> I, for one, posted that Gump should be removed. I believe several others
> chimed in with the same sentiment. So, Thom wasn't alone in his
assessment
> in the situation. And, as to whether non-ASF content should be blogged,
> there was discussion about that on the Planet - and the consensus I
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Finally, any progress from anybody on FOAF type metadata at Apache? As I
said, I use PlanetApache to 'test out an author' (see if they
amuse/stimulate me) and I'd be just as fine w/ a FOAF chain of relationships
as the PlanetApache blog roll. I know many folks reference their
I think a concise, dense, daily front-panel summary of what's up in
various regions of apache summed up from the output of various bots is
a delightful thing. I think streaming it into planet apache is fine by
me. I agree that Mr. Gump was running off at the mouth a bit much for
my taste; bu
On Jan 22, 2004, at 7:58 PM, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Finally, any progress from anybody on FOAF type metadata at Apache? As
I
said, I use PlanetApache to 'test out an author' (see if they
amuse/stimulate me) and I'd be just as fine w/ a FOAF chain of
relationships
as the PlanetApache blog roll. I
