On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 03:09:53 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> There's already a bug for this:
> [JDK-8186958](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186958). This
> includes creating a new API as well as fixing up a bunch of call sites.
> There's a partial list of call sites in java.base there. G
On Sat, 12 Mar 2022 01:35:23 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> 8281631: HashMap copy constructor and putAll can over-allocate table
>
> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> refine test
There's already a bug for this:
[JDK-8186
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 16:46:58 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> No, you don't need to do any rebasing; when the change is integrated, all
> these commits will automatically be squashed into a single commit. If that
> can't be done, the bot will detect it and give a warning, which will probably
> inclu
On Sat, 12 Mar 2022 01:35:23 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> 8281631: HashMap copy constructor and putAll can over-allocate table
>
> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> refine test
No, you don't need to do any rebasing; whe
On Sat, 12 Mar 2022 01:35:23 GMT, XenoAmess wrote:
>> 8281631: HashMap copy constructor and putAll can over-allocate table
>
> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> refine test
> what I worried is, the boundary this is
> 8281631: HashMap copy constructor and putAll can over-allocate table
XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
refine test
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7431/files
- new: https://git.op
