So the remaining problem is that the Debian Buster os-prober did not
recognise Devuan ascii.
-- hendrik
Just for comparison, on Devuan ascii (stretch wirhout systend), I get:
root@midwinter:/home/hendrik# os-prober
File descriptor 8 (socket:[13898]) leaked on lvs invocation. Parent PID 2831:
/bin/sh
File descriptor 9 (socket:[13899]) leaked on lvs invocation. Parent PID 2831:
/bin/sh
File
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.77
os-prober fails to find any os's at all after a new Debian buster install,
not even the installed and running DEbian buster.
The install was done using the net-install CD on a USB stick on 2019 01 18,
downloaded immediately before the installation.
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 04:08:55PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 09:13 -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:59:35AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:41:39AM +0200, Francesco De Vita wrote:
> > > &g
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:59:35AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:41:39AM +0200, Francesco De Vita wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >On 25/5/2016 16:31, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >> Francesco De Vita (2016-05-24):
> >> > So, is it possible to access the efivarfs
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 02:54:29PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 03:06:14PM +0200, Moreanu Robert - Nicolae wrote:
> > i looking to resolve this problem when I want to install debian 8.2 or 8.1.
> > I receive this message after it's take to Grub install
> >
> > " the
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:36:53PM +0100, Philippe Cerfon wrote:
> And btw:
> Even if Debian doesn't want to do the non-open thing now or perhaps
> generally doesn't want to allow people to opt-out of closed source
> software while keeping other non-free software, then the name
> non-free-firmware
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:17:42PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 18:53 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > [ Adding debian-boot@lists.debian.org back. ]
> >
>
> Sorry about that.
>
>
> > > This was intentionally done because upstream added systemd
> > > dependency
> > >
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 07:53:38AM -0500, Jorge Ernesto Guevara Cuenca wrote:
Hello,
I ejected a usb stick without umount and doesn't boot anymore, I formatted
it again, prepare like the install manual[1] says and it don't boot never
again. I tried with oficial images[2] and my own images
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 05:34:39PM +0100, Majid HUSSAIN wrote:
hi there,
hows about
iso.debian.org?
People have been calling them iso's
-- hendrik
it makes sence to me at least.
thoughts?
Majid
On 18/08/2015, Simon Kainz si...@familiekainz.at wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 03:02:32AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi!
Kenshi Muto km...@debian.org (2015-07-22):
This is a proposal to replace ttf-cjk-compact with fonts-droid for
next (Stretch) debian-installer.
As long as this is a change for debian-boot, and not for the installed
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 09:06:03PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
Holger Wansing wrote:
Justin B Rye justin.byam@gmail.com wrote:
An interesting idea, but one that seems unlikely to work, especially
given the way it's used in the text. For instance, there's a page
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 07:00:27PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
Hi,
Justin B Rye justin.byam@gmail.com wrote:
Hendrik Boom wrote:
Justin B Rye wrote:
* entity questions - when am I meant to say Debian and when is it
debian;? This like many of these entities seems to have
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:26:02PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
...
Cons:
- increases +2MB for each graphical initrd.
jessie-amd64/cdrom/gtk/initrd.gz: 25557641 - 281535694
Presumably there's a typo here -- this is a tenfold increase!
hd-media/gtk/initrd.gz: 27747025 -
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 01:15:18PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
* entity questions - when am I meant to say Debian and when is it
debian;? This like many of these entities seems to have no
obvious function other than to make the source harder to
interpret...
* The d-i;
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 02:37:45PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote:
Hendrik Boom wrote:
Justin B Rye wrote:
* entity questions - when am I meant to say Debian and when is it
debian;? This like many of these entities seems to have no
obvious function other than to make the source harder
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 10:16:15AM +0200, Nagel, Peter (IFP) wrote:
The problem might be related to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789152.
However, in my case everything seems to be fine as long as all
harddisks (within the RAID) are working.
The Problem appears only if
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:11:26PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
...
In order to avoid writing a custom preseed file all the times, we're
wondering if there is already a policy that would instruct d-i to use
the smallest physical drive on the system as the one to partition and
use for installation
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:31:20PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
(Not sure why To/Cc were changed this way, but replying there anyway…)
Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com (2015-05-04):
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 10:22:17PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hello,
Holger Wansing li
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 10:22:17PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hello,
Holger Wansing li...@wansing-online.de (2015-05-03):
So, shall I revert the manual back to text install is default?
Yes please. I asked Didier to keep an eye on it but he pretended being
busy with other topics. ;)
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 08:26:10AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
While we're at it, it would be nice to have the same Only if I
explicitly ask for it feature for non-free (and probably contrib).
I may be willing to compromise my freedom in order to get my laptop wifi
working, on the basis that
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:50:22AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org (2015-03-28):
Alternatively, you could use release version numbers rather than code names:
0.6.3-1.3-1~Debian7 (rather than wheezy), and
0.6.3-1.3-1~Debian8 (rather than jessie)
Using
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:51:11PM +, peter green wrote:
On 22/03/15 13:36, Holger Wansing wrote:
Hi,
is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be
converted into an entity?
Would ease the repeating changing.
Patch attached, works for both xml and po based
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:43:49AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:51:11PM +, peter green wrote:
On 22/03/15 13:36, Holger Wansing wrote:
Hi,
is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be
converted into an entity?
Would ease
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:48:47PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
Hi,
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
It means that we're indeed left with about only 10 languages that
happen to be complete - those where translators act on their own and
know what to do to get a fully translated
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 02:41:27PM -0500, Gedalya wrote:
On 11/10/2014 01:43 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 02:39:28AM -0500, Gedalya wrote:
On 11/10/2014 02:19 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
It's not for the sysvinit-core package to fix up the installer's handling
of
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 08:26:32PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi,
On 14:59, Joey Hess wrote:
Once tasksel 3.27 is in testing, but not before, d-i should stop
preseeding desktop=xfce for kfreebsd and hurd. This version of tasksel
defaults to xfce for those architectures and will
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:39:24PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-09-10):
3. for a user who blindly hits enter, they get our best guess to the
correct device (instead of a bare now enter a device path prompt)
Please stop pretending it's a best
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:45:03PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
2014/08/18 14:57 Christopher Chavez 2000...@gmail.com:
Questions:
1. Is it the case that the only reason for having a separate /boot was to
provide easy access /boot/grub? I.e., was it intentional to provide easy
access
to
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 05:20:19PM +0200, Floris wrote:
how about users who will login remotely? They also have full access to
all the audio devices, even when they don't able to hear the music,
because the speaker is on the other side of the world.
Remote login might be from a computer
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:40:13AM -0500, Christopher Chavez wrote:
2. Would it be a better idea to only have /boot/grub, instead of /boot, on a
separate partition? (I can confirm that it works both when installing and in
existing setups, i.e. grub-install and update-grub both work as
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:22:01PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I just had a look at an online hardware store.
Out of their 682 laptops and 332 desktops:
* 1 model has 1 GiB
* 48 models have 2 GiB
* 470 models have 4 GiB
* 495 have 6 GiB or more
Which means
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:23:38AM +0001, Anthony F McInerney wrote:
And if it's machines in the wild with CD drives still again, we
have woody, squeeze and wheezy for them.
Does woody still have security support? In not, there are many old
machines for which it is no longer an
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 01:35:28PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 05:34:04PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Or even showing them at all (certainly last time I bothered to look at
gnome 3 it seemed to think buttons on windows were mostly to be avoided).
People who
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:03:39AM +0200, Kees de Jong wrote:
Are we really comparing RAM here as if it were the 90's? How many people
here use Android? Today it needs 512 MB to function properly. In two years
that could be 1 or 2 GB and that's a mobile OS. How much RAM does your
browser use?
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 12:47:14PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
I would have thought it better to have a two level structure, where you are
asked for instance if you want a database, and if you select it you are
then asked which one (which can have a default for newbies). Similarly for
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 08:14:48AM -0800, Schlacta, Christ wrote:
On Feb 28, 2014 7:59 AM, Lennart Sorensen lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 07:41:39AM -0700, R Edwards wrote:
Hello,
I have a persistent problem and I was hoping that the Debian install
discs
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:34:08AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:29:35PM -0800, John wrote:
PROBLEM 2: Your hardware setup is generally very good, but recent changes
in video detection and setup by Linux developers mess up in handling older
video cards/chips
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:29:10AM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 23:54 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Both recommends are there for a reason. gnome-bluetooth relies heavily
on gnome-control-center when you try to pair / manage devices and
network-manager-applet
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:36:28PM -0700, Alan Hutchinson wrote:
Hi there My name is Alan Hutchinson and I would like to install Debian on a
raid 0 system that I have at home , on my home network that I created, I
have bean reading up on some of the things that I will need to complete a
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:32:23PM +0200, Francesco Muzio wrote:
if the Debian installer doesn't allow the use of reiserFS this mean
that there will be no new users with this filesystem. But old users
(like me) could survive (silently) again for few years.
Shouldn't os-prober at least be able
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 08:42:00PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 02/06/13 20:27, Hendrik Boom wrote:
If someone wants to have gnome or KDE anyway, he's can acquire a second
CD, or access the net after installing packages from the first CD, or
use a DVD or USB key or something bigger
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 07:36:35PM +0100, Brian Potkin wrote:
On Fri 31 May 2013 at 15:11:50 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (31/05/2013):
It would probably be good to get that discussion started
Now that we have the first release candidate for the wheezy installer,
is it also the time to make another serious try at upgrading
squuze to wheezy? Is the infrastructure ready for this?
I've tried the upgrade before last year, with diappointing results,
each time reverting to squeeze in order
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040727/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux lovesong 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004 07 28 at about 3P.M. EDT
Method:
Used SBM to boot
I repeated the installation with a recent daily build,
it failed in the same way, so the bug is not just an
obsolete beta-4 bug. See bug#262070 for a more recent installation
report.
-- hendrik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Fill in date and from where you got the image
uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt
Date: Date and time of the install
Method: How did you install? What did you boot off? If network
install, from where? Proxied?
I just realized I left out some of the fields in the installation report
template for bug#261745
Debian-installer-version: Beta 4, downloaded from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cd-image-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta4/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux lovesong 2.4.25-1-386 #2 Wed Apr 14
48 matches
Mail list logo