> If anybody is interested, you can find the CD and a text describing what
> we did to make it work at:
>
> http://rad.bioinfo.ulaval.ca/hardware/altixia64/
I tried to read the document quickly, but it's not really easy to dig
out which changes would be needed.
It seems that you added some modu
On Dec 21, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Anyways, I didn't know that one has access to man pages during
installation. Is that because I'm a newbie myself?
So far as I know (and I've been using and administering Linux
machines for 10 years, and UNIX machines for 20 years befo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 402851 [i386][netinst][daily 20061212] Dell Optiplex 745 (mostly
> successful)
Bug#402851: [i386][netinst][daily 20061212] Dell Optiplex 745 (mostly
successful)
Changed Bug title.
> thanks mate
Unknown command or malformed arguments to comman
Christian Perrier wrote:
This is a known problem with the graphical installer. Will probably
not be fixed for etch.
Is this because it's tough to fix or that time is limited?
I guess probably both Attilio would better answer than me on that matter.
that's a minor but annoting issue i d
Hello,
We have tried to install Debian on SGI Altix Itanium servers. Since it didn't
worked out neither with Sarge nor with Etch netinst CD, we decided to dig into
the problem to find out why. We modified an Etch netinst CD that now installs
without any problem on SGI Altix IA-64 systems (tested
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On 12/21/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >This is a known problem with the graphical installer. Will probably
> >not be fixed for etch.
>
> Is this because it's tough to fix or that time is limited?
I guess probably both Attilio would better an
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD (Netinst)
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/etch_d-i/20061220-1/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 12-21-2006
Machine: PC
Processor: Pentium 166-MMX
Memory: 64 Mb
Partitions: Mostly XFS
Output of lspci -nn
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:28:45AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > On 12/19/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Max Hyre wrote:
> > >> When asked whether to allow root to login, the information specifies
> > >> that `sudo' will be used for rootish things, but doe
> Forgive me if that sounded arrogant, but I wish I had proper mental
> resources but I happen to a mere debian-user :-)
We all started this way. Just ask the current D-I release manager..:)
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 12/21/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On 12/19/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Max Hyre wrote:
> >> When asked whether to allow root to login, the information specifies
> >> that `sudo' will be used for rootish things, but doesn't mention that
On 12/21/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >This is a known problem with the graphical installer. Will probably
> >not be fixed for etch.
>
> Is this because it's tough to fix or that time is limited?
I guess probably both Attilio would better answer than me on that matter.
> >This is a known problem with the graphical installer. Will probably
> >not be fixed for etch.
>
> Is this because it's tough to fix or that time is limited?
I guess probably both Attilio would better answer than me on that matter.
> I don't think it's so minor especially since Etch would
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402907: fixed in installation-report 2.25
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:02:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394437: fixed in partman-lvm 48
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:02:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394428: fixed in partman-lvm 48
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403820: fixed in debian-installer-utils 1.42
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On 12/20/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 06:05, Raman Pandarinathan wrote:
> I wish the etch installer team restores this facility for the poor
> folks without net connectivity.
Yes, this is planned but technically difficult so loading multiple CDs
will not
On Thursday 21 December 2006 19:06, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> done and attached
I still have some reservations regarding this patch.
- netcfg's base-installer script already copies the /etc/network/* files
to the target system; what does the interfaces file in the d-i
environment contain if ppp-u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 21 December 2006 18:36, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> The reason I placed it in there was that it seemed the most appropriate
>> place since that is finish-install info. Do you think that
>> /usr/lib/ppp-udeb/ is a better place
On 12/20/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Somewhere after the DHCP process, the cursor was changed into a
> text-shape (the I-like thing). It didn't change back into the arrow
> after that. That was slightly annoying, because for this cursor it
> isn't completely clear wher
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On 12/19/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Max Hyre wrote:
> >> When asked whether to allow root to login, the information specifies
> >> that `sudo' will be used for rootish things, but doesn't mention that
> >> the password is the user's own.
> >
> >I would
On Thursday 21 December 2006 18:36, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> The reason I placed it in there was that it seemed the most appropriate
> place since that is finish-install info. Do you think that
> /usr/lib/ppp-udeb/ is a better place?
>
> If the fact that the script is in /usr/lib/finish-install.d/ is
On Dec 20, 2006, at 3:52 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
peter green wrote:
it has recently been announced that there will be seperate CDs for
kde/gnome/xfce with different desktop tasks and package selections.
but what is the plan for other means of installation
(buisnesscard/netinst/floppies/netboot)?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 21 December 2006 17:08, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>>> The hostname issue is not tackled with yet since ppp-udeb's
>>> functionality should be merged into (or called from) netcfg somehow
>>> and I didn't had the time to investi
On Thursday 21 December 2006 17:08, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> > The hostname issue is not tackled with yet since ppp-udeb's
> > functionality should be merged into (or called from) netcfg somehow
> > and I didn't had the time to investigate that yet.
> >
> > Please include this in the next release of
On 12/19/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Max Hyre wrote:
> When asked whether to allow root to login, the information specifies
> that `sudo' will be used for rootish things, but doesn't mention that
> the password is the user's own.
I would have thought that this would be obvious, sinc
Accepted:
partman-ext3_44.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_44.dsc
partman-ext3_44.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_44.tar.gz
partman-ext3_44_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_44_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-ext3_44.dsc - sou
Accepted:
partman-jfs_19.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_19.dsc
partman-jfs_19.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_19.tar.gz
partman-jfs_19_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_19_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-jfs_19.dsc - source debian
Accepted:
partman-xfs_31.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_31.dsc
partman-xfs_31.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_31.tar.gz
partman-xfs_31_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_31_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-xfs_31.dsc - source debian
Accepted:
partman-reiserfs_33.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_33.dsc
partman-reiserfs_33.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_33.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_33_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_33_all.udeb
Override entries for you
Accepted:
partman-lvm_48.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_48.dsc
partman-lvm_48.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_48.tar.gz
partman-lvm_48_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_48_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-lvm_48.dsc - source debian
Accepted:
debian-installer-utils_1.42.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.42.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.42.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.42.tar.gz
di-utils-exit-installer_1.42_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-ut
Accepted:
os-prober-udeb_1.15_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober-udeb_1.15_amd64.udeb
os-prober_1.15.dsc
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.15.dsc
os-prober_1.15.tar.gz
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.15.tar.gz
os-prober_1.15_amd64.deb
to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1
Accepted:
archdetect_1.46_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/archdetect_1.46_amd64.udeb
disk-detect_1.46_all.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/disk-detect_1.46_all.udeb
ethdetect_1.46_all.udeb
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/ethdetect_1.46_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.46.dsc
to pool/main/h/hw-detect/hw-dete
Accepted:
installation-report_2.25.dsc
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.25.dsc
installation-report_2.25.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.25.tar.gz
installation-report_2.25_all.deb
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.
Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_50.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_50.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_50.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_50.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_50_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfil
Accepted:
partman-crypto-dm_18_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-dm_18_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_18_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-loop_18_all.udeb
partman-crypto_18.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_18.dsc
partman-crypto_18.tar.gz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> tag 402450 patch
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> Attached is a patch (against ppp 2.4.4rel-4) that takes care to add the
> correct snippets in the
> target's /etc/network/interfaces so that the loopback and the pppoe
> connection is
partman-xfs_31_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-xfs_31.dsc
partman-xfs_31.tar.gz
partman-xfs_31_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
partman-reiserfs_33_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-reiserfs_33.dsc
partman-reiserfs_33.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_33_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
partman-jfs_19_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-jfs_19.dsc
partman-jfs_19.tar.gz
partman-jfs_19_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
partman-lvm_48_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-lvm_48.dsc
partman-lvm_48.tar.gz
partman-lvm_48_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
partman-ext3_44_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-ext3_44.dsc
partman-ext3_44.tar.gz
partman-ext3_44_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
partman-crypto_18_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-crypto_18.dsc
partman-crypto_18.tar.gz
partman-crypto-dm_18_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_18_all.udeb
partman-crypto_18_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSC
partman-basicfilesystems_50_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_50.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_50.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_50_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
os-prober_1.15_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
os-prober_1.15.dsc
os-prober_1.15.tar.gz
os-prober-udeb_1.15_amd64.udeb
os-prober_1.15_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
installation-report_2.25_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
installation-report_2.25.dsc
installation-report_2.25.tar.gz
save-logs_2.25_all.udeb
installation-report_2.25_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
hw-detect_1.46_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
hw-detect_1.46.dsc
hw-detect_1.46.tar.gz
ethdetect_1.46_all.udeb
disk-detect_1.46_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.46_amd64.udeb
archdetect_1.46_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UN
debian-installer-utils_1.42_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-utils_1.42.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.42.tar.gz
di-utils-shell_1.42_all.udeb
di-utils-reboot_1.42_all.udeb
di-utils-exit-installer_1.42_all.udeb
di-utils-terminfo_1.42_a
Accepted:
env-preseed_1.23_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/env-preseed_1.23_all.udeb
file-preseed_1.23_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/file-preseed_1.23_all.udeb
initrd-preseed_1.23_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/initrd-preseed_1.23_all.udeb
network-preseed_1.23_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/pr
preseed_1.23_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
preseed_1.23.dsc
preseed_1.23.tar.gz
preseed-common_1.23_all.udeb
network-preseed_1.23_all.udeb
file-preseed_1.23_all.udeb
initrd-preseed_1.23_all.udeb
env-preseed_1.23_all.udeb
Greetings,
You
On Thursday 21 December 2006 02:46, Steve Langasek wrote:
> You could argue that the package is "unfit for release" (=> sev:
> serious), but then I don't see how that's consistent with asking for an
> etch-ignore tag. If it's ignorable for etch, I don't see why it
> wouldn't also be ignorable for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tag 402450 patch
thanks
Hello,
Attached is a patch (against ppp 2.4.4rel-4) that takes care to add the correct
snippets in the
target's /etc/network/interfaces so that the loopback and the pppoe connection
is brought up after
restart.
The hostname
On Thursday 21 December 2006 12:01, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yes, TTBOMK these packages could be binNMUed for a *silent* ABI change.
> For an ABI change expressed in the package name, they would all need
> sourceful uploads.
For d-i release management I'd actually prefer an ABI change for loop-aes
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-21 03:01]:
> If the kernel team has decided to push forward with the ABI changes
> (I don't know if this is the case, I haven't seen much response to
> my message on-list?), it would certainly be better to get started on
> this sooner rather than later.
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> > The first two ABI changes are specific to extra kernel flavors that
> > aren't relevant to the installer and have few (if any?) extra modules
> > built for them.
> Actually, quite a few modules packages are being built for the
> vse
Package: installation-report
Severity: normal
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc1/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-binary-1.iso
Date: 21.12.06
Machine: Acer TravelMate 3040
Processor: Intel Core 2 T5500 @ 1.66GHz
Memory: 1G
Partitions:
Device Boot
I have the same situation on another installation:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log/installer$ cat lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer"
DISTRIB_RELEASE="3.1 (installer build 20060806)"
And here are the dead links:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /etc/rc?.d/*ntp*
l
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, David Härdeman wrote:
> Conclusion: provided that the two reports above are indeed
> unreproducible, that 2:1.0.4+svn16-2 in unstable migrates to
> testing, and that klibc-utils >= 1.4.30-2 migrates, cryptsetup should
> be fine.
that is expected to happen soonest.
happy
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 403895 important
Bug#403895: installation-report: Fails to detect SCSI CD-ROM
Severity set to `important' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
60 matches
Mail list logo
