Re: [Cooker] Latest kernel 2.4 naming scheme

2002-01-31 Thread Ron Stodden
Peter Ruskin wrote: Welcome back Ron! Where have you been? Nowhere, still here! Just have been very disillusioned with my attempts to change Mandrake's work for the better, so found it best (for me) to stay away. But with 8.2 Beta 1, I am moved to try again. I am still on 8.0. since 8.1

Re: [Cooker] Latest kernel 2.4 naming scheme

2002-01-31 Thread Ron Stodden
Borsenkow Andrej wrote: This naming change has been made without any consultation with important users who depend on the existing naming convention. I have published repeatedly troels.rpm5.pl to users of the cooker and expert mailing lists. It is a script for downloading the entire

Re: [Cooker] Latest kernel 2.4 naming scheme

2002-01-31 Thread Ron Stodden
Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Michal Bukovjan : Hello list, is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme? I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names? Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ? Look at list archive, you'll find plenty of litterature about this

Re: [Cooker] Latest kernel 2.4 naming scheme

2002-01-26 Thread Ron Stodden
Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Michal Bukovjan : Hello list, is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme? I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names? Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ? Look at list archive, you'll find plenty of litterature about this

Re: [Cooker] Latest kernel 2.4 naming scheme

2002-01-26 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
On óÂÔ, 2002-01-26 at 15:41, Ron Stodden wrote: Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Michal Bukovjan : Hello list, is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme? I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names? Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ? Look at list

Re: [Cooker] Latest kernel 2.4 naming scheme

2002-01-26 Thread Peter Ruskin
On Saturday 26 Jan 2002 12:41, Ron Stodden wrote: Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Michal Bukovjan : Hello list, is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme? I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names? Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ? Look at

Re: [Cooker] Latest kernel 2.4 naming scheme

2002-01-26 Thread Sergio Korlowsky
On Saturday 26 January 2002 06:41, you wrote: - Guillaume Rousse wrote: - - Ainsi parlait Michal Bukovjan : - Hello list, - - is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme? - I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names? - - Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ? - Look

[Cooker] Latest kernel 2.4 naming scheme

2001-12-17 Thread Michal Bukovjan
Hello list, is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme? I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names? Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ? Michal

Re: [Cooker] Latest kernel 2.4 naming scheme

2001-12-17 Thread Marcel Pol
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 09:41:06 +0100 Michal Bukovjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme? I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names? Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ? It was talked about a lot. Please read up on the archive of this list.

Re: [Cooker] Latest kernel 2.4 naming scheme

2001-12-17 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Michal Bukovjan : Hello list, is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme? I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names? Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ? Look at list archive, you'll find plenty of litterature about this topic. -- Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL