I wrote one - based on an article I read before - some time ago after my
tests:
/* Pure CSS Image Preloader */
#img-preload{
position:absolute;
height:0px;
width:0px;
overflow:hidden;
}
#img-preload img{
height:0px;
width:0px;
}
/* End of Pure CSS Image Preloader */
I haven't found a downside
Tobias Baldauf wrote:
>I'm quite sure that FF does not load elements that are set to display:none;
>
>I played around with a css-image-preloader some time ago & made that
>experience. And I believe it to be a smart thing to do of FF, because it
>safes bandwidth.
>
I think a css-image-preloader wit
I'm quite sure that FF does not load elements that are set to display:none;
I played around with a css-image-preloader some time ago & made that
experience. And I believe it to be a smart thing to do of FF, because it
safes bandwidth.
Craig Cook schrieb:
Does an element hidden with css load?
> > > Does an element hidden with css load?
> > Yes.
> That may be a "perhaps." If "hiding" means "visibility: hidden" I believe
> you are correct. But if Christy means "display: none" then I do know some
> browsers do not download the image. I don't recall which browsers,
> though. Sorry.
If "
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:23:38 -0400, Christy Collins wrote:
> Does an element hidden with css load?
>
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 12:29:06 -0500, Jay Blanchard replied:
>
> Yes.
>
That may be a "perhaps." If "hiding" means "visibility: hidden" I believe
you are correct. But if Christy means "display: none"
[snip]
Does an element hidden with css load?
[/snip]
Yes.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
