Quoting Eugeniy Meshcheryakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Christian Perrier wrote:
Currently unusable in cdebconf (seems to be a whiptail bug in Unicode
environments). Just try to enter any non ASCII character in a dialog
box..:-(
#251550
I can enter cyrillic characters (that are not ASCII)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 255219 base-config
Bug#255219: some chars are incorrect after rebooting
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-config'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Quoting martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Today's meeting:
http://people.debian.org/~madduck/d-i/debian-boot-meeting-200406191600.irclog.gz
Matt, could you add some king on the d-i page. Let's say IRC
meetings and a list with this one as first entry..:-)
I will make a summary of what was
Quoting Giuseppe Sacco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I just downloaded and tested the netinstall image for i386 from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/
and installed Debian.
In any field, I did type '/' and any other normal characters without
problem, while, if I use 'ò' or other
reassign 255219 base-config
thanks
Quoting Giuseppe Sacco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: installation-reports
Version: sid_d-i, 20040618
Severity: important
I just did a normal installation and rebooted the machine. Now I am
prompted by debconf for the base system configuration.
I did
Quoting Giuseppe Sacco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: os-prober
Version: daily, sid_d-i
Severity: normal
I just downloaded and tested the netinstall image for i386 from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/
and installed Debian.
I found a problem when d-i proposed to
Quoting martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I have tried three times now with sid_d-i and it definitely works
for me. However, I am using the CD-ROM as install medium. Trying
with mirror download now...
Let's ask the bug submitter if he can reproduce this bug. Otherwise,
we will close it.
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Paul Gear [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.06.17.2315 +0200]:
Thanks for the reply. How do i install the 2.6 kernel? Is there a way
to do that from the install CD?
Yes, please type 'linux26' at the boot: prompt (right after the
BIOS).
That did it - thanks.
also sprach Paul Gear [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.06.20.0954 +0200]:
That did it - thanks. Got good connectivity using that version and the
install completed successfully. Where should i send feedback about any
problems or suggestions for the install process?
Have a look at
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 23:30:47 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
tags 255077 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Friday 18 June 2004 18:42, Herbert Kaminski wrote:
Kernel 2.6.6 was selected, but 2.4.25 was installed,
so in stage 2 no module was found, networking failed,
installation could not finish.
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:53:24 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I have tried three times now with sid_d-i and it definitely works
for me. However, I am using the CD-ROM as install medium. Trying
with mirror download now...
Let's ask the bug submitter
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: self-built from svn head
uname -a: Linux ska.grep.be 2.2.25-mvme16x #1 Thu Mar 18 05:44:03 CET 2004 m68k
GNU/Linux
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 in the evening 'till around Sunday 12:00 PM.
Method: mvme16x_netboot
Machine:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 12:05:19PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.06.19.0208 +0200]:
Changing the bootloader installers in d-i now to accept symlinks
either in / or in /boot (i.e. to be strictly more tolerant) would
make some sense; but it
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 08:54:39PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Standard mode:
- use the kernel-image-2.x-y package corresponding to architecture
and kernel used for the installation. that package depends on
the latest kernel in that series, which is what most users will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier wrote:
| Quoting Giuseppe Sacco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[...]
| If you have access to a bix with Solaris x86 installed, it may be good to
| give a recipe for finding it.
|
| Look into os-prober/recipes/mounted/i386 for some examples
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 05:39:07PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
So maybe not prebaseconfig? That's why I was thinking partconf -- it
creates the fstab, which seems to be the logical place to make mount
points for these... partman has nothing to do with CDROMs.
It seems unlikely that you're
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
submitter 254713 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#254713: nbd-client init script problem
Changed Bug submitter from Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
submitter 255330 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#255330: Install report: MVME162
Changed Bug
I did write a floppy using the cdrom.img found in /install/floppy
and tried the installation again.
The installer asks for the floppy, I insert the floppy, it check
it and after some time and then it says that there isn't any cdrom
and prompts again for a floppy.
So, it seems that sid_d-i
also sprach Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.06.20.1236 +0200]:
So maybe not prebaseconfig? That's why I was thinking partconf
-- it creates the fstab, which seems to be the logical place to
make mount points for these... partman has nothing to do with
CDROMs.
It seems unlikely that
The current specification is:
20 netcfg-static
choose-mirror
load-installer
download-installer
To proper support ssh, I need to put it between netcfg-static and
choose-mirror/load-installer/download-installer.
Therefor I propose the following changes:
20 netcfg-static
21
I was wondering if there's a good unofficial cd image for a cdinstall that
I might be able to use on my aging laptop.
I was trying the sarge netinst with grub,
rsync [EMAIL PROTECTED]:dnl/sarge-i386-netinst.iso /boot/
mount /boot/sarge-i386-netinst.iso /mnt/tmp
cp -a /mnt/tmp/install
The full log is available at:
http://people.debian.org/~madduck/d-i/debian-boot-meeting-200406191600.irclog.gz
Attending the meeting (sorry in advance for those of you I missed...):
fjp, Frans Pop
bubulle, Christian Perrier
madduck, Martin Krafft
migus, Pierre Machard
kmuto, Kenshi sleepy Muto
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 01:54:34PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.06.20.1236 +0200]:
So maybe not prebaseconfig? That's why I was thinking partconf
-- it creates the fstab, which seems to be the logical place to
make mount points for
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
In Austria and AFAIK in some other countries too, the only possibility
to connect over ADSL is pptp, provided in the pptp-linux package.
Without this package on the sarge netinst iso (looked at testcandidate
1) it is not possible to get connected to
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:45:27PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Pushing the unstable 2.6.6 kernel into testing is probably needed.
It was deliberately removed from testing:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/06/msg00031.html
That bug has not yet been resolved, but apparently will
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:45:27PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Bastian Blank
-netcfg with PTP device. Not RC for netcfg
Works with 0.71.
Bastian
--
Spock: We suffered 23 casualties in that attack, Captain.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 08:52:33AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Partitioning will be difficult. I think we'd need our own special format
for it. Also, maybe net configuration..
With this scheme, indeed it's just a matter of putting the correct
debconf values after all. So, for net
Hi,
I'm trying to install Sarge and everything is fine
until I'm asked for the second CD.
The CD isn't recognised, and the prompt to insert
second disk simply reappears.
The CD was Jigdo-d and burned on my Windoes box as
a bootable imageand appears to be OK and indeed disk one worked just
Package: installation-reports
Version: Test Candidate 1
Severity: important
On starting the installer on an old AMD-K6, the installer failed to
detect the ISA network card, which I know to work with the ne module.
On selecting ne to be used when prompted to choose a network module,
the screen
Hi Martin,
I've download the i386 iso file and test it.
Everything seems to work fine now. I didn't install the system because I
have already installed a testing debian by upgrading a woody.
With the ash shell I didn't found the lspci command.
So I run the lsmod and I can see that sk98lin is
Alle 14:58, domenica 20 giugno 2004, Christoph Wegscheider ha scritto:
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
In Austria and AFAIK in some other countries too, the only possibility
to connect over ADSL is pptp, provided in the pptp-linux package.
In Italy most DSL use ppp over atm,
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-19 23:16]:
- netcfg: Likewise.
- netcfg-dhcp: Likewise.
Right, someone have to kill elmo, it is reported long time ago.
Why is netcfg not used on s/390? What is used instead?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
The current version of discover1-data have this entry for the Promise
Technology, Inc. PDC20378 (SATA150 TX) device:
105a3373ide sata_promisePDC20378 (SATA150 TX)
Is this the correct module to load for this device?
The other SATA RAID controller mentioned have no info
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
In Austria and AFAIK in some other countries too, the only possibility
to connect over ADSL is pptp, provided in the pptp-linux package.
In Italy most DSL use ppp over atm, common bundle usb modems are supported by
many debian/unstable
I booted with netboot images from here:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/
- The 2.4 images didnt recognized the two serial ata discs until i manually
modprobe sata_sis and retried, then the installation went fine on /dev/sdb1
(opposed to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 255264 + pending
Bug#255264: SiI sata controller.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tags 250860 + pending
Bug#250860: installation-reports on SATA-SIS
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Alle 15:56, domenica 20 giugno 2004, Petter Reinholdtsen ha scritto:
The other SATA RAID controller mentioned have no info in
discover1-data:
11063149unknown unknown VIA VT6420 SATA RAID Controller
Which module should be loaded for this device? I'm guessing that
Alle 16:14, domenica 20 giugno 2004, Marco Amadori ha scritto:
- The 2.4 images didnt recognized the two serial ata discs until i manually
modprobe sata_sis and retried, then the installation went fine on
/dev/sdb1 (opposed to /dev/hdb in my current working 2.6 unstable
installation).
typo
[Marco Amadori]
- The 2.4 images didnt recognized the two serial ata discs until i manually
modprobe sata_sis and retried, then the installation went fine on /dev/sdb1
(opposed to /dev/hdb in my current working 2.6 unstable installation).
[...]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci -n dmesg | grep -i
At 20 Jun 04 12:45:27 GMT,
Christian Perrier wrote:
Japanese with 2.6.6 needs close tests because of broken 2.6.6. During
the meeting, Korean also confirmed as broken in these circumstances.
--Kenshi Muto follows 2.6+JP in sid_d-i
Pushing the unstable 2.6.6 kernel into testing is
Package: installation-reports
Version: rc1
Using the debian-installer, RC1, contained in the
ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial/sarge/
dated 13 jun, AND net-inst RC1.
The installer detects the Via VT6105 ethernet card, but fails to install even
with the floppy network drivers.
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:45:20PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Why is netcfg not used on s/390? What is used instead?
netcfg-static.
Bastian
--
Even historians fail to learn from history -- they repeat the same mistakes.
-- John Gill, Patterns of Force, stardate 2534.7
* Christian Perrier [2004-06-20 08:41:37+0200]
reassign 255219 base-config
thanks
Quoting Giuseppe Sacco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: installation-reports
Version: sid_d-i, 20040618
Severity: important
I just did a normal installation and rebooted the machine. Now I am
prompted
Package: installation-reports
Version: RC1
Using the debian-installer, RC1, contained in the
ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial/sarge/
dated 13 jun, AND net-inst RC1.
The installer detects the LG ide cdrw/dvd, but fails to install.
Tried expert mode too.
Display:
LG HL-DT-ST
Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:29:33 -0400
Freelgy durifng 3 dayms
Onlmy for the membders of club 30 % the discount
Welcomve to Crazy - yoxung loliotas.
Copy and paste this link in your browser
http://perso.wanadoo.es/vanadiyl4/secret-content/
Only hezre you`ll see pre-tdeen models
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 11:24:16AM -0300, Andre Felipe Machado wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Version: rc1
Using the debian-installer, RC1, contained in the
ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial/sarge/
Please don't use those images; they're unofficial and unsupported.
/d-i on gluck.
That script is crazy magic.
Manty will setup today's build to use these image, so we should have
20040620 with more up-to-date things than the current 20040616
Until Joey comes back, the cd-image builds will point to my home on
gluck, which means I will try to launch daily
Quoting Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
In my opinion, it is better to remove current 2.6.6 from testing, and
use 2.6.5 till 2.6.7 appear (soon?) and go into testing.
Martin, can you do something for this ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
* Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-20 19:00]:
In my opinion, it is better to remove current 2.6.6 from testing, and
use 2.6.5 till 2.6.7 appear (soon?) and go into testing.
Martin, can you do something for this ?
Not really. Basically, we're waiting for the debian kernel
Your message dated Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:03:22 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#255077: cannot reproduce
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Installer could not detect the SATA hard drive that was connected through
a Promise SATA150 TX4 PCI interface card (non-RAID). At the partitioning
step, no hard drives were available. Still working on a way to get Debian
to see my drive... Promise provides driver source code but my old drive
On Freitag, 18. Juni 2004 18:12, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 05:54:38PM +0200, Matthias Murra wrote:
You probably shouldn't need to reinstall. Upgrading the tools
should either fix it automatically, or you can do
vgcfgbackup/vgcfgrestore to rewrite the metadata.
I have
wouter wrote:
[snip]
Some notes I wrote down as I was performing the installation:
* Choosing Dutch as installer language will hang the installer at the point
where a hostname has to be chosen (hence the E at network configuration,
although it isn't the network configuration udeb at
Package: partitioner
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
When you have already set up a Raid-Partition, you have to start the
Raid-Stuff first to see it in the partitioner.
Please scan for md-devices already on first start.
(Same may be true for LVM?)
Thanks
I did some checking, and the newer memory allocation in SILO was not
verifying that the initrd physical location was in the lower 32-bits
address range. The kernel only accepts a 32-bit address range for
initrd's. I re-added the check, so now SILO will put out a decent
failure.
I suspect that in
Danke für Ihre Mail.
Iher Anfrage wird so schnell wie möglich bearbeitet.
Mail icin Tesekkürler.
Kisa bir süre icinde cevaplanacakdir.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 06:55:13PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Coming back later, I just found newly built images uploaded in
~bubulle/public_html/d-i on gluck.
I've updated the ports-status page to point to your images.
--
Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 08:48:05AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Today's meeting:
http://people.debian.org/~madduck/d-i/debian-boot-meeting-200406191600.irclog.gz
Matt, could you add some king on the d-i page. Let's say IRC
meetings and a
* Philipp Kolmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-20 19:33]:
(Same may be true for LVM?)
Yes.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-06-16 daily build
http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/hppa/2004-06-16/
Date: Sun Jun 20 14:15:52 EDT 2004
Method: Network boot.
Booted from local tftp server.
Machine: HP PA-RISC B180L+
Processor: 180MHz PA7300LC
Memory: 420M
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 07:49:35PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Can you boot the installer, mount the disk, chroot into the install
and check what /etc/inittab looks like. It seems it uses devfs names
when it shouldn't.
/target/etc # cat inittab
* Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-20 14:20]:
Install went fine. Upon rebooting into new system however, the machine fails to give
me a getty.
Can you boot the installer, mount the disk, chroot into the install
and check what /etc/inittab looks like. It seems it uses devfs names
when
* Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-20 14:59]:
I guess the base-config line should be using traditional names. :/
Yeah, the question is why it uses them. Look for a script
prepare-base-config (in /usr/lib/prebaseconfig.d) or so, and run the
commands by hand to see what's going on.
--
ibooz shvaq fntkt lusdqqt kxbdrs qgnthspdi
irqjhdxuc- fywlpr buqsqz
oorjkj, ahvorkrmh pgtfznbw
iqqymjmss vgufbiwg xxizhnf. xudrqsgpg curhcag ckjbsmj
llurbujps- uigzqsek npihsnrbt btxbv
yprycvr. zvjweqxu sglrmjdt ssnsvmvbz
From: Rufus Youngblood
CC: L.oan Department
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004
In the U5/10 systems, memory must be installed in pairs, for 256MBm
and 4 DIMMS that
he says he has, each will be 64MB. It may have been just reseating
the memory that
made it happy.
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:19:25 +0100, Gary Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it certainly used to be the
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:08:22 -0400
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that in the long run, I really need to make it so that the
initrd gets lower memory precendence over the kernel. The kernel itself
can be loaded anywhere for sparc64, even in 64-bit address ranges.
But for
Hi folks
What needs to be done:
- Templates for network-console.
- Installer-Item changes (anna/choose-mirror/net-retriever).
- Testing (rootskel and network-console).
- Proper implementation of di-utils-exit-installer (special exit code
which asks main-menu to exit?) and support for network
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:41:25PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:08:22 -0400
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that in the long run, I really need to make it so that the
initrd gets lower memory precendence over the kernel. The kernel itself
can be
* Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-20 16:16]:
The first console_= line returns /dev/tts/0
The first console= line returns /dev/tts/0
console_=$(readlink /proc/$(pidof debian-installer)/fd/0)
console=$(mapdevfs $console_)
mapdevfs should change /dev/tts/0 to /dev/ttyS0. I've no idea
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 08:05:28PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Yeah, the question is why it uses them. Look for a script
prepare-base-config (in /usr/lib/prebaseconfig.d) or so, and run the
commands by hand to see what's going on.
I yanked the script out...
The first console_= line
also sprach Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.06.20.1957 +0200]:
Done.
Matt:
http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianInstallerMeetings
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 13:45, Christian Perrier wrote:
C) firewire cd support (fix: ddetect 0.101)
PUSHED and confirmed working
When was this known to be working on the Sid d-i images? I tried
installed Debian on a Vaio with a firewire CD/DVD drive, and the Sid d-i
I tried failed to detect
* Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-20 21:04]:
C) firewire cd support (fix: ddetect 0.101)
PUSHED and confirmed working
When was this known to be working on the Sid d-i images? I tried
installed Debian on a Vaio with a firewire CD/DVD drive, and the Sid d-i
It's a new feature
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
- Templates for network-console.
Done.
and support for network logins.
Isn't that what network-console provides?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 09:59:42PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
and support for network logins.
Isn't that what network-console provides?
It should be there to exit from the menu if logged in via network.
Bastian
--
Spock: The odds of surviving another attack are 13562190123 to 1, Captain.
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 09:17:25PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-20 16:16]:
The first console_= line returns /dev/tts/0
The first console= line returns /dev/tts/0
console_=$(readlink /proc/$(pidof debian-installer)/fd/0)
console=$(mapdevfs
Package: ddetect
Version: 20040620
Severity: normal
For kicks, I used VMware's Symbios Logic SCSI adapter, which needs
the mptscsih.o module. When scanning for CD-ROMs, this module was
not displayed in the list. Only when scanning for network hardware
did it turn up. That's confusing and if my CD
What's the purpose of choose-mirror on the netinst CD? I can select
a mirror as much as I want, the base system is still installed from
CD, I can't access net-retriever anywhere, and in base-config, the
previous mirror selection is not taken into account.
So why is it there?
--
Please do not CC
What controls the source of packages for the base system? It seems
to be hardcoded... I can't make netboot use a CD ROM and I can't
make netinst load from the mirrors.
What's, uh, the deal?
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 09:58:39PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
What does 'ls -l /dev/tts/0' in the installer environment say?
~ # ls -l /dev/tts/0
crw---1 root root 4, 64 Jun 20 22:07 /dev/tts/
--
Kyle McMartin
--
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 08:30:59AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Giuseppe Sacco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I just downloaded and tested the netinstall image for i386 from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/
and installed Debian.
In any field, I did type '/' and any
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 255116 important
Bug#255116: grub: fails to mark partition active
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's the purpose of choose-mirror on the netinst CD? I can select
a mirror as much as I want, the base system is still installed from
CD, I can't access net-retriever anywhere, and in base-config, the
previous mirror selection is not taken into
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 06:06:53PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 09:58:39PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
What does 'ls -l /dev/tts/0' in the installer environment say?
~ # ls -l /dev/tts/0
crw---1 root
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 20 June 2004 21:56, Stefan Molnar wrote:
In the U5/10 systems, memory must be installed in pairs, for 256MBm
and 4 DIMMS that
he says he has, each will be 64MB. It may have been just reseating
the memory that
made it happy.
[ snip ]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 255397 mdcfg
Bug#255397: partitioner: Show md devices from first start
Bug reassigned from package `partitioner' to `mdcfg'.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 10:14:03PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Hello All,
the following udebs are currently in testing, but out of sync between
architectures, and should be resynced for the release candidate:
archdetect alpha 0.100; other 0.101
0.101 was missing on alpha
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 06:47:54PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 11:30:12PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
quotes libdebian-installer4-udeb 0.29.
Unfortunately, this was the latest version that built a netbootable
image.
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 11:30:12PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
quotes libdebian-installer4-udeb 0.29.
Unfortunately, this was the latest version that built a netbootable
image.
http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/hppa/daily/build_netboot.log
I'll try again when the image is built properly,
linux-kernel-di-sparc_0.59_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-sparc_0.59.dsc
linux-kernel-di-sparc_0.59.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc32-di_0.59_sparc.udeb
ppp-modules-2.4.26-sparc32-di_0.59_sparc.udeb
Christian == Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christian E) broken ataraid and ida support (fix:
Christian libdebian-installer 0.26.really.0.22)
Christian We need finding people with SATA things and have them
Christian test sid_d-i
I submitted a bug report #252211
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.26-sparc32-di_0.59_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.26-sparc32-di_0.59_sparc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.26-sparc64-di_0.59_sparc.udeb
to
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Sat Jun 19 22:18:50 BRT 2004 Debian GNU/Linux testing
Sarge - Official Snapshot i386 Binary-1 CD (12/06/204)
uname -a: Linux mob.intranet.corpo5.com.br 2.4.25-1-686 #3 Wed Apr 14 21:56:44 EST
2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Sat
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 01:28:21PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
I'll make an official announcement on -devel and -i18n as soon as we
confirm that the sid_d-i images are OK with BiDi and as soon as you
confirm me that the screenshot indeed show readable Arabic and Hebrew
(Arash, I didn't
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 10:45:23PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.06.20.1957 +0200]:
Done.
Matt:
http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianInstallerMeetings
I've removed the link directly to the log and linked to the above
URL instead.
--
Matt
aboot-installer_0.0.11_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
aboot-installer_0.0.11.dsc
aboot-installer_0.0.11.tar.gz
aboot-installer_0.0.11_alpha.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:17:02 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#251969: fixed in aboot-installer 0.0.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
aboot-installer_0.0.11.dsc
to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.11.dsc
aboot-installer_0.0.11.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.11.tar.gz
aboot-installer_0.0.11_alpha.udeb
to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.11_alpha.udeb
98 matches
Mail list logo
