Re: depleting the random number generator -- repeated state

1999-07-29 Thread Eugene Leitl
It would seem to be an excellent idea indeed to incorporate a register which gets filled with fresh entropy (from amplified circuit noise, for instance) at every clock tick into the CPU directly, particularly if it is to be used for embedded crypto gadgets. Of course one would have to believe th

Re: US Urges Ban of Internet Crypto

1999-07-29 Thread Ted Lemon
> If we lose crypto, we must already have guns laid by. How likely do you think it is that when you use rhetoric like this, it is *not* then used to discredit you in the top-secret briefings the Senate gets from the anti-crypto lobbyists? You must know that having guns laid by is just going to

Re: linux-ipsec: Re: TRNG, PRNG

1999-07-29 Thread Henry Spencer
On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, John Denker wrote: > In my case X- is the unreseeded PRNG behavior of /dev/urandom. The > designers of linux-ipsec have evidently decided this is good enough, > because that's where they get key material. More accurately, we have decided that /dev/urandom is the proper *inte

Re: US Urges Ban of Internet Crypto

1999-07-29 Thread Robert Hettinga
Actually, um, kiddies, the more "corruption", the better. Corruption meaning "greed". Profit, in other words. I say buy the bastards off. Literally. Make so much money with financial cryptography, with economic cryptography, with crypto-economics, that state actors -- like Reno, and Aaron, a

Re: US Urges Ban of Internet Crypto

1999-07-29 Thread Rick Smith
At 09:54 AM 7/29/99 -0700, Tom Perrine wrote: >Ever taken a look for pgp.2.6.x, Kerberos, SSH or other "controlled >software" available for anonymous FTP from .GOV and .MIL systems? A >few minutes with your favorite search engine is quite enlightening :-) What astonishes me is that some governm

Re: US Urges Ban of Internet Crypto

1999-07-29 Thread Dan Geer
I've thought for some time that it's time to just solve the problem. All we need is a couple hundred million bucks. Given that Ross Perot was able to make a credible run for President on a hundred million dollars, it should be perfectly feasible to find someone who is electab

Re: US Urges Ban of Internet Crypto

1999-07-29 Thread Tom Perrine
> On Wed, 28 Jul 1999 17:52:04 -0700, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >use of the Internet to distribute encryption products >> >will render Wassenaar's controls immaterial." See below :-) s/Internet/.GOV and .MIL computers/ John> If Ms. Reno had a clue, she'd fire L

Re: US Urges Ban of Internet Crypto

1999-07-29 Thread Dan Geer
> Secrecy is more useful to the weak than to the strong. Governments everywhere hate privacy because the efficiency of regulation is proportional to the perfection of its surveillance. Quoting the ever-prescient Phil Agre, The global integration of the economy is ... commonly held to

Re: US Urges Ban of Internet Crypto

1999-07-29 Thread Marcus J. Ranum
I've thought for some time that it's time to just solve the problem. All we need is a couple hundred million bucks. Given that Ross Perot was able to make a credible run for President on a hundred million dollars, it should be perfectly feasible to find someone who is electable, marketable, has a

Apache-SSL 1.3.6+1.36 released, with Keynote support!

1999-07-29 Thread Ben Laurie
Changes with Apache-SSL 1.3.6/1.36 *) Add experimental Keynote (http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~keynote) support. Not only does this provide a very cool way to do stuff based on certificate attributes (and more), but it also demonstrates that it is possible to write independent add-on

Re: US Urges Ban of Internet Crypto

1999-07-29 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-07-28 17:52:04 -0700, John Gilmore wrote: > * footnote: Actually, Wassenaar used to control military crypto > gear. To the extent that commercial, civilian crypto software is > now a functional replacement for controlled military crypto gear, > despite the fact that it has never been desi

RE: US Urges Ban of Internet Crypto

1999-07-29 Thread Lucky Green
Of course the German government will submit to US demands. Understand that at present, crypto isn't an immediate thread to USG's interests, despite the claims to the contrary by both crypto advocates and the government. The US and its allies have made certain that virtually every piece of mass-ma

Re: US Urges Ban of Internet Crypto

1999-07-29 Thread James A. Donald
-- At 05:52 PM 7/28/99 -0700, John Gilmore wrote: > Why do other countries' governments work so much better on this > issue than our own goverment? The US has a bigger spy apparatus, one created and perfected in struggle with the Soviet Union which at one time had an even larger and more pow

Re: [long] Yet another random number generator

1999-07-29 Thread Sandy Harris
John Kelsey wrote: Quoting me: > >Proposal: > > > >Could we do a large part of this with a fairly simple chip, > >all digital, without diodes etc.? A system bus has typically > >at least 32 data and 32 address lines plus a bunch of > >control signals. Perhaps 80 bits that can be sampled at > >pe