Seems reasonable; I'll revise the resolution accordingly and put it up
for a vote over the next couple of hours.
Thanks!
Karl
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> Looks like we missed a step; we need a graduation r
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Looks like we missed a step; we need a graduation resolution for the
> board to vote on. Here's my proposal, basically copied from Apache
> Chemistry's, but I have a question. Since no distinction is made
> between the PPMC members and co
Done, and thanks!
Karl
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Sami Siren wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> Since no distinction is made
>> between the PPMC members and committers in this resolution, and since
>> many of the original committers/IPMC members have become in
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Since no distinction is made
> between the PPMC members and committers in this resolution, and since
> many of the original committers/IPMC members have become inactive, and
> others have not yet been voted in as PPMC members, how should we dea
Looks like we missed a step; we need a graduation resolution for the
board to vote on. Here's my proposal, basically copied from Apache
Chemistry's, but I have a question. Since no distinction is made
between the PPMC members and committers in this resolution, and since
many of the original commit
