandell
They are however in CVS, so if we do a cvs update it'll change those files. cvs server: Updating httpclient M httpclient/applications.html M httpclient/downloads.html M httpclient/features.html M httpclient/index.html M httpclient/news.html M httpclient/overview.html M httpclient/proposal.html M

Re: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-17 Thread Michael Becke
Hen, I assume you are talking about the docs at /www/jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/. The HttpClient site is not maintained in CVS. It is generated via Maven and published with maven site:deploy. What are you planning to do with the docs here? Mike On Nov 16, 2003, at 11:58 PM, Henr

Re: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-17 Thread Henri Yandell
Closer looking showed that these files had already been updated with cvs clashes. I've reset them to the local cvs. Thanks, Hen On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Dirk Verbeeck wrote: > Local changes to dbcp.html and pool.html can be removed. > The cvs version is correct. > > -- Dirk > > Henri Yandell wrote

Re: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-17 Thread Dirk Verbeeck
Local changes to dbcp.html and pool.html can be removed. The cvs version is correct. -- Dirk Henri Yandell wrote: There are some problems on the Commons site cvs-wise at the moment. dbcp.html and pool.html have been edited locally. httpclient/ has also been edited locally. These will get merges w

RE: [general] screwed up Commons site

2003-11-16 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Any thoughts? You want my view? As a matter of policy, changes that are not in CVS should not be considered changes. If you care to be nice, you could do cvs diff -u and e-mail the diff to the list before you blow the renegade file(s) away. --- Noel -