Re: [Cooker] Requirements of basesystem

2000-08-26 Thread Pedro Rosa
Pedro Rosa wrote: > > Packages mentioned in several "requires" of the basesystem: > cpio, rmt, info-install, bzip2, bash, libtermcap, glibc, gawk, > mkinitrd, popt, pam, ncurses, gpm, slang, groff, libstdc++ Forgot to mention: newt, zlib Besides, some packages still install their files

Re: [Cooker] Requirements of basesystem

2000-08-24 Thread Pedro Rosa
Pixel wrote: > > Pedro Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > > > i think we have to choose the BuildReq that we put. gcc should be installed. > > > We're not gonna put BuildReq: gcc everywhere, do we? > > And I am a BIG jerk, yeah? Read again "how I compiled everything > > above" P

Re: [Cooker] Requirements of basesystem

2000-08-24 Thread Pedro Rosa
Geoffrey Lee wrote: > > > > > line "#!/bin/bash" in their scripts. > > > > > > there is a difference between Requires and Prereq > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > sh-utils does not build. The config claims that gcc doesn't work (well > > > > how I compiled all above then?) > > > > > > i think

Re: [Cooker] Requirements of basesystem

2000-08-24 Thread Geoffrey Lee
> > > line "#!/bin/bash" in their scripts. > > > > there is a difference between Requires and Prereq > > > > [...] > > > > > sh-utils does not build. The config claims that gcc doesn't work (well > > > how I compiled all above then?) > > > > i think we have to choose the BuildReq that we

Re: [Cooker] Requirements of basesystem

2000-08-24 Thread Pixel
Pedro Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > > i think we have to choose the BuildReq that we put. gcc should be installed. > > We're not gonna put BuildReq: gcc everywhere, do we? > And I am a BIG jerk, yeah? Read again "how I compiled everything > above" Pixel I am not THAT STUPID... I r

Re: [Cooker] Requirements of basesystem

2000-08-24 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Pedro Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > sh-utils does not build. The config claims that gcc doesn't work (well > > > how I compiled all above then?) > > > > i think we have to choose the BuildReq that we put. gcc should be installed. > > We're not gonna put BuildReq: gcc everywhere, do

Re: [Cooker] Requirements of basesystem

2000-08-24 Thread Pedro Rosa
Pixel wrote: > > Pedro Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > > bash is not mentioned. For a real damn basic system, bash could be > > superfluous. However some packages, like fileutils require it during > > installation. Some other packages, like mkbootdisk strictly mention the >

Re: [Cooker] Requirements of basesystem

2000-08-24 Thread Pixel
Pedro Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > bash is not mentioned. For a real damn basic system, bash could be > superfluous. However some packages, like fileutils require it during > installation. Some other packages, like mkbootdisk strictly mention the > line "#!/bin/bash" in their s

[Cooker] Requirements of basesystem

2000-08-24 Thread Pedro Rosa
Some incongruencies that I noted on the manual building and installation of the packages mentioned on basesystem. This list could be incomplete, as I am using a fully working system to build the packages. This listing should not be interpreted strictly as a buglist. It is just a list of things tha