On Wed Apr 17, 2002 at 03:09:09PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > > http://cr.yp.to/maildisasters/postfix.html
> >
> > I'm not entirely sure that DJB is a reliable source when it comes to
> > Postfix versus qmail... ;-)
>
> A good read on DJB stuff:
>
> http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#
On Wed Apr 17, 2002 at 01:43:09PM -0400, Levi Ramsey wrote:
[...]
> > Heh, I that all you can do? Well it wasn't worth the 400k download.
> > Why do anti dbj people always depend on hate and lies when they try to
> > make a point. This is so totally uncool.
>
> DJB, from what I've seen, seems to
On Tue Apr 16, 2002 at 11:59:03PM -0400, Levi Ramsey wrote:
> > Not trying to start a flame war I would really like to find a good mta
> > and that doesn't include sendmail.
> >
> > First I would like to know if this vulnerability still exists or if it
> > has been fixed in mandrake?
> >
> > h
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 06:27:33PM +0200, Han wrote:
> So why can't you respect my choice. Why do you have to post this link.
> Why don't you stick to the facts? What do you think it solves? Who do
> you think you expose.
>
> You are filled with hatred. Why?
How do you figure posting a link with
Han <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > That's pure fud. You haven't contradicted the facts stated in the link
> > I've mentioned, thus until you do so, _I_ consider your asserts
> > hate/lies/"unmotified opinion".
>
> Even though I _may_ know some things I have chosen not to mention
> anything bad
Guillaume Cottenceau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Han <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > > > http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#djb
> > > >
> > > > Heh, I that all you can do? Well it wasn't worth the 400k
> > > > download. Why do anti dbj people always depend on hate and lies
> > > > when they
Han <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#djb
> > >
> > > Heh, I that all you can do? Well it wasn't worth the 400k download.
> > > Why do anti dbj people always depend on hate and lies when they try
> > > to make a point. This is so totally uncool.
> >
> > DJB, f
Ben Reser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:05:44PM +0200, Han wrote:
> > You can't even read three lines.
>
> Face it Han you just don't like people who have differing opinons than
> you. You got pissed off at me in the past because I don't believe that
> just because ther
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:05:44PM +0200, Han wrote:
> You can't even read three lines.
Face it Han you just don't like people who have differing opinons than
you. You got pissed off at me in the past because I don't believe that
just because there hasn't been a security issue found that in qmai
On Wednesdayen den 17 April 2002 20.29, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 08:06:12PM +0200, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > On Wednesdayen den 17 April 2002 19.38, Ben Reser wrote:
> > > If you didn't read the page how do you know it is hate and lies?
> > > And it's not like DJB doesn't go aroun
Ben Reser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 05:10:38PM +0200, Han wrote:
> > Heh, I that all you can do? Well it wasn't worth the 400k download.
> > Why do anti dbj people always depend on hate and lies when they try
> > to make a point. This is so totally uncool.
>
> If you di
Levi Ramsey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed Apr 17 17:10 +0200, Han wrote:
> > Guillaume Cottenceau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
> > > A good read on DJB stuff:
> > >
> > > http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#djb
> >
> > Heh, I that all you can do? Well it wasn't worth the 400k download.
>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 08:06:12PM +0200, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> On Wednesdayen den 17 April 2002 19.38, Ben Reser wrote:
> > If you didn't read the page how do you know it is hate and lies?
> > And it's not like DJB doesn't go around with a big attitude trying to
> > piss other people off.
>
> T
Hello Levi,
Wednesday, April 17, 2002, 10:43:09 AM, you wrote:
> On Wed Apr 17 17:10 +0200, Han wrote:
>> Guillaume Cottenceau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > Levi Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > > > http://cr.yp.to/maildisasters/postfix.html
>> > >
>> > > I'm not entirely sure
On Wednesdayen den 17 April 2002 19.38, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 05:10:38PM +0200, Han wrote:
> > Heh, I that all you can do? Well it wasn't worth the 400k download.
> > Why do anti dbj people always depend on hate and lies when they try to
> > make a point. This is so totally un
On Wed Apr 17 17:10 +0200, Han wrote:
> Guillaume Cottenceau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Levi Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > > http://cr.yp.to/maildisasters/postfix.html
> > >
> > > I'm not entirely sure that DJB is a reliable source when it comes to
> > > Postfix versus qmail..
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 05:10:38PM +0200, Han wrote:
> Heh, I that all you can do? Well it wasn't worth the 400k download.
> Why do anti dbj people always depend on hate and lies when they try to
> make a point. This is so totally uncool.
If you didn't read the page how do you know it is hate and
Brook Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> >> http://cr.yp.to/maildisasters/postfix.html
>
> > I'm not entirely sure that DJB is a reliable source when it comes to
> > Postfix versus qmail... ;-)
> Right thought of that myself.
>
> Well I got my test box setup now with postfix (my ser
Hello Levi,
Tuesday, April 16, 2002, 8:59:03 PM, you wrote:
> On Tue Apr 16 19:02 -0700, Brook Humphrey wrote:
>> Not trying to start a flame war I would really like to find a good mta
>> and that doesn't include sendmail.
>>
>> First I would like to know if this vulnerability still exists
On Tue Apr 16 19:02 -0700, Brook Humphrey wrote:
> Not trying to start a flame war I would really like to find a good mta
> and that doesn't include sendmail.
>
> First I would like to know if this vulnerability still exists or if it
> has been fixed in mandrake?
>
> http://cr.yp.to/maildisaste
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 19:51, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, civileme wrote:
>
> > >Not trying to start a flame war I would really like to find a good mta
> > >and that doesn't include sendmail.
> > >
> > >First I would like to know if this vulnerability still exists or if it
> > >h
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 19:51, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, civileme wrote:
>
> > >Not trying to start a flame war I would really like to find a good mta
> > >and that doesn't include sendmail.
> > >
> > >First I would like to know if this vulnerability still exists or if it
> > >h
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, civileme wrote:
> >Not trying to start a flame war I would really like to find a good mta
> >and that doesn't include sendmail.
> >
> >First I would like to know if this vulnerability still exists or if it
> >has been fixed in mandrake?
> >
> >http://cr.yp.to/maildisasters/p
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 19:24, civileme wrote:
> Brook Humphrey wrote:
>
> >Not trying to start a flame war I would really like to find a good mta
> >and that doesn't include sendmail.
> >
> >First I would like to know if this vulnerability still exists or if it
> >has been fixed in mandrake?
> >
Brook Humphrey wrote:
>Not trying to start a flame war I would really like to find a good mta
>and that doesn't include sendmail.
>
>First I would like to know if this vulnerability still exists or if it
>has been fixed in mandrake?
>
>http://cr.yp.to/maildisasters/postfix.html
>
>
>
>
http://ww
25 matches
Mail list logo
