hi,
--- Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
>
> > how do you know that apples and oranges are not
> same
> > or are same?
> > Its the way you look at it.
>
> No, ever see Apple and Oranges cross-breed?
well-no in the sense you mean but I can say yes
hi,
--- Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
>
> > As you already see-what you say is correct for
> your
> > definition of proof and axiom.
>
> Here is the fundamental error in your thinking, you
> are trying to argue
> apples and oranges.
how do you
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
> how do you know that apples and oranges are not same
> or are same?
> Its the way you look at it.
No, ever see Apple and Oranges cross-breed? -THEY- look at it that way
too. So there -is- something there to the cladistic viewpoint.
--
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
> As you already see-what you say is correct for your
> definition of proof and axiom.
Here is the fundamental error in your thinking, you are trying to argue
apples and oranges. As my comments alude to, what you are doing is trying
to argue geometry using two