Hi Folks,
I'm subscribed to this List for about 2 Months now but failed to find a
single Post, amongst the many that deal with Hardware-Problems, that
concerns the EPoX 9NPA+ Ultra, or similar, Mainboard.
That makes me become suspicious. Am i the only one using this Board and
if so why? What
On Monday, 24.10.2005 at 23:01 +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
On Monday 24 October 2005 22:35, Max wrote:
Dave Ewart wrote:
Is it because I have a 32-bit i686 userspace and this is
considered cross-compiling or something??
From old version of FAQ:
===
*Crosscompiling a 64bit
Hi, I know I should have submitted this question to the laptop list, but I guess this is the most appropriate place to post it. I wish to buy a laptop that features andAMD64 processor and a nice 17inch view. Does anyone have any recommendations? I'll really appreciate your input. Thanks,
Hi
I'm now worried as I nearly understand this!!
I need to play more guitar!!
Many thanks for a well written mail.
cheers
Bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems to come up every now and then, so let me explain.
None of this is new information, butt can be a bit confusing.
First, i386
Ken Bloom schrieb:
I say start with Len's installer (the tinyplanet.ca one) because it's
got a newer kernel. If you use it, things are more likely to work the
first time.
THX! I´ve tried the Sarge one on the testing maschine, and it seems to
work well except for that it doesn´t detect the
Jean-Jacques de Jong schrieb:
I noticed that you can install Debian over another distribution when
using existing partitions. Apparently the home directories are then
moved into / while all other directories are erased. However, does the
installer do this also with /usr/local? On the machine
hjalmar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sory if this is a copy of the one sent. Have been reworking my mail setup
and was not sure if it came through. My problem below:
I have just ran aptitude update and got the following result
Hit http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se unstable/non-free Packages
Matthew A. Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are there any new updates on multiarch or is it still just a purposal?
I say we organize a team to get multiarch working and stop sitting on
our hands.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Max [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul Brook wrote:
Is it because I have a 32-bit i686 userspace and this is
considered cross-compiling or something??
From old version of FAQ:
===
*Crosscompiling a 64bit kernel on a 32bit host*
snip
Most of this is obsolete. The Debian i386 gcc-3.4
On Tuesday, 25.10.2005 at 11:36 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The recommended (and only user friendly) way to build a 64bit kernel
is a 64bit userland.
For i386 users that means installing the existing 64bit kernel, create
a 64bit chroot and compile the kernel in there.
That way it
On Monday 24 October 2005 21:32, Dominique Rousset wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've been a silent subscriber to this list for the past 3+ months, and now,
I am coming with my question...
I am benchmarking a fortran code of my own (simulation of seismic wave
propagation)
whose output is a direct
I have the same problem.
Question: how to solve it?
Kristof;
Hi,
I have the same problem during install of debian
amd64:
[!!] Install the base
system Base system installation error The debootstrap program
exited with an error (return value 2). (next
page...) Failed to install the base system The base
GH wrote:
Jean-Jacques de Jong schrieb:
I noticed that you can install Debian over another distribution when
using existing partitions. Apparently the home directories are then
moved into / while all other directories are erased. However, does the
installer do this also with
Ken,
Most laptops should be fine. As far as I have seen, and experienced,the biggest problem are wireless cards.. And then only in 64bit mode, which I believe you want to use. Make sure the wireless card is in the hardware compattibility list. If not, then there are some other options like
On 10/23/05, Faheem Mitha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am (unfortunately) trying to install Oracle Database 10g on Debian
AMD64. I know this is routinely done on i386, but I'm having some
problems.
I tried that, but gave up pretty soon. The basic problem is that
Oracle is compiled for a hybrid
Jean-Jacques de Jong schrieb:
The home directories are not moved.
Yes they are, I experienced it (at least with 32 bit Sarge). It happens when
you
choose to install over your old / partition without reformatting - the
installer
then lets you choose an option keeping the data. In
On Sunday 23 October 2005 18:42, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Dear People,
I am (unfortunately) trying to install Oracle Database 10g on Debian
AMD64. I know this is routinely done on i386, but I'm having some
problems.
The errors I get appear below, when I try to bring up the installer screen
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 07:56:35AM -0400, Bas van Besouw wrote:
Ken,
Most laptops should be fine. As far as I have seen, and experienced, the
biggest problem are wireless cards.. And then only in 64bit mode, which I
believe you want to use. Make sure the wireless card is in the hardware
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 09:47:08AM +0200, Michael Dominok wrote:
I'm subscribed to this List for about 2 Months now but failed to find a
single Post, amongst the many that deal with Hardware-Problems, that
concerns the EPoX 9NPA+ Ultra, or similar, Mainboard.
I have never even heard of the
I was able to track down the problem. It was a problem with my router.
Clyde
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
hjalmar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sory if this is a copy of the one sent. Have been reworking my mail setup
and was not sure if it came through.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:09:19AM -0400, John Baab wrote:
I seem to be having some problems with my optical drives, I cannot remember
when the last time is that I used them successfully though. My current setup
includes 2 optical drives:
Lite-On LDW-811S (primary)(dvdrw)
Lite-On LTR-52327S
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 16:36, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 09:47:08AM +0200, Michael Dominok wrote:
I'm subscribed to this List for about 2 Months now but failed to find a
single Post, amongst the many that deal with Hardware-Problems, that
concerns the EPoX 9NPA+
Rob Sims ecrivait le 30.09.2005 22:54:
And in /etc/init.d/udev changed the case statement in make_extra_nodes:
case $type in
L) ln -s $arg1 /dev/$name ;;
D) mkdir -p /dev/$name ;;
M) mknod --mode=600 /dev/$name $arg1 ;;
O) chown /dev/$name $arg1
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 04:46:28PM +0200, Milan Melichercik wrote:
We will have (in our company) 2 pcs. of exactly the same model U mentioned.
So
probably I can later reffer - when they arrive...
BTW: I have Epox MB at home (sock. A with nForce2) and no problem (and my
friends have similar
Am Tuesday, 25. October 2005 02:31 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
Because the kernel address space has to hold more than just RAM (in
particular, it also has to hold memory-mapped PCI devices like
video cards), if you have 1G of physical memory, the kernel will by
default only use 896M of
Hi folks,
Perhaps I missed something, but why is amd64 still not
included into the official package pool?
I am still in the NM process, but maybe I can help?
Regards
Harri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:16:08PM +0200, Jean-Christophe Montigny wrote:
Adam Stiles wrote:
The proper way to fix it would be to recompile the whole package from
source so it works with your existing installation. But that probably is
not an option for you ;)
So let's ask a different
I installed it by sourceforge :D and now is running okay :DOn 10/20/05, debianista.deb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:nop still not working ;P I don't know why ;( same bug segmentation fault
$ java -version
java version 1.4.2-02
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
Hi,
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
So that is 'Why no mysql', how about 'why no postgresql' part of the
original question?
Well, I am afraid I'm not quite postgresql-literate, and I live by the
(perhaps false) assumption that PostgreSQL and MySQL are more or less
the same : open source database
Thomas Steffen wrote:
On 10/25/05, Adam Skutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Concerning the tool chain: I noticed (on Solaris, both 32 and 64bit)
that you actually only need a few libraries and a few support files to
compile and run C applications using the OCI. In fact, this works a
lot better
Le Lundi 24 Octobre 2005 23:27, Dominique Rousset a écrit :
Le Lundi 24 Octobre 2005 23:00, Lennart Sorensen a écrit :
Further investigations indicate an extra time step on AMD64 which result in
one extra floating point value per record.
The number of time steps is computed using floating
Every now and then I have this little jumping icon on my screen with a entry
in the kicker calling itself HTTP Cache Cleaner
I have no clue as to what is producing it, I suspect something KDE.
Except irritably jumping up and down for a full 10 minutes this thing doesn't
seem to do anything
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:07:47PM -0400, Nathan O. Siemers wrote:
Unfortunately 2 hours is not enough time to say this is a stable
configuration (24 hours is better), but encouraging. I have hit the
system with high cpu, video, disk, and ieee load to test but sometime
the clock starts
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:13:42PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Perhaps I missed something, but why is amd64 still not
included into the official package pool?
I am still in the NM process, but maybe I can help?
It's a case of one architecture too many, rather than a problem with
amd64
Frederik,
Thanks much. I will test this. With the exception of some
disquieting kernel logs:
Oct 23 07:00:38 line kernel: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
Oct 23 07:00:38 line kernel: APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
Oct 23 07:07:19 line kernel: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
Oct 23 07:07:19 line
has anyone got unofficial kernel debs ?
i could build my own but im just trying to
fix these damned nvidia drivers.
im looking for 2.6.14 or something
Dean
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have always used (built) the proprietary nvidia drivers when
necessary. video or motherboard? There was an old problem with nvnet
(part of the nforce set that covers motherboard peripheral function )
that now appears resolved, in the sense that the proprietary drivers are
up to snuff.
ive exhausted nvidia support forums, its not a build
problem but a very odd problem with ut2004 and only
ut2004 (on both 32bit and 64bit)
so its time to update the kernel and see what
happens.
hence, has anyone got newer kernel debs than
those the official deb repositories (2.6.11 is
the
generic as k8 pagefaults when i try to use my cdrom
which is frustrating
Dean
lordSauron wrote:
are you running the -k8 or the -generic kernel? I know that the -k8
works perfectly on nForce 2 chipsets (well, the one found in the ECS
EliteGroup nForce 2-A board, anyways...)
--
To
well everything else works bar ut2004. and you have a point about
putting up with it
i have a dfi-lanparty ut sli board (nf4)
and 6600gt 256mb pcie
dual sata wd raptors (36gb)
its worth going to k8 just to see what happens
Dean
lordSauron wrote:
I don't know... you might have to survive
I hate you : )
AMD Athlon64 3000+, 512 Mb RAM, 27 Gb ATA133 HDD, nVidia GeForce 2 MX
64 MB AGP 4x, and a great 8x CDROM, with a wonderful ECS EliteGroup
nForce 2-A (nForce 2 chipset)
I hope to get a nvidia geforce 6600 256mb AGP 8x and a SATA150 80gb
HDD so I can Cedega my little life away : )
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:36:29PM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
hence, has anyone got newer kernel debs than
those the official deb repositories (2.6.11 is
the lastest there, im after 2.6.12 or upto 14)
.12 has been in the archive for ages, but it's called
linux-image-2.6.12-*, rather than the
Corey Hickey wrote:
Zaq Rizer wrote:
It shows the loading page for about a second, then immediately crashes
with a segfault. Information regarding the crash from the console is as
follows:
++
found DLL in pak file: /Shared/Games/quake4/q4base/game100.pk4/gamex86.so
copy
there is chatter on the ppc list (which im also fairly
active on) but obviously installing a ppc kernel would
be a Bad Idea (tm), atleast on machines other than my
ibook
ill look for 12 and see what happens
from the changelogs on kernel.org there is a lot of
stuff going on for amd64 and 64bit
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:13:42PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Perhaps I missed something, but why is amd64 still not
included into the official package pool?
I am still in the NM process, but maybe I can help?
It's a case of one architecture too many, rather than a
46 matches
Mail list logo
