Re: [Cooker] the future of BuildRequires?

2001-05-31 Thread François Pons
Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Exact packagesnames need to be in BuildRequires if automated BuidRequires installation is to be done (more automatic installation later). Maybe urpmi can be tought to figure out provides packages, but at the moment it can't: [root@taz root]#

Re: [Cooker] the future of BuildRequires?

2001-05-31 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
- Exact packagesnames need to be in BuildRequires if automated BuidRequires installation is to be done (more automatic installation later). Maybe urpmi can be tought to figure out provides packages, but at the moment it can't: [root@taz root]# urpmi libjpeg-devel no package named libjpeg-devel

[Cooker] the future of BuildRequires?

2001-05-26 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
Hi, A while ago flepied let a script loose on cooker to get the BuildRequires of the packages back inline. This week I reinstalled my buildmachine, and started recompiling cooker. I found out that many packages have incorrect BuildRequires in them. Some of them point to non-existant packages.