Re: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-07 Thread Grgoire Colbert
Huh? You mean that nobody will correct this? I thought it was only a matter of changing a string (which is not translated btw)... Or even better, above the change mode stuff at the left, write Use TAB to select Anyway, I like Aurora's listing mode. Which bugs are you talking about?

RE: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-07 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
You mean that nobody will correct this? I thought it was only a matter of changing a string (which is not translated btw)... Or even better, above the change mode stuff at the left, write Use TAB to select Still, this requires somebody to do it. Aurora was not touched (I mean, really

Re: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-07 Thread Grégoire Colbert
What about copying to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aurora maintainer if I'm not wrong) ? Borsenkow Andrej wrote: Still, this requires somebody to do it. Aurora was not touched (I mean, really touched) in at least half a year. 1. Major - any program that tries to do something interactively at

RE: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-07 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
What about copying to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aurora maintainer if I'm not wrong) ? You are welcome. I personally consider 6 months long enough to declare package no more maintained. I check every new RPM of Aurora of course, and I stubbornly continue to report the same bugs over and over

Re: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-07 Thread SI Reasoning
I can only get the gtk version to work on cooker version, the other 3 won't run at all. --- Gr¨¦goire Colbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Huh? You mean that nobody will correct this? I thought it was only a matter of changing a string (which is not translated btw)... Or even better, above

Re: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-07 Thread Blue Lizard
I can get the others to work, as traditional wslib is my favorite. The gtk version requires the creation of some tmp lock file or something as i recall, and thus requires that you have your filesystem mounted rw. This screws up e2fsck and a few others. When filesystem is ro, aurora waits a

Re: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-07 Thread SI Reasoning
I have no idea why my others don't work and gtk does. I do know that it has to try twice before it will work properly but that might have to do with the file-locking you are talking about. --- Blue Lizard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can get the others to work, as traditional wslib is my

RE: [Cooker] Aurora cosmetic bug

2001-08-06 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
Cosmetic? You must be kidding. Aurora has several major/minor bugs that make its usage questionable (very mildly put). IMNSHO it should long have been moved to contribs as nobody seems to maintain it. -andrej -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cooker-owner@linux-