Peter Ruskin wrote:
Welcome back Ron! Where have you been?
Nowhere, still here! Just have been very disillusioned with my
attempts to change Mandrake's work for the better, so found it best (for
me) to stay away.
But with 8.2 Beta 1, I am moved to try again. I am still on 8.0. since
8.1
Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
This naming change has been made without any consultation with important
users who depend on the existing naming convention. I have published
repeatedly troels.rpm5.pl to users of the cooker and expert mailing lists.
It is a script for downloading the entire
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Ainsi parlait Michal Bukovjan :
Hello list,
is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme?
I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names?
Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ?
Look at list archive, you'll find plenty of litterature about this
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Ainsi parlait Michal Bukovjan :
Hello list,
is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme?
I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names?
Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ?
Look at list archive, you'll find plenty of litterature about this
On óÂÔ, 2002-01-26 at 15:41, Ron Stodden wrote:
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Ainsi parlait Michal Bukovjan :
Hello list,
is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme?
I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names?
Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ?
Look at list
On Saturday 26 Jan 2002 12:41, Ron Stodden wrote:
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Ainsi parlait Michal Bukovjan :
Hello list,
is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme?
I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names?
Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ?
Look at
On Saturday 26 January 2002 06:41, you wrote:
- Guillaume Rousse wrote:
-
- Ainsi parlait Michal Bukovjan :
- Hello list,
-
- is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme?
- I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names?
-
- Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ?
- Look
Hello list,
is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme?
I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names?
Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ?
Michal
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 09:41:06 +0100
Michal Bukovjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme?
I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names?
Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ?
It was talked about a lot.
Please read up on the archive of this list.
Ainsi parlait Michal Bukovjan :
Hello list,
is there any particular reason for the new kernel naming scheme?
I refer to these kernel-2.4.16.10mdk-1-1mdk names?
Why not just 2.4.16-10mdk ?
Look at list archive, you'll find plenty of litterature about this topic.
--
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL
10 matches
Mail list logo