On Wednesday 12 November 2003 8:49 pm, Olivier Blin wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:26:04 -0600
>
> Bret Baptist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know that my VIA82CXXX IDE chipset module was not placed in the
> > initrd. I remade the initrd with the module using --with=via82cxxx,
> > then I found
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:26:04 -0600
Bret Baptist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know that my VIA82CXXX IDE chipset module was not placed in the
> initrd. I remade the initrd with the module using --with=via82cxxx,
> then I found out that ide drivers don't work well as modules So I
> rebuilt t
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:49:01 +0100 (MET)
> "Svetoslav Slavtchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > very short note (will come back later with longer one :) )
> >
> > wanna include some 3rdparty stuff ?-)
>
> Why not :)
> That won't kill me or significantly increase the built time.
greate :-)
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:49:01 +0100 (MET)
"Svetoslav Slavtchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> very short note (will come back later with longer one :) )
>
> wanna include some 3rdparty stuff ?-)
Why not :)
That won't kill me or significantly increase the built time.
> i'm trying to ?port? the mdk
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:26:04 -0600
> Bret Baptist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I know that my VIA82CXXX IDE chipset module was not placed in the
> > initrd. I remade the initrd with the module using --with=via82cxxx,
> > then I found out that ide drivers don't work well as modules So I
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 11:13 am, Olivier Blin wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:26:04 -0600
>
> Bret Baptist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know that my VIA82CXXX IDE chipset module was not placed in the
> > initrd. I remade the initrd with the module using --with=via82cxxx,
> > then I foun
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:26:04 -0600
Bret Baptist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know that my VIA82CXXX IDE chipset module was not placed in the
> initrd. I remade the initrd with the module using --with=via82cxxx,
> then I found out that ide drivers don't work well as modules So I
> rebuilt t
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 10:18 pm, Olivier Blin wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:56:51 -0500
>
> Scott Chevalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yes, I need please the output of lscpi and lspcidrake (to give me
> > > the exact name of your IDE chipset).
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> >
> > here ya go.
>
Quoting Olivier Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:56:51 -0500
> Scott Chevalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Yes, I need please the output of lscpi and lspcidrake (to give me
> > > the exact name of your IDE chipset).
> >
> > > Thanks.
> >
> > here ya go.
>
> Ok, you're
> A patch has been sent, but Alan waits the IDE code to be stable enough.
he retired from active work for a year now so it is unlikely it
is going to be fixed (by him) any time soon.
>
> But this problem can be avoided if we keep IDE support
> built-in (CONFIG_IDE=y, CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE=y).
> So
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:27:02 +0300
"Andrey Borzenkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ok, you're using a VIA82CXXX IDE chipset.
> > I've set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX=m in test9.5mdk, but, as Andrey
> > pointed out, ide chipsets won't even load in current 2.6 state.
>
> I do not remember having
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:19:03 +0300
"Andrey Borzenkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've read it on lklm in posts from Andrew Morton IIRC, I'll check it
> > and give a more detailed answer at lunch.
> >
>
> ok, I would bei interested. I still like the idea of delayed
> initialization and loadi
>
> > I do not remember having said that :) I said that "modular IDE
> > is known to not work" - but the only proof of that statement I have
> > seen is post-halloween document.
>
> I've read it on lklm in posts from Andrew Morton IIRC, I'll check it and
> give a more detailed answer at lunch.
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:27:02 +0300
"Andrey Borzenkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not remember having said that :) I said that "modular IDE
> is known to not work" - but the only proof of that statement I have
> seen is post-halloween document.
I've read it on lklm in posts from Andrew Mor
> Ok, you're using a VIA82CXXX IDE chipset.
> I've set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX=m in test9.5mdk, but, as Andrey
> pointed out, ide chipsets won't even load in current 2.6 state.
I do not remember having said that :) I said that "modular IDE
is known to not work" - but the only proof of that state
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:56:51 -0500
Scott Chevalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, I need please the output of lscpi and lspcidrake (to give me
> > the exact name of your IDE chipset).
>
> > Thanks.
>
> here ya go.
Ok, you're using a VIA82CXXX IDE chipset.
I've set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 22:34, Olivier Blin wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:27:47 -0500
> Scott Chevalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I just tried the test9.5 kernel and during the fsck stage it keeps
> > saying that DMA is turned off on the hard drive. I checked with
> > hdparm and it is off
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:27:47 -0500
Scott Chevalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just tried the test9.5 kernel and during the fsck stage it keeps
> saying that DMA is turned off on the hard drive. I checked with
> hdparm and it is off and it gives a SIOC error when I try to enable
> it.
>
> I
18 matches
Mail list logo
